Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Name of the Degree Programme
Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Field of study
Engineering, manufacturing and construction
The classification of the educational field is based on the international ISCED classification used by the Ministry of Education and Culture.
Specialisations
- Automotive and Work Machine Engineering (selectable in daytime studies)
- Mechanical and Production Engineering
Qualification awarded
Bachelor of Engineering
Level of qualification
The degree programme leads to a higher education degree which is a first cycle Bachelor-level degree in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). According to the eight-level classification of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF), the degree represents level 6.
The description of the level of the Degree is included in the Statute, at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120
Specific admission requirements
Eligibility for studies at a university of applied sciences is stipulated in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014.
The selection criteria are specified in the data of the Degree Programme at www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku
On the websites, application and instructions are in Finnish language for the degree programmes taught in Finnish.
Qualification requirements and regulations (incl. graduation requirements)
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Examination regulations, assessment and grading
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Link
Structure of the studies
In accordance with the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the studies of a Degree Programme consist of basic studies, professional studies, practical training promoting professional skills, free elective studies, and a final project/thesis. The extent of the studies is 60 credits a year.
The programme includes 30 credits of supervised practical training in field-related companies. Students in both areas of specialisation participate in Project Studies, which are carried out together with a company. The studies involve Project Workshops where students engage in project work in small groups and the Projects course where students complete assignments independently (27 cr). Students also select 15 credits of elective courses and do a final thesis (15 cr). The degree programme has strong ties with European universities of applied sciences. This offers students the opportunity to study and do their practical training abroad.
The curriculum includes five seams permeating through the studies and extending over them. They are based on SeAMK’s reports, studies and strategy, as well as on the national and international recommendations and regulations related to education provided by universities of applied sciences.
- The Information Search seam strengthens the student’s professional and field-specific information search skills throughout the studies.
- The Internationalization seam secures the improvement of the student’s international competencies during their studies. In addition to student exchange opportunities, the seam also manifests itself as visiting lecturers, in which case the teaching is in English. Also some study materials are in English.
- The studies corresponding to the Entrepreneurship seam help the student understand the central and growing role of entrepreneurship in society.
- The Sustainable Development seam. In the degree program in mechanical engineering, the competencies of sustainable development run through the curriculum. The aim of the sustainable development seam is to help students become aware of social responsibility and to understand the multidimensional significance of sustainable development both as a working life skill and as a competence related to the design and maintenance of machines. In the degree program, the student also learns to apply the principles of sustainable development and the circular economy in practice.
- The seam of Career Guidance helps the student recognise their competencies and own strengths. It also includes working life knowledge, job search skills, and lifelong learning.
Students have the opportunity to include multidisciplinary, working life-oriented project studies in their personal curricula (SeAMKPro).
Learning outcomes
The competence objectives of the Degree Program in Mechanical Engineering are defined in detail in the description of the content of the degree program and in the competence description specific to the degree program.
Profile of the programme
Specialisation in Automotive and Work Machine Engineering:
The purpose of this line of specialisation is to produce automotive engineers who have basic skills in mechanical engineering and specialised expertise in automotive engineering. Students become familiar with machine design, structural engineering of automobiles, automotive electronics, mechanical engineering and entrepreneurship. Students acquire practical experience, on the level of both the employee and that of the engineer, during their practical training and Project Studies.
There is a wide and diverse range of jobs automotive engineers can perform. Typical jobs include designing, production, management, marketing and sales, or working as an independent entrepreneur. Places of employment may include the automotive industry, engineering industry, and the fields of insurance and inspection.
The automotive industry is one of the fields of industry that has significantly changed the world. Changes have taken place since the time of Henry Ford and will continue to take place in the future. Even today, the automotive engineers are pioneers in technology and their expertise ensures the further development of technology and the preservation of the profession.
The automotive industry is one of the fields of industry that has significantly changed the world. Changes have taken place since the time of Henry Ford and will continue to take place in the future. Even today, the automotive engineers are pioneers in technology and their expertise ensures the further development of technology and the preservation of the profession.
Specialisation in Mechanical and Production Engineering:
The purpose of the Mechanical and Production Engineering programme is to produce mechanical engineers who have command of the production processes in the machine and metal industry and production management. Students graduating from this programme will have the readiness they need to work as specialists and supervisors in the machine and metal industry, from designing to production and from sales to marketing.
Emphasis in the programme is placed on production engineering, mechanical engineering and entrepreneurship. Students have the opportunity to acquire advanced skills in technical mechanics, materials design, or automation systems. Students acquire practical experience, on the level of both the employee and that of the engineer, during their practical training and Project Studies.
There is a wide and diverse range of jobs mechanical engineers can perform. Typical jobs include designing, production, management, marketing and sales, or working as an independent entrepreneur.
The employment prospects for mechanical engineers are good. Mechanical engineers are needed to develop and produce top products for a very wide range of clientele, not only in domestic markets but for exporting as well. As graduates in engineering, students have the opportunity to choose a job that interests them and to reinforce the success story created by Finnish engineers.
Generic and subject specifc competences
Competencies are extensive knowledge entities, or combinations of the individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They describe qualifications, performance potential, and the ability to cope with professional duties.
Common/general competencies are fields of know-how common to different Degree Programmes, but their special characteristics and importance may vary between professions and work assignments. General competencies form the basis for professional activities, cooperation, and the development of expertise. According to Arene’s (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences) recommendations, general competencies include learning skills, ethical competence, cooperation skills, innovation skills, and internationalization skills. In addition to the above-mentioned competencies, entrepreneurial skills and quality management skills are emphasized in the degree studies of SeAMK as competencies common to all.
Degree programme-specific competencies form the basis for the development of the student’s professional expertise.
The competences in Automotive and Work Machine Engineering:
1 Basics of automotive engineering
- understands the laws of physics for automotive technology.
- knows the common chemicals and materials and how to use them.
- knows the methods for production technology.
- knows the basic structures, components and systems of automobiles.
- understands the dynamic behaviour of automobiles and ability to illustrate and simulate it mathematically.
- has knowledge of solid-state technology and the associated components.
2 Advanced competence in automotive technology
- knows the structures the chassis, frame, tyre, engine, and transmission in automobiles, and understanding of the significance of maintenance.
- understands the environmental impact of traffic.
- commands the essential electronic and data communications applications in automobiles.
- has knowledge of maintenance diagnostics.
- has knowledge of sensor technology and is able to reliably measure technical magnitudes.
3 Competence in legislation
- knows the essential legislation pertaining to the structure of automobiles, traffic and transportation.
- knows the rights and responsibilities of the employer and the employee.
- has knowledge of occupational safety and environmental protection.
- knows the rights and responsibilities of the consumer
4 Business and customer service competence
- knows the prerequisites for profitable business operations and understands the business idea behind automobile dealerships and transportation companies.
- understands the significance of customer service to the operations in a service-providing company.
- is able to communicate and work in international organisations.
- knows the principles of management and ability to function as a supervisor.
The competences in Mechanical and production engineering:
1 Basics of Mechanical engineering
- is able to utilise mathematics and physics to illustrate phenomena in mechanical engineering and to solve problems.
- knows the more common components and mechanical organs used in mechanical engineering, and understanding of how the more common types of machines work.
- commands basic mechanical measurements.
- has knowledge of energy technology and how to use it.
2 Competence in planning
- knows the principles of technical documentation and is able to utilise 3D modelling.
- knows of the more common structural materials and the ways they can be used.
- understands the significance of standardisation in the design and manufacturing of products.
- is able to consider the entire life cycle of a product when designing it.
- understands the significance of teamwork and is able to work as an active member of international designing organisations.
3 Competence in manufacturing
- knows the methods, devices and opportunities available in production engineering.
- understands the principles of production systems and automation and the impact of them on the structure of a product.
- knows the principles of logistics.
4 Competence in safety of machine
- knows the directives pertaining to mechanical design.
- is able to design safe and easy-to-use devices and structures.
5 Competence in company finances and business
- knows the directives pertaining to mechanical design.
- is able to design safe and easy-to-use devices and structures.
Pedagogical approach and learning environment
The working world and expertise demand that employees have advanced skills in information acquisition and processing and problem-solving, the ability to collaborate with others and to always be open to new learning situations, as well as the ability to combine various types of information and various disciplines with practical work. This means that students must understand what they are taught. For this reason, teaching in the engineering programme emphasises the constructivist theory of learning where the students' active role and world of experience form a significant part of the education. It is the teacher's duty to facilitate learning and co-ordinate studies.
A variety of teaching methods are used in the programme to support students' professional development, readiness for the working world and professional expertise. Students work in small groups, listen to lectures by experts, work in the laboratory, do assignments, work in projects and obtain practical experience in real work environments.
Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)
The RPL procedure means the identification and recognition of the student’s previously acquired learning. The student has the opportunity to apply for the recognition of their competencies if the competencies correspond to the learning goals of the Degree Programme. The identification process is closely connected with the preparation of the student’s personal curriculum and is updated during personal counselling discussions.
The identification and recognition practices are presented in the RPL Instruction of SeAMK. It specifies how recognition of competencies is applied for, how the application is processed, and how the student is informed of it. The instruction lists the RPL contact persons of each Degree Programme, who counsel students on matters related to the process.
In the assessment of prior learning, for example the following evidence is used:
- certificates on training programmes with similar content and other training programmes
- testimonials and further clarifications by an employer
- interviews of the student
- written and oral exams or reports
- functional or written assignments or other evidence
- presentations, portfolios
The Project studies and the final project/thesis and the Maturity Test cannot be submitted to the RPL procedure.
The Head of Degree Programme, Student Counsellor, and when necessary, the teacher of the course in question are responsible for RPL. Their task is to inform students of the recognition and assessment process, to discuss students' Personal Study Plan and to guide students in the demonstration of prior learning.
According to the degree regulation, prior learning of a subject expires in ten years.
Assessment is course-specific, defined by the teacher in question. Assessment methods are an exam (written or oral), practical work, a laboratory test, a field test or equivalent.
Work-based learning and work placements
The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.
Occupational profiles
The automotive engineer's scope of duties is broad and diverse. Their duties typically involve designing, production, management, marketing and sales, or they may be self-employed. Places of employment may include the automotive industry, engineering industry, and the fields of insurance and inspection.
The mechanical engineers scope of duties is broad and diverse. Their duties typically involve designing, production, management, marketing and sales, or they may be self-employed. The employment prospects for mechanical engineers are good. Mechanical engineers are needed to develop and produce top products for a very wide range of clientele, not only in domestic markets but for exporting as well. As graduates in engineering, students have the opportunity to choose a job that interests them and to reinforce the success story created by Finnish engineers.
After completing the vocational language studies the student is able to communicate in spoken and written situations related to his field of study. He can search for information and follow the development of his professional field in the target language.
Internationalization
Internationalization is reflected in the degree program in many ways. Lectures can be either in Finnish or in English, depending on whether the lectures involve foreign students or whether the lecturer comes from an international partnership network. This improves students' language skills, which encourages them to go abroad for exchange studies.
It is possible to go on an international student exchange in several stages of studies. Typically, exchange periods last 3-5 months. There are many destination countries around the world.
Access to further studies
After two years of work experience, the student will be eligible for further studies for a Master’s Degree in the field in question.
Graduation requirements
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences and instructions for graduates at Intra.
Mode of study
Young students study full-time in this programme. Students in adult education study part-time through a diverse range of teaching methods.
Head of degree programme
Dr Pasi Junell, tel. +358 40 830 2212, e-mail: pasi.junell(at)seamk.fi
Student counsellor
Mr Heikki Heiskanen, tel. +358 40 830 4269, e-mail: heikki.heiskanen(at)seamk.fi
Coordination of Practical Training
In the practical training period named persons will be responsible for the quiding of students. The head of degree progran has the main responsibility
Coordination of international mobility
Ms Tiina Välimäki, +358 40-830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi.Outgoing student mobilities to Europe
Ms Maria Loukola, +358 40-830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi.Incoming and outgoing mobilities outside Europe
Ms Tiina Ojanperä, +358 40 6807100, tiina.ojanpera(a)seamk.fi. Incoming student mobilities from Europe
Student services
Tel. +358 20 124 5055, studentservices@seamk.fi
Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Full-time studies
Timing plans by study path
Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Full-time studies
Timing plans by study path
Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering, Full-time studies
Timing plans by study path
Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering, Full-time studies
Timing plans by study path
Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering, Full-time studies
Timing plans by study path
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 12.11.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will know:
- the basic properties and the use of brakes, suspension, convenience of use ja stability control.
- how to explain the basics of testing and troubleshooting of systems mentioned above.
- how to explain bus controller (CAN) in vehicles
- present aspects of autonomous driving
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Anti-locking and anti-skidding systems
- ESP system
- Adjusting electronic suspension and shock absorption
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading:
Rudhart ja Kiiskinen: Kuljettajaa Avustavat Järjestelmät (ADAS)
Bosch: Automotive Handbook
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises and independent study
Student workload
Lectures ca. 28 hr, exercises ca. 20 hr and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Qualifications
Basics of car electric systems and Basics of vehicle electronics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will:
- be competent in determining the formation of driving resistance under various circumstances.
- understand the factors affecting fuel consumption.
- be able to determine the factors corresponding to the performance of a car
- be able to seek information on the subject
Content
- Driving resistance
- Basic operational principles of the engine and transmission
- Diagrams of the driving space
- Acceleration
- Choosing transmission drive gear
- Fuel consumption
- Durability
- Limitations of acceleration and ascent
- Automotive labs
Materials
-Field-related publications
-Lecturers material
-Theory of Ground Vehicles; J.Y Wong
-Fundumentals of Vehicle Dynamics; Thomas D. Gillespie
Teaching methods
-Lectures
-Group exercise
-Independent studies
-Automotive lab. exercises
Student workload
-Lectures 26 hours
-Laboratory exercises 4 hours
-Group exercise 28 hours
-Final Exam 2 hours
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam 50% and group exercise 50% effect on grade
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will:
- understand the more common electronic equipment in automobiles and machinery, the basic properties of the mentioned equipment and how to use it
- know how to explain sensor technology used in different kinds of systems
- know how to explain the basics of testing and troubleshooting
- be able to seek information on the subject
Content
- Electronic components and circuit technology
- Sensor technology
- Bus technology
- OBD and Testing technology
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading:
Robert Bosch GmbH. Automotive Electrics and Automotive Electronics
Robert Bosch GmbH. Automotive Sensors
Field-related publications and literature pertaining to maintenance
Teaching methods
Classroom learning: Lectures and Exercises
Independent study
Student workload
Lectures ca. 28 h, exercises ca. 20 h and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam, exercises
Qualifications
Basics of car electric systems
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course student will know:
- how to use the legislation concerning the automobile industry and how to apply it in practice.
- the difference between directives, laws and regulations concerning the automobile industry and how to apply them in practice
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Directives, laws, decrees and directions
- Vehicle law, Decree on Vehicle Construction and Equipment, Decree on the Use of Vehicles on the Road, decree on repairing the vehicles and making structural changes and car assembly components
- Installation and repair permits
- Occupational safety legislation
Location and time
- Vehicle Law: legal code
- Finlex, EUR-lex and Edilex.
- Material recommended by lecturer during the course
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Exercises,
- Group work
- Independent study
- Information search
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings.
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Students will be competent in utilising the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.
Content
- Solving algebraic expressions
- Solving equations
- Basic trigonometry
- Vectors in planes
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 56 h
- of which autonomous studies: 52 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Students will be competent in utilising the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.
Content
- Solving algebraic expressions
- Solving equations
- Basic trigonometry
- Vectors in planes
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 56 h
- of which autonomous studies: 52 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 05.11.2023
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Students will be competent in utilising the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.
Content
- Solving algebraic expressions
- Solving equations
- Basic trigonometry
- Vectors in planes
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 20 h
- of which autonomous studies: 88 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heli Simon
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
• Students can describe technical devices, their use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.
Content
- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Telling about field related companies
Materials
Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita 2014, or later. There is also an electronic version available.
Teaching methods
Contact lessons.
Student workload
81 h
Further information
Compulsory attendance in the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam and spoken presentation
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
• Students can describe technical devices, their use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.
Content
- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Telling about field related companies
Materials
Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita 2014, or later.
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching.
Student workload
81 h
Further information
Compulsory attendance in the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam and spoken presentation
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
0.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
• Students can describe technical devices, their use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.
Content
- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Telling about field related companies
Materials
Cory Isaacs - Piia Pesso - Ritva Rasimus - Ilona Rönkä: Engineer Your English.
Teaching methods
Distance learning
Student workload
81 h
Further information
Functioning headset obligatory
Compulsory attendance in the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam and spoken presentation
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will recognize basic sensors in automation systems and will explain how sensors work, their electrical, mechanical and performance properties. Students will be competent in selecting the right sensor to solve a problem in detection or measurement. Students will be able to design electrical connections of sensors and will be able to connect them to control devices. Furthermore, students will be able to connect a sensor to the field bus.
Content
- Basics in sensor and measurement
- Shield categories
- Bi-stable sensors
- Senors that detect presence
- Sensors that measure magnitude
- Detection systems
- Measuring movement
- Basics of computer vision
- Connecting sensors and measurement exercises in the laboratory
Materials
Lecture material, demonstrations during lectures, assignments, product and programming manuals
Teaching methods
Lectures, demonstrations, exercises and seminar work, mandatory laboratory exercises and an exam.
Student workload
Total work load 81 h. Most of the time is used for self-studying and minor part is classroom- and distance learning. Contact teaching includes laboratory exercises and an exam, total 28 h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1...2): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of sensor technology, and is able to choose right sensor type to defined system.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3...4): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of sensor technology, and is able to choose right sensor type to defined system. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge in basic laboratory exercises.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of sensor technology, and is able to choose right sensor type to defined system. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge in basic and difficult laboratory exercises.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises, lab work+reports, seminar and an exam.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will recognize basic sensors in automation systems and will explain how sensors work, their electrical, mechanical and performance properties. Students will be competent in selecting the right sensor to solve a problem in detection or measurement. Students will be able to design electrical connections of sensors and will be able to connect them to control devices. Furthermore, students will be able to connect a sensor to the field bus.
