Skip to main content

Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Degree:
Bachelor of Culture and Arts

Degree title:
Bachelor of Culture and Arts

Credits:
240 ects

Name of the Degree Programme

Degree Programme in Cultural Management

Field of study

Arts and humanities
The classification of the educational field is based on the international ISCED classification used by the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Specialisations

The degree programme does not include any specialisation studies

Qualification awarded

Bachelor of Culture and Arts

Level of qualification

The degree programme leads to a higher education degree which is a first cycle Bachelor-level degree in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). According to the eight-level classification of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF), the degree represents level 6.
The description of the level of the Degree is included in the Statute, at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120

Specific admission requirements

Eligibility for studies at a university of applied sciences is stipulated in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014.

The selection criteria are specified in the data of the Degree Programme at www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku

Qualification requirements and regulations (incl. graduation requirements)

See the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.

Examination regulations, assessment and grading

See the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Link

Structure of the studies

In accordance with the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the studies of a Degree Programme consist of basic studies, professional studies, practical training promoting professional skills, free elective studies, and a final project/thesis. The extent of the studies is 60 credits a year.

The studies consist of the following modules:

- basic studies
- professional studies of the degree programme
- professional studies of a cultural manager
- optional workshops
- free elective studies
- practical training
- final thesis

The basic studies are studies common to all the degree programmes of SeAMK. The degree programme is implemented through productions. The professional studies are interspersed between the productions; some of the theoretical studies may also be implemented as separate courses.

At workshops, the student can deepen or widen their knowledge. The degree includes 25 credits of workshop studies. The supply of workshop studies is established for every academic year. A workshop is arranged if there is a sufficient number of participants. Not all workshop studies are necessarily arranged during the studies.

The programme includes guided practical training in working life (60 credits). The studies also include free elective studies (10 credits) and a final thesis (15 credits). The Degree Programme in Cultural Management has good international networks. This provides excellent opportunities for studies or traineeship abroad.



The curriculum includes five seams permeating through the studies and extending over them. They are based on SeAMK’s reports, studies and strategy, as well as on the national and international recommendations and regulations related to education provided by universities of applied sciences.
- The Information Search seam strengthens the student’s professional and field-specific information search skills throughout the studies.
- The Internationalization seam secures the improvement of the student’s international competencies during their studies.
- The studies corresponding to the Entrepreneurship seam help the student understand the central and growing role of entrepreneurship in society.
- The Sustainable Development seam makes the student aware of social responsibility and helps them understand the diversity of sustainable development as a working life skill.
- The seam of Career Guidance helps the student recognise their competencies and own strengths. It also includes working life knowledge, job search skills, and lifelong learning.

Students have the opportunity to include multidisciplinary, working life-oriented project studies in their personal curricula (FramiPro). The students can participate in the FramiPro studies for one semester after their first year of study (30 credits).

Learning outcomes

The cultural manager's core competencies include the design and implementation of productions, productization, brand building, and communication. The cultural manager is able to anticipate and assess benefits of productions, be they cultural, economic, or social. A student who graduates from the programme is able to design content and productions for different target groups in a profitable way. Productions may be cultural service products, events, media products, or campaigns, irrespective of the field.

Profile of the programme

Starting from the first year of study, the common thread of the studies comprises projects and commissions implemented in cooperation with working life. Projects enable multidisciplinary cooperation and networking. Professional studies, the orientation of practical training, and career counselling secure the depth of the student's professional competencies.

In their studies, the student can exploit different methods of group guidance and ideation. The studies include basics of production techniques and production management. The core elements of the studies of a cultural manager also include pricing, financing and budgeting, as well as efficient production design. The student learns to anticipate and assess the benefits achieved through productions, be they cultural, economic, or social.

The student learns to utilise digital media as a marketing tool. Interpersonal skills and networking skills comprise the core competencies of a cultural manager. The command of intercultural communication in different languages is part of the cultural manager's studies.

Generic and subject specifc competences

Competencies are extensive knowledge entities, or combinations of the individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They describe qualifications, performance potential, and the ability to cope with professional duties.

Common/general competencies are fields of know-how common to different Degree Programmes, but their special characteristics and importance may vary between professions and work assignments. General competencies form the basis for professional activities, cooperation, and the development of expertise. According to Arene’s (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences) recommendations, general competencies include learning skills, ethical competence, cooperation skills, innovation skills, and internationalization skills. In addition to the above-mentioned competencies, entrepreneurial skills and quality management skills are emphasized in the degree studies of SeAMK as competencies common to all.

