Introduction to Research and DevelopmentLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: YPO1C2
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 28.04.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 30.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
SOS24ABachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Vilkka Hanna. Tutki ja mittaa.
Material provided by the teacher.
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
Total 52 h
- 1h contact (orientation)
- 51 h of independent e-learning.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
All assignments must be passed (100%) in order to complete the course.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 28.04.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 30.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
MSOS24KBachelor of Social Services, Multimodal implementation
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Vilkka Hanna. Tutki ja mittaa.
Material provided by the teacher.
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
Total 52 h
- 1h contact (orientation)
- 51 h of independent e-learning.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
All assignments must be passed (100%) in order to complete the course.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
02.09.2024 - 15.12.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
Teachers
- Kaija Nissinen
Student groups
-
RESTO23Bachelor of Hospitality Management, Full-time studies
-
MRESTO24Bachelor of Hospitality Management, Part-time studies
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Student workload
54 h, of which independent studying 46 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Tehtävien suorittaminen hyväksytysti
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
TITE21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTE21KA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTE21SA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 19.01.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Margit Närvä
Student groups
-
BIELI23Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology, Full-time studies
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Content scheduling
54 h,
independent studying 48h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
KUTU22
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Kananen, J. (2008). Kvali: Kvalitatiivisen tutkimuksen teoria ja käytänteet. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu, liiketalous : Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun kirjasto [jakaja].
Heikkilä, T. (2014). Tilastollinen tutkimus (9. uudistettu painos.). Edita.
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T., & Ritalahti, J. (2009). Kehittämistyön menetelmät: Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. WSOYpro.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 29.09.2024
Timing
16.09.2024 - 24.11.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 06.09.2024
Timing
16.09.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
MLITA23Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management, Multimodal implementation
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Kananen, J. (2008). Kvali: Kvalitatiivisen tutkimuksen teoria ja käytänteet. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu, liiketalous : Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun kirjasto [jakaja].
Heikkilä, T. (2014). Tilastollinen tutkimus (9. uudistettu painos.). Edita.
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T., & Ritalahti, J. (2009). Kehittämistyön menetelmät: Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. WSOYpro.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 20.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
LITA23BBachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
-
LITA23ABachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Kananen, J. (2008). Kvali: Kvalitatiivisen tutkimuksen teoria ja käytänteet. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu, liiketalous : Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun kirjasto [jakaja].
Heikkilä, T. (2014). Tilastollinen tutkimus (9. uudistettu painos.). Edita.
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T., & Ritalahti, J. (2009). Kehittämistyön menetelmät: Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. WSOYpro.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
24.04.2024 - 15.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Samu Palander
Student groups
-
MAGRO23Bachelor of Natural Resources
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 20.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
LITA23CBachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
-
LITA23DTradenomi (AMK), Liiketalous
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Kananen, J. (2008). Kvali: Kvalitatiivisen tutkimuksen teoria ja käytänteet. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu, liiketalous : Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun kirjasto [jakaja].
Heikkilä, T. (2014). Tilastollinen tutkimus (9. uudistettu painos.). Edita.
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T., & Ritalahti, J. (2009). Kehittämistyön menetelmät: Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. WSOYpro.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 28.04.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 29.11.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 80
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
SOS23CBachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
-
SOS23BBachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
The course is assessed on a pass-fail scale.