Content
- Basics in sensor and measurement
- Shield categories
- Bi-stable sensors
- Senors that detect presence
- Sensors that measure magnitude
- Detection systems
- Measuring movement
- Basics of computer vision
- Connecting sensors and measurement exercises in the laboratory
Materials
Lecture material, demonstrations during lectures, assignments, product and programming manuals
Teaching methods
Lectures, demonstrations, exercises and seminar work as a distance learning. Mandatory laboratory exercises and an exam as a contact teaching.
Student workload
Total work load 81 h. Most of the time is used for self-studying and minor part is classroom- and distance learning. Contact teaching includes laboratory exercises and an exam, total 20 h. Lectures 8 h are as a distance learning.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1...2): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of sensor technology, and is able to choose right sensor type to defined system.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3...4): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of sensor technology, and is able to choose right sensor type to defined system. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge in basic laboratory exercises.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of sensor technology, and is able to choose right sensor type to defined system. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge in basic and difficult laboratory exercises.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises, lab work+reports, seminar and an exam.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- know the safety factors associated with laboratories.
- be knowledgeable of the tools and machines in mechanical laboratory.
- be able to define basic concepts associated with the structures of automobiles and workmachines.
Content
- General safety in a laboratories
- Basic training in the use of machines in mechanical laboratory
- Basics of CAM-programming
- Basics of automotive technology
- Basics of workmachine technology
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Approved
The student controls the grounds of matters that have been presented in the know-how objectives, the safety viewpoints of the working in laboratory and will participate in the laboratory hours as agreed.
Failed
The student does not control basic concepts, the safety of the working in laboratory and/or will not participate in the laboratory hours actively.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- know the safety factors associated with laboratories.
- be knowledgeable of the tools and machines in mechanical laboratory.
- be able to define basic concepts associated with the structures of automobiles and workmachines.
Content
- General safety in a laboratories
- Basic training in the use of machines in mechanical laboratory
- Basics of CAM-programming
- Basics of automotive technology
- Basics of workmachine technology
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Approved
The student controls the grounds of matters that have been presented in the know-how objectives, the safety viewpoints of the working in laboratory and will participate in the laboratory hours as agreed.
Failed
The student does not control basic concepts, the safety of the working in laboratory and/or will not participate in the laboratory hours actively.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students,
- will understand the basics in marketing in car industry and busines.
- be able to seek information on the subject
Content
- development of the marketing
- competitive tools
- sales in sparepart and repairshop
- car sale and general sales terms
- consumer protection
- customer service
Materials
Lecturers material
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Exercises
- Group work
- Independent study
- Information search
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings: 50/50
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Jarno Arkko
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be able to do the most common measurements in automobiles.
- be able to use garage equipment, meters and instruments.
- be able to do troubleshooting usig them.
Content
- Inspections of steering, air-conditioning and engines
- Measurements of fuel equipment, combustion, viewing instruments, ignition, charging and ignition system
Materials
- Material relating to automotive and body technology
- Repair shop guidebooks
- Equipment settings manuals
Teaching methods
Laboratory work and reports
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved assignments and reports
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 29.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Jarno Arkko
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be able to do the most common measurements in automobiles.
- be able to use garage equipment, meters and instruments.
- be able to do troubleshooting using them.
Content
- Inspections of driving space, movement, fuel and braking
- Measuring power dunamo meters and pneumatic brakes
- Inspections of rocking and wheel alignment
Materials
- Material relating to automotive and body technology
- Repair shop guidebooks
- Equipment settings manuals
Teaching methods
Laboratory work and reports
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved assignments and reports
Qualifications
Automotive engineering 1 and 2
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Jarno Arkko
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
AUTO20
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be able to do the most common measurements in automobiles.
- be able to use garage equipment, meters and instruments.
- be able to do troubleshooting using them.
Content
Inspections of autoelectronics, body, flow, motor dynamo meter, combustion emissions and power transmission
Materials
- Material relating to automotive and body technology
- Repair shop guidebooks
- Equipment settings manuals
Teaching methods
Laboratory work and reports
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved assignments and reports
Qualifications
Courses: Automotive engineering 1, 2 and 3, Automotive electrical and electronic systems, Automotive and work machine electronics 1 and 2
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Toni Luomanmäki
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will have command of the basic principles associated with designing and selecting automation systems for production machinery and equipment.
Content
Fundamental principles of simulation and application examples, properties of simulation tools, areas of use and limitations, phases of a simulation project and what it involves, use of simulation software.
Integration of automation system components and sub-systems into a complete system.
Materials
Lecturer handouts, web-based tutorials
Teaching methods
Contact teaching with possibility to participate remotely. Theoretical and software assignments.
Student workload
Lectures 48 h, independent work 80 h
Content scheduling
- The basics of simulation technology, Visual Components 4.x user interface
- Library components based modeling
- Modelling customized machine components with functionality
- Modelling more functionality to machine components
- Simulating automatic production systems
- Adding robotics to production simulation
- Final assignment
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the contents of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice
Assessment methods and criteria
Personal assignments. Grading will be announced during the course. Theoretical assignments 30 % and software-based assignments 70 %
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 17.03.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Toni Luomanmäki
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will have command of the basic principles associated with designing and selecting automation systems for production machinery and equipment.
Content
Fundamental principles of simulation and application examples, properties of simulation tools, areas of use and limitations, phases of a simulation project and what it involves, use of simulation software.
Integration of automation system components and sub-systems into a complete system.
Materials
Lecturer handouts, web-based tutorials
Teaching methods
Contact teaching with possibility to participate remotely. Theoretical and software assignments.
Student workload
Lectures 40 h, independent work 80 h
Content scheduling
- The basics of simulation technology, Visual Components 4.x user interface
- Library components based modeling
- Modelling customized machine components with functionality
- Modelling more functionality to machine components
- Simulating automatic production systems
- Adding robotics to production simulation
- Final assignment
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the contents of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice
Assessment methods and criteria
Personal assignments. Grading will be announced during the course. Theoretical assignments 30 % and software-based assignments 70 %
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Tommi Ylimäki
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Students will be able to differentiate between various automation systems and identify the components used in them. They will understand how automation systems work. Students will be knowledgeable of the structure, function and connections of relays and PLC drivers and the more common types of sensors and actuators. They will learn the idea behind the logic needed in automation technology.
Content
Development of automation and automation technology, - What is automation?, - Control and regulation, control systems for automation, sensors, actuators, programmable logics, components for a control system, - Common connections for sensors and actuators into programmable logics, - Practice making connections in the lab, - Familiarisation with various automation control system.
Materials
- Lecturer's material
- Lecture demonstrations
- Exercises
- Product and programming manuals
- Lessons in industrial instrumentation handbook (free PDF book)
Teaching methods
Contact or distance teaching (lectures). Lecture recordings will be available for self-study.
Independent work (Excercises)
Exam schedules
Exam will be arranged at second last contact lesson. One exam retake will be available after the course.
Student workload
Total 81 hours of work of which 28 is contact teaching and rest independent work.
Content scheduling
Development of automation and automation technology. What is automation. Control and regulation, automation control systems, sensors, actuators, relay circuits, programmable logics, control system components. The most common connections of sensors and actuators to programmable logics. Possibly visit(s) in the laboratory. The course introduces various automation control systems via simulation environment
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2; Student knows the basics of the course. The student is able to define a simple automation system that includes sensors and actuators as well as programmable logic.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4; Student knows the contents of the course well. The student is able to define a simple automation system that includes sensors and actuators as well as programmable logic. In addition, he is able to evaluate the operation and compatibility of components in practice.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5; Student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice. The student is able to apply Automation components and design an automation system that includes sensors and actuators as well as programmable logic. In addition, he is able to evaluate the operation and compatibility of components in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam. Home exercises give extra points for examination.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
05.02.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juha Ylivinkka
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Students will be able to differentiate between various automation systems and identify the components used in them. They will understand how automation systems work. Students will be knowledgeable of the structure, function and connections of relays and PLC drivers and the more common types of sensors and actuators. They will learn the idea behind the logic needed in automation technology.
Content
Development of automation and automation technology, - What is automation?, - Control and regulation, control systems for automation, sensors, actuators, programmable logics, components for a control system, - Common connections for sensors and actuators into programmable logics, - Practice making connections in the lab, - Familiarisation with various automation control system.
Materials
- Lecturer's material
- Lecture demonstrations
- Exercises
- Product and programming manuals
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2; Student knows the basics of the course. The student is able to define a simple automation system that includes sensors and actuators as well as programmable logic.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4; Student knows the contents of the course well. The student is able to define a simple automation system that includes sensors and actuators as well as programmable logic. In addition, he is able to evaluate the operation and compatibility of components in practice.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5; Student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice. The student is able to apply Automation components and design an automation system that includes sensors and actuators as well as programmable logic. In addition, he is able to evaluate the operation and compatibility of components in practice.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will:
- understand the behaviour of braking systems in various situations.
- be able to name the variables associated with braking.
- be competent in solving calculations associated with braking.
- be able to explain the rpinciples for designing brakes, suspension and power transmission,
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Drum and disc brakes
- Hydraulic brake systems
- Clutches
- Gears and choosing gear ratios
- Final drives
- Differential gears
- 4wd systems
Materials
- Bosch: Autoteknillinen taskukirja
- Field-related publications and literature pertaining to maintenance
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, group work and independent work.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings: 50/50 - 70/30
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
Driving dynamics and Car steering and wheel support
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course student will know how to explain,
- the behaviour of steering-related issues in vehicles.
- the importance of the angles of the wheels on the vehicle's driving properties.
- matters related to the tyres and rims of vehicles.
- the impact of side-wind on vehicles
- axes stuctures,
- steering geometry of a motorcycle,
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Angles of the wheels and pivoted axles and measurement of them
- Steering devices
- Tyres, rims, alignment
- Behaviour of vehicles in curves
- Properties of side-wind
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, group work and independent work.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings: 50/50 - 70/30
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
Driving dynamics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will know how to:
- interpret and compile plans for the installation and wiring of electronic equipment.
- explain the more important electronic systems in automobiles as well as their properties and how to use them.
- explain the principles of inspections and troubleshooting
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Electricity diagrams
- Electronic clutches
- Batteries
- Lights
- Ignition, charging and ignition systems
- Other electronic equipment
- basics of the electrical devices of the hybrid and electric cars.
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises and independent work.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exami/excercises: 70/30 - 90/10
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarkko Pakkanen
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- effective product design in 3D design environment
- Bottom up and Top down design principles
- sheet metal part designing according to manufacturing methods and parameters
- use of parametric models in modular configurations
- topology optimization as a tool of generative designing
Content
Basic features and principles of Bottom up and Top down design, Sheet metal product design, Design model parametricity, Topology optimization
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (2-1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing symbols and be able to models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (4-3)
Students are able to model the workpieces, create drawings and assemblies.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
KONE21
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
22.01.2024 - 14.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to define the derivative and integral for one-variable functions. They will be competent in derivating and integrating the more common mathematical functions and calculating definite integrals and applying their knowledge to common applications. Students will also be capable of calculation tools to solve problems in one-variable differential and integral calculus. They will also apply this knowledge in their Professional Studies and working world.
Content
- Definition of one-variable derivative and integral
- Polynomials: derivation and integration
- Composite functions: derivation and integration
- Tangent of a curve
- Extreme values
- Definite integral
- Area and volume
- Small differentials
- Applications in engineering (deflection of beam, shear and moment, moment of inertia)
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h
- of which scheduled studies: 28 h
- of which autonomous studies: 53 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to define the derivative and integral for one-variable functions. They will be competent in derivating and integrating the more common mathematical functions and calculating definite integrals and applying their knowledge to common applications. Students will also be capable of calculation tools to solve problems in one-variable differential and integral calculus. They will also apply this knowledge in their Professional Studies and working world.
Content
- Definition of one-variable derivative and integral
- Polynomials: derivation and integration
- Composite functions: derivation and integration
- Tangent of a curve
- Extreme values
- Definite integral
- Area and volume
- Small differentials
- Applications in engineering (deflection of beam, shear and moment, moment of inertia)
Materials
Material in Moodle
Lecture notes
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent work
Student workload
Lectures 28 h and independent work 53 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to define the derivative and integral for one-variable functions. They will be competent in derivating and integrating the more common mathematical functions and calculating definite integrals and applying their knowledge to common applications. Students will also be capable of calculation tools to solve problems in one-variable differential and integral calculus. They will also apply this knowledge in their Professional Studies and working world.
Content
- Definition of one-variable derivative and integral
- Polynomials: derivation and integration
- Composite functions: derivation and integration
- Tangent of a curve
- Extreme values
- Definite integral
- Area and volume
- Small differentials
- Applications in engineering (deflection of beam, shear and moment, moment of inertia)
Materials
The learning material is in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent work
Student workload
Lectures 20 h and independent work 61 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 31.12.2023
Timing
01.01.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Responsible person
Heikki Kokkonen
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to define the derivative and integral for one-variable functions. They will be competent in derivating and integrating the more common mathematical functions and calculating definite integrals and applying their knowledge to common applications. Students will also be capable of calculation tools to solve problems in one-variable differential and integral calculus. They will also apply this knowledge in their Professional Studies and working world.
Content
- Definition of one-variable derivative and integral
- Polynomials: derivation and integration
- Composite functions: derivation and integration
- Tangent of a curve
- Extreme values
- Definite integral
- Area and volume
- Small differentials
- Applications in engineering (deflection of beam, shear and moment, moment of inertia)
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
11.03.2024 - 21.04.2024
Timing
01.05.2024 - 31.08.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to define the derivative and integral for one-variable functions. They will be competent in derivating and integrating the more common mathematical functions and calculating definite integrals and applying their knowledge to common applications. Students will also be capable of calculation tools to solve problems in one-variable differential and integral calculus. They will also apply this knowledge in their Professional Studies and working world.
Content
- Definition of one-variable derivative and integral
- Polynomials: derivation and integration
- Composite functions: derivation and integration
- Tangent of a curve
- Extreme values
- Definite integral
- Area and volume
- Small differentials
- Applications in engineering (deflection of beam, shear and moment, moment of inertia)
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be able to apply basic knowledge of dynamics in the analysis of the dynamic bevahiour of structures.
- understand the basic phenomena of mechanical vibrations
- strengthen basics of mechanical engineering and design competences.
Content
- Basic principles of dynamics
- Kinematics of particles
- Kinematics of solids
- Basic principles of kinetics
- Vibrations of a system with a single degree of freedom
- Energy principle
Materials
The learning material is in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent work
Completion alternatives
Dependent on the current circumstances course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible.
Student workload
Lectures and independent work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be able to apply basic knowledge of dynamics in the analysis of the dynamic bevahiour of structures.
- understand the basic phenomena of mechanical vibrations
- strengthen basics of mechanical engineering and design competences.
Content
- Basic principles of dynamics
- Kinematics of particles
- Kinematics of solids
- Basic principles of kinetics
- Vibrations of a system with a single degree of freedom
- Energy principle
Materials
The learning material is in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent work. Distance learning via Teams if needed.
Completion alternatives
Course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible if needed.
Student workload
Lectures, home exercises, exam.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam, home exercises.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be able to apply basic knowledge of dynamics in the analysis of the dynamic bevahiour of structures.
- understand the basic phenomena of mechanical vibrations
- strengthen basics of mechanical engineering and design competences.
Content
- Basic principles of dynamics
- Kinematics of particles
- Kinematics of solids
- Basic principles of kinetics
- Vibrations of a system with a single degree of freedom
- Energy principle
Materials
The learning material is in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent work. Distance learning via Teams.
Completion alternatives
Course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible.
Student workload
Lectures and independent work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
KONE21
-
AUTO21
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- using finite-element methods in the dimensioning of structures.
- using softwares in static analyses of structures.
In addition student will strengthen design and machine safety competences.
Content
- basic principles of finite-element methods
- stiffness matrix
- summing of elements
- loads
- boundary conditions
- basic equations
- truss and beam structures
Materials
Lecturers material
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Hybrid-learning. It is possible to participate through Teams sessions. Computers located in Frami computer classes are used via remote desktop connection. Course consists of lectures and home exercises.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Examination and exercises
Qualifications
Strength of Materials 1, Matrix algebra
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
KONE22
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to use the common tools and methods used in the research of technology
- be able to identify restrictions of the basic experimental research tools
- become familiar with the experimental data acquisition and are able to make controlled measurements
- be able to process results and to evaluate measurement methods and reliability of the results
- be able to analyze results with computer-assisted mathematical tools
- be able to form a scientific report based on the received measurements and their analysis by using a word processing program
- be able to build the relationship between theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge of physics
- be able to evaluate his/her skills and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies and real problems at work
Content
Laboratory experiments from different areas of physics and engieering.
Materials
Guidelines for laboratory assignments
Teaching methods
Laboratory assignments and reports
Student workload
To be announced in the beginning of laboratory works
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student is able to make basic measurements in accordance with working instructions and work safely in the laboratory. The student is able to deal with measurement results and to present the results graphically using computer-aided tools. The student is able to assess the reliability of the measurements according to instructions. The student is able to present a short technical report of the results of the measurements.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is able to make different types of measurements in accordance with work instructions and work independently in the laboratory. The student is able to deal with the measurement results, and present the results graphically using computer-aided tools. The student is able to assess the reliability of measurements using different types of error estimation methods. The student is able to present the results in a logical and clear technical report.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student works independently in the laboratory, and is able to make measurements based on instructions and develop the measurement methods. The student is able to evaluate the results using a wide range of computer-assisted tools, make reliable error estimates and draw conclusions from the results and error estimates. The student is able to present the results and conclusions in a logical and clear technical report.
Assessment methods and criteria
Reports and exam
Qualifications
Mechanics and Electrical and thermal physics or similar knowledge and skills
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Tommi Ylimäki
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to use the common tools and methods used in the research of technology
- be able to identify restrictions of the basic experimental research tools
- become familiar with the experimental data acquisition and are able to make controlled measurements
- be able to process results and to evaluate measurement methods and reliability of the results
- be able to analyze results with computer-assisted mathematical tools
- be able to form a scientific report based on the received measurements and their analysis by using a word processing program
- be able to build the relationship between theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge of physics
- be able to evaluate his/her skills and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies and real problems at work
Content
Laboratory experiments from different areas of physics and engieering.
