Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Master of Health Care
Name of the Degree Programme
Master's Degree Programme in Advanced Practice Nursing
Field of study
Health and welfare
The classification is based on the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) used by the Ministry of Education and Culture
Specialisations
no specialisations
Qualification awarded
Upon completion of the programme, students will be awarded a second-cycle higher education degree.
Level of qualification
The level of the qualification is described in the Statute at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120
Specific admission requirements
Provisions on eligibility for universities of applied sciences are contained in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act (932/2014).
For the eligibility criteria please see www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku
Examination regulations, assessment and grading
Structure of the studies
As stipulated by the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the degree programme consists of advanced professional studies, free-choice studies and a Master's thesis. The extent of the studies is 90 credits.
In the advanced professional studies, the focus will be on public health, prevalent diseases, clinical work and acute situations. Students will also become familiar with various research, development and evaluation methods. The practice-oriented Master's thesis will allow the development of new practices and models.
Profile of the programme
The programme contains studies pertaining to public health, prevalent diseases, expertise in clinical work and expertise in acute situations. Other contents involve working life research and development, including evaluation methods. Besides writing a Master's thesis, students choose elective (free-choice) studies.
Generic and subject specifc competences
Competences are extensive combinations of an individual's knowledge, skills and attitudes. They describe a person's capability, performance potential and ability to carry out professional tasks.
Generic competences are shared by all degree programmes, but may contain special features and their importance may vary between professions and duties. The generic competences create a foundation for the students' contribution to working life, for cooperation and for the develoment of expertise. They are, following the recommendation of Arene (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences): Learning competence, ethical competence, working community competence, innovation competence and internationalisation competence. In addition, entrepreneurship and quality assurance competence are stressed at Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
The degree programme-specific competences create a foundation for the development of professional expertise. In this programme, they involve expertise in public health and prevalent diseases and expertise in clinical and acute situations.
Pedagogical approach and learning environment
A variety of pedagical approaches are used in the degree programme. The pedagogical solutions are defined for each module separately. Besides classroom learning, students will study in work communities and in the Moodle learning environment.
Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)
The recognition of prior learning (RPL, AHOT in Finnish) means that the student has the right to apply for recognition and accreditation of prior learning if the acquired knowledge is equivalent to the learning objectives of the degree programme.
Recognition of Prior Learning is closely related to the student's Personal Curriculum, updated at personal development and counselling discussions.
The general principles for recognising prior learning are presented in the RPL Guidelines of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. They contain the application and assessment procedures and specify how the student will be informed of the results. The guidelines also contain names of RPL contact persons, who are in charge of advising students in each degree programme.
The following evidence can be used to assess the student's prior learning:
- Certificates from courses of similar content or from other training
-Work references and additional reports from employers
- Interviews with the student
- written or oral examinations or reports
- action-based or written assignments or demonstrations
-presentations, portfolios
RPL cannot be used for the Master's thesis or the maturity test.
Work-based learning and work placements
The degree programme does not contain practical training.
Students who are employed during their studies, can request credits for the competence gained at work. The term used for this process is studification, and it can also cover volunteer work or other activities. It is essential that students can demonstrate that they have gained the knowledge and skills defined in the learning outcomes of the course. Practical demonstrations or assignments are used to gain evidence of the student's competence.
Work-based learning and work placements
The degree programme does not contain practical training.
Students who are employed during their studies, can request credits for the competence gained at work. The term used for this process is studification, and it can also cover volunteer work or other activities. It is essential that students can demonstrate that they have gained the knowledge and skills defined in the learning outcomes of the course. Practical demonstrations or assignments are used to gain evidence of the student's competence.
Work-based learning and work placements
The degree programme does not contain practical training.
Students who are employed during their studies, can request credits for the competence gained at work. The term used for this process is studification, and it can also cover volunteer work or other activities. It is essential that students can demonstrate that they have gained the knowledge and skills defined in the learning outcomes of the course. Practical demonstrations or assignments are used to gain evidence of the student's competence.
Work-based learning and work placements
The degree programme does not contain practical training.
