Skip to main content

Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Degree:
Master of Engineering

Degree title:
Master of Engineering

Credits:
60 ects

Name of the Degree Programme

Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management, 60 etcts

Field of study

Engineering, manufacturing and construction

The classification of the educational field is based on the international ISCED classification used by the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Specialisations

There are no lines of specialization in this degree programme.

Qualification awarded

The Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management is a university of applied sciences degree with close ties to the working life. The Programme grants graduates the same qualifications for job positions in the public sector as a master's in an academic university.

Degree: Master of Engineering

Level of qualification

The degree programme leads to a higher education degree which is a second cycle Master-level degree in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). According to the eight-level classification of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) the degree represents level 7.

The description of the level of the Degree is included in the Statute, at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120

Specific admission requirements

Please see the websites www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku.

On the websites, application and instructions are in Finnish language for the degree programmes taught in Finnish.
Eligibility for studies at a university of applied sciences is stipulated in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014.

The selection criteria are specified in the data of the Degree Programme at www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku

Qualification requirements and regulations (incl. graduation requirements)

Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.

Examination regulations, assessment and grading

Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Link

Structure of the studies

In accordance with the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the studies of a Degree Programme consist of advanced professional studies, free elective studies, and a final project/thesis. The extent of the studies is 60 credits.

Profile of the programme

The purpose of the programme is to enhance students' professional expertise with adequate theoretical knowledge and to combine the development of training and the working life. The programme grants students the same qualifications for job positions in the public sector as a master's in an academic university.

The programme is intended for engineers working in technology companies and organisations who wish to develop their skills in leadership and expertise and who aim to advance in their career. The purpose of the programme is also to expand and enhance the readiness of engineers to manage and develop expert organisations and to manage and carry out demanding development projects.

Generic and subject specifc competences

Competencies are extensive knowledge entities, or combinations of the individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They describe qualifications, performance potential, and the ability to cope with professional duties.

Common/general competencies are fields of know-how common to different Degree Programmes, but their special characteristics and importance may vary between professions and work assignments. General competencies form the basis for professional activities, cooperation, and the development of expertise. According to Arene’s (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences) recommendations, general competencies include learning skills, ethical competence, cooperation skills, innovation skills, and internationalization skills. In addition to the above-mentioned competencies, entrepreneurial skills and quality management skills are emphasized in the degree studies of SeAMK as competencies common to all.

Degree programme-specific competencies form the basis for the development of the student’s professional expertise.

Pedagogical approach and learning environment

Socio constructivism

Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)

The RPL procedure means the identification and recognition of the student’s previously acquired learning. The student has the opportunity to apply for the recognition of their competencies if the competencies correspond to the learning goals of the Degree Programme. The identification process is closely connected with the preparation of the student’s personal curriculum and is updated during personal counselling discussions.

The identification and recognition practices are presented in the RPL Instruction of SeAMK. It specifies how recognition of competencies is applied for, how the application is processed, and how the student is informed of it. The instruction lists the RPL contact persons of each Degree Programme, who counsel students on matters related to the process.

In the assessment of prior learning, for example the following evidence is used:

– certificates on training programmes with similar content and other training programmes
– testimonials and further clarifications by an employer
– interviews of the student
– written and oral exams or reports
– functional or written assignments or other evidence
– presentations, portfolios

The final project/thesis and the Maturity Test cannot be submitted to the RPL procedure.

The Head of Degree Programme, Student counsellor, and when necessary, the teacher of the course in question are responsible for RPL. Their task is to inform students of the recognition and assessment process, to discuss students' Personal Study Plan and to guide students in the demonstration of prior learning.

Project studies and the final thesis are not observed in RPL.

Assessment is course-specific, defined by the teacher in question. Assessment methods are an exam (written or oral), practical assignment, a laboratory test, a field test or equivalent. Please see the website http://intra.seamk.fi/loader.aspx?id=0ef1a173-a85c-49b9-8329-bc89ce7d27ab.

Work-based learning and work placements

The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.

Occupational profiles

The graduates of the degree programme are prepared to manage and develop expert organizations and to manage and carry out demanding development projects.

Internationalization

There are some course books and other learning materials in English.

Access to further studies

Eligible for doctoral studies.

Graduation requirements

Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences and instructions for graduates at Intra.

Mode of study

This programme is a part of our adult education. Students attend part-time and teaching takes place through various modes on weekends (Fri.-Sat.). Part of the lessons will be held as distance learning.

Head of degree programme

Anne-Maria Aho
e-mail: anne-maria.aho(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)40 830 4173

Petteri Mäkelä
email: petteri.makela(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358(0)408302351

Student counsellor

Essi Hauta
e-mail: essi.hauta(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)40 830 1262

Coordination of Practical Training

The Degree Programme doesn’t include practical training.