Materials
Guidelines for laboratory assignments
Books for physics in university of applied sciences
Teaching methods
Laboratory assignments and reports
Student workload
To be announced in the beginning of laboratory works
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student is able to make basic measurements in accordance with working instructions and work safely in the laboratory. The student is able to deal with measurement results and to present the results graphically using computer-aided tools. The student is able to assess the reliability of the measurements according to instructions. The student is able to present a short technical report of the results of the measurements.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is able to make different types of measurements in accordance with work instructions and work independently in the laboratory. The student is able to deal with the measurement results, and present the results graphically using computer-aided tools. The student is able to assess the reliability of measurements using different types of error estimation methods. The student is able to present the results in a logical and clear technical report.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student works independently in the laboratory, and is able to make measurements based on instructions and develop the measurement methods. The student is able to evaluate the results using a wide range of computer-assisted tools, make reliable error estimates and draw conclusions from the results and error estimates. The student is able to present the results and conclusions in a logical and clear technical report.
Assessment methods and criteria
Reports and exercices
Qualifications
Mechanics and Electrical and thermal physics or similar knowledge and skills
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 05.11.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to use the common tools and methods used in the research of technology
- be able to identify restrictions of the basic experimental research tools
- become familiar with the experimental data acquisition and are able to make controlled measurements
- be able to process results and to evaluate measurement methods and reliability of the results
- be able to analyze results with computer-assisted mathematical tools
- be able to form a scientific report based on the received measurements and their analysis by using a word processing program
- be able to build the relationship between theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge of physics
- be able to evaluate his/her skills and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies and real problems at work
Content
Laboratory experiments from different areas of physics and engieering.
Materials
Guidelines for laboratory assignments
Teaching methods
Laboratory assignments and reports
Student workload
To be announced in the beginning of laboratory works
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student is able to make basic measurements in accordance with working instructions and work safely in the laboratory. The student is able to deal with measurement results and to present the results graphically using computer-aided tools. The student is able to assess the reliability of the measurements according to instructions. The student is able to present a short technical report of the results of the measurements.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is able to make different types of measurements in accordance with work instructions and work independently in the laboratory. The student is able to deal with the measurement results, and present the results graphically using computer-aided tools. The student is able to assess the reliability of measurements using different types of error estimation methods. The student is able to present the results in a logical and clear technical report.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student works independently in the laboratory, and is able to make measurements based on instructions and develop the measurement methods. The student is able to evaluate the results using a wide range of computer-assisted tools, make reliable error estimates and draw conclusions from the results and error estimates. The student is able to present the results and conclusions in a logical and clear technical report.
Assessment methods and criteria
Reports and exam
Qualifications
Mechanics and Electrical and thermal physics or similar knowledge and skills
Timing
31.10.2023 - 31.07.2024
Credits
10 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Students will work in their own profession under the supervison of an expert. They will have the opportunity to deepen their knowledge of the profession they have chosen.
Content
Students will familiarise themselves with their profession and apply the knowledge they have leaned during their studies in practice.
Materials
There are separate instructions from a practice and reporting, furthermore, the instructions of the training job
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students have a good concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field.
They can reflect critically their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
Students have a good concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field.
They can reflect critically their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Fail
Students have not complied their practical training plan or they have no concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field. They are not able to study their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Qualifications
Practical Training 1
Timing
25.09.2023 - 31.07.2024
Credits
10 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Students will work in their own profession under the supervison of an expert. They will have the opportunity to deepen their knowledge of the profession they have chosen.
Content
Students will familiarise themselves with their profession and apply the knowledge they have leaned during their studies in practice.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students have a good concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field.
They can reflect critically their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
Students have a good concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field.
They can reflect critically their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Fail
Students have not complied their practical training plan or they have no concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field. They are not able to study their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Qualifications
Practical Training 1 and 2
Further information
There are separate instructions from a practice and reporting, furthermore, the instructions of the training job
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
KONE20
-
AUTO20
Objective
Students will be competent in assessing the impacts changes in the environment outside an enterprise have on the strategy, leadership and organisational culture in the enterprise. They will be able to analyse the relationships between an enterprise's strategy, organisational structure and human resources system. They will also be able to analyse and develop their own leadership skills.
Students will be knowledgeable of the traditional theories and practices of leadership and the impacts they have on the atmosphere of an organisation, the commitment of the staff to develop their performance and the motivation of individuals. They will be competent in functioning as a member of the work community and in planning, promoting and carrying out activities in the work community. Students will also be able to utilise practices associated with development discussions in the management of the expertise in an organisation, as a person in charge and as a subordinate.
Content
- Human resources management today, with focus on the learning organisation
- Strategic dimensions in human resources management and company culture
- Leadership in changing organisations, situation management and interaction
- Individuals as part of the work community (motivation, commitment and superior/subordinate dialogs)
- Development of expertise
- Collective agreements and labour legislation
Materials
Riitta Viitala, Henkilöstöjohtaminen - Keskeiset käsitteet, teoriat ja trendit, 2021, Edita Publishing Oy
Riitta Viitala, Henkilöstöjohtaminen - Strateginen kilpailutekijä, 2007, Edita Publishing Oy
Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching:lessons
Lessons include theory, exercises and tasks. In addition, independent studying will be required.
Exam schedules
The options to complete the course will be explained at the beginning of the course
An optional exam will take place on the last lesson
Student workload
Estimated workload of the student: app. 81 hours
Classroom lessons: 32 hours
Further information
A part of material and tasks might be in English
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the most important things in management skills. The student is able to interpret the totality of supervisory work and leadership as well as the importance of management for successful activities. He / she is able to distinguish between the basic concepts of management and the aspects of human resource management.
The student is able to act as a member of the work community, plan, promote and implement the activities of the work community. The student knows the basics of labor law and is able to search for and apply in practice the legislation concerning the rights and obligations of the parties related to the employment relationship.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the most important things of management skills well. The student is able to interpret the totality of supervisory work and leadership as well as the importance of management for successful activities. He / she is able to distinguish between the basic concepts of management and the aspects of human resource management.
The student is able to apply different methods and change his / her own activities in different working life management situations and when working with different people.
The student is able to act as a member of the work community, plan, promote and implement the activities of the work community. The student knows the basics of future labor legislation and is able to search for and apply in practice the legislation concerning the rights and obligations of the parties related to the employment relationship.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to explain the totality of supervisory work and leadership as well as the importance of management for successful operations. He / she is able to distinguish between the basic concepts of management and the aspects of human resource management and is able to analyze them.
The student knows the most important things of management skills very well. He / she is able to apply different methods fluently and change his / her own actions in different management situations of working life and when working with different people, thus adapting his / her management to the situation and the needs of his / her subordinates.
The student is able to act as a member of the work community, plan, promote and implement the activities of the work community. The student knows the working life related legislation well and is able to search information and apply both labor law and the collective agreement to issues arising in employment.
Assessment methods and criteria
The tests and tasks affecting the grade
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
AUTE20KA
-
AUTE20SA
Objective
Students will be competent in assessing the impacts changes in the environment outside an enterprise have on the strategy, leadership and organisational culture in the enterprise. They will be able to analyse the relationships between an enterprise's strategy, organisational structure and human resources system. They will also be able to analyse and develop their own leadership skills.
Students will be knowledgeable of the traditional theories and practices of leadership and the impacts they have on the atmosphere of an organisation, the commitment of the staff to develop their performance and the motivation of individuals. They will be competent in functioning as a member of the work community and in planning, promoting and carrying out activities in the work community. Students will also be able to utilise practices associated with development discussions in the management of the expertise in an organisation, as a person in charge and as a subordinate.
Content
- Human resources management today, with focus on the learning organisation
- Strategic dimensions in human resources management and company culture
- Leadership in changing organisations, situation management and interaction
- Individuals as part of the work community (motivation, commitment and superior/subordinate dialogs)
- Development of expertise
- Collective agreements and labour legislation
Materials
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
- Active participation in the lectures and group work
- Seminars and approved assignments
- Final exam
Employer connections
None
Student workload
Teaching in classroom 28h
Self study and distance mode 50h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2; Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4; Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5; Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written examination and approved assignments: 60/40
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student understands the basic theories of Human resource management.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student understands the basic theories of Human resource management.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student understands the basic theories of Human resource management.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Students will be competent in assessing the impacts changes in the environment outside an enterprise have on the strategy, leadership and organisational culture in the enterprise. They will be able to analyse the relationships between an enterprise's strategy, organisational structure and human resources system. They will also be able to analyse and develop their own leadership skills.
Students will be knowledgeable of the traditional theories and practices of leadership and the impacts they have on the atmosphere of an organisation, the commitment of the staff to develop their performance and the motivation of individuals. They will be competent in functioning as a member of the work community and in planning, promoting and carrying out activities in the work community. Students will also be able to utilise practices associated with development discussions in the management of the expertise in an organisation, as a person in charge and as a subordinate.
Content
- Human resources management today, with focus on the learning organisation
- Strategic dimensions in human resources management and company culture
- Leadership in changing organisations, situation management and interaction
- Individuals as part of the work community (motivation, commitment and superior/subordinate dialogs)
- Development of expertise
- Collective agreements and labour legislation
Materials
Riitta Viitala, Henkilöstöjohtaminen - Keskeiset käsitteet, teoriat ja trendit, 2021, Edita Publishing Oy
Riitta Viitala, Henkilöstöjohtaminen - Strateginen kilpailutekijä, 2007, Edita Publishing Oy
Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Online teaching: includes time dependent online teaching
The online teaching application used is Teams
Lessons include theory, exercises and tasks. In addition, independent studying will be required.
Exam schedules
The exam shall take place on the last lesson
Student workload
Estimated workload of the student: app. 81 hours
Online lessons: 23 hours + exam 3 hours
Further information
A part of material and tasks might be in English
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the most important things in management skills. The student is able to interpret the totality of supervisory work and leadership as well as the importance of management for successful activities. He / she is able to distinguish between the basic concepts of management and the aspects of human resource management.
The student is able to act as a member of the work community, plan, promote and implement the activities of the work community. The student knows the basics of labor law and is able to search for and apply in practice the legislation concerning the rights and obligations of the parties related to the employment relationship.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the most important things of management skills well. The student is able to interpret the totality of supervisory work and leadership as well as the importance of management for successful activities. He / she is able to distinguish between the basic concepts of management and the aspects of human resource management.
The student is able to apply different methods and change his / her own activities in different working life management situations and when working with different people.
The student is able to act as a member of the work community, plan, promote and implement the activities of the work community. The student knows the basics of future labor legislation and is able to search for and apply in practice the legislation concerning the rights and obligations of the parties related to the employment relationship.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to explain the totality of supervisory work and leadership as well as the importance of management for successful operations. He / she is able to distinguish between the basic concepts of management and the aspects of human resource management and is able to analyze them.
The student knows the most important things of management skills very well. He / she is able to apply different methods fluently and change his / her own actions in different management situations of working life and when working with different people, thus adapting his / her management to the situation and the needs of his / her subordinates.
The student is able to act as a member of the work community, plan, promote and implement the activities of the work community. The student knows the working life related legislation well and is able to search information and apply both labor law and the collective agreement to issues arising in employment.
Assessment methods and criteria
The exam and tasks affecting the grade
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will:
- know how the more common metals can be welded.
- understand various welding methods and how to use them.
- understand the mechanization and automation of welding.
- understand the meaning of the quality management in welding
Content
- Welding methods
- Welding various metals
- Changes in shape
- Welding mistakes
- Designing welded joints
- Quality in welding
- Costs
Materials
Lecture material and information
Hitsaustekniikat ja teräsrakenteet, Pertti Lepola ja Matti Makkonen
Teaching methods
Lectures
Group study
Self study
Company visits
Student workload
Leture 45%
Self study and group work 45%
Company visits 10%
Content scheduling
Welding processes
Weldability
Formation
Welding faults
Welding joints planning
Costs
Automation and mechanization
Robotics
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will
- knows the basics of metals welding
- can apply several welding methods
- can planning of automation and mechanization
- understands meaning of the quality in welding
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the most common welding methods and their purposes of use and materials to be welded.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can choose a welding method best suitable to the conditions
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design the welding process and automation to the welding
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Group study
Precence
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows general welding methods, their purpose and weldable materials
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can choose the welding method best suitable for current use
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can plannig of the welding process an automation
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 03.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Janne Perälä
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will:
- know how the more common metals can be welded.
- understand various welding methods and how to use them.
- understand the mechanization and automation of welding.
- understand the meaning of the quality management in welding
Content
- Welding methods
- Welding various metals
- Changes in shape
- Welding mistakes
- Designing welded joints
- Quality in welding
- Costs
Materials
Lecture material and information
Hitsaustekniikat ja teräsrakenteet, Pertti Lepola ja Matti Makkonen
Teaching methods
Lecture and laboratory
Group study
Self study
Company visit
Student workload
Lecture and laboratory 45%
Self study and group work 45%
Company visit 10%
Content scheduling
Welding processes
Weldability
Formation
Welding faults
Welding joints planning
Costs
Automation and mechanization
Robotics
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will
- knows the basics of metals welding
- can apply several welding methods
- can planning of automation and mechanization
- understands meaning of the quality in welding
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the most common welding methods and their purposes of use and materials to be welded.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can choose a welding method best suitable to the conditions
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design the welding process and automation to the welding
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Group study
Precence
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows general welding methods, their purpose and weldable materials
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can choose the welding method best suitable for current use
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can plannig of the welding process an automation
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- understand the basics of repair shop designing.
- be able to explain repair shop processes.
- be competent in interpreting common key figures in repair shop.
- know how to suggest procedures for improving the operations in a repair shop.
- be able to define environmental issues concerning repair shop operations.
- be able to justify the significance of customer service
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Structures of repair shops
- Repair shop networks
- Furnishings and equipment in repair shops
- Repair shop processes
- Repair shop cost calculations, profitability and rationalization
- Waste disposal
- Customer service in repair shops
- Terms of repair and consumer protection
- Sustainable development in car field
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, group work and independent work.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings: 50/50 - 70/30
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- understand the basics of hydraulics.
- understand how the common components functions
- know the basics of system planning and calculation.
- be able to choose suitable hydraulic systems to use.
Content
- Basic theory of hydraulics
- Pressure generators, controllers and regulating devices
- Structure and function of components
- System planning, choosing and dimensioning components
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: A satisfactory grade will be reached by mastering the fundamental issues mentioned in the contents. This also means that the student is able to solve simple problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: For a good grade the requirements increase so that the student has a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and is also able to solve more complicated problems. The student can choose a system suitable to the conditions
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: An excellent grade can only be reached by fulfilling the previous demands and in addition to that the student must be able to solve a very challenging problem correctly. The student can design and can dimension the system
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
19.02.2024 - 21.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- understand the basics of hydraulics.
- understand how the common components functions
- know the basics of system planning and calculation.
- be able to choose suitable hydraulic systems to use.
Content
- Basic theory of hydraulics
- Pressure generators, controllers and regulating devices
- Structure and function of components
- System planning, choosing and dimensioning components
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: A satisfactory grade will be reached by mastering the fundamental issues mentioned in the contents. This also means that the student is able to solve simple problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: For a good grade the requirements increase so that the student has a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and is also able to solve more complicated problems. The student can choose a system suitable to the conditions
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: An excellent grade can only be reached by fulfilling the previous demands and in addition to that the student must be able to solve a very challenging problem correctly. The student can design and can dimension the system
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
AUTO20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will know how to explain:
- heavy-duty automotive technology.
- measurements and the concepts associated with structural engineering.
- distinctive features of heavy-duty automotive technology.
- funcions and systems of brakes and suspension components in heavy-duty vehicles.
Content
- Constructing and servicing heavy-duty automotive bodies
- Measurement regulations
- Calculating weight and dimensions
- Choosing a chassis
- Body structures and components
- Designing and choosing vehicle equipment
- Pneumatic brake systems
- Structures of axles and transmissions
- Polar clearances
- Brake fitting
- Retarders
- Special features of electronics in commercial vehicles
Materials
Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Exercises
- Information search
- Group work
- Independent study
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Examination and exercises: 70/30
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
28.08.2023 - 24.09.2023
Timing
25.09.2023 - 01.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Jussi Kareinen
- Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
-
KUTU23Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will able to define the central concepts and related to general and inorganic chemistry and how they influence their professional field.
Content
The course involves discussion of atoms, chemical compounds, forms of substances and chemical reactions. The following topics and their applications are discussed in detail
- Thermal chemistry and combustion,
- Electrochemistry and corrosion
- Surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis.
Additionally safe working methods will be discussed.
Materials
Lecturer's material, online material
Teaching methods
Lectures and excersises
Exam schedules
Will be announced later
Student workload
Total work 81h
Lectures 24 h and exercises 8 h / group
Independent studying
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of chemistry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of chemistry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of chemistry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end exam
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
11.03.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will able to define the central concepts and related to general and inorganic chemistry and how they influence their professional field.
Content
The course involves discussion of atoms, chemical compounds, forms of substances and chemical reactions. The following topics and their applications are discussed in detail
- Thermal chemistry and combustion,
- Electrochemistry and corrosion
- Surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis.
Additionally safe working methods will be discussed.
Materials
Lecturer's material available from Moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculations, assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 20 h
- of which autonomous and virtual studies: 60 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of chemistry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of chemistry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of chemistry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written examination, assignment
Evaluation scale 1 - 5
Failed 0
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand how machine components work and be competent in dimensioning.
- be able to select parts from standards and catalogues.
In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- component calculations and basis of design
- welded joints
- screw connections
- axle connections
- antifriction bearings
- springs
- cylindrical gearwheels
Materials
Lecture material in Moodle
Additional reading:
Spektor, Michael B.. (2018). Machine Design Elements and Assemblies. Industrial Press. Retrieved from
https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpMDEA0001/machine-design-elements/machine-design-elements
Standards
Manufacturers' catalogs
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Lectures ca. 42 h, exercises ca. 50 h and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercise 60 %, exam 40 %
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand how machine components work and be competent in dimensioning.
- be able to select parts from standards and catalogues.
In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- component calculations and basis of design
- welded joints
- screw connections
- axle connections
- antifriction bearings
- springs
- cylindrical gearwheels
Materials
Lecture material in Moodle
Additional reading:
Spektor, Michael B.. (2018). Machine Design Elements and Assemblies. Industrial Press. Retrieved from
https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpMDEA0001/machine-design-elements/machine-design-elements
Standards
Manufacturers' catalogs
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Lectures ca. 42 h, exercises ca. 50 h and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercise 60 %, exam 40 %
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 27.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 04.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand how machine components work and be competent in dimensioning.