Students who are employed during their studies, can request credits for the competence gained at work. The term used for this process is studification, and it can also cover volunteer work or other activities. It is essential that students can demonstrate that they have gained the knowledge and skills defined in the learning outcomes of the course. Practical demonstrations or assignments are used to gain evidence of the student's competence.
Occupational profiles
Graduates of the degree programme will be qualified to work as advanced clinical practitioners in the social and health field. The focus of their expertise will be on public health, prevalent diseases, clinical work and acute situations. The graduates will be able to work in the health and social field in development and management, as consultants, experts, entrepreneurs or as first line managers in the public, private and third sector.
Internationalization
Student mobility, internationalisation at home and staff exchange are promoted and encouraged. They can involve study visits, intensive programmes and conferences as part of students' free-choice studies. Lecturers also have a possibility to participate. Other forms of internationalisation include the use of international literature and virtual contacts.
Access to further studies
Graduates will be eligible to apply for postgraduate research degree programmes.
Mode of study
Students will study part time using multiple learning methods: lectures, independent studies and various assignments. Students will have approximately two days of contact time per month with compulsory attendance.
Head of degree programme
Anne-Maria Aho
e-mail: anne-maria.aho(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)40 830 4173
Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
e-mail: mari.salminen-tuomaala (a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)408304166
Student counsellor
Essi Hauta
e-mail: essi.hauta(a)seamk.fi
Phone: +358 (0)40 830 1262
Coordination of Practical Training
The degree programme does not contain practical training
Coordination of international mobility
Tiina Välimäki, 040-830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi,
for students planning an exchange period in Europe
Maria Loukola, 040-830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi,
for students planning an exchange period outside Europe
outgoint(at)seamk.fi
Student services
Tel. 020 124 5055, opiskelijapalvelut(at)seamk.fi
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
5 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
- Anita Keski-Hirvi
- Tarja Svahn
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Objective
Students are able to recognise and define public health challenges in the Finnish population and apply preventive evidence-based counselling, care and rehabilitation methods. Students are able to recognise and define public health challenges and risks also at international level.
Students are able to recognise treatment and rehabilitation methods used in Finnish prevalent and chronic diseases and apply evidence-based, empowering and client-centred counselling, care and rehabilitation methods. Students know how to apply current care guidelines on prevalent diseases.
Students can argue for the importance of patients'/clients' self-care support, motivation and compliance in responding to various prevalent diseases.
Students know how to use various patient counselling methods.
Students are aware of the roles of the third sector and experts by experience in supporting patients'/clients' self-care.
Content
Public health visions
Public health challenges and risks at national and international level
Preventive counseling
Teaching methods
Discussion lessons, pair and group working
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are able to recognise contemporary evidence-based guidelines and challenges pertaining to the promotion of public health and to the prevention of prevalent diseases and different counselling methods.
Students are able to recognise contemporary evidence-based guidelines and challenges pertaining to the care and the rehabilitation of prevalent or chronic diseases and different counselling methods.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to apply contemporary evidence-based guidelines pertaining to the promotion of public health and to the prevention of prevalent diseases and to use different counselling methods.
Students are able to apply contemporary evidence-based guidelines pertaining to the care and the rehabilitation of prevalent or chronic diseases and to use different counselling methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to evaluate and develop evidence-based knowledge and different counseling methods to promote public health and to prevent prevalent diseases.
Students are able to evaluate and respond to challenges pertaining to the care and the rehabilitation of prevalent or chronic diseases with the help of evidence-based knowledge and different counselling methods.