Coordination of international mobility

Tiina Välimäki, 040-830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Outgoing student exchanges to Europe
Maria Loukola, 040-830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Incoming and outgoing student exchanges outside Europe

Student services

Frami Campus. Tel.: +358 (0)20 124 5055, studentservices(at)seamk.fi

Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management

Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management

Master's Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management

Enrollment

17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023

Timing

28.08.2023 - 26.05.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • Master's Degree Programme in Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pia-Mari Riihilahti
  • Petteri Mäkelä
  • Pasi Junell
Student groups
  • YAUTE23
    Master of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Objective

The student is able to distinguish and explain the similarities and differences of everyday/lay and scientific thinking. S/he is able to recognise and define targets for development, improvement and research in working life. S/he knows how to plan and implement a justified process of developing or researching.

Content

- Similarities and differences in scientific and everyday/lay thinking.
- Ctirical thinking and argumentation.
- Critical observation of practical activities.
- Making suitable questions for development and research.
- Designing developmend and research processes that meet practical demands.
- Theories of knowledge.
- Different methods for development work.

Materials

Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., & Sajavaara, P. (2009). Tutki ja kirjoita (earlier editions znd later editions are ok)
Kananen, J. (2012). Kehittämistutkimus opinnäytetyönä : kehittämistutkimuksen kirjoittamisen käytännön opas

Teaching methods

Contact teaching: Lectures independent and group learning assignments

Student workload

5 cr = 40 hours of contact time and 90 hours of independent work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.The student has read all the materials used and accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and can explain the differences and similarities between development and research.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he
can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and knows what kind of development and research methods are suitable for different kind of topics. S/he shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting, which is done logically and clearly so that a reader is able to follow and evaluate the process and results.

Assessment methods and criteria

Learning assignments, active participation in the lectures. The assessment is based - to a large extent - on research plan and its presentation.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments have not been completed successfully. The student does not comprehend the meaning of various research methods or how to conduct research.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology. The student has only comprehended the difference of research methods but does not grasp the various ways to conduct research

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology. The student has comprehended the difference of research methods and has understood different ways to conduct research. The student knows how to choose a research method and validate its use.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminology. The student has comprehended the difference of research methods and knows how to use them in different situations. The student knows how to choose a research method and critically evaluate its use and the whole research.

Enrollment

13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024

Timing

15.02.2024 - 26.05.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
  • Tuulia Potka-Soininen
Student groups
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Objective

The student is able to present the various stages of planning and implementation of financial management. He knows how to use management accounting methods and their results in financial management. He can use key figures and their interpretation guidelines to assess a company's success and value from the perspective of the company and its various stakeholders. The student is able to assess the importance of financial management for companies and other organisations. After completing the course, the student understands the diversity of management control systems. He is able to apply different management control systems to influence economic and business success. The student understands the importance of financial management in controlling businesses and in business development. After the course, the student will be able to use the management control systems to support decision making.

Content

Comprehensive financial management, different management accounting methods in financial management, use of financial statement analysis and valuation in financial management.
Management control system, planning (key performance indicators, life cycle and target cost calculation) and control (activity-based and total quality management) support systems.

Teaching methods

Contact teaching.

Student workload

Lectures 20 hours.
Assignments and independent work 115 hours.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has actively participated in the course work and successfully completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated the ability to understand the basic concept of the subject and the student has been able to use the basic concept of the course in the assignments given.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has performed well in the course studies, participated actively in course work and completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated a good understanding of the concepts of the subject and applied them in practice. The student is able to identify different aspects of financial management and assess their relevance to an individual company. The student has developed an understanding of the use of different management accounting methods and management control systems in the financial management of the company. He is also able to assess the importance of financial management and management control systems in the management of a company. The student is able to present a justifiable assessment of the success of an individual company based on key figures. The student has been able to present clear development solutions in their own development task.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has completed the course commendably, participated actively in course work and completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated a commendable ability to understand the concepts of the subject and to apply them in practice. The student is able to identify different aspects of financial management and analyze their significance for an individual company. The student is able to evaluate the use of different management accounting methods and management control systems in the financial management of the company. He is also able to analyze the importance of financial management and management control systems in the management of a company. The student is able to form a well-founded understanding of the success of an individual company by analyzing key figures. The student has been able to present new and justifiable development solutions in his or her own development assignment.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to present the various stages of planning and implementation of financial management. He knows how to use management accounting methods and their results in financial management. He can use key figures and their interpretation guidelines to assess a company's success and value from the perspective of the company and its various stakeholders. The student is able to assess the importance of financial management for companies and other organisations. After completing the course, the student understands the diversity of management control systems. He is able to apply different management control systems to influence economic and business success. The student understands the importance of financial management in controlling businesses and in business development. After the course, the student will be able to use the management control systems to support decision making.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has done well in the course studies, participated actively in course work and completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated a good understanding of the concepts of the subject and applied them in practice. The student is able to identify different aspects of financial management and assess their relevance to an individual company. The student has developed an understanding of the use of different management accounting methods and management control systems in the financial management of the company. He is also able to assess the importance of financial management and management control systems in the management of a company. The student is able to assess the success of an individual company based on key figures. The student has been able to present clear development solutions in their own development task.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student has completed the course commendably, participated actively in course work and completed the assignments given during the course. During the course, the student has demonstrated a commendable ability to understand the concepts of the subject and to apply them in practice. The student is able to identify different aspects of financial management and analyze their significance for an individual company. The student is able to evaluate the use of different management accounting methods and management control systems in the financial management of the company. He is also able to analyze the importance of financial management and management control systems in the management of a company. The student is able to form a well-founded understanding of the success of an individual company by analyzing key figures. The student has been able to present new and justifiable development solutions in his or her own development assignment.

