Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet

The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics

Sisältö

- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work

Oppimateriaalit

- Material provided by the teacher

Opetusmenetelmät

Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteeri, hyväksytty/hylätty

Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %

Hylätty (0)

The assignments have not been completed successfully.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.

Esitietovaatimukset

Aikaisempia opintoja ei tarvita