Introduction to Research and DevelopmentLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: YPOE1C2
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Materials
r
Enrollment
19.02.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AE22Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Further information
PLEASE NOTE THAT ATTENDANCE IN CLASSES IS MANDATORY
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
PLEASE NOTE THAT ATTENDANCE IN CLASSES IS MANDATORY
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
02.09.2024 - 19.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
Teachers
- Samu Palander
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 25. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 25. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
AFE23Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies
-
AFE22Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
The teacher announces at the beginning of the course
Teaching methods
Introductory lesson, e-learning and assignments online, final disussion
Student workload
Total work load 54 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments individually or as group work, final discussion/presentation (obligatory)
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
-
AE21Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 10.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Teachers
- Cory Isaacs
Student groups
-
IB22A
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
-Lecture
-Written tasks
-Quiz
Student workload
54 hours
4 hours of contact tuition
50 hours of online study
Further information
Students must progress through the course according to the schedule.
Students must hand in all tasks at the deadlines and the tasks must be at an acceptable level.
Inactive students will get an immediate fail for the course and be removed.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- exercises
- independent work
- active participation in the virtual environment
- quiz
- course is graded pass/fail
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 10.03.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Teachers
- Cory Isaacs
Student groups
-
IB22B
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
-Lecture
-Written tasks
-Quiz
Student workload
54 hours
4 hours of contact tuition
50 hours of online study
Further information
Students must progress through the course according to the schedule.
Students must hand in all tasks at the deadlines and the tasks must be at an acceptable level.
Inactive students will get an immediate fail for the course and be removed.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- exercises
- independent work
- active participation in the virtual environment
- quiz
- course is graded pass/fail
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
02.10.2023 - 14.01.2024
Timing
01.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
MRN22Degree Programme in Nursing, Nursing Branch, Registered Nurse, RN, (UAS)
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Location and time
11.1.24 Introduction to course 3h online
19.1.24 Theory 4h Kampus
Individual Moodle -assingments
Materials
An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Flick, U. 2014
Teaching methods
Introduction to course 3h online
Theory 4h Kampus
Individual Moodle -assingments
Student workload
27h/ETC
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
Passed/ Failed
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 22.02.2023
Timing
20.03.2023 - 16.04.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Sinikka Vainionpää
Student groups
-
RN21Degree Programme in Nursing, Nursing Branch, Registered Nurse, RN, (UAS)
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
06.03.2023 - 31.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Teachers
- Cory Isaacs
Student groups
-
IB21
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
-Lecture
-Written tasks
-Quiz
Student workload
54 hours
4 hours of contact tuition
50 hours of online study
Further information
Students must progress through the course according to the schedule.
Students must hand in all tasks at the deadlines and the tasks must be at an acceptable level.
Inactive students will get an immediate fail for the course and be removed.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.10.2021 - 31.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 20.03.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Teachers
- Cory Isaacs
Student groups
-
IB20
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
-Lecture
-Written tasks
-Quiz
Student workload
54 hours
4 hours of contact tuition
50 hours of online study
Further information
Students must progress through the course according to the schedule.
Students must hand in all tasks at the deadlines and the tasks must be at an acceptable level.
Inactive students will get an immediate fail for the course and be removed.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Qualifications
No prerequisites