Degree programme-specific competencies form the basis for the development of the student’s professional expertise.The cultural manager's field-specific competencies include familiarity with operational environments, command of production processes, business skills, as well as development and people skills. Through command of field-specific competencies, the cultural manager deepens their own professional identity.

Pedagogical approach and learning environment

The studies in cultural management are based on project learning, which means that starting from the first year, all the studies are integrated with working life. Individual courses are integrated into larger productions or projects, and students act in groups of different sizes. Students' team work skills and interpersonal skills develop through collaborative learning.


The teacher's role is to be a mentor-counsellor, who facilitates and supports the student's learning process. Through learning assignments, projects and practical training, the student also explores in depth the subareas of culture in which they are especially interested. The student's own career path is planned throughout the student's studies. Networking is particularly important, for which real cooperation with working life is sought throughout the studies. The studies include small group work, expert lectures, company visits, learning assignments, project work and practical training in real learning environments.

Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)

The RPL procedure means the identification and recognition of the student’s previously acquired learning. The student has the opportunity to apply for the recognition of their competencies if the competencies correspond to the learning goals of the Degree Programme. The identification process is closely connected with the preparation of the student’s personal curriculum and is updated during personal counselling discussions.

The identification and recognition practices are presented in the RPL Instruction of SeAMK. It specifies how recognition of competencies is applied for, how the application is processed, and how the student is informed of it. The instruction lists the RPL contact persons of each Degree Programme, who counsel students on matters related to the process.

In the assessment of prior learning, for example the following evidence is used:

– certificates on training courses with similar content and on other training courses
– testimonials and further clarifications by an employer
– interviews with the student
– written and oral exams or reports
– functional or written assignments or other evidence
– presentations, portfolios

The final project/thesis and the Maturity Test cannot be submitted to a RPL procedure.


Studies completed at other institutions may also be included in the optional and free elective studies. Prior work experience replacing the practical training is reported as instructed by the degree programme. Previously acquired expertise expires in 10 years. The teacher who processes the application may request additional information or demonstration of prior learning, if necessary.

Work-based learning and work placements

The degree programme includes tow traineeship periods: the first one accounts for 25 credits and the second one 35, respectively. The student does the first traineeship as early as the autumn of the second year of study and is able to apply their competencies gained while studying. During their second traineeship, the student goes deeply into working life challenges with a development task designed together with the supervisor at the traineeship workplace. The practical training is the cornerstone of the professional identity of the cultural manager.


The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things or skills learned through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Work-based learning and work placements

The degree programme includes tow traineeship periods: the first one accounts for 25 credits and the second one 35, respectively. The student does the first traineeship as early as the autumn of the second year of study and is able to apply their competencies gained while studying. During their second traineeship, the student goes deeply into working life challenges with a development task designed together with the supervisor at the traineeship workplace. The practical training is the cornerstone of the professional identity of the cultural manager.


The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things or skills learned through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Work-based learning and work placements

The degree programme includes tow traineeship periods: the first one accounts for 25 credits and the second one 35, respectively. The student does the first traineeship as early as the autumn of the second year of study and is able to apply their competencies gained while studying. During their second traineeship, the student goes deeply into working life challenges with a development task designed together with the supervisor at the traineeship workplace. The practical training is the cornerstone of the professional identity of the cultural manager.


The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things or skills learned through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Work-based learning and work placements

The degree programme includes tow traineeship periods: the first one accounts for 25 credits and the second one 35, respectively. The student does the first traineeship as early as the autumn of the second year of study and is able to apply their competencies gained while studying. During their second traineeship, the student goes deeply into working life challenges with a development task designed together with the supervisor at the traineeship workplace. The practical training is the cornerstone of the professional identity of the cultural manager.


The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things or skills learned through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Occupational profiles

The cultural manager's extensive competencies are needed in different productions in the creative sector, the coordination of productions, and administrative tasks in the public, private, and third sectors. There is a need for the cultural manager's competencies in the media and entertainment industry, publishing, sports-related productions, advertising and marketing organisations' productions, art productions (music, theatre, TV, film), as well as game and other interactive productions.
After completing the vocational language studies the student is able to communicate in spoken and written situations related to his field of study. He can search for information and follow the development of his professional field in the target language.

Internationalization

Students are encouraged to gain international experience. An internationally-oriented study module of approximately 30 credits, mainly targeted at incoming exchange students, is offered during one semester; second or third-year students of the degree programme are also eligible to participate. Moreover, students can complete part of their studies in another country. They can spend all or part of the practical training periods abroad. On several courses, students use professional literature written in a foreign language as study material and have exams based on it.

