Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Name of the Degree Programme
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management, 60 etcts
Field of study
Engineering, manufacturing and construction
The classification of the educational field is based on the international ISCED classification used by the Ministry of Education and Culture.
Specialisations
There are no lines of specialization in this degree programme.
Qualification awarded
The Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management is a university of applied sciences degree with close ties to the working life. The Programme grants graduates the same qualifications for job positions in the public sector as a master's in an academic university.
Degree: Master of Engineering
Level of qualification
The degree programme leads to a higher education degree which is a second cycle Master-level degree in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). According to the eight-level classification of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) the degree represents level 7.
The description of the level of the Degree is included in the Statute, at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120
Specific admission requirements
Please see the websites www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku.
On the websites, application and instructions are in Finnish language for the degree programmes taught in Finnish.
Eligibility for studies at a university of applied sciences is stipulated in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014.
The selection criteria are specified in the data of the Degree Programme at www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku
Qualification requirements and regulations (incl. graduation requirements)
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Examination regulations, assessment and grading
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Link
Structure of the studies
In accordance with the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the studies of a Degree Programme consist of advanced professional studies, free elective studies, and a final project/thesis. The extent of the studies is 60 credits.
Profile of the programme
The purpose of the programme is to enhance students' professional expertise with adequate theoretical knowledge and to combine the development of training and the working life. The programme grants students the same qualifications for job positions in the public sector as a master's in an academic university.
The programme is intended for engineers working in technology companies and organisations who wish to develop their skills in leadership and expertise and who aim to advance in their career. The purpose of the programme is also to expand and enhance the readiness of engineers to manage and develop expert organisations and to manage and carry out demanding development projects.
Generic and subject specifc competences
Competencies are extensive knowledge entities, or combinations of the individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They describe qualifications, performance potential, and the ability to cope with professional duties.
Common/general competencies are fields of know-how common to different Degree Programmes, but their special characteristics and importance may vary between professions and work assignments. General competencies form the basis for professional activities, cooperation, and the development of expertise. According to Arene’s (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences) recommendations, general competencies include learning skills, ethical competence, cooperation skills, innovation skills, and internationalization skills. In addition to the above-mentioned competencies, entrepreneurial skills and quality management skills are emphasized in the degree studies of SeAMK as competencies common to all.
Degree programme-specific competencies form the basis for the development of the student’s professional expertise.
Pedagogical approach and learning environment
Socio constructivism
Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)
The RPL procedure means the identification and recognition of the student’s previously acquired learning. The student has the opportunity to apply for the recognition of their competencies if the competencies correspond to the learning goals of the Degree Programme. The identification process is closely connected with the preparation of the student’s personal curriculum and is updated during personal counselling discussions.
The identification and recognition practices are presented in the RPL Instruction of SeAMK. It specifies how recognition of competencies is applied for, how the application is processed, and how the student is informed of it. The instruction lists the RPL contact persons of each Degree Programme, who counsel students on matters related to the process.
In the assessment of prior learning, for example the following evidence is used:
– certificates on training programmes with similar content and other training programmes
– testimonials and further clarifications by an employer
– interviews of the student
– written and oral exams or reports
– functional or written assignments or other evidence
– presentations, portfolios
The final project/thesis and the Maturity Test cannot be submitted to the RPL procedure.
The Head of Degree Programme, Student counsellor, and when necessary, the teacher of the course in question are responsible for RPL. Their task is to inform students of the recognition and assessment process, to discuss students' Personal Study Plan and to guide students in the demonstration of prior learning.
Project studies and the final thesis are not observed in RPL.
Assessment is course-specific, defined by the teacher in question. Assessment methods are an exam (written or oral), practical assignment, a laboratory test, a field test or equivalent. Please see the website http://intra.seamk.fi/loader.aspx?id=0ef1a173-a85c-49b9-8329-bc89ce7d27ab.
Work-based learning and work placements
The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.
Work-based learning and work placements
The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.
Work-based learning and work placements
The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.
Work-based learning and work placements
The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.
Occupational profiles
The graduates of the degree programme are prepared to manage and develop expert organizations and to manage and carry out demanding development projects.