Enrollment

17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023

Timing

28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • Master's Degree Programme in Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Petteri Mäkelä
Student groups
  • YAUTE23
    Master of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Objective

Student knows how the Industrial Internet affects to the business of manufacturing enterprises. Student knows the relevant technologies of Industrial Internet and the system architecture concepts. Student can conceptualize and design end-user services utilizing the Industrial Internet technologies.

Student understands how an industrial enterprise can improve its operations with Digital Manufacturing.

Student knows the impact of industrial internet of things on sustainable development.

Content

- Basic concepts of Industrial Internet
- Industrial Internet technology stack
- Data modelling and system integration
- Cloud services and IoT platforms
- Application and business scenarios
- Digital Manufacturing

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Exam schedules

The exam is in the last lesson

Student workload

Lectures 37 %, independent studying 63 %.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows the basics of the industrial internet. Student knows the technology stack of the industrial internet and knows the technologies associated to each level.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student can conceptualize application which utilizes IoT technologies. Student can conceptualize this application so that it improves the business of a company.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student can conceptualize an IoT system and integrate it to an industrial process.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam 75 % and exercises 25 %

Qualifications

-

Further information

-

Enrollment

01.08.2023 - 06.09.2023

Timing

08.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • Master's Degree Programme in Business Competence
  • Master of Culture and Arts
  • Master's Degree Programme in Food Chain Development
  • Master of Hospitality Management, Food Chain Development
  • Master of Natural Resources, Food Chain Development
Teachers
  • Emilia Kangas
Student groups
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • YLI23
    Master of Business Administration, Business Competence
  • YRKK22R
  • YKUTU23
    Master of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • YRKK22A
  • YRKK22I

Objective

The student is familiar with supervisory duties, responsibilities and future requirements. The student recognizes the requirements of supervisory work and the organization in the present and in the future. The student is able to assess what kind of leader he/she is regarding his/her personality and is able to develop his/her own supervisory work.

Content

Management of one's own performance and time management
Transformational leadership
Management of work motivation
Managing well-being at work
Leadership and interaction
Leader's emotional intelligence
Leadership profile

Materials

Literature specified by the teacher

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is aware of the importance and elements of leadership skills. The student has shown ability to understand the basic concepts of the topic. The student's outputs show a tolerable command of the operational concepts in practice.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to apply leadership skills. The student's actions and outputs show good command of the operational concepts in business management. The student is able to clearly assess supervisory work and its elements and develop their own supervisory skills.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to apply, analyze and develop leadership skills. The student's actions and outputs show strong command of the operational concepts in business management and its development. The student shows excellent skills in critically analyzing supervisory work and its elements and develop their own supervisory skills with an evaluative approach.

Qualifications

-

Enrollment

13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024

Timing

19.01.2024 - 26.05.2024

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • Master's Degree Programme in Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Heikki Rasku
Student groups
  • YAUTE23
    Master of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will understand the phases involved in the process of developing a new product, the principles of organizing product development activities, the principles of identifying customer needs and the principles of managing projects. They will be competent in making product development a part of the business strategy and in assessing the quality of product development. They know the basics of industrial internet from the product development point of view.

Content

- Phased, parallel product processing
- Organizational models for product development
- Identifying customer needs
- Managing costs for a product development project
- DFMA
- Product development as part of business strategy
- Industrial internet in the management product development operations
- Measuring the results of product development
- Company case study

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student recognizes phased processing of developing a new product and can work in product developing organization accordingly. Student knows various principles of organizing product development and various bases to apply in different environment. Student can name various methods of identifying customer needs and principles of managing project portfolio. Student recognizes connection of product development to business strategy and basics of industrial internet and can name typical assessment criteria of the quality of product development.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the previous; Student knows and can explain the idea of phased processing of developing a new product. Student can compare various ways of organizing product development. Student can choose most suitable methods to recognize various customer needs. Student can prioritize projects by principles of managing project portfolio. Student can analyze meaning of product development to business. Student recognize the potential of industrial internet to enhance product development. Student can apply quality assessment criteria in product development process.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the previous; The student knows thoroughly the phased process of developing new product. Student can use in various ways many methods to recognize customer needs. Student can connect product development to company´s business strategy and can work in product development to support company´s strategic goals. Student can utilize industrial internet in product development activities and product development. Student can creatively utilize quality assessment methods to manage product development

Qualifications

No prerequisites.