- be able to select parts from standards and catalogues.
In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- component calculations and basis of design
- welded joints
- screw connections
- axle connections
- antifriction bearings
- springs
- cylindrical gearwheels
Materials
Lecture material in Moodle
Additional reading:
Spektor, Michael B.. (2018). Machine Design Elements and Assemblies. Industrial Press. Retrieved from
https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpMDEA0001/machine-design-elements/machine-design-elements
Standards
Manufacturers' catalogs
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Lectures ca. 34 h, exercises ca. 40 h and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
MKONE20
-
KONE20
-
AUTO20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the principles of creating calculation models of structures.
- be competent in using FEM software in the static and dynamic simulation of machines and structures.
In addition student will strengthen design and machine safety competences.
Content
- pre-processors, solvers, post-processors
- data transfer from CAD software
- finite element types
- material models
- static and dynamic analyses
Materials
Lecture material
Teaching methods
Exercises
Completion alternatives
Dependent on the current circumstances course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible.
Student workload
Exercises, from which most by self learning.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student knows the basics principals of the course and is able to utilize them.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and is cabable to conceive connections between learned issues
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course excellent and is able to evaluate and validate content of course
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises
Qualifications
Strength of Materials 1, Matrix algebra, Finite-element method, Mechanical vibrations
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 25.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- understand the concepts and units used in explaining oscillatory motion, in the phenomena related to wave motion and in photometry.
- be able to analyse oscillatory and wave motion using mathematical models.
- be competent in calculating predictions for wave motion using mathematical models.
- be able to analyse the behaviour of different wave motions in different media and be competent in describing them using equations of magnitude.
- be able to design and carry out the noise level measurements of various machines according to standardized practises.
- be able to utilize photometry in design of lighting and light-based systems.
- be able to evaluate their skills in physics and apply their expertise in the subsequent advanced studies.
Content
- Oscillatory motion
- Wave motion
- Acoustics
- Wave optics and geometric optics
- Principle and uses of photoelectric effect
Materials
- TBA
- Lecture notes
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises, independent and virtual studies
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 32 h
- of which autonomous studies: 48 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of oscillatory motion and wave physics. The student is able to apply the basic consepts to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of oscillatory motion, wave physics and photometry. The student is able to apply the consepts to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of oscillatory motion, wave physics and photometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination and student assignment
Qualifications
Mechanics, Thermal and electrical physics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- understand the concepts and units used in explaining oscillatory motion, in the phenomena related to wave motion and in photometry.
- be able to analyse oscillatory and wave motion using mathematical models.
- be competent in calculating predictions for wave motion using mathematical models.
- be able to analyse the behaviour of different wave motions in different media and be competent in describing them using equations of magnitude.
- be able to design and carry out the noise level measurements of various machines according to standardized practises.
- be able to utilize photometry in design of lighting and light-based systems.
- be able to evaluate their skills in physics and apply their expertise in the subsequent advanced studies.
Content
- Oscillatory motion
- Wave motion
- Acoustics
- Wave optics and geometric optics
- Principle and uses of photoelectric effect
Materials
- TBA
- Lecture notes
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises, independent and virtual studies
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 20 h
- of which autonomous studies: 60 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of oscillatory motion and wave physics. The student is able to apply the basic consepts to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of oscillatory motion, wave physics and photometry. The student is able to apply the consepts to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of oscillatory motion, wave physics and photometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination and student assignment
Qualifications
Mechanics, Thermal and electrical physics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- know the safety factors associated with laboratories.
- be knowledgeable of the tools and machines in mechanical laboratory.
Content
- General safety in a laboratories
- Basic training in the use of machines in mechanical laboratory
- Basics of CAM-programming
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1 - 2; Student knows basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3 - 4; Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5; Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can be able to turn it to practice.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completing the course, the student knows what the machine safety is based on, is able to utilize the legal material concerning machine safety and is able to apply risk assessment to improve the safety of machines. After the course, the student also understands and is able to clarify the impact of machine safety during the product development process. The student develops an understanding of how the risk assessment process is performed and how risks can be reduced by designing machines. The student understands the factors that make up the CE marking and is able to utilize the acquired knowledge to compile technical documentation.
Content
• Basics of machine safety
• Machinery safety legislation
• Criteria for the CE marking
• Machine risk assessment and management
Teaching methods
-Lectures
-Exercises
-Group work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has an understanding of the most important concepts and processes related to machine safety. The student will be able to demonstrate which factors affect the safety of machines and how safety can be improved.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student masters the most important concepts and processes in machine safety. The student is able make the risks assesment for machines and to understand the origin of the risks. The student has a strong understanding of how legislation governs machine safety and what the requirement for the CE marking consists of.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to form a comprehensive proposal for measures to improve the safety of a machine, taking into account the legislation on machine safety and the assessment of machine risks. The student also has a strong understanding of the steps in the CE marking process and how it is part of the machine design process.
Assessment methods and criteria
-Exercises 30%
-Exam 70%
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 21.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 03.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completing the course, the student knows what the machine safety is based on, is able to utilize the legal material concerning machine safety and is able to apply risk assessment to improve the safety of machines. After the course, the student also understands and is able to clarify the impact of machine safety during the product development process. The student develops an understanding of how the risk assessment process is performed and how risks can be reduced by designing machines. The student understands the factors that make up the CE marking and is able to utilize the acquired knowledge to compile technical documentation.
Content
• Basics of machine safety
• Machinery safety legislation
• Criteria for the CE marking
• Machine risk assessment and management
Teaching methods
-Lectures
-Exercises
-Group work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has an understanding of the most important concepts and processes related to machine safety. The student will be able to demonstrate which factors affect the safety of machines and how safety can be improved.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student masters the most important concepts and processes in machine safety. The student is able make the risks assesment for machines and to understand the origin of the risks. The student has a strong understanding of how legislation governs machine safety and what the requirement for the CE marking consists of.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to form a comprehensive proposal for measures to improve the safety of a machine, taking into account the legislation on machine safety and the assessment of machine risks. The student also has a strong understanding of the steps in the CE marking process and how it is part of the machine design process.
Assessment methods and criteria
-Exercises 50%
-Exam 50%
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course student will know how to explain,
- the basics of the body structure and materials,
- the theory of the basics of the body repair and design.
Content
- The body development
- collision safety
- body materials
- body maintenance
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, and diagrams of the driving space.
Information search
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2 Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4 Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5 Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings: 70/30
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
- Tiina Välimäki
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: lectures and assignments, presentations
Student workload
53 hours, which consists of contact teaching, assignments and exercises
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes, by completing the required course assignments
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
- Tiina Välimäki
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: lectures and assignments, presentations
Student workload
53 hours, which consists of contact teaching, assignments and exercises
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes, by completing the required course assignments
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: lectures and assignments, presentations
Student workload
53 hours, which consists of contact teaching, assignments and exercises
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes, by completing the required course assignments
Timing
30.09.2023 - 15.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Tiina Nieminen
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Enrollment
15.12.2023 - 21.04.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 31.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Johanna Koivula
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle
Student workload
Total 54 h of independent work
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Further information
The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will be competent in applying their knowledge of elasticity and strength in the measuring of structures. In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- basic concepts of the strength of materials
- tension in structures
- changes in form and dimensioning in cases of tension, compression, shearing, bending and torsion
- buckling
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading (examples):
in Finnish: Karhunen ym.: Lujuusoppi
in English: Parnes: Solid mechanics in engineering. Wiley.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assignments
Self-study
Student workload
Lectures ca. 50 hr
Assignments and self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two midterm exams or final exam.
Assignments affect the grade.
Qualifications
Statics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 25.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will be competent in applying their knowledge of elasticity and strength in the measuring of structures. In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- basic concepts of the strength of materials
- tension in structures
- changes in form and dimensioning in cases of tension, compression, shearing, bending and torsion
- buckling
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading (examples):
in Finnish: Karhunen ym.: Lujuusoppi
in English: Parnes: Solid mechanics in engineering. Wiley.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assignments
Self-study
Student workload
Lectures ca. 50 hr
Assignments and self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two midterm exams or final exam.
Assignments affect the grade.
Qualifications
Statics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 03.11.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will be competent in applying their knowledge of elasticity and strength in the measuring of structures. In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- basic concepts of the strength of materials
- tension in structures
- changes in form and dimensioning in cases of tension, compression, shearing, bending and torsion
- buckling
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading (examples):
in Finnish: Karhunen ym.: Lujuusoppi
in English: Parnes: Solid mechanics in engineering. Wiley.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assignments
Self-study
Student workload
Lectures ca 30 hr
Assignments and self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two midterm exams or final exam.
Assignments affect the grade.
Qualifications
Statics
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand the principles of the linear elasticity theory. In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- bending a curved beams
- state of stress
- state of deformation
- connection between stress and strain
- strength hypotheses
- fatigue
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading (examples):
in Finnish: Karhunen ym.: Lujuusoppi
in English: Parnes: Solid mechanics in engineering. Wiley.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assignments
Self-study
Student workload
Lectures 28 hr
Assignments and self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam, assignments
Qualifications
Statics, Strength of materials 1
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 18.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand the principles of the linear elasticity theory. In addition student will strengthen basics of mechanical engineering, design and machine safety competences.
Content
- bending a curved beams
- state of stress
- state of deformation
- connection between stress and strain
- strength hypotheses
- fatigue
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading (examples):
in Finnish: Karhunen ym.: Lujuusoppi
in English: Parnes: Solid mechanics in engineering. Wiley.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assignments
Self-study
Student workload
Lectures 20 hr
Assignments and self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam, assignments
Qualifications
Statics, Strength of materials 1
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jori Lahti
Responsible person
Jori Lahti
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will know how to:
- explain the structure, function and design of the more common farming machinery.
- explain the distinctive technology associated with farming machinery.
Content
- Tractors: structures, features, engines, steering devices, transmissions, brakes, tyres, attaching machinery, and hydraulics
- Combine harvesters: harvesting and threshing mechanisms, separators and conveyors, power transmission and utilising electronics
- Soil cultivators, hoppers and fertilizer spreaders, plant protection sprays, bailers and feed machines
Materials
- Field-related publications and literature
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Exercises
- Information search
- Group work
- Independent study
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Examination and exercises: 70/30
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Students will acquire insight into customer-focused marketing concepts, models, as well as various marketing strategies and how they should be implemented. Students will understand customer-focused marketing as a critical success factor in marketing.
Content
- Operational environment and forms of marketing
- Customer-focused marketing
- Segmentation and marketing to the individual
- Internal marketing
- Marketing organisation: structure and resources
- New competition for the service industry and customer relations management
- Role of communication in marketing
- Service culture
Materials
Bergström & Leppänen: Yrityksen asiakasmarkkinointi
Lahtinen & Isoviita: Asiakaspalvelun ja markkinoinnin perusteet
Grönroos: Palveluiden johtaminen ja markkinointi
Teaching methods
Team learning, online course
Student workload
27 h/ects
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participating at course and compliting given assignments. Information searching, applying theory to practice, evaluating the learning and making learnig process visible.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course. There is some lack to understand connection between the theory and practical approach.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well. Student's approach is wide but not so deep.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice. Student's vapproach is wide and deep in every aspect of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 29.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Students will acquire insight into customer-focused marketing concepts, models, as well as various marketing strategies and how they should be implemented. Students will understand customer-focused marketing as a critical success factor in marketing.
Content
- Operational environment and forms of marketing
- Customer-focused marketing
- Segmentation and marketing to the individual
- Internal marketing
- Marketing organisation: structure and resources
- New competition for the service industry and customer relations management
- Role of communication in marketing
- Service culture
Materials
Bergström & Leppänen: Yrityksen asiakasmarkkinointi
Lahtinen & Isoviita: Asiakaspalvelun ja markkinoinnin perusteet
Grönroos: Palveluiden johtaminen ja markkinointi
Teaching methods
Team learning, online course
Student workload
27 h/ects
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participating at course and compliting given assignments. Information searching, applying theory to practice, evaluating the learning and making learnig process visible.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course. There is some lack to understand connection between the theory and practical approach.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well. Student's approach is wide but not so deep.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice. Student's vapproach is wide and deep in every aspect of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student masters the rules for calculating fractions and powers and uses them for unit calculations. The student masters the handling of polynomial expressions and simple fractional expressions.
Content
- fractions
- rules for calculating powers
- calculation in units
- polynomial expressions
- fractional expressions
Materials
Given in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 54 h
- of which scheduled studies: 14 h
- of which autonomous studies: 40 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): The student is able to calculate fractions. He is able to handle units and perform their calculations. The student masters simple power and polynomial expressions.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): In addition to the criteria of a satisfactory level of competence, the student is able to deal with power and polynomial expressions in a variety of ways. In addition, the student masters simple fractional expressions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): In addition to the above criteria, the student is able to handle more demanding fractional expressions. He / she is able to apply letter counting to problems in practical life.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student masters the rules for calculating fractions and powers and uses them for unit calculations. The student masters the handling of polynomial expressions and simple fractional expressions.
Content
- fractions
- rules for calculating powers
- calculation in units
- polynomial expressions
- fractional expressions
Materials
Given in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 54 h
- of which scheduled studies: 14 h
- of which autonomous studies: 40 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): The student is able to calculate fractions. He is able to handle units and perform their calculations. The student masters simple power and polynomial expressions.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): In addition to the criteria of a satisfactory level of competence, the student is able to deal with power and polynomial expressions in a variety of ways. In addition, the student masters simple fractional expressions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): In addition to the above criteria, the student is able to handle more demanding fractional expressions. He / she is able to apply letter counting to problems in practical life.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the basic principles involved in the selection of materials.
- understand the process involved in selecting appropriate materials.
Content
- General principles
- Selection process
- Types of tension
- Selection maps
- Economical aspects of the selection of materials
Materials
Lecture materia in moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculations
Student workload
50% lecture 50% independent studies
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can identify the demands which are related to the material choice.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can perform the choice of material process and can justify his choice.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can perform the choice of material process well and the demands of the usage environment and manufacturing technique of the product are able to adapt paying attention to the alternatives of the choice process.
Assessment methods and criteria
Home exercises and lectures
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the basic principles involved in the selection of materials.
- understand the process involved in selecting appropriate materials.
Content
- General principles
- Selection process
- Types of tension
- Selection maps
- Economical aspects of the selection of materials
Materials
Lecture materia in moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculations
Student workload
50% lecture 50% independent studies
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can identify the demands which are related to the material choice.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can perform the choice of material process and can justify his choice.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can perform the choice of material process well and the demands of the usage environment and manufacturing technique of the product are able to adapt paying attention to the alternatives of the choice process.
Assessment methods and criteria
Home exercises and lectures
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will competent in:
- designing and manufacturing a product while considering the demands of the product and manufacturing.
- recognising requirements of standards for a product.
- independently carrying out research.
Content
- Designing, drawing, dimensioning and manufacturing a product
- Independent use of the machines in an engineering shop
- Standards
- Making samples and analysing them
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can use modern planning tools for the planning of the product and he is able to use the manual machines for making of parts.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the demands of standards to the product to be made and is able to design and is able to carry out it.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can adapt the properties of material to the manufacturing method, to the standards and the modern tools into use.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
30.10.2023 - 21.01.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will competent in:
- designing and manufacturing a product while considering the demands of the product and manufacturing.
- recognising requirements of standards for a product.
- independently carrying out research.
Content
- Designing, drawing, dimensioning and manufacturing a product
- Independent use of the machines in an engineering shop
- Standards
- Making samples and analysing them
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can use modern planning tools for the planning of the product and he is able to use the manual machines for making of parts.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the demands of standards to the product to be made and is able to design and is able to carry out it.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can adapt the properties of material to the manufacturing method, to the standards and the modern tools into use.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will know various types of construction materials, their properties, handling, standards and selection.
Content
- Using and testing various materials
- Internal structure of metals
- Constitutional diagram
- Thermal treatment
- Steel and cast iron
- Aluminium alloys
- Other alloys
- Consumption of natural resources and recycling of materials
Materials
Lecturing material.
Extra material:
Konetekniikan Materiaalioppi
Koivisto, Kaarlo ; Laitinen, Esko ; Niinimäki, Matti ; Tiainen, Tuomo ; Tiilikka, Pentti ; Tuomikoski, Juho
Teaching methods
Learning material is published in Moodle.
Lectures, self learning and laboratory work.
Student workload
Lectures 28h and laboratory work 4h.
Self learning.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1 - 2 Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3 - 4 Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5 Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 05.11.2023
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will know various types of construction materials, their properties, handling, standards and selection.
Content
- Using and testing various materials
- Internal structure of metals
- Constitutional diagram
- Thermal treatment
- Steel and cast iron
- Aluminium alloys
- Other alloys
- Consumption of natural resources and recycling of materials
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1 - 2 Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3 - 4 Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5 Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the destructive and non-destructive inspection and examination procedures for metals.
- understand the principles associated with shaping sheet metall
- know how to coat steel surfaces.
- be knowledgeable of superplastic materials.
- be knowledgeable of various structural steels.
Content
- Shaping metals
- Planning the shaping sheet metal
- Examining metals, damage analysis
- Hardening of steel
- Aluminium alloys
- Steel grades, coating
- Properties of super-plastic and materials
- Materials standards
- Corrosion
- Construction materials for automobile chassis
Materials
Teachers material
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the properties of the metallic materials and their possibilities to use.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the effect of material qualifications on their possibilities to use.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can adapt the demands of the use of making and the product to the material qualifications.
Assessment methods and criteria
assignments
Qualifications
Material technique 1, Plastics technology
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
12.02.2024 - 14.04.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the destructive and non-destructive inspection and examination procedures for metals.
- understand the principles associated with shaping sheet metall
- know how to coat steel surfaces.
- be knowledgeable of superplastic materials.
- be knowledgeable of various structural steels.
Content
- Shaping metals
- Planning the shaping sheet metal
- Examining metals, damage analysis
- Hardening of steel
- Aluminium alloys
- Steel grades, coating
- Properties of super-plastic and materials
- Materials standards
- Corrosion
- Construction materials for automobile chassis
Materials
Teachers material
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the properties of the metallic materials and their possibilities to use.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the effect of material qualifications on their possibilities to use.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can adapt the demands of the use of making and the product to the material qualifications.