Internationalization
There are some course books and other learning materials in English.
Access to further studies
Eligible for doctoral studies.
Graduation requirements
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences and instructions for graduates at Intra.
Mode of study
This programme is a part of our adult education. Students attend part-time and teaching takes place through various modes on weekends (Fri.-Sat.). Part of the lessons will be held as distance learning.
Head of degree programme
Anne-Maria Aho
e-mail: anne-maria.aho(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)40 830 4173
Petteri Mäkelä
email: petteri.makela(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358(0)408302351
Student counsellor
Essi Hauta
e-mail: essi.hauta(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)40 830 1262
Coordination of Practical Training
The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.
Coordination of international mobility
Tiina Välimäki, 040-830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Outgoing student exchanges to Europe
Maria Loukola, 040-830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Incoming and outgoing student exchanges outside Europe
Student services
Frami Campus. Tel.: +358 (0)20 124 5055, studentservices(at)seamk.fi
Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
30.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
- Petteri Mäkelä
- Pasi Junell
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
-
YRAK24Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
The student is able to distinguish and explain the similarities and differences of everyday/lay and scientific thinking. S/he is able to recognise and define targets for development, improvement and research in working life. S/he knows how to plan and implement a justified process of developing or researching.
Content
- Similarities and differences in scientific and everyday/lay thinking.
- Ctirical thinking and argumentation.
- Critical observation of practical activities.
- Making suitable questions for development and research.
- Designing developmend and research processes that meet practical demands.
- Theories of knowledge.
- Different methods for development work.
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., & Sajavaara, P. (2016). Tutki ja kirjoita (earlier editions znd later editions are ok)
Kananen, J. (2012). Kehittämistutkimus opinnäytetyönä : kehittämistutkimuksen kirjoittamisen käytännön opas
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures independent and group learning assignments
Student workload
5 cr = 40 hours of contact time and 90 hours of independent work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.The student has read all the materials used and accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and can explain the differences and similarities between development and research.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he
can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and knows what kind of development and research methods are suitable for different kind of topics. S/he shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting, which is done logically and clearly so that a reader is able to follow and evaluate the process and results.
Assessment methods and criteria
Learning assignments, active participation in the lectures. The assessment is based - to a large extent - on research plan and its presentation.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully. The student does not comprehend the meaning of various research methods or how to conduct research.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology. The student has only comprehended the difference of research methods but does not grasp the various ways to conduct research
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology. The student has comprehended the difference of research methods and has understood different ways to conduct research. The student knows how to choose a research method and validate its use.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminology. The student has comprehended the difference of research methods and knows how to use them in different situations. The student knows how to choose a research method and critically evaluate its use and the whole research.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 30.08.2024
Timing
30.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Competence
Teachers
- Anmari Viljamaa
Responsible person
Elisa Kannasto
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 20. Open UAS: 20.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
-
YLI23Master of Business Administration, Business Competence
-
LIIKE24SDevelopment of Business Competence
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Student is able to describe the core conceptual tensions involved in strategic renewal. The student is able to identify trends and developments in the operating environment on firm and industry level. Student can describe change drivers and their role and importance in the strategic renewal. Student can evaluate the impact of the identified factors of change and transformation processes and analyze the value creation and business logic model in a changing world. Student can recognize and assess new business opportunities. Student can act in the learning team and evaluate his/her own knowledge development.
Content
- strategic renewal
- environmental and internal analysis
- strategic tools and methods
- leading strategic renewal
Materials
Sutinen, M., & Haapakorva, A. (2021). Pelastetaan strategia pöytälaatikosta päivittäiseksi työkaveriksi. Alma Talent.
Vuorinen, T., & Huikkola, T. (2023). Strategiakirja - 25 työkalua. Alma Talent.
In addition, journal articles to be announced by lecturer.
Teaching methods
Lectures, independent study, practical written excercise
Employer connections
It is recommended to write the practicial excercise in relation to a genuine case.
Exam schedules
The optional exam is taken in the Exam-space.
Completion alternatives
Exam.