Enrollment

13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024

Timing

22.03.2024 - 26.05.2024

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • Master's Degree Programme in Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jaakko Kujala
Responsible person

Elisa Kannasto

Student groups
  • YAUTE23
    Master of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will understand and estimate the principles behind project work and will be competent in managing demanding projects.

Content

- Planning, preparing, initiating and ending a project
- Project organization and the project manager, working in projects and managing them
- Management of resources, time, costs and risks
- Project business

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows basics of the project management and project business. Student understands different goals of the project and can actively operate as a member of the project group to gain the goals.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the previous, Student can apply project management skills and business in various situations. Student can operate so that the goals of the project will be taken into consideration both in planning and running project. Students understands meaning of the certain project for company´s business. The student can estimate and develop operation in project level.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the previous; Student can widely take into consideration various goals of the project and can in demanding conditions choose relevant methods. Student can estimate and develop project operations also in company level.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.

Enrollment

17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023

Timing

28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • Software Engineering
  • Master's Degree Programme in Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Aapo Koski
Student groups
  • YAUTE23
    Master of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
  • OHSU23
    Software Engineering

Objective

After completing this course, student knows the common methods and tools of software engineering. Student can use the version control systems (git). Student understands the principles of software testing and can develop software, which can be tested well. Student knows the principles of Devops and can utilize the container technology in system development (Docker).

Content

- Methods and tools of software engineering
- Version control systems
- Software testing
- Continuous integration, continuous deployment, Devops
- Containers (Docker)

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows the common methods and tools of software engineering. Student can use the version control systems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student knows the common methods and tools of software engineering. Student can use the version control systems. Student understands the principles of software testing and can develop software, which can be tested well. Student knows the principles of Devops and can utilize the container technology in system development.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student can utilize the methods and tools of software engineering. Student masters the use of the version control systems. Student understands the principles of software testing and can develop software, which can be tested well. Student knows the principles of Devops and can utilize the container technology in system development.

Qualifications

Basics of software engineering

Enrollment

17.04.2023 - 31.08.2023

Timing

02.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
  • Anmari Viljamaa
Student groups
  • YTOJ23
    Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management

Objective

Student is able to describe the core conceptual tensions involved in strategic renewal. The student is able to identify trends and developments in the operating environment on firm and industry level. Student can describe change drivers and their role and importance in the strategic renewal. Student can evaluate the impact of the identified factors of change and transformation processes and analyze the value creation and business logic model in a changing world. Student can recognize and assess new business opportunities. Student can act in the learning team and evaluate his/her own knowledge development.

Content

- strategic renewal
- environmental and internal analysis
- strategic tools and methods
- leading strategic renewal

Materials

Sutinen, M., & Haapakorva, A. (2021). Pelastetaan strategia pöytälaatikosta päivittäiseksi työkaveriksi. Alma Talent.
Vuorinen, T. (2021). Strategiakirja - 20 työkalua. Alma Talent.
In addition, journal articles to be announced by lecturer.

Teaching methods

Lectures, independent study, practical written excercise

Employer connections

It is recommended to write the practicial excercise in relation to a genuine case.

Completion alternatives

Exam.

Student workload

lectures 16h, independent study 80h, excercise 40h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student participates in teaching and debate passively
Student uses and applies the concepts with a shallow analysis
Student assesses the changing operating environment and its impacts at a superficial level
Student works at identifying new business opportunities with a somewhat incomplete analysis
Student is able to apply strategic tools at a limited level
Student evaluates his/her learning outcomes narrowly

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student participates in classroom work quite actively and present own opinions occasionally
Student applies the concepts logically
Student analyses the operating environment and its changes diligently
Student applies strategic tools systematically
Student is able to identify a new business opportunity and assess it credibly
Student is able to assess his/her own learning to some extent

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student is actively involved in teaching and presents own analytical views on the issues discussed
Student applies the concepts logically and with insight
Student analyses the operating environment and its changes systematically and with versatility
Student applies strategic tools systematically and context-sensitively
Student is able to identify a viable new business opportunity and provide credible arguments for it
Student is able to assess his/her own learning in different ways

Assessment methods and criteria

Excercise 100%, quality of feedback for other participants 20%