Assessment methods and criteria
assignments
Qualifications
Material technique 1, Plastics technology
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
KONE21
-
AUTO21
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will possess basic knowledge of matrices and matrix algebra needed in the courses Finite-element Methods, Mechanics of Vibrations and Simulation of Machines.
Content
- Definitions, transposing, determinants, inverse of a matrix
- Solving a linear system of equations
- Gauss elimination method
- Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
- Diagonalisation
- Use of mathematics software
Materials
to be announced
Teaching methods
lectures and independent study
Student workload
81h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of matrix algebra, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of matrix algebra, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of matrix algebra, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
exam
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling mechanical phenomena
- be able to build and solve physical models that describe different mechanical phenomena
- be able to interpret a physical model as an approximate description of the real world phenomenon
- be able to analyze the motion of solid bodies and fluids, and to understand the empirical nature of the physical science
- be able to evaluate his/her skills on mechanics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies
Content
- Kinematics
- Newton's laws
- Work, power, energy, impulse
- Linear momentum
- Rotary movement
- Mechanics of solids and fluids
Materials
The material in the Moodle
Lecture notes
Extra material
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises. NB! 80 % attendance in excersises required.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h
- of which scheduled studies: 32 h
- of which autonomous studies: 49 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the mechanical basic concepts and methods, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
30.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling mechanical phenomena
- be able to build and solve physical models that describe different mechanical phenomena
- be able to interpret a physical model as an approximate description of the real world phenomenon
- be able to analyze the motion of solid bodies and fluids, and to understand the empirical nature of the physical science
- be able to evaluate his/her skills on mechanics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies
Content
- Kinematics
- Newton's laws
- Work, power, energy, impulse
- Linear momentum
- Rotary movement
- Mechanics of solids and fluids
Materials
The material in Moodle
Lecture notes
Extra material
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises. NB! 80 % attendance in excersises required.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h
- of which scheduled studies: 20 h
- of which autonomous studies: 61 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the mechanical basic concepts and methods, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Ari Saunamäki
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- explaining the general structures of engines.
- calculating combustion engines thermal processes.
- explaining the stress on mechanisms in relation to design, use and maintenance.
- demonstrating fuel and exhaust systems and their maintenance
- be able to seek information on the subject.
Content
- Combustion engines
- Thermodynamics
- Concepts of power recovery and coefficients of performance
- Structures and maintenance of crank mechanisms and valve gears
- Vibration dampers
- Lubrication, cooling and fuel devices
- Fuel and exhaust
- Measuring exhaust
- Super-charging
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, group work and independent work.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination/other way and trainings: 50/50 - 70/30
The presence (min 50%) and hour activity affect a grade.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the basic concepts of polymer chemistry.
- be familiar with the more common engineering plastics.
- know the technical characteristics of plastics and the areas of application.
Content
- Structure of plastics
- Physical and mechanical characteristics of plastics
- Manufacturing, machining and bonding plastics
- Areas of application
Materials
Moodle
Teaching methods
Lecturing material
Completion alternatives
Dependent on the current circumstances course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the most general plastic materials and their usage environment.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student is able to identify the most general plastic materials and their properties and to know the manufacturing technique.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can adapt the choice of plastic material in the locations which are in accordance with the demands utilising a modern manufacturing technique.
Assessment methods and criteria
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
19.02.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the basic concepts of polymer chemistry.
- be familiar with the more common engineering plastics.
- know the technical characteristics of plastics and the areas of application.
Content
- Structure of plastics
- Physical and mechanical characteristics of plastics
- Manufacturing, machining and bonding plastics
- Areas of application
Materials
Moodle
Teaching methods
Lecturing material
Completion alternatives
Dependent on the current circumstances course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the most general plastic materials and their usage environment.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student is able to identify the most general plastic materials and their properties and to know the manufacturing technique.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can adapt the choice of plastic material in the locations which are in accordance with the demands utilising a modern manufacturing technique.
Assessment methods and criteria
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Janne Perälä
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand
- the basic control structures of automated production units.
- the mechanical structure of a machine tool.
- how to programme a machine tool.
Content
- NC machines and structures
- Programme codes
- CAD/CAM systems
Materials
Lecture material and information
NC-tekniikan perusteet, Eero Pikkarainen
Koneistustekniikat, Maaranen Keijo
CNC Programming Handbook, Peter Smid
CAD/CAM Principles and Applications McGraw-Hill. Iowa USA
Teaching methods
Lectures and laboratory
Group study
Self study
Company visit
Student workload
Lectures and laboratory 45%
Self-study and group work 45%
Company visit 10%
Content scheduling
NC-machines, struture and function
Programming basics
CAD/CAM system
Tooling and manufacturing methods
NC-machining
NC-sheet metal working
NC-measuring
Maintenance
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be knowledgeable basics of NC control
- understand the structure of NC machines
- understand machine tool programming
- understand NC manufacturing
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the structure and programming of the NC machine
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows making with the NC processing
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design the NC manufacturing process
Assessment methods and criteria
Group study and presentations
Documents and study tasks delivered to the teacher
Precence
Exam (as an alternative evaluation)
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the NC-machine structure and programming
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the NC-manufacturing
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can plan NC-manufacturing
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand
- the basic control structures of automated production units.
- the mechanical structure of a machine tool.
- how to programme a machine tool.
Content
- NC machines and structures
- Programme codes
- CAD/CAM systems
Materials
Lecture material and information
NC-tekniikan perusteet, Eero Pikkarainen
Koneistustekniikat, Maaranen Keijo
CNC Programming Handbook, Peter Smid
CAD/CAM Principles and Applications McGraw-Hill. Iowa USA
Teaching methods
Lectures and laboratory
Group study
Self study
Company visit
Student workload
Lectures and laboratory 45%
Self-study and group work 45%
Company visit 10%
Content scheduling
NC-machines, struture and function
Programming basics
CAD/CAM system
Tooling and manufacturing methods
NC-machining
NC-sheet metal working
NC-measuring
Maintenance
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will
- be knowledgeable basics of NC control
- understand the structure of NC machines
- understand machine tool programming
- understand NC manufacturing
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the structure and programming of the NC machine
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows making with the NC processing
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design the NC manufacturing process
Assessment methods and criteria
Group study and presentations
Documents and study tasks delivered to the teacher
Precence
Exam (as an alternative evaluation)
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the NC-machine structure and programming
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the NC-manufacturing
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can plan NC-manufacturing
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juha Hirvonen
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Content
Basic structures of a programming language: types, statements, input/output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Materials
W3Schools-documents and teatcher's handout and viedos
Teaching methods
Lectures and programming assingments
Student workload
Total 80 hours of work of which lessons 28 hours, assignments and independent work 52 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student knows the basic structures of programming. Student can develop small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions and loops.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop, document and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and assignments
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juha Hirvonen
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Content
Basic structures of a programming language: types, statements, input/output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Materials
W3Schools-documents and teatcher's handout and viedos
Teaching methods
Lectures and programming assingments
Student workload
Total 80 hours of work of which lessons 28 hours, assignments and independent work 52 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student knows the basic structures of programming. Student can develop small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions and loops.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop, document and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and assignments
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 10.03.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Content
Basic structures of a programming language: types, statements, input/output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Materials
W3Schools-documents and teatcher's handout and viedos
Teaching methods
Lectures and programming assingments
Student workload
Total 80 hours of work of which lessons 28 hours, assignments and independent work 52 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student knows the basic structures of programming. Student can develop small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions and loops.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write simple programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student knows the basic structures of programming and the basics of structural program design. Student can develop, document and test small programs having a console user interface. Student can write programs, which contain console input and output, conditional expressions, loops, methods (functions) and lists.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and assignments
Timing
01.08.2023 - 31.07.2024
Credits
15 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
- Heikki Järvi
- Juho Yli-Suomu
- Pasi Junell
- Samuel Suvanto
- Heikki Kokkonen
- Jarno Arkko
- Pekka Lager
- Ari Saunamäki
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Objective
The thesis prepares students for their future profession. It enables students to apply the knowledge they have learned during their studies into practice and to find new knowledge to solve problems. More detailed information about the thesis is available in the Guidelines for Writing a Thesis.
Content
- Planning, producing and reporting of a thesis
- Present the topic
- Present the results
- Maturity Test
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS's Instructions for Writing a Thesis
Assessment criteria, good (3)
More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS's Instructions for Writing a Thesis
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS's Instructions for Writing a Thesis
Qualifications
Research and Development Work
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- know the basics of pneumatics.
- know how essential components function.
- know how to design and make calculations for various systems.
- be able to choose suitable pneumatic systems to use.
Content
- basic theory of pneumatics
- pressure generators, controllers and regulating components
- structure and function of components
- systems design, choosing and dimensioning of components
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: A satisfactory grade will be reached by mastering the fundamental issues mentioned in the contents. This also means that the student is able to solve simple problems. The student knows the basic theory and calculation and components
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: For a good grade the requirements increase so that the student has a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and is also able to solve more complicated problems. The student can choose a system suitable to the conditions
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: An excellent grade can only be reached by fulfilling the previous demands and in addition to that the student must be able to solve a very challenging problem correctly. The student can design and can dimension the system
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
08.04.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- know the basics of pneumatics.
- know how essential components function.
- know how to design and make calculations for various systems.
- be able to choose suitable pneumatic systems to use.
Content
- basic theory of pneumatics
- pressure generators, controllers and regulating components
- structure and function of components
- systems design, choosing and dimensioning of components
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: A satisfactory grade will be reached by mastering the fundamental issues mentioned in the contents. This also means that the student is able to solve simple problems. The student knows the basic theory and calculation and components
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: For a good grade the requirements increase so that the student has a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and is also able to solve more complicated problems. The student can choose a system suitable to the conditions
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: An excellent grade can only be reached by fulfilling the previous demands and in addition to that the student must be able to solve a very challenging problem correctly. The student can design and can dimension the system
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 31.07.2024
Credits
15 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Students will work on multi-technical, international student teams to fulfil product and production development commissions for various companies utilising Seinäjoki UAS's laboratories. Students will develop their technical expertise and skills in project work and enhance their relationships with companies and other actors.
Content
Students carry out tasks given by their employer. They solve these in an engineering way at group work. Project groups are given specific learning goals for doing the tasks. The companies commissions are clearly defined development tasks that supprt learning. The tasks may vary from short-term surveys to more extensive tasks.
A commission may involve a survey pertaining to quality, the manufacturing of prototypes, testing and comparing work methods, and conventional practical and design work. A commission may also involve a company's completed development project, the functioning, need for refining or cost efficiency of which needs to be examined.
The commisions of companies contain business secrets and therefore they are always confidential.
Teaching methods
Projects solved in an engineering way at group work.
Project groups are given specific learning goals for doing the tasks.
The tasks may vary from short-term surveys to more extensive tasks.
Further information
You work in a project group and learn the principles of project work.
You will learn the importance of different roles in project activities.
You learn development and planning in a project group.
You will learn to document events, project progress and the results.
You learn how to do planning tasks according to the goals.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can act in the project group and master the principles of the project work. He works actively.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can act as the designer in the group and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student documents results and the progress of the project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can solve planning tasks according to the objective and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student produces good documentation from the project.
Assessment methods and criteria
The student can act in the project group and master the principles of the project work.
He works actively.
The student can act as the designer in the group and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student documents the progress of the project and the results.
The student can solve planning tasks according to the objective and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group.
The student produces good documentation from the project.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 18.12.2024
Credits
15 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Students will work on multi-technical, international student teams to fulfil product and production development commissions for various companies utilising Seinäjoki UAS's laboratories. Students will develop their technical expertise and skills in project work and enhance their relationships with companies and other actors.
Content
Students carry out tasks given by their employer. They solve these in an engineering way at group work. Project groups are given specific learning goals for doing the tasks. The companies commissions are clearly defined development tasks that supprt learning. The tasks may vary from short-term surveys to more extensive tasks.
A commission may involve a survey pertaining to quality, the manufacturing of prototypes, testing and comparing work methods, and conventional practical and design work. A commission may also involve a company's completed development project, the functioning, need for refining or cost efficiency of which needs to be examined.
The commisions of companies contain business secrets and therefore they are always confidential.
Teaching methods
Projects solved in an engineering way at group work.
Project groups are given specific learning goals for doing the tasks.
The tasks may vary from short-term surveys to more extensive tasks.
Further information
You work in a project group and learn the principles of project work.
You will learn the importance of different roles in project activities.
You learn development and planning in a project group.
You will learn to document events, project progress and the results.
You learn how to do planning tasks according to the goals.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can act in the project group and master the principles of the project work. He works actively.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can act as the designer in the group and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student documents results and the progress of the project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can solve planning tasks according to the objective and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student produces good documentation from the project.
Assessment methods and criteria
The student can act in the project group and master the principles of the project work.
He works actively.
The student can act as the designer in the group and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student documents the progress of the project and the results.
The student can solve planning tasks according to the objective and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group.
The student produces good documentation from the project.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 15.12.2024
Credits
15 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Students will work on multi-technical, international student teams to fulfil product and production development commissions for various companies utilising Seinäjoki UAS's laboratories. Students will develop their technical expertise and skills in project work and enhance their relationships with companies and other actors.
Content
Students carry out tasks given by their employer. They solve these in an engineering way at group work. Project groups are given specific learning goals for doing the tasks. The companies commissions are clearly defined development tasks that supprt learning. The tasks may vary from short-term surveys to more extensive tasks.
A commission may involve a survey pertaining to quality, the manufacturing of prototypes, testing and comparing work methods, and conventional practical and design work. A commission may also involve a company's completed development project, the functioning, need for refining or cost efficiency of which needs to be examined.
The commisions of companies contain business secrets and therefore they are always confidential.
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student can act in the project group and master the principles of the project work. He works actively.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student can act as the designer in the group and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student documents results and the progress of the project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can solve planning tasks according to the objective and master the principles of the project work and it is active in the group. The student produces good documentation from the project.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student is able to
- explain the character of project work and determine when the project work model is useful
- present the basic knowledge and skills on the basis of which he/she can participate in project work and project planning
- explain concepts connected with projects, content of a project plan, project time planing and supervising (life circle)
- present tasks connected with the different phases of the project cycle
Content
- concepts and methods of project work
- project phases and process
- project plan (time, resource and cost planning)
- project organisation and interest groups
- changes, risks and problems in project work
- project communication and reporting
- concluding a project
Materials
A textbook in project management and Project management competence 3.0 ( http://www.pry.fi/UserFiles/33fa4818-2dbf-44aa-a497-0e74914327b1/Web/IPMA-sertifiointi/ENG/PMAF_NCB_3.0_v1.3.pdf )
Teaching methods
Lectures and self study
Project group work
Student workload
Lectures and self study 50%
Project group work 50%
Content scheduling
- concepts and methods of project work
- project phases and process
- project plan (time, resource and cost planning)
- project organisation and interest groups
- changes, risks and problems in project work
- project communication and reporting
- concluding a project
Further information
The student is able to
- explain the character of project work and determine when the project work model is useful
- present the basic knowledge and skills on the basis of which he/she can participate in project work and project planning
- explain concepts connected with projects, content of a project plan, project time planing and supervising (life circle)
- present tasks connected with the different phases of the project cycle
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1-2 :
The student knows the main project management concepts and methods . He is able to make a project plan , and he has an understanding of the project implementation and management.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3-4
The student knows well the main project concepts and management techniques . He is able to do different kind of project plans , and he has a good understanding of the project implementation and management.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
5 :
The student knows perfectly the main project concepts and methods. He is able to do different kind of project plans and analyze them. He a very good understanding of the project implementation and management and leadership.
Assessment methods and criteria
Project management and planning skills
Knowledge of concepts
Knowledge of the course and progress of the project
Project analysis and management skills
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student is able to
- explain the character of project work and determine when the project work model is useful
- present the basic knowledge and skills on the basis of which he/she can participate in project work and project planning
- explain concepts connected with projects, content of a project plan, project time planing and supervising (life circle)
- present tasks connected with the different phases of the project cycle
Content
- concepts and methods of project work
- project phases and process
- project plan (time, resource and cost planning)
- project organisation and interest groups
- changes, risks and problems in project work
- project communication and reporting
- concluding a project
Materials
A textbook in project management and Project management competence 3.0 ( http://www.pry.fi/UserFiles/33fa4818-2dbf-44aa-a497-0e74914327b1/Web/IPMA-sertifiointi/ENG/PMAF_NCB_3.0_v1.3.pdf )
Teaching methods
Lectures and self study
Project group work
Student workload
Lectures and self study 50%
Project group work 50%
Content scheduling
- concepts and methods of project work
- project phases and process
- project plan (time, resource and cost planning)
- project organisation and interest groups
- changes, risks and problems in project work
- project communication and reporting
- concluding a project
Further information
The student is able to
- explain the character of project work and determine when the project work model is useful
- present the basic knowledge and skills on the basis of which he/she can participate in project work and project planning
- explain concepts connected with projects, content of a project plan, project time planing and supervising (life circle)
- present tasks connected with the different phases of the project cycle
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1-2 :
The student knows the main project management concepts and methods . He is able to make a project plan , and he has an understanding of the project implementation and management.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3-4
The student knows well the main project concepts and management techniques . He is able to do different kind of project plans , and he has a good understanding of the project implementation and management.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
5 :
The student knows perfectly the main project concepts and methods. He is able to do different kind of project plans and analyze them. He a very good understanding of the project implementation and management and leadership.
Assessment methods and criteria
Project management and planning skills
Knowledge of concepts
Knowledge of the course and progress of the project
Project analysis and management skills
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
18.03.2024 - 21.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student is able to
- explain the character of project work and determine when the project work model is useful
- present the basic knowledge and skills on the basis of which he/she can participate in project work and project planning
- explain concepts connected with projects, content of a project plan, project time planing and supervising (life circle)
- present tasks connected with the different phases of the project cycle
Content
- concepts and methods of project work
- project phases and process
- project plan (time, resource and cost planning)
- project organisation and interest groups
- changes, risks and problems in project work
- project communication and reporting
- concluding a project
Materials
A textbook in project management and Project management competence 3.0 ( http://www.pry.fi/UserFiles/33fa4818-2dbf-44aa-a497-0e74914327b1/Web/IPMA-sertifiointi/ENG/PMAF_NCB_3.0_v1.3.pdf )
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1-2 :
The student knows the main project management concepts and methods . He is able to make a project plan , and he has an understanding of the project implementation and management.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3-4
The student knows well the main project concepts and management techniques . He is able to do different kind of project plans , and he has a good understanding of the project implementation and management.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
5 :
The student knows perfectly the main project concepts and methods. He is able to do different kind of project plans and analyze them. He a very good understanding of the project implementation and management and leadership.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Professional Studies in Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
KONE21
-
AUTO21
-
IEPIP23International Professional Studies
Objective
The student is able to understand the fundamental concepts of quality as a tool of industrial and business environment.