Student workload
lectures 21h, independent study 75h, excercise 40h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student participates in teaching and debate passively
Student uses and applies the concepts with a shallow analysis
Student assesses the changing operating environment and its impacts at a superficial level
Student works at identifying new business opportunities with a somewhat incomplete analysis
Student is able to apply strategic tools at a limited level
Student evaluates his/her learning outcomes narrowly
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student participates in classroom work quite actively and present own opinions occasionally
Student applies the concepts logically
Student analyses the operating environment and its changes diligently
Student applies strategic tools systematically
Student is able to identify a new business opportunity and assess it credibly
Student is able to assess his/her own learning to some extent
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student is actively involved in teaching and presents own analytical views on the issues discussed
Student applies the concepts logically and with insight
Student analyses the operating environment and its changes systematically and with versatility
Student applies strategic tools systematically and context-sensitively
Student is able to identify a viable new business opportunity and provide credible arguments for it
Student is able to assess his/her own learning in different ways
Assessment methods and criteria
Excercise 80%, quality of feedback for other participants 20%
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
30.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
Credits
30 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Petteri Mäkelä
Responsible person
Petteri Mäkelä
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Objective
Master's thesis is a wide and demanding R&D project based on theoretical knowledge, student's professional knowledge and expertise and work experience. The aim of the thesis is to carry out the employer's demanding development project.
Content
- Choice and approval of the subject, working plan
- Implementation and supervision, written report
- Oral presentation and closing session
- Assesment
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Qualifications
-
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
30.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
Credits
30 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Petteri Mäkelä
Responsible person
Petteri Mäkelä
Student groups
-
YRAK24Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Master's thesis is a wide and demanding R&D project based on theoretical knowledge, student's professional knowledge and expertise and work experience. The aim of the thesis is to carry out the employer's demanding development project.
Content
- Choice and approval of the subject, working plan
- Implementation and supervision, written report
- Oral presentation and closing session
- Assesment
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Qualifications
-
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
01.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
Credits
30 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Jorma Imppola
Student groups
-
YAUTE23Master of Engineering, Automation Engineering
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Objective
Master's thesis is a wide and demanding R&D project based on theoretical knowledge, student's professional knowledge and expertise and work experience. The aim of the thesis is to carry out the employer's demanding development project.
Content
- Choice and approval of the subject, working plan
- Implementation and supervision, written report
- Oral presentation and closing session
- Assesment
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
According to the Instructions for Writing a Thesis for the Master's Degree.
Qualifications
-
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
30.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Emilia Kangas
Responsible person
Elisa Kannasto
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Student is able to plan, evaluate and manage competence at the organizational, team and individual level. Student understands the connection between competence management and organizational strategy and success. The student masters the process of competence management and development. Student recognizes the organization's competence needs and know how to use competence development methods in line with strategic goals of a company.
Content
Competence management process and concepts
Strategy-driven competence development
Methods of competence assessment
Methods of competence development
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has participated actively in the course. Student has shown in the course ability to comprehend the basic concepts of the course: Student has been able to use the basic concepts of the course in the case company's assignment.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has carried out work very well and participated actively and constructively. Student has shown in the course good ability to comprehend the concepts of the course and apply the concepts in practical business cases. Student has been able to develop supportive solutions for competence management in the assignment of the course.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has carried out work to an excellent standard and participated very actively and constructively. Student has shown in the course excellent ability to comprehend the concepts of the course and apply the concepts in practical business cases. Student has been able to develop creative solutions supporting competence management in the assignment of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 13.01.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 31.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Food Chain Development
Teachers
- Jaakko Kujala
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
-
YRKK24IMaster of Engineering, Food Chain Development
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand and estimate the principles behind project work and will be competent in managing demanding projects.
Content
- Planning, preparing, initiating and ending a project
- Project organization and the project manager, working in projects and managing them
- Management of resources, time, costs and risks
- Project business
Materials
- Teacher´s material.