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
19.08.2024 - 17.11.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
MAUTE21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Understands the principles and key concepts of development and research, and is able to analyse information at a basic level. Can construct an adequate research plan at a basic level, on the basis of which development or research work can be carried out.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Demonstrates an in-depth understanding and ability to apply theories and concepts. Can evaluate and critique information and present reasoned opinions. Can construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, showing a thorough understanding of the subject under consideration.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of research theory and innovation in the application of theories. Also demonstrates excellent analytical and evaluative skills, combining depth and innovative independent thinking. Is able to construct a research plan on the basis of which a development or research project can be carried out, demonstrating a deep understanding of and innovation in the subject area under consideration.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 17.01.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
MRKM22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- contact lessons
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
Teachers
- Samu Palander
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
AGRO22TABachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
-
AGRO22PRBachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- contact lessons
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
11.03.2024 - 23.04.2024
Timing
06.05.2024 - 06.06.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
VVO
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 20.04.2023
Timing
04.03.2024 - 17.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
SOS23A
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 23.02.2024
Timing
01.03.2024 - 26.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
MPK23
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
16.01.2024 - 17.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
MGERO22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RKM21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
28.08.2023 - 07.09.2023
Timing
08.01.2024 - 31.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
MGERO23Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology,Multimodal implementation
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 11.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 04.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
0.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
Teachers
- Katriina Kuhalampi
Student groups
-
TH23
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 20.04.2023
Timing
08.01.2024 - 01.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
MSOS23KDegree Programme in Social Services
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
RD proportion (cr)
0.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
Teachers
- Kaija Nissinen
Student groups
-
RESTO22
-
MRESTO23Degree Programme in Food and Hospitality, Part-time studies
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Student workload
54 h, of which independent studying 46 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
Teachers
- Samu Palander
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
MAGRO22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 15.01.2024
Timing
01.01.2024 - 17.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
SH23K
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä
- Tutkimus hoitotieteessä, 2017, https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/978-952-63-0148-8
- Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, 2017, https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789520400118
- Tilastollinen tutkimus, 2014, https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/978-951-37-6495-1
- Tutkiva hoitotyö -julkaisuartikkelit-
Teaching methods
- Theory lectures and research methods practices
Student workload
-27h/ECT
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Evaluation: passed /failed, according to qurriculum
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
13.11.2023 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
MSH23K
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
-
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 29.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTE20KA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTE20SA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 31.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Margit Närvä
Student groups
-
BIELI22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Content scheduling
54 h,
independent studying 48h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
KITI22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 14.09.2023
Timing
25.09.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
MLITA22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
LITA22B
-
LITA22A
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
LITA22D
-
LITA22C
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 31.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
MSH22SB
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
-
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
KUTU21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 20.04.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 27.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 80
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
SOS22C
-
SOS22B
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
30.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
Teachers
- Samu Palander
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
AGRO21TAAgrologi (AMK)
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
30.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Samu Palander
Student groups
-
AGRO21PRAgrologi (AMK)
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RAK20SU
-
RAK20TU
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 31.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
MSH22SA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
-
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 28.08.2023
Timing
14.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
MRAK20SUDegree Programme in Construction Engineering
-
MRAK20TUDegree Programme in Construction Engineering
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 20.04.2023
Timing
01.08.2023 - 31.12.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
MSOS22SV
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course onlineorientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2022 - 21.04.2022
Timing
20.03.2023 - 17.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
SOS21B
-
SOS21C
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2022 - 21.04.2022
Timing
06.03.2023 - 26.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 36
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
SOS22A
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 22.02.2023
Timing
06.03.2023 - 14.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Kaija Nissinen
Student groups
-
MBIELI22
-
MRESTO22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Content scheduling
54 h,
independent studying 48h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
13.02.2023 - 23.04.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
SH21S
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 20.01.2023
Timing
01.02.2023 - 31.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
MPK22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
23.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 36
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
MGERO21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Vilkka Hanna. Tutki ja mittaa.
