Introduction to Research and Development (2 op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: YPOE1C2-3016
Toteutuksen perustiedot
Ilmoittautumisaika
19.02.2025
Ajoitus
03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025
Laajuus
2 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK Automaatio- ja tietotekniikka
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
AE22Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Tavoitteet
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Sisältö
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Oppimateriaalit
- Material provided by the teacher
Opetusmenetelmät
Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
PLEASE NOTE THAT ATTENDANCE IN CLASSES IS MANDATORY
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteeri, hyväksytty/hylätty
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
PLEASE NOTE THAT ATTENDANCE IN CLASSES IS MANDATORY
Hylätty (0)
The assignments have not been completed successfully.
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)
The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)
The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.
Esitietovaatimukset
Aikaisempia opintoja ei tarvita