- Artto, K., Martinsuo, M. & Kujala, J. 2008. Projektiliiketoiminta. WSOY Oppimateriaalit Oy
Pelin, R. 2011. Projektihallinnan käsikirja. Projektijohtaminen Oy Risto Pelin.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student knows basics of the project management and project business. Student understands different goals of the project and can actively operate as a member of the project group to gain the goals.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the previous, Student can apply project management skills and business in various situations. Student can operate so that the goals of the project will be taken into consideration both in planning and running project. Students understands meaning of the certain project for company´s business. The student can estimate and develop operation in project level.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the previous; Student can widely take into consideration various goals of the project and can in demanding conditions choose relevant methods. Student can estimate and develop project operations also in company level.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student knows basics of the project management and project business. Student understands different goals of the project and can actively operate as a member of the project group to gain the goals.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the previous, Student can apply project management skills and business in various situations. Student can operate so that the goals of the project will be taken into consideration both in planning and running project. Students understands meaning of the certain project for company´s business. The student can estimate and develop operation in project level.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
In addition to the previous; Student can widely take into consideration various goals of the project and can in demanding conditions choose relevant methods. Student can estimate and develop project operations also in company level.
Qualifications
No prerequisites.
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
01.01.2025 - 31.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Competence
- Master's Degree Programme in Food Chain Development
- Master of Hospitality Management, Food Chain Development
Teachers
- Tuulia Potka-Soininen
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
-
YRAK24Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
YRKK24RMaster of Hospitality Management, Food Chain Development
-
YLI23Master of Business Administration, Business Competence
-
YRKK24IMaster of Engineering, Food Chain Development
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
The student is able to present the various stages of planning and implementation of financial management. He knows how to use management accounting methods and their results in financial management. He can use key figures and their interpretation guidelines to assess a company's success and value from the perspective of the company and its various stakeholders. The student is able to assess the importance of financial management for companies and other organisations. After completing the course, the student understands the diversity of management control systems. He is able to apply different management control systems to influence economic and business success. The student understands the importance of financial management in controlling businesses and in business development. After the course, the student will be able to use the management control systems to support decision making.
Content
Comprehensive financial management, different management accounting methods in financial management, use of financial statement analysis and valuation in financial management.
Management control system, planning (key performance indicators, life cycle and target cost calculation) and control (activity-based and total quality management) support systems.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has actively participated in the course work and successfully completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated the ability to understand the basic concept of the subject and the student has been able to use the basic concept of the course in the assignments given.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has performed well in the course studies, participated actively in course work and completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated a good understanding of the concepts of the subject and applied them in practice. The student is able to identify different aspects of financial management and assess their relevance to an individual company. The student has developed an understanding of the use of different management accounting methods and management control systems in the financial management of the company. He is also able to assess the importance of financial management and management control systems in the management of a company. The student is able to present a justifiable assessment of the success of an individual company based on key figures. The student has been able to present clear development solutions in their own development task.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has completed the course commendably, participated actively in course work and completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated a commendable ability to understand the concepts of the subject and to apply them in practice. The student is able to identify different aspects of financial management and analyze their significance for an individual company. The student is able to evaluate the use of different management accounting methods and management control systems in the financial management of the company. He is also able to analyze the importance of financial management and management control systems in the management of a company. The student is able to form a well-founded understanding of the success of an individual company by analyzing key figures. The student has been able to present new and justifiable development solutions in his or her own development assignment.
Enrollment
01.12.2023 - 06.01.2025
Timing
10.01.2025 - 04.04.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Petteri Mäkelä
Responsible person
Elisa Kannasto
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Student knows how the Industrial Internet affects to the business of manufacturing enterprises. Student knows the relevant technologies of Industrial Internet and the system architecture concepts. Student can conceptualize and design end-user services utilizing the Industrial Internet technologies.
Student understands how an industrial enterprise can improve its operations with Digital Manufacturing.
Student knows the impact of industrial internet of things on sustainable development.