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.12.2022 - 15.03.2023
Timing
16.01.2023 - 31.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 12.02.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
16 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
-
RKM20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
written learning assignments
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 30.04.2023
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Kaija Nissinen
Student groups
-
BIELI21
-
RESTO21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Student workload
54 h, of which independent studying 48 h
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 31.12.2022
Timing
09.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
TH22
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2022 - 21.04.2022
Timing
09.01.2023 - 10.03.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Pirita Hakoneva
Student groups
-
SOS21B
-
SOS21C
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
29.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Timing
02.01.2023 - 19.03.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
SH22K
-
SH22S
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
02.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
MSH22K
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 01.11.2022
Timing
24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTE19KA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 27.10.2022
Timing
24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AUTE19SA
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 12.10.2022
Timing
24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
KUTU20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 12.10.2022
Timing
24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
Teachers
- Ari Haasio
Student groups
-
KITI21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2022 - 21.04.2022
Timing
10.10.2022 - 31.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 37
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
MSOS22K
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 12.10.2022
Timing
03.10.2022 - 20.11.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Margit Närvä
Student groups
-
MBIELI21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Content scheduling
54 h,
independent studying 48h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022
Timing
26.09.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
MSH21S
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022
Timing
05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
LITA21A
-
LITA21B
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022
Timing
05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
LITA21C
-
LITA21D
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 28.08.2022
Timing
05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
MLITA21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.05.2022 - 15.10.2022
Timing
01.09.2022 - 31.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 16.10.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
15 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
-
RAK19TU
-
RAK19SU
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
written learning assignments
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.04.2022 - 30.09.2022
Timing
01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
16 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
MRKM20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.10.2021 - 31.01.2022
Timing
21.03.2022 - 25.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
KITI20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
26.04.2021 - 02.05.2021
Timing
21.03.2022 - 13.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
SOS20B
-
SOS20C
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
26.04.2021 - 02.05.2021
Timing
14.03.2022 - 27.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
SOS21A
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
07.02.2022 - 03.04.2022
Timing
07.03.2022 - 29.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
MAUTE19
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2021 - 06.03.2022
Timing
07.03.2022 - 15.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Food and Hospitality
Teachers
- Kaija Nissinen
Responsible person
Jukka Kauppila
Student groups
-
MRESTO21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Exam schedules
Will be announced in the beginning of the course
Student workload
54 h,
of which independent studying 48 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
01.05.2021 - 14.02.2022
Timing
07.02.2022 - 13.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
MGERO20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.10.2021 - 07.01.2022
Timing
29.01.2022 - 25.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Student groups
-
MPK21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.12.2021 - 15.03.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 31.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Open University of Applied Sciences
Teachers
- Hannu Tuuri
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- network
Student workload
55 hours of student work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- examinations in Moodle
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
26.04.2021 - 02.05.2021
Timing
10.01.2022 - 25.02.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Hilkka Latva-Somppi
Student groups
-
SOS20B
-
SOS20C
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Network-materials in Moodle.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara. Tutki ja kirjoita.
Heikkilä Tarja. Tilastollinen tutkimus.
Metsämuuronen. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
Tuomi & Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
Salonen, Kari et.al. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämistoiminnan menetelmiä ammatillisessa koulutuksessa
Teaching methods
Network course.
Student workload
52 hours of student work, of which 1 hours course orientation -lesson and 51 hours independent work.
Content scheduling
Orientation in the beginning of course, 2 hours.
Independent work in the Moodle for two-week periods.
Further information
The Students must remain on schedule. Two weeks assignments are returned to the Moodle before the next assignments are opened.
If student doesn´t remain on schedule, he/she will be removed from the course.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of Students' work made in e-learning platform.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
03.12.2021 - 23.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 27.02.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RKM19
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
Lectures and guided work and independent work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 11.04.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Margit Närvä
Responsible person
Margit Närvä
Student groups
-
BIELI20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Content scheduling
54 h,
independent studying 46h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
19.04.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 06.03.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Food and Hospitality
Teachers
- Kaija Nissinen
Responsible person
Jukka Kauppila
Student groups
-
RESTO20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- SeUAS Thesis guidelines
- SeUAS Instructions for written work
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Exercises in Moodle and lessons
Student workload
54 h,
of which independent studying 46 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate his/her competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
01.05.2021 - 16.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 31.07.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
SH20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009 tai uudempi. Tutki ja kirjoita.
- Heikkilä Tarja 2014. Tilastollinen tutkimus. 9. uudistettu painos.
- Metsämuuronen 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä.
- Tuomi & Sarajärvi (2002, 2009) 2013. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi.
- Materials in Moodlessa.
Teaching methods
Lectures and learning tasks independently and in groups (in Moodle and in lectures)
Student workload
20 hours of contact lectures and 32 hours of independent work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Completing learning tasks and ctive participation during the lectures
Qualifications
No prerequisites