Content
- Introduction to quality management. What does this concept include?
- Quality standards, ISO 9000 and its derivatives, Malcom Baldridge quality award.
- Quality evaluation tools;
- Pareto analysis
- fishbone diagram
- FMEA
- QFD
- balance score card
- the Deming quality cycle, PDCA
- overview to the pioneers of quality, W. Deming, K. Ishikawa, J. Juran
Materials
Barrie G. Dale. 2016. Managing Quality. Sixth Edition
Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching:lessons
Lessons include theory, exercises and tasks. In addition, independent studying will be required
Exam schedules
The options to complete the course will be explained at the beginning of the course
An optional exam will take place on the last lesson
Student workload
Estimated workload of a student: app. 81 hours
Classroom lessons: 21 hours
Further information
Material is in English
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can answer some of arbitrary questions about the contents described above. However, the student is not able to produce any deeper picture about the entire concept.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is clearly showing capability to understand the entire concept. He or she can give a comprehensive answer to any question related to contents.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to what is required for grade 3-4 the exercise, quality manual, must represent a complete and realistic description of a real quality manual.
Assessment methods and criteria
The tests and tasks affecting the grade
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 17.03.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- Student can define different quality ideologies.
- Student can explain the basic concept of quality control.
- Student can use the common quality and lean tools.
- Student can identify quality costs and their significance.
- Student can present different quality systems and their structure and criteria of different quality awards
Content
- Significance of quality
- The history of quality and overview to the pioneers of quality (Deming, Ishikawa, Juran etc.)
- Total Quality Management
- Seven quality management principles
- Seven basic tools of quality
- Cost of poor quality (COPQ)
- Principles of Lean
- Most essential Lean tools (Kaizen, 5S, Muda, Andon, VSM, Visual Factory etc.)
- Quality standards, quality manual and quality awards criteria
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2). Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
The student can answer some of arbitrary questions about the contents described above. However, the student is not able to produce any deeper picture about the entire concept.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4). Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well. The student is clearly showing capability to understand the entire concept. He or she can give a comprehensive answer to any question related to contents.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5). Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarkko Pakkanen
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will:
- be knowledgeable of various types of robots
- will be capable of inspecting robots and know how to use robots in factory automation and other areas where robotics are used.
- understand the structure, properties, co-ordinates of robots, as well as the peripheral devices used in robots.
- be competent in handling and programming industrial robots using online and offline methods of programming.
- be competent in designing and selecting robots and peripheral devices for the automatic handling of products.
Content
- Types of robots
- Mechanical structure of industrial robots
- Control systems, properties, coordinates and peripheral devices
- Handling an ABB-, Fanuc- and Yaskawa industrial robots, online and offline programming
- Features of collaborative robotics and programming of Universal Robots collaborative robots
- Mobile robotics applications and programming with Omron mobile robot
- Application of sensor technology and artificial intelligence in robotics. Application of machine vision in robotics.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1...2): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts in robotics. The student is able to program simple movement command to ABB robot.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3...4): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts in robotics. The student is able to program simple movement command to ABB robot. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge in basic laboratory exercises.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts in robotics. The student is able to program ABB and Motoman robots by using On- and Off-line programming methods.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
25.09.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarkko Pakkanen
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will:
- be knowledgeable of various types of robots
- will be capable of inspecting robots and know how to use robots in factory automation and other areas where robotics are used.
- understand the structure, properties, co-ordinates of robots, as well as the peripheral devices used in robots.
- be competent in handling and programming industrial robots using online and offline methods of programming.
- be competent in designing and selecting robots and peripheral devices for the automatic handling of products.
Content
- Types of robots
- Mechanical structure of industrial robots
- Control systems, properties, coordinates and peripheral devices
- Handling an ABB-, Fanuc- and Yaskawa industrial robots, online and offline programming
- Features of collaborative robotics and programming of Universal Robots collaborative robots
- Mobile robotics applications and programming with Omron mobile robot
- Application of sensor technology and artificial intelligence in robotics. Application of machine vision in robotics.
Materials
- Lecturer's material
- Demonstrations during lectures
- Assignments
- Product and programming manuals from importers
- Book: Teollisuuden Robotiikka. Suomen robotiikkayhdistys Ry (2023).
Teaching methods
Lectures, robot programming exercises in simulaltion environment, laboratory assignments with ABB, Fanuc, Yaskawa, Omron (mobile) and Universal robots.
Student workload
A total of 100 hours studying, which includes 20 hours of classroom education and 20 hours of laboratory assignments.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1...2): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts in robotics. The student is able to program simple movement command to ABB robot.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3...4): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts in robotics. The student is able to program simple movement command to ABB robot. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge in basic laboratory exercises.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student knows and understands to a basic concepts in robotics. The student is able to program ABB and Motoman robots by using On- and Off-line programming methods.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written examination (50%) and robot programming examination (50%).
The course grade scales between 1-5.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has completed the assignments/sections assigned approvingly. The student knows and mastered to a satisfactory degree the basic concepts and methods associated with the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has completed the assignments/sections and actively participated in the course. Students are familiar with the basic concepts and methods involved and are able to apply them when solving normal questions. He/She is able to combine what he/she has learned with his previous experience in the subject matter.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student has completed the assignments/sections and actively participated in the course. Students are familiar with the basic concepts and methods involved and are able to apply them when solving normal questions. He/She has demonstrated the ability to create new meanings and ideas within the framework of the subject, applying what he/she has previously learned.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
The students can communicate in Swedish both orally and in writing in working life situations. They are able to discuss field related topics in Swedish. They are able to develop their expertise using literature as well as other sources in Swedish.
Students:
- can tell about themselves, their education and work experience
- can write a cv and a job application and can handle job interviews
- can write work relevant messages (e.g. e-mails) and manages work related telephone conversations, company presentations and other spoken communication situations
- can use polite phrases
- knows the basic terminology of the field
Content
Telling about oneself and one´s studies
Job application, cv, job interview
Polite phrases and small talk
Basic written messages and spoken work life communication (e.g. company presentations, e-mails)
texts on field specific topics
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Also used: Pietilä: Kontakt - Teknisk svenska. Edita.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course. Oral exam face-to-face.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
81 h. Contact lessons + independent studying and training.
Further information
Compulsory attendance in lessons. Minimum attendance 80 %.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text . Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam, oral exam, exercises and attendance at contact lessons.
Students have to attend lessons, pass the exams and exercises.
Qualifications
B1 skill level
Further information
80 % attendance requidred
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
The students can communicate in Swedish both orally and in writing in working life situations. They are able to discuss field related topics in Swedish. They are able to develop their expertise using literature as well as other sources in Swedish.
Students:
- can tell about themselves, their education and work experience
- can write a cv and a job application and can handle job interviews
- can write work relevant messages (e.g. e-mails) and manages work related telephone conversations, company presentations and other spoken communication situations
- can use polite phrases
- knows the basic terminology of the field
Content
Telling about oneself and one´s studies
Job application, cv, job interview
Polite phrases and small talk
Basic written messages and spoken work life communication (e.g. company presentations, e-mails)
texts on field specific topics
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Also used: Pietilä: Kontakt - Teknisk svenska. Edita.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course. Oral exam face-to-face.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
81 h. Contact lessons + independent studying and training.
Further information
Compulsory attendance in lessons. Minimum attendance 80 %.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text . Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam, oral exam, exercises and attendance at contact lessons.
Students have to attend lessons, pass the exams and exercises.
Qualifications
B1 skill level
Further information
80 % attendance requidred
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
06.11.2023 - 21.01.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
The students can communicate in Swedish both orally and in writing in working life situations. They are able to discuss field related topics in Swedish. They are able to develop their expertise using literature as well as other sources in Swedish.
Students:
- can tell about themselves, their education and work experience
- can write a cv and a job application and can handle job interviews
- can write work relevant messages (e.g. e-mails) and manages work related telephone conversations, company presentations and other spoken communication situations
- can use polite phrases
- knows the basic terminology of the field
Content
Telling about oneself and one´s studies
Job application, cv, job interview
Polite phrases and small talk
Basic written messages and spoken work life communication (e.g. company presentations, e-mails)
texts on field specific topics
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Also used: Pietilä: Kontakt - Teknisk svenska. Edita.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course. Oral exam face-to-face.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
81 h. Contact lessons + independent studying and training.
Further information
Compulsory attendance in lessons. Minimum attendance 80 %.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text . Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam, oral exam, exercises and attendance at contact lessons.
Students have to attend lessons, pass the exams and exercises.
Qualifications
B1 skill level
Further information
80 % attendance requidred
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- creating free body diagrams of a particle and a rigid body, forming equations of equilibrium from them and solving unknown support reactions.
- calculating the normal forces, shear forces, bending moments and torsional moments of a beam and making corresponding loading diagrams.
- calculating the co-ordinates of the centre of gravity equilibrium point of a body.
- calculating the bar forces of plane trusses and the forces and momentums concentrated on beam structures.
- observing the impacts of friction on static structures.
Content
- Basic laws of mechanics
- Combining forces
- Momentum of force
- Supports
- Centre of gravity
- Equilibrium of a particle and a rigid body
- Stress and depictions of stress in beams
- Statics of structures
- Friction
- Working virtually
- Machines in mechanics
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 35 h
- of which autonomous studies: 45 h
Further information
Grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
A satisfactory grade is reached by solving at least two problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
A good grade is reached by solving at least three problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
An excellent grade is reached by solving a challening last problem at the examination and solving other problems correctly.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Vectors and matrices
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- creating free body diagrams of a particle and a rigid body, forming equations of equilibrium from them and solving unknown support reactions.
- calculating the normal forces, shear forces, bending moments and torsional moments of a beam and making corresponding loading diagrams.
- calculating the co-ordinates of the centre of gravity equilibrium point of a body.
- calculating the bar forces of plane trusses and the forces and momentums concentrated on beam structures.
- observing the impacts of friction on static structures.
Content
- Basic laws of mechanics
- Combining forces
- Momentum of force
- Supports
- Centre of gravity
- Equilibrium of a particle and a rigid body
- Stress and depictions of stress in beams
- Statics of structures
- Friction
- Working virtually
- Machines in mechanics
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 28 h
- of which autonomous studies: 52 h
Further information
Grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
A satisfactory grade is reached by solving at least two problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
A good grade is reached by solving at least three problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
An excellent grade is reached by solving a challening last problem at the examination and solving other problems correctly.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Vectors and matrices
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
12.02.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- creating free body diagrams of a particle and a rigid body, forming equations of equilibrium from them and solving unknown support reactions.
- calculating the normal forces, shear forces, bending moments and torsional moments of a beam and making corresponding loading diagrams.
- calculating the co-ordinates of the centre of gravity equilibrium point of a body.
- calculating the bar forces of plane trusses and the forces and momentums concentrated on beam structures.
- observing the impacts of friction on static structures.
Content
- Basic laws of mechanics
- Combining forces
- Momentum of force
- Supports
- Centre of gravity
- Equilibrium of a particle and a rigid body
- Stress and depictions of stress in beams
- Statics of structures
- Friction
- Working virtually
- Machines in mechanics
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 25 h
- of which autonomous studies: 55 h
Further information
Grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
A satisfactory grade is reached by solving at least two problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
A good grade is reached by solving at least three problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
An excellent grade is reached by solving a challening last problem at the examination and solving other problems correctly.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Vectors and matrices
Enrollment
01.09.2023 - 15.05.2024
Timing
01.09.2023 - 31.08.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Responsible person
Heikki Kokkonen
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- creating free body diagrams of a particle and a rigid body, forming equations of equilibrium from them and solving unknown support reactions.
- calculating the normal forces, shear forces, bending moments and torsional moments of a beam and making corresponding loading diagrams.
- calculating the co-ordinates of the centre of gravity equilibrium point of a body.
- calculating the bar forces of plane trusses and the forces and momentums concentrated on beam structures.
- observing the impacts of friction on static structures.
Content
- Basic laws of mechanics
- Combining forces
- Momentum of force
- Supports
- Centre of gravity
- Equilibrium of a particle and a rigid body
- Stress and depictions of stress in beams
- Statics of structures
- Friction
- Working virtually
- Machines in mechanics
Materials
- Kärkkäinen M. & Mikkonen P. Insinöörin mekaniikka.
- Outinen H. Statiikka tekniikan opiskelijoita varten I ja II.
- Lecture material
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
A satisfactory grade is reached by solving at least two problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
A good grade is reached by solving at least three problems of the five given at the examination.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
An excellent grade is reached by solving a challening last problem at the examination and solving other problems correctly.
Qualifications
Vectors and matrices
Enrollment
22.02.2024 - 15.05.2024
Timing
22.02.2024 - 15.05.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Järvi
- Pasi Junell
- Jarno Arkko
Responsible person
Jarno Arkko
Objective
After this course student knows how sustainable vehicle aftermarket sector works and ?understands how digitalization is affecting in it. Student can also comprehend how circular economy ?works in automotive aftermarket sector and how it connects to sustainability.
- Be able to evaluate repair shop processes and know the importance of customer service
- Be able to analyse various aspects of the circular economy in aftermarket sector
- Can suggest procedures for improving the quality and processes in a vehicle aftermarket sector
Student will also be able to point out different sustainability aspects in the terms of using ?different transportation systems. Student will understand how change in vehicle powertrains is reflecting to ?automotive aftersales functions, considering technological and economical aspects.
- Can analyse environmental issues concerning vehicle maintenance and end-of-life operations
- Be able to identify and explain common economic key indicators
- Know how to seek latest information about vehicle aftermarket sector, vehicle population management and legislation
Content
- Definition of aftermarket sector functions
- Aftermarket networks and business models
- Vehicle aftermarket legislation
- Aftermarket processes: Maintenance and repair shop, Inspection, End-of-life
- Customer service and satisfaction
- Quality of processes
- Infrastructure, equipment and data systems in an aftermarket company
- Cost calculations, profitability and rationalization
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Grasps basic concepts in sustainability and basic circular economy principles. Identify and analyze common issues in car maintenance and repair, proposing effective solutions that align with sustainable practices and minimize environmental impact.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Grasps basic concepts in sustainability and circular economy principles and is able to apply them effectively in most scenarios. Identify and analyze common issues in car maintenance and repair, proposing effective solutions that align with sustainable practices and minimize environmental impact.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Displays advanced knowledge, integrating complex sustainability concepts effectively. Applies innovative circular economy strategies adeptly in diverse car aftersales situations. Offers innovative, sustainable solutions for complex car maintenance challenges. Provides deep critical analysis of car aftersales cases, offering insightful and nuanced perspectives.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Junell
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling thermal and electrical phenomena
- be able to analyze the thermodynamic properties of materials and solid bodies with equilibrium models
- be able to interpret thermal and electrical laws as approximate empirical descriptions
- is able to analyze electrostatic interactions between electric fields and charged particles
- be able to solve even complicated DC circuits
- be able to identify electricity production and transmission processes, such as the use of three-phase power, transformer, generator and induction motor operation
- be able to evaluate his/her skills on thermal and electrical physics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies
Content
- Basics of thermal physics
- Electrostatics
- Direct current
- Alternating current
- Basics of magnetism
Materials
The material in Moodle
Lecture notes
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises, independent study
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h
- of which scheduled studies: 32 h
- of which autonomous studies: 49 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of both electricity and thermal physics. The student is able to apply electricity and thermal physics to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electricity and thermal physics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electricity and thermal physics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination
Qualifications
Mechanics
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 10.03.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling thermal and electrical phenomena
- be able to analyze the thermodynamic properties of materials and solid bodies with equilibrium models
- be able to interpret thermal and electrical laws as approximate empirical descriptions
- is able to analyze electrostatic interactions between electric fields and charged particles
- be able to solve even complicated DC circuits
- be able to identify electricity production and transmission processes, such as the use of three-phase power, transformer, generator and induction motor operation
- be able to evaluate his/her skills on thermal and electrical physics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies
Content
- Basics of thermal physics
- Electrostatics
- Direct current
- Alternating current
- Basics of magnetism
Materials
The material in Moodle
Lecture notes
Extra material
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises, independent study
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h
- of which scheduled studies: 20 h
- of which autonomous studies: 61 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of both electricity and thermal physics. The student is able to apply electricity and thermal physics to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electricity and thermal physics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electricity and thermal physics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination
Qualifications
Mechanics
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Alpo Anttonen
- Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand the essential concepts and calculation methods used in theoretical electrical engineering. They will acquire a general view of the possibilities of electronics in mechanical engineering applications. Students will know the more important components used in electronics and have command of the basic dimensioning and calculations of them.
Content
- Basics in electrical engineering and methods of calculation
- Basic structures and features of various types of motors
- Basic components of electronics: diodes, transistors, operation amplifiers and their operating principles, basic circuits in analog technology
Materials
Lecturer's material, online material and laboratory materials
Teaching methods
Lectures, laboratory exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course 108 h, of which
- scheduled lectures: 32 h
- Laboratory work: 24 h
- autonomous studies: 52 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2) The student knows the basics
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4) The student masters well the principles of essential concepts and calculation methods used in theoretical electrical engineering
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5):The student can utilize the learned skills in demanding project assignment
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and laboratory works
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Alpo Anttonen
- Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand the essential concepts and calculation methods used in theoretical electrical engineering. They will acquire a general view of the possibilities of electronics in mechanical engineering applications. Students will know the more important components used in electronics and have command of the basic dimensioning and calculations of them.
Content
- Basics in electrical engineering and methods of calculation
- Basic structures and features of various types of motors
- Basic components of electronics: diodes, transistors, operation amplifiers and their operating principles, basic circuits in analog technology
Materials
Lecturer's material, online material and laboratory materials
Teaching methods
Lectures, laboratory exercises
Student workload
Total work load of the course 108 h, of which
- scheduled lectures: 16 h
- Laboratory work: 15 h
- autonomous studies: 77 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2) The student knows the basics
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4) The student masters well the principles of essential concepts and calculation methods used in theoretical electrical engineering
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5):The student can utilize the learned skills in demanding project assignment
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Students are competent in basic percentage calculation. They know how to calculate simple and compound interests. Students apply various investment calculation. They know common statistical indicators and use them in the analysis of measurement results.