Assessment methods and criteria
Independent tasks, numeric evaluation: 1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are not able to recognise contemporary evidence-based guidelines and challenges pertaining to the promotion of public health and to the prevention of prevalent diseases and different counselling methods.Students are not able to recognise contemporary evidence-based guidelines and challenges pertaining to the care and the rehabilitation of prevalent or chronic diseases and different counselling methods.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to recognise contemporary evidence-based guidelines and challenges pertaining to the promotion of public health and to the prevention of prevalent diseases and different counselling methods.Students are able to recognise contemporary evidence-based guidelines and challenges pertaining to the care and the rehabilitation of prevalent or chronic diseases and different counselling methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to apply contemporary evidence-based guidelines pertaining to the promotion of public health and to the prevention of prevalent diseases and to use different counselling methods.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Students are able to evaluate and develop evidence-based knowledge and different counseling methods to promote public health and to prevent prevalent diseases.Students are able to evaluate and respond to challenges pertaining to the care and the rehabilitation of prevalent or chronic diseases with the help of evidence-based knowledge and different counselling methods.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 10.12.2024
Timing
02.12.2024 - 28.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
RD proportion (cr)
3.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Sami Perälä
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Objective
The potential of remote counselling services in supporting self-care and rehabilitation of various groups of clients has been growing in recent years. This course helps students examine and reflect on the usefulness and challenges of various remote counselling methods from the perspective of both professionals and clients.
The course aim is to help students deepen their competence in the use and development of remote counselling methods.
Content
• Ethics and data security in remote services
• Remote counselling and remote rehabilitation; examination, observation, counselling and self-care counselling of clients by means of remote technology
• eHealth, mHealth
• Special features in interaction in remote services
* Remote counseling simulation based practices
Teaching methods
Discussions and reflections/theory lessons, simulation based education, virtual education, hybrid education, independent task
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Assessment, level satisfactory (1-2)
Students recognise ethical and data security issues in remote services. Students know how and in what kind of settings clients can be examined, observed and counselled using remote counselling technology. They know the meaning of eHealth and mHealth. Students are able to list special features in interaction in remote services.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Assessment, level good (3-4)
Students reflect on factors affecting ethical and data security issues in remote services. Students can describe and give reasons for how and in what kind of settings clients can be examined, observed and counselled using remote counselling technology. They can explain when eHealth and mHealth can be made use of. Students are able to describe and give examples of special features in interaction in remote services.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Assessment, level excellent (5)
Students take into account and anticipate factors affecting ethical and data security issues when they plan remote services. Students know how to use remote counselling, explain their action and competently recognize the settings in which they can examine, observe and counsel clients using remote counselling technology. They are able to use eHealth and mHealth methods in client counselling. Students are able to anticipate special features in interaction in remote services, and based on this knowledge, know how to plan high quality remote counselling.
Assessment methods and criteria
Independent task, numeric evaluation: 1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Student cannot describe remote counseling and it's methods.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students can describe remote counseling as a guidance method and are familiar with remote counseling methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can describe usefulness and challenges of remote counseling as a guidance method and are familiar with remote counseling methods.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Students can analyse usefulness and challenges of remote counseling as a guidance method and can apply various remote counseling methods.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
- Mika Wallin
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Objective
The objective is that student's pharmagological knowledge will deepen especially from the perspective of national diseases and acute disease situations. The goal is that the student is able to counsel customers independently in pharmacological care and consult the doctor when needed.
Content
Pharmacological treatment in heart and vascular diseases
Pharmacological treatment in respiratory diseases
Pharmacological treatment in neurological diseases
Pain killers, sedatives
Pharmacological treatment in acute disease situations
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can name drugs used as a treatment of various diseases.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows well drugs used as a treatment of various diseases. The student recognizes the side effects and synergies of various drugs.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows well drugs used as a treatment of various diseases. The student recognizes the side effects and synergies of various drugs. The student is able to counsel customers with the questions in their drug care.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 31.07.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
3 op
RD proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Leena Elenius
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
- Katriina Kuhalampi
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Objective
The student is able to distinguish and explain the similarities and differences of everyday/lay and scientific thinking. S/he is able to recognise and define targets for development, improvement and research in working life. S/he knows how to plan and implement a justified process of developing or researching.
Content
Similarities and differences in scientific and everyday/lay thinking.
Ctirical thinking and argumentation.
Critical observation of practical activities.
Making suitable questions for development and research.
Designing developmend and research processes that meet practical demands.
Theories of knowledge.
At least two different methods for development work, for example development as a process, research-based developmend, action research, evaluation research.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has read all the materials used and accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and can explain the differences and similarities between development and research.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he
can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and knows what kind of development and research methods are suitable for different kind of topics. S/he shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting, which is done logically and clearly so that a reader is able to follow and evaluate the process and results.