Content
- Basic concepts of Industrial Internet
- Industrial Internet technology stack
- Data modelling and system integration
- Cloud services and IoT platforms
- Application and business scenarios
- Digital Manufacturing
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises
Exam schedules
The exam is in the last lesson
Student workload
Lectures 37 %, independent studying 63 %.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student knows the basics of the industrial internet. Student knows the technology stack of the industrial internet and knows the technologies associated to each level.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Student can conceptualize application which utilizes IoT technologies. Student can conceptualize this application so that it improves the business of a company.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student can conceptualize an IoT system and integrate it to an industrial process.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam 75 % and exercises 25 %
Qualifications
-
Further information
-
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
01.01.2025 - 31.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Food Chain Development
- Master of Natural Resources, Food Chain Development
Teachers
- Emilia Kangas
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
-
YRAK24Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
YKEJO23Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Development and Management
-
LIIKE24SDevelopment of Business Competence
-
YRKK24IMaster of Engineering, Food Chain Development
-
YRKK24AMaster of Natural Resources, Food Chain Development
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
The student is familiar with supervisory duties, responsibilities and future requirements. The student recognizes the requirements of supervisory work and the organization in the present and in the future. The student is able to assess what kind of leader he/she is regarding his/her personality and is able to develop his/her own supervisory work.
Content
Management of one's own performance and time management
Transformational leadership
Management of work motivation
Managing well-being at work
Leadership and interaction
Leader's emotional intelligence
Leadership profile
Materials
-
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is aware of the importance and elements of leadership skills. The student has shown ability to understand the basic concepts of the topic. The student's outputs show a tolerable command of the operational concepts in practice.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply leadership skills. The student's actions and outputs show good command of the operational concepts in business management. The student is able to clearly assess supervisory work and its elements and develop their own supervisory skills.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply, analyze and develop leadership skills. The student's actions and outputs show strong command of the operational concepts in business management and its development. The student shows excellent skills in critically analyzing supervisory work and its elements and develop their own supervisory skills with an evaluative approach.
Qualifications
-
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 30.08.2024
Timing
29.08.2024 - 14.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Heikki Rasku
Responsible person
Elisa Kannasto
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will understand the phases involved in the process of developing a new product, the principles of organizing product development activities, the principles of identifying customer needs and the principles of managing projects. They will be competent in making product development a part of the business strategy and in assessing the quality of product development. They know the basics of industrial internet from the product development point of view.
Content
- Phased, parallel product processing
- Organizational models for product development
- Identifying customer needs
- Managing costs for a product development project
- DFMA
- Product development as part of business strategy
- Industrial internet in the management product development operations
- Measuring the results of product development
- Company case study
Materials
- Teacher´s material.
- Ulrich, K.T., & Eppinger, S.D. 2008. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill.
- Martinsuo, M., Aalto, T. & Artto, K. 2003. Projektisalkun johtaminen. Teknologiateollisuus ry.
- Berg, P., Leivo, V., Pihlajamaa, J. & Leinonen, M. 2001. Tuotekehitystoiminnan laadun ja kypsyyden arviointi (luentomateriaali). MET.
Teaching methods
The course can be taken either face-to-face + assignments / possible exam
or alternatively as a fully online course
Student workload
Total student time 135 h. Contact hours 24 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student recognizes phased processing of developing a new product and can work in product developing organization accordingly. Student knows various principles of organizing product development and various bases to apply in different environment. Student can name various methods of identifying customer needs and principles of managing project portfolio. Student recognizes connection of product development to business strategy and basics of industrial internet and can name typical assessment criteria of the quality of product development.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the previous; Student knows and can explain the idea of phased processing of developing a new product. Student can compare various ways of organizing product development. Student can choose most suitable methods to recognize various customer needs. Student can prioritize projects by principles of managing project portfolio. Student can analyze meaning of product development to business. Student recognize the potential of industrial internet to enhance product development. Student can apply quality assessment criteria in product development process.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the previous; The student knows thoroughly the phased process of developing new product. Student can use in various ways many methods to recognize customer needs. Student can connect product development to company´s business strategy and can work in product development to support company´s strategic goals. Student can utilize industrial internet in product development activities and product development. Student can creatively utilize quality assessment methods to manage product development
Assessment methods and criteria
The course can be taken either face-to-face + assignments / possible exam
or alternatively as a fully online course
Qualifications
No prerequisites.