Development and research (5 cr)
Code: 8G00DM21-3002
General information
- Enrollment
- 22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 30.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- SeAMK Master School
- Campus
- SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
- Teachers
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
- Petteri Mäkelä
- Pasi Junell
- Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10 . Open UAS : 10.)
- Groups
-
YTOJ24Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
-
YRAK24Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Small groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
- Course
- 8G00DM21
Evaluation scale
1-5
Objective
The student is able to distinguish and explain the similarities and differences of everyday/lay and scientific thinking. S/he is able to recognise and define targets for development, improvement and research in working life. S/he knows how to plan and implement a justified process of developing or researching.
Content
- Similarities and differences in scientific and everyday/lay thinking.
- Ctirical thinking and argumentation.
- Critical observation of practical activities.
- Making suitable questions for development and research.
- Designing developmend and research processes that meet practical demands.
- Theories of knowledge.
- Different methods for development work.
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., & Sajavaara, P. (2016). Tutki ja kirjoita (earlier editions znd later editions are ok)
Kananen, J. (2012). Kehittämistutkimus opinnäytetyönä : kehittämistutkimuksen kirjoittamisen käytännön opas
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures independent and group learning assignments
Student workload
5 cr = 40 hours of contact time and 90 hours of independent work
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.The student has read all the materials used and accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and can explain the differences and similarities between development and research.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he
can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and knows what kind of development and research methods are suitable for different kind of topics. S/he shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting, which is done logically and clearly so that a reader is able to follow and evaluate the process and results.