Content
Business mathematics
- Basic percentage calculations
- Simple and compound interest
- Methods of investiments
Statistics
- Statistical indicators
- Common statistical distributions
- Measurement errors and their management
Materials
material in the moodle
Teaching methods
lectures and exercises
Student workload
81 h
lectures and exercises 28 h
independent work 54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): The student knows the basics of simple calculation of interest and compound interest. They are able to calculate indicators needed in statistical analysis from measuring data.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): The student is able to use methods of calculation of interest to solve practical problems. They are able to use statistical analysis methods needed in the processing of measuring data.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student masters calculation of interest well and is able to use investment calculation methods in investment profitability calculations. They are able to search for information about statistical analysis methods to solve practical problems of different types.
Assessment methods and criteria
exam
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Students are competent in basic percentage calculation. They know how to calculate simple and compound interests. Students apply various investment calculation. They know common statistical indicators and use them in the analysis of measurement results.
Content
Business mathematics
- Basic percentage calculations
- Simple and compound interest
- Methods of investiments
Statistics
- Statistical indicators
- Common statistical distributions
- Measurement errors and their management
Materials
to be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
lectures and exercises
Student workload
81 h
lectures and exercises 28 h
independent work 54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): The student knows the basics of simple calculation of interest and compound interest. They are able to calculate indicators needed in statistical analysis from measuring data.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): The student is able to use methods of calculation of interest to solve practical problems. They are able to use statistical analysis methods needed in the processing of measuring data.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student masters calculation of interest well and is able to use investment calculation methods in investment profitability calculations. They are able to search for information about statistical analysis methods to solve practical problems of different types.
Assessment methods and criteria
exam
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Students are competent in basic percentage calculation. They know how to calculate simple and compound interests. Students apply various investment calculation. They know common statistical indicators and use them in the analysis of measurement results.
Content
Business mathematics
- Basic percentage calculations
- Simple and compound interest
- Methods of investiments
Statistics
- Statistical indicators
- Common statistical distributions
- Measurement errors and their management
Materials
The learning material is in the moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent study
Student workload
Lectures 15 h and independent study 66 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): The student knows the basics of simple calculation of interest and compound interest. They are able to calculate indicators needed in statistical analysis from measuring data.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): The student is able to use methods of calculation of interest to solve practical problems. They are able to use statistical analysis methods needed in the processing of measuring data.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student masters calculation of interest well and is able to use investment calculation methods in investment profitability calculations. They are able to search for information about statistical analysis methods to solve practical problems of different types.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- interpreting and using the standardised methods of technical drawing including standard scales, symbols and diagrams.
- utilising methods of illustration for mechanical drawings and creating the required projections of an object to be designed.
- using a three-dimensional, computer-aided designing (CAD) environment to create simple 3D models and standardised technical documents.
Content
- Concept of technical drawing
- Standardisation
- Projections
- Sectioning
- Dimensioning
- Assembly drawings
- 3D environments and simple models
Materials
- Hasari-Salonen: Teknillinen piirtäminen
- Pere: Koneenpiirustus 1&2
- Material provided during the lessons
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Drafting and Modeling exercises by CAD
- Assignments
- Indendent study
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 - 2): The student knows the basics of technical drawing and CAD. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning. The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of topics, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 -.4): The student is able to read technical drawings. The student is able to make CAD drawings related to the given assignments. The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of topics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is interpreting and using the standardised methods of technical drawing including standard scales, symbols and diagrams. He is utilising methods of illustration for mechanical drawings and creating the required projections of an object to be designed. The student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and exercises/assignments
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- interpreting and using the standardised methods of technical drawing including standard scales, symbols and diagrams.
- utilising methods of illustration for mechanical drawings and creating the required projections of an object to be designed.
- using a three-dimensional, computer-aided designing (CAD) environment to create simple 3D models and standardised technical documents.
Content
- Concept of technical drawing
- Standardisation
- Projections
- Sectioning
- Dimensioning
- Assembly drawings
- 3D environments and simple models
Materials
- Hasari-Salonen: Teknillinen piirtäminen
- Pere: Koneenpiirustus 1&2
- Material provided during the lessons
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Drafting and Modeling exercises by CAD
- Assignments
- Indendent study
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 - 2): The student knows the basics of technical drawing and CAD. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning. The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of topics, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 -.4): The student is able to read technical drawings. The student is able to make CAD drawings related to the given assignments. The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of topics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is interpreting and using the standardised methods of technical drawing including standard scales, symbols and diagrams. He is utilising methods of illustration for mechanical drawings and creating the required projections of an object to be designed. The student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and exercises/assignments
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
18.09.2023 - 05.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- interpreting and using the standardised methods of technical drawing including standard scales, symbols and diagrams.
- utilising methods of illustration for mechanical drawings and creating the required projections of an object to be designed.
- using a three-dimensional, computer-aided designing (CAD) environment to create simple 3D models and standardised technical documents.
Content
- Concept of technical drawing
- Standardisation
- Projections
- Sectioning
- Dimensioning
- Assembly drawings
- 3D environments and simple models
Materials
- Hasari-Salonen: Teknillinen piirtäminen
- Pere: Koneenpiirustus 1&2
- Material provided during the lessons
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Drafting and Modeling exercises by CAD
- Assignments
- Indendent study
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 - 2): The student knows the basics of technical drawing and CAD. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning. The student knows and understands to a basic concepts and methods of topics, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 -.4): The student is able to read technical drawings. The student is able to make CAD drawings related to the given assignments. The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of topics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student is interpreting and using the standardised methods of technical drawing including standard scales, symbols and diagrams. He is utilising methods of illustration for mechanical drawings and creating the required projections of an object to be designed. The student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and exercises/assignments
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- dimensioning an object to be designed and including the necessary standard symbols pertaining to surface roughness, tolerances, adapters, geometric tolerances and standard welding symbols, and making manufacturing drawings and assembly diagrams for machine parts using the symbols in question.
- using a three-dimensional, computer-aided environment to develop 3D CAD models of parts and assemblies and necessary design documents thereof.
Content
- Symbols for surface roughnes, welding and tolerances
- Assembly drawings
- 3D CAD environments
Materials
- Hasari-Salonen: Teknillinen piirtäminen
- Pere: Koneenpiirustus
- Material provided during the lessons
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Drafting exercises by CAD
- Assignments
- Indendent study
-Group exercise
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
32h assignments, preparing to exam
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 - 2)
Students are familiar with the standard machine drawing symbols and be able to model 3D workpieces.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 - 4)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and small assemblies.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding product design
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and exercises/assignments
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- dimensioning an object to be designed and including the necessary standard symbols pertaining to surface roughness, tolerances, adapters, geometric tolerances and standard welding symbols, and making manufacturing drawings and assembly diagrams for machine parts using the symbols in question.
- using a three-dimensional, computer-aided environment to develop 3D CAD models of parts and assemblies and necessary design documents thereof.
Content
- Symbols for surface roughnes, welding and tolerances
- Assembly drawings
- 3D CAD environments
Materials
- Hasari-Salonen: Teknillinen piirtäminen
- Pere: Koneenpiirustus
- Material provided during the lessons
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Drafting exercises by CAD
- Assignments
- Indendent study
-Group exercise
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
32h assignments, preparing to exam
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 - 2)
Students are familiar with the standard machine drawing symbols and be able to model 3D workpieces.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 - 4)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and small assemblies.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding product design
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and exercises/assignments
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 08.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jarno Arkko
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- dimensioning an object to be designed and including the necessary standard symbols pertaining to surface roughness, tolerances, adapters, geometric tolerances and standard welding symbols, and making manufacturing drawings and assembly diagrams for machine parts using the symbols in question.
- using a three-dimensional, computer-aided environment to develop 3D CAD models of parts and assemblies and necessary design documents thereof.
Content
- Symbols for surface roughnes, welding and tolerances
- Assembly drawings
- 3D CAD environments
Materials
- Hasari-Salonen: Teknillinen piirtäminen
- Pere: Koneenpiirustus
- Material provided during the lessons
Teaching methods
- Lectures
- Drafting exercises by CAD
- Assignments
- Indendent study
-Group exercise
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
32h assignments, preparing to exam
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1 - 2)
Students are familiar with the standard machine drawing symbols and be able to model 3D workpieces.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3 - 4)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and small assemblies.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding product design
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and exercises/assignments
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students understand the issues associated with a company's production economics. The student is able to
- define the basic concepts of business operations, different types of business concepts in different fields, operational and revenue generation models
- analyse the meaning and purpose of creating and planning new business
- analyse the meaning and purpose of the different functions of existing business
- produce a business plan at least a theoretical level either individually or in a team
Content
- Productivity, growth, profitability, liquidity and financial solidity
- Fundamental business costs
- Investment calculations, budgeting, key ratios
- Forms and sources of financing
- Materials management
- Fundamentals of marketing
- Quality as part of production and general operations
Materials
Uusi-Rauva, Haverila, Kouri & Miettinen 2009 Teollisuustalous, Infacts johtamistekniikka oy
Martinsuo, Mäkinen, Suomala ja Lyly-Yrjänäinen 2016 Teollisuustalous kehittyvässä liiketoiminnassa (1. edition or newer), Edita Publishing Oy
Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching:lessons
Lessons include theory, exercises and tasks. In addition, independent studying will be required
Exam schedules
The options to complete the course will be explained at the beginning of the course
An optional exam will take place on the last lesson
Student workload
Estimated workload of a student: app. 54 hours
Classroom lessons: 21 hours
Further information
A part of material and tasks might be in English
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to identify and define the basic concepts of business competence and examine business activities by means of these concepts.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to explain processes of business activities and produce examples and plans.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to assess and analyse by means of concepts what he/she has learned. The student is able to present and apply process management. The student is able to apply the business competence theories he/she has learned in a goal-oriented and realistic way.
Assessment methods and criteria
The tests and tasks affecting the grade
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
02.10.2023 - 19.11.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students understand the issues associated with a company's production economics. The student is able to
- define the basic concepts of business operations, different types of business concepts in different fields, operational and revenue generation models
- analyse the meaning and purpose of creating and planning new business
- analyse the meaning and purpose of the different functions of existing business
- produce a business plan at least a theoretical level either individually or in a team
Content
- Productivity, growth, profitability, liquidity and financial solidity
- Fundamental business costs
- Investment calculations, budgeting, key ratios
- Forms and sources of financing
- Materials management
- Fundamentals of marketing
- Quality as part of production and general operations
Materials
Uusi-Rauva, Haverila, Kouri & Miettinen 2009 Teollisuustalous, Infacts johtamistekniikka oy
Martinsuo, Mäkinen, Suomala ja Lyly-Yrjänäinen 2016 Teollisuustalous kehittyvässä liiketoiminnassa (1. edition or newer), Edita Publishing Oy
Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Online teaching: includes time dependent online teaching
The online teaching application used is Teams
Lessons include theory, exercises and tasks. In addition, independent studying will be required.
Exam schedules
The exam shall take place on the last lesson
Student workload
Estimated workload of a student: app. 54 hours
Online lessons: 15 hours + exam 2 hours
Further information
A part of material and tasks might be in English
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to identify and define the basic concepts of business competence and examine business activities by means of these concepts.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to explain processes of business activities and produce examples and plans.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to assess and analyse by means of concepts what he/she has learned. The student is able to present and apply process management. The student is able to apply the business competence theories he/she has learned in a goal-oriented and realistic way.
Assessment methods and criteria
The exam and tasks affecting the grade
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments
Content
Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises and independent work.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 45 h
- of which autonomous studies: 63 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination and trainings:
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments
Content
Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises and independent work.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 45 h
- of which autonomous studies: 63 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination and trainings:
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 19.11.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments
Content
Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright
Materials
- Field-related publications
- Lecturer's material
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises and independent work.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 25 h
- of which autonomous studies: 83 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.
Assessment methods and criteria
An examination and trainings:
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Juha Yli-Hemminki
Student groups
-
AUTE23BBachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Objective
- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments
Content
Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.
Enrollment
15.12.2023 - 21.04.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 31.05.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Raija Kangassalo
Objective
- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments
Content
Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright
Materials
Material assigned by the teacher in Moodle
Teaching methods
independent online study
Student workload
Student workload 108 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.
Assessment methods and criteria
Independent assingments, Moodle exams
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the mathematical functions in the Excel programme.
- understand the basics of the Matlab programme.
- be able to applying the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and practical problems in the working world.
Content
- Statistical indicators
- Graphic presentations
- Regressions
- Solvers
- Optimization
- Basics of the Matlab programme
- Matlab programming
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
lectures and exercices
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Mathcad test and exercises
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the mathematical functions in the Excel programme.
- understand the basics of the Matlab programme.
- be able to applying the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and practical problems in the working world.
Content
- Statistical indicators
- Graphic presentations
- Regressions
- Solvers
- Optimization
- Basics of the Matlab programme
- Matlab programming
Materials
to be announced
Teaching methods
lectures and independent study
Student workload
54h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
exercises
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the mathematical functions in the Excel programme.
- understand the basics of the Matlab programme.
- be able to applying the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and practical problems in the working world.
Content
- Statistical indicators
- Graphic presentations
- Regressions
- Solvers
- Optimization
- Basics of the Matlab programme
- Matlab programming
Materials
to be announced
Teaching methods
lectures and independent study
Student workload
54h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
exercises
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the mathematical functions in the Excel programme.
- understand the basics of the Matlab programme.
- be able to applying the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and practical problems in the working world.
Content
- Statistical indicators
- Graphic presentations
- Regressions
- Solvers
- Optimization
- Basics of the Matlab programme
- Matlab programming
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
lectures and exercices
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Mathcad test and exercises
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand the mathematical functions in the Excel programme.
- understand the basics of the Matlab programme.
- be able to applying the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and practical problems in the working world.
Content
- Statistical indicators
- Graphic presentations
- Regressions
- Solvers
- Optimization
- Basics of the Matlab programme
- Matlab programming
Materials
to be announced
Teaching methods
lectures and independent study
Student workload
54h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Excel and MATLAB, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
exercises
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
be familiar with the concepts associated with production management and the problematic, can be used by production management for future assignments.
Content
Supply-Chain management and ERP,
Production management,
Sales and Operations management,
Master Production Scheduling,
Manufacturing Resource Planning,
Inventory Management,
Introduction to production management system
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2) The student knows the basic concepts of production management and how to identify and analyse different production methods and their application in industry.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): The student masters the essentials of operations and production management. The student is able to analyse different production methods and their application in different industries.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student can utilize the learned skills in the exercises, exam and in the demo enterprise
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
12.02.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
be familiar with the concepts associated with production management and the problematic, can be used by production management for future assignments.
Content
Supply-Chain management and ERP,
Production management,
Sales and Operations management,
Master Production Scheduling,
Manufacturing Resource Planning,
Inventory Management,
Introduction to production management system
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2) The student knows the basic concepts of production management and how to identify and analyse different production methods and their application in industry.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): The student masters the essentials of operations and production management. The student is able to analyse different production methods and their application in different industries.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): The student can utilize the learned skills in the exercises, exam and in the demo enterprise
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- be knowledgeable of various production systems used in engineering shops.
- understand the principals and significance of flexible manufacturing.
- understand the significance of different manufacturing methods in production operations.
- be competent in applying varios manufacturing methods in practice.
- notices the arise of the cost and the effect to production system
Content
- Production in engineering shops
- Production flow
- Assembly
- Automation
- Tooling systems
- manufacturing costs
- Control
- Data processing systems
Materials
Lecture material and information
Kone- ja metalliteollisuuden tuotantojärjestelmä, Sanoma Pro Oy
Teaching methods
Lectures
Group study
Self study
Company visits
Student workload
Leture 45%
Self study and group work 45%
Company visits 10%
Content scheduling
- Production in engineering shops
- Production flow
- Assembly
- Automation
- Tooling systems
- Manufacturing costs
- Control
- Data processing systems
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- be knowledgeable of various production systems used in engineering shops.
- understand the principals and significance of flexible manufacturing.
- understand the significance of different manufacturing methods in production operations.
- be competent in applying varios manufacturing methods in practice.
- notices the arise of the cost and the effect to production system
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows how the production system works and is familiar with them.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the key factors influencing the operation of the production system, and shows the effect of applying their significance on production.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student is able to design a production system and demonstrate the ability to analyze the whole operation system.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Group study
Precence
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the operation of the production system and types
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the most central matters that affect a production system
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can design the production system
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- be knowledgeable of various production systems used in engineering shops.
- understand the principals and significance of flexible manufacturing.
- understand the significance of different manufacturing methods in production operations.
- be competent in applying varios manufacturing methods in practice.
- notices the arise of the cost and the effect to production system
Content
- Production in engineering shops
- Production flow
- Assembly
- Automation
- Tooling systems
- manufacturing costs
- Control
- Data processing systems
Materials
Lecture material and information
Kone- ja metalliteollisuuden tuotantojärjestelmät, Sanoma Pro Oy
Teaching methods
Lectures
Group study
Self study
Company visits
Student workload
Leture 45%
Self study and group work 45%
Company visit 10%
Content scheduling
- Production in engineering shops
- Production flow
- Assembly
- Automation
- Tooling systems
- Manufacturing costs
- Control
- Data processing systems
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- be knowledgeable of various production systems used in engineering shops.
- understand the principals and significance of flexible manufacturing.
- understand the significance of different manufacturing methods in production operations.
- be competent in applying varios manufacturing methods in practice.
- notices the arise of the cost and the effect to production system
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows how the production system works and is familiar with them.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the key factors influencing the operation of the production system, and shows the effect of applying their significance on production.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student is able to design a production system and demonstrate the ability to analyze the whole operation system.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam
Group study
Precence
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the operation of the production system and types
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the most central matters that affect a production system
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can design the production system
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 26.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- be competent in applying their knowledge and skills in production processes, production control and development of production systems.
- be capable of selecting suitable methods for production in engineering shops.
- be capable of further developing their skills in workshop technology.
