Skip to main content

Development and research (5 cr)

Code: 8G00DM21-3002

General information


Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
30.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Local portion
5 cr
Mode of delivery
Contact learning
Unit
SeAMK Master School
Campus
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Teaching languages
Finnish
Degree programmes
Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
Teachers
Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Petteri Mäkelä
Pasi Junell
Scheduling groups
Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10 . Open UAS : 10.)
Groups
YTOJ24
Master of Engineering, Technology Competence Management
YRAK24
Master of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Small groups
Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Course
8G00DM21

Evaluation scale

1-5

Objective

The student is able to distinguish and explain the similarities and differences of everyday/lay and scientific thinking. S/he is able to recognise and define targets for development, improvement and research in working life. S/he knows how to plan and implement a justified process of developing or researching.

Content

- Similarities and differences in scientific and everyday/lay thinking.
- Ctirical thinking and argumentation.
- Critical observation of practical activities.
- Making suitable questions for development and research.
- Designing developmend and research processes that meet practical demands.
- Theories of knowledge.
- Different methods for development work.

Materials

Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., & Sajavaara, P. (2016). Tutki ja kirjoita (earlier editions znd later editions are ok)
Kananen, J. (2012). Kehittämistutkimus opinnäytetyönä : kehittämistutkimuksen kirjoittamisen käytännön opas

Teaching methods

Contact teaching: Lectures independent and group learning assignments

Student workload

5 cr = 40 hours of contact time and 90 hours of independent work

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.The student has read all the materials used and accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and can explain the differences and similarities between development and research.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he
can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and knows what kind of development and research methods are suitable for different kind of topics. S/he shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting, which is done logically and clearly so that a reader is able to follow and evaluate the process and results.

Go back to top of page