Enrollment
29.08.2024 - 27.10.2024
Timing
07.11.2024 - 30.04.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Students are able to respond to acute illness situations using evidence-based knowledge. Students are able to work in networks and in multicultural and digital environments.Students know how to evaluate and use digital tools as a support for counselling, care and rehabilitation of patients/clients. Students are able to compare and use the distance counselling options available.
Content
Acute illness and how to respond to it in various settings
Communication challenges in acute situations
Supporting patients/clients and their families in acute situations
Digital methods as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation
The potential of distance counselling
Ethical challenges in clinical work
Teaching methods
Discussion lessons, virtual teaching, Interpretation of ECG's and Blood gas analyses
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are able to define what special issues and challenges the patient/client counselling situations can involve in clinical work. Students are able to describe and categorise various digital methods that can be used as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to compare methods used in clinical work in responding to special issues and in patient/client counselling situations. Students are able to apply various digital methods used as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to analyse, evaluate and develop methods used in clinical work in responding to special issues and in patient/client counselling situations. Students are able to apply and develop digital methods used as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation.
Assessment methods and criteria
Independent and group tasks, numeric evaluation: 1-5
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to define what special issues and challenges the patient/client counselling situations can involve in clinical work. Students are able to describe and categorise various digital methods that can be used as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to compare methods used in clinical work in responding to special issues and in patient/client counselling situations. Students are able to apply various digital methods used as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Students are able to analyse, evaluate and develop methods used in clinical work in responding to special issues and in patient/client counselling situations. Students are able to apply and develop digital methods used as a support for care, counselling and rehabilitation.
Timing
01.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2.5 op
RD proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
- Katriina Kuhalampi
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Objective
Students know how to write a thesis plan.
Content
The structure of the thesis plan
Teaching methods
Counselling for an individual student and student groups
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The thesis plan has been written according to the instructions given at Seinäjoki UAS on how to write a thesis and other assignments.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The thesis plan has been written according to the instructions given at Seinäjoki UAS on how to write a thesis and other assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The thesis plan has been written according to the instructions given at Seinäjoki UAS on how to write a thesis and other assignments.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The thesis plan has been written according to the instructions given at Seinäjoki UAS on how to write a thesis and other assignments.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
5 op
RD proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Teachers
- Mari Salminen-Tuomaala
- Yklas Nimeämätön
Student groups
-
YKLAS24Master's Degree in Social Services and Health Care, Advanced Clinical Practitioner
Objective
Using evidence-based knowledge and a multiprofessional approach, students are able to assess patients'/clients' health, ability to function and needs for urgent care or rehabilitation, and to apply various assessment methods.
Students know how to use various communication, counselling and consultation methods.
Content
Clinical examination
Assessing and supporting functional capacity
Various instruments
Various communication, counselling and consultation methods
Teaching methods
Discussion lessons, clinical client experiments, laboration teaching, simulation based education
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are able to describe and define basic concepts in clinical expertise.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to critically analyse the content of clinical expertise and apply to practice what they have learnt. Students know how to use various evidence-based counselling, consultation and communication methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to compare and evaluate concepts in clinical expertise and extensively and critically apply to practice evidence-based knowledge. Students are able to evaluate and develop various counselling, communication and consultation methods.
Assessment methods and criteria
Independent task, numeric evaluation: 1.-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has not participated in evaluation of the patient physical condition (laboration lessons)
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to describe and define basic concepts in clinical expertise. Students can examine the patient and evaluate his physical condition and symptoms.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to critically analyse the content of clinical expertise and apply to practice what they have learnt. Students know how to use various evidence-based counselling, consultation and communication methods.Students are able to describe and define basic concepts in clinical expertise. Students can examine the patient and evaluate his physical condition and symptoms.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Students are able to compare and evaluate concepts in clinical expertise and extensively and critically apply to practice evidence-based knowledge. Students are able to evaluate and develop various counselling, communication and consultation methods.Students can examine the patient and evaluate his physical condition and symptoms independently.