- can solve manufacturing tehnology things at an engineering group work
Content
- Fastening components and working with materials that chip
- Sheet metal work
- Working with edging presses
- Methods used in welding
- FMS manufacturing
- Robotics in a machine shop
- 3D measuring in a machine shop
- Other important issues associated with machine shop manufacturing
Materials
The knowledge and the materials in previous courses
Teaching methods
Group study
Self study
Group presentations
Company visits
Student workload
Lectures 10%
Self study and group work 50%
Group presentations 30%
Company visits 10%
Content scheduling
workpiece fixtures and tooling
production systems and automation
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will
- can apply manufacturing, control and developing in production systems
- can choose suitable production methods on manufacturing
- can develope his technical knowledge
- can solve tehcnical manufacturing issues as an engineering group work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student is able to apply the production methods and functions of a machine shop in practice and show familiarity with them.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student is able to choose the most suitable production methods and functions for workshop use, and to show the effect of their application on production.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student is able to plan the operation of a machine shop as a process and demonstrate the ability to analyze the operation and goals of the manufacturing process.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can apply production methods
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can choose the best production method to use
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can plan and apply the production process
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- be competent in applying their knowledge and skills in production processes, production control and development of production systems.
- be capable of selecting suitable methods for production in engineering shops.
- be capable of further developing their skills in workshop technology.
- can solve manufacturing tehnology things at an engineering group work
Content
- Fastening components and working with materials that chip
- Sheet metal work
- Working with edging presses
- Methods used in welding
- FMS manufacturing
- Robotics in a machine shop
- 3D measuring in a machine shop
- Other important issues associated with machine shop manufacturing
Materials
The knowledge and the materials in previous courses
Teaching methods
Group study
Self study
Group presentations
Company visits
Student workload
Lectures 10%
Self study and group work 50%
Group presentations 30%
Company visits 10%
Content scheduling
workpiece fixtures and tooling
production systems and automation
Further information
Upon completion of the course, students will
- can apply manufacturing, control and developing in production systems
- can choose suitable production methods on manufacturing
- can develope his technical knowledge
- can solve tehcnical manufacturing issues as an engineering group work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student is able to apply the production methods and functions of a machine shop in practice and show familiarity with them.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student is able to choose the most suitable production methods and functions for workshop use, and to show the effect of their application on production.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student is able to plan the operation of a machine shop as a process and demonstrate the ability to analyze the operation and goals of the manufacturing process.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can apply production methods
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can choose the best production method to use
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student can plan and apply the production process
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
KONE21
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course students will be competent in:
- applying the stage-gate product process model in the development of a new product.
- identifying different methods of implementation for a matrix organisation
- utilising various methods to identify customer needs.
- converting customer needs in to product specifications.
- identifying the role of industrial design in the product process.
- analysing products in production using the DFMA method.
- using present value calculations to determine the costs of a product development project.
- recognising the significance of patents, trademarks, copyrights of design and trade names to the company.
Content
- Product process and organisation models
- Identifying customer needs
- Concept design and determining product specifications
- Industrial design
- Planning efficient manufacturing
- Prototypes in product development
- Cost management of a product development project
- Patents, trademarks, copyrights of design, trade names
- Development of a service product
- Product development in supplier company
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading:
Ulrich, Karl T., Steven D. Eppinger, ja Maria C. Yang. Product Design and Development. Seventh edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.
Teaching methods
lectures
exercises
presentations
information search
independent study
Student workload
Lectures ca. 42 h, exercises ca. 50 h and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the operation of product development and demonstrates familiarity with its significance.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the stages of the product development process, and demonstrates competence in the operation of the stages and the application of objectives.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student is able to plan the product development process as a whole and is able to analyze its impact on the company.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises 70 %, exam 30 %
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 17.03.2024
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course students will be competent in:
- applying the stage-gate product process model in the development of a new product.
- identifying different methods of implementation for a matrix organisation
- utilising various methods to identify customer needs.
- converting customer needs in to product specifications.
- identifying the role of industrial design in the product process.
- analysing products in production using the DFMA method.
- using present value calculations to determine the costs of a product development project.
- recognising the significance of patents, trademarks, copyrights of design and trade names to the company.
Content
- Product process and organisation models
- Identifying customer needs
- Concept design and determining product specifications
- Industrial design
- Planning efficient manufacturing
- Prototypes in product development
- Cost management of a product development project
- Patents, trademarks, copyrights of design, trade names
- Development of a service product
- Product development in supplier company
Materials
Lecture material
Additional reading:
Ulrich, Karl T., Steven D. Eppinger, ja Maria C. Yang. Product Design and Development. Seventh edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Exercises
Presentations
Self-study
Student workload
Lectures ca. 32 h, exercises ca. 60 h and independent study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: The student knows the operation of product development and demonstrates familiarity with its significance.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: The student knows the stages of the product development process, and demonstrates competence in the operation of the stages and the application of objectives.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student is able to plan the product development process as a whole and is able to analyze its impact on the company.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises, exam
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 27.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTO20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
30.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
Materials
Isaacs - Pesso - Rasimus - Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Latest edition.
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching
Student workload
81 h
Further information
Compulsory attendance in the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1:
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2:
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
If oral presentation is read directly from notes or slides the maximum grade will be 2.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3:
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument. Text is mainly comprehensible.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4:
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam, spoken presentation
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 20.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
Materials
Isaacs - Pesso - Rasimus - Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Latest edition.
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching
Student workload
81 h
Further information
Compulsory attendance in the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1:
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2:
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
If oral presentation is read directly from notes or slides the maximum grade will be 2.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3:
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument. Text is mainly comprehensible.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4:
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam and spoken presentation
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
29.01.2024 - 07.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
0.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
Materials
Isaacs - Pesso - Rasimus - Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Latest edition.
Teaching methods
Distance teaching
Student workload
81 h
Further information
Functioning headset obligatory
Compulsory attendance in the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1:
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2:
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
If oral presentation is read directly from notes or slides the maximum grade will be 2.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3:
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument. Text is mainly comprehensible.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4:
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam and spoken presentation
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
16 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Roni Kuru
- Jarno Arkko
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
AUTO20
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand the concepts associated with the dimensioning, servicing, and troubleshooting of farming equipment and machinery.
Content
Students will investigate and measure the sources of power, components, hydraulics, ergonomics, power transmission and vehicle heaters. They will also make a field trip.
Materials
- Material pertaining to automotive and work machine technology
- Repair shop manuals
- Equipment and settings manuals
Teaching methods
Laboratory work and reports
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1-2: Student knows the basics of the knowledge objectives of the course.
.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3-4: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: Student knows the knowledge objectives of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved lab work and reports: 50/50
Qualifications
Mobile work machines, Farming machinery engineering
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anne Vuokila
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student knows the basic grammatical structures and essential daily vocabulary.
The student is able to find information on the language.
Content
- the most essential grammatical structures
- key daily vocabulary
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching and independent studies using the material provided through Moodle.
Exam schedules
Exam at the end of the course.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has a one-sided command of the basic vocabulary and grammar.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has a fairly good command of the vocabulary of standard language. The student uses basic structures of the language almost without mistakes.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has a good command of vocabulary and uses structures fluently.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam and active participation in lessons.
Qualifications
Not needed
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
The student knows the basic grammatical structures and the most central daily vocabulary.
The student is able to find information on the language.
Content
- the most central grammatical structures
- the most central daily vocabulary
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
54 h.
Necessary amount of Independent studying and training in addition to the contact lessons.
Further information
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has a one-sided command of the basic vocabulary and grammar.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has a fairly good command of the vocabulary of standard language. The student uses basic structures of the language almost without mistakes.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has a good command of vocabulary and uses structures fluently.
Assessment methods and criteria
The course is assessed pass/fail.
Written exam and exercises.
Students have to pass the exam and exercises.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 22.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Tiina Välimäki
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Students are able to
- plan their studies in accordance with their own career plans
- develop their job seeking skills in different ways
- identify their own career opportunities
- anticipate the changing needs of working life
- identify the effects of multiculturalism and globalisation on working life and interaction
- function in an international operational environment and make use of international networks
- plan their personal internationalisation in studies and working life
Content
- rules of working life and working life skills
- anticipating the needs of future working life
- career planning and job seeking skills
- goal-oriented planning of studies from the viewpoint of the student’s own career plans
- personal internationalisation planning
- opportunities of study and training abroad
- international operational environment and multiculturalism
- international networks
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, group work, presentations, online learning, guided exercises
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass: The student participates in the classes of the course and shows the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class and/or by completing the required course assignments.
Fail: The student does not reach the learning outcomes of the course and is not able to show required knowledge and skills
Assessment methods and criteria
Completing assignments and exercises
Attendance in lessons
Qualifications
Course: Studying in an University of Applied Sciences
Recommended optional programme components:
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 22.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Tiina Välimäki
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Students are able to
- plan their studies in accordance with their own career plans
- develop their job seeking skills in different ways
- identify their own career opportunities
- anticipate the changing needs of working life
- identify the effects of multiculturalism and globalisation on working life and interaction
- function in an international operational environment and make use of international networks
- plan their personal internationalisation in studies and working life
Content
- rules of working life and working life skills
- anticipating the needs of future working life
- career planning and job seeking skills
- goal-oriented planning of studies from the viewpoint of the student’s own career plans
- personal internationalisation planning
- opportunities of study and training abroad
- international operational environment and multiculturalism
- international networks
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, group work, presentations, online learning, guided exercises
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass: The student participates in the classes of the course and shows the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class and/or by completing the required course assignments.
Fail: The student does not reach the learning outcomes of the course and is not able to show required knowledge and skills
Assessment methods and criteria
Completing assignments and exercises
Attendance in lessons
Qualifications
Course: Studying in an University of Applied Sciences
Recommended optional programme components:
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
21.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lager
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Students are able to
- plan their studies in accordance with their own career plans
- develop their job seeking skills in different ways
- identify their own career opportunities
- anticipate the changing needs of working life
- identify the effects of multiculturalism and globalisation on working life and interaction
- function in an international operational environment and make use of international networks
- plan their personal internationalisation in studies and working life
Content
- rules of working life and working life skills
- anticipating the needs of future working life
- career planning and job seeking skills
- goal-oriented planning of studies from the viewpoint of the student’s own career plans
- personal internationalisation planning
- opportunities of study and training abroad
- international operational environment and multiculturalism
- international networks
Materials
Online material will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Contact lessons: lectures
Independent e-learning: exercises and tasks
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass: The student participates in the classes of the course and shows the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class and/or by completing the required course assignments.
Fail: The student does not reach the learning outcomes of the course and is not able to show required knowledge and skills
Assessment methods and criteria
- Active participation in lessons
- Moodle assignments and tests
Qualifications
Course: Studying in an University of Applied Sciences
Recommended optional programme components:
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- understand the basics of manufacturing technology.
- be knowledgeable of the machines and tools used in engineering shops.
- be competent in selecting suitable manufacturing methods.
Content
- Metal manufacturing
- Welding
- Casting
- Powder metallurgy
- Methods of shaping
- Machining methods that remove substances from the surface of components
- Sheet metal work
- Coating
- Quality and measuring
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1 - 2: The student knows the manufacturing methods of the workshop
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3 - 4: The student can choose manufacturing methods suitable into use
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design a part of the manufacturing method
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
- Janne Perälä
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- understand the basics of manufacturing technology.
- be knowledgeable of the machines and tools used in engineering shops.
- be competent in selecting suitable manufacturing methods.
Content
- Metal manufacturing
- Welding
- Casting
- Powder metallurgy
- Methods of shaping
- Machining methods that remove substances from the surface of components
- Sheet metal work
- Coating
- Quality and measuring
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1 - 2: The student knows the manufacturing methods of the workshop
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3 - 4: The student can choose manufacturing methods suitable into use
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design a part of the manufacturing method
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
14.09.2023 - 02.11.2023
Timing
13.11.2023 - 18.02.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Yli-Suomu
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will,
- understand the basics of manufacturing technology.
- be knowledgeable of the machines and tools used in engineering shops.
- be competent in selecting suitable manufacturing methods.
Content
- Metal manufacturing
- Welding
- Casting
- Powder metallurgy
- Methods of shaping
- Machining methods that remove substances from the surface of components
- Sheet metal work
- Coating
- Quality and measuring
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Level 1 - 2: The student knows the manufacturing methods of the workshop
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Level 3 - 4: The student can choose manufacturing methods suitable into use
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Level 5: The student can design a part of the manufacturing method
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- doing 3D vector calculations.
- using vectors to solve problems pertaining to space geometry.
- solving equations of a straight line.
- utilising linear optimization.
- doing matrix algebra
- using calculation tools.
- utilising the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and in the working world.
Content
- Addition of vector
- Unit vectors
- Scalar product and cross product
- Scalar component and vector component
- Scalar triple product
- Vectors in statics
- Equation of a straight line
- Linear optimization
- Matrix algebra
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises 35 h, independent study
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 35 h
- of which autonomous studies: 45 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to usual problems
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Leo Sippola
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- doing 3D vector calculations.
- using vectors to solve problems pertaining to space geometry.
- solving equations of a straight line.
- utilising linear optimization.
- doing matrix algebra
- using calculation tools.
- utilising the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and in the working world.
Content
- Addition of vector
- Unit vectors
- Scalar product and cross product
- Scalar component and vector component
- Scalar triple product
- Vectors in statics
- Equation of a straight line
- Linear optimization
- Matrix algebra
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises 35 h, independent study
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 35 h
- of which autonomous studies: 45 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to usual problems
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
27.11.2023 - 11.02.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heikki Kokkonen
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- doing 3D vector calculations.
- using vectors to solve problems pertaining to space geometry.
- solving equations of a straight line.
- utilising linear optimization.
- doing matrix algebra
- using calculation tools.
- utilising the above-mentioned methods in their Professional Studies and in the working world.
Content
- Addition of vector
- Unit vectors
- Scalar product and cross product
- Scalar component and vector component
- Scalar triple product
- Vectors in statics
- Equation of a straight line
- Linear optimization
- Matrix algebra
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises 16 h, independent study
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 81 h
- of which scheduled studies: 15 h
- of which autonomous studies: 66 h
Further information
grades 1 - 5
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to usual problems
Assessment criteria, good (3)
good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Algebra and Trigonometry
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 12.11.2023
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
16 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Heli Simon
- Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
- Juholin, E. (2022). Communicare! Ota viestinnän ilmiöt ja strategiat haltuun (8. uud. p.). Infor / Management Institute of Finland MIF.
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work https://seamk.libguides.com/KirjallistenToidenOhje
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielijelppi http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Opintokeskus Sivis https://www.kokouskaytannot.fi/
Teaching methods
Hybrid learning, contact lessons and Teams lessons
Independent study: data acquisition and exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exams
Exam schedules
Exam and assignment times will be announced during the course.
Student workload
108 h, including 18 h contact learning / Teams-learning
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written and spoken assignments
Online exams
Active participation in the assignments and submitting the assignments on time
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Samuel Suvanto
Student groups
-
MKONE20
-
KONE20
-
AUTO20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will
- understand phenomena pertaining to vibration and their significance in mechanical engineering.
- undesrstand basics of using of FEM software in dynamic analyses of structures.
In addition student will strengthen design and machine safety competences.
Content
- mathematical illustrations of vibration
- vibrations of one degree of freedom
- vibrations of many degrees of freedom
- natural frequencies and natural modes
- damping
Materials
Lecture material
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Completion alternatives
Dependent on the current circumstances course will be arranged via Teams-sessions such that distance-learning is possible.
Student workload
Will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (1-2): Student understands phenomena related to subject in general level. Student is able to answer to theory questions related to subject. Student is also able to identify and analyze the most relevant formulas related to subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3-4): Student is able to answer correctly to theory questions related to subject. In addition student knows how to apply calculation formulas to real life calculation problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Student understands the phenomena related to subject and is able to apply calculation methods to real life dimensioning problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Examination and exercises
Qualifications
Strength of Materials 1, Matrix algebra, Finite-element method
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
KONE23BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
KONE23ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student
• Masters the main features of entrepreneurial competencies, recognises their own entrepreneurial competencies and attitudes, as well as recognises the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their actions and interaction
• Can name and define the phases of setting up a business
• Recognises, from the perspective of their business idea, the key customers, and their role for profitable business
• Knows and can name entrepreneurship-related opportunities at SeAMK, and related support services.
Content
• Personal entrepreneurial competencies, such as self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation values, tolerance for ambiguity, and the importance of one’s own attitudes for choices
• Value production in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts and revenue model of entrepreneurship and business activity, economic literacy, risk management
• Phases of business establishment
• Business plan as a tool for the structuration of a business idea
• Business activity as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Familiarization with the entrepreneurship services provided by SeAMK
Materials
Online material in moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures, group work, online studies
Student workload
- contact teaching and guided exercises 20 h
- independent study 60 h
Content scheduling
- entrepreneurship, meaning of entrepreneurship at the individual level
- business operations in the student's own field
- main principles of legislation regulating business operations
- presentation of the business concepts of SeAMK
- presentations of organizations supporting business operations
- entrepreneur profiles
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service
Assessment methods and criteria
Online assignments and group assignment.
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 03.03.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jussi Yli-Hukkala
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student
• Masters the main features of entrepreneurial competencies, recognises their own entrepreneurial competencies and attitudes, as well as recognises the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their actions and interaction
• Can name and define the phases of setting up a business
• Recognises, from the perspective of their business idea, the key customers, and their role for profitable business
• Knows and can name entrepreneurship-related opportunities at SeAMK, and related support services.
Content
• Personal entrepreneurial competencies, such as self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation values, tolerance for ambiguity, and the importance of one’s own attitudes for choices
• Value production in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts and revenue model of entrepreneurship and business activity, economic literacy, risk management
• Phases of business establishment
• Business plan as a tool for the structuration of a business idea
• Business activity as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Familiarization with the entrepreneurship services provided by SeAMK
Materials
Online material in moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures, group work, online studies
Student workload
- contact teaching and guided exercises 20 h
- independent study 60 h
Content scheduling
- entrepreneurship, meaning of entrepreneurship at the individual level
- business operations in the student's own field
- main principles of legislation regulating business operations
- presentation of the business concepts of SeAMK
- presentations of organizations supporting business operations
- entrepreneur profiles
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service
Assessment methods and criteria
Online assignments and group assignment.