Access to further studies

After three years of work experience, the student will be eligible for further studies for a Master’s Degree in the field in question.

Graduation requirements

See the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences and instructions for graduates at Intra.

Mode of study

Full-time studies.

Head of degree programme

Mr Esa Leikkari, tel. +358 40 830 4270, e-mail: esa.leikkari(at)seamk.fi

Student counsellor

Ms Johanna Ikola, tel. +358 40 868 2005, e-mail: johanna.ikola(at)seamk.fi

Coordination of Practical Training

Ms Sari Havulehto, tel. +358 40 830 3975, email: sari havulehto (at)seamk.fi

Coordination of international mobility

Tiina Välimäki, +358 40 830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi, students planning an exchange period in Europe
Maria Loukola, +358 40 830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi, students planning an exchange period outside Europe

Student services

Tel. +358 20 124 5055, opiskelijapalvelut(at)seamk.fi

Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management, Full-time studies

Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management, Full-time studies

Degree Programme in Cultural Management, Full-time studies

Degree Programme in Cultural Management, Full-time studies

Degree Programme in Cultural Management, Full-time studies

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 23.02.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Leena Elenius
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to
- take different target groups and their special characteristics into account while planning and implementing the different parts of an event
- utilize different user and customer-oriented information search methods
- utilize the methods of participatory planning and crowdsourcing
- recognize a service path and its actors at their event
- take special groups into account in their planning

Content

- Service path and personas as a concept and practical tools in the design of productions
- Customer and target groups
- Customer and user information collection and analysis methods as an aid to planning (e.g. observation, interview, design game, empathy probe)
- Taking special groups and accessibility into account in event planning
- Methods of participatory design and crowdsourcing

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognizes different user groups and their special characteristics and is able to take them into account while designing a production.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the demands of different user groups in planning and is able to utilize user information they have collected.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to take the customer group's needs into account in planning and choose the appropriate user information collection and analysis methods. The student is able to utilize the information they have collected.

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jukka Saarela
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student is able to
- interpret the basic structure of an audiovisual product
- recognize different techniques of audiovisual narration
- use the basic concepts of dramaturgy
- apply audiovisual narration in practice

Content

Analysis of the basic structure of a film
Basics of film narrative
Basic concepts of dramaturgy
Production process of a short film

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognizes the basic structures of a film and is able to name different methods of film narration. They recognize some of the basic concepts of dramaturgy. They participate in the production process of a short film.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to interpret the basic structures of a film and explain the effects of the different methods of film narration on the structure of a film. They are able to use the basic concepts of dramaturgy. They participate actively in the production process of a short film .

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to analyze the basic structures of a film and to compare the effects of the different methods of film narration on the structure of a film. They are able to fluently use the basic concepts of dramaturgy. They participate in the production process of a short film actively and work fluently in the production.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 08.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 05.12.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jukka Saarela
Student groups
  • KUTU22
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student
Becomes familiar with the principles of image and sound production design
Is able to recognise the importance of filming in the design process of audiovisual products
Becomes familiar with production technology

Content

Basics of filming design
Basics of image and sound narrative
Exercises on filming and recording

Materials

Will be shared in the course

Teaching methods

Guided exercises and independent exercise

Further information

classroom teaching 30 h
Independent study 100 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognises the importance of design in the production process of audiovisual products. The student is able to use the required technology under guidance. The student is able to implement filming and recording in video production with the assistance of a teacher. Does the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters the basics of design in the production process of audiovisual products. The student is able to use the required technology. The student is able to implement filming and recording in video production . Does the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters well the basics of design in the production process of audiovisual products. The student is able to use the required technology fluently. The student is able to implement filming and recording in video production fluently. Does the required exercises.

Assessment methods and criteria

Numerical assessment which is based on the exercise work.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student does not participate in teaching and does not complete the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student recognises the importance of design in the production process of audiovisual products. The student is able to use the required technology under guidance. The student is able to implement filming and recording in video production with the assistance of a teacher. Does the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters the basics of design in the production process of audiovisual products. The student is able to use the required technology. The student is able to implement filming and recording in video production . Does the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student masters well the basics of design in the production process of audiovisual products. The student is able to use the required technology fluently. The student is able to implement filming and recording in video production fluently. Does the required exercises.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 16.02.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jukka Saarela
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student
Becomes familiar with the basics of editing
Is able to recognise the importance of editing in the production process of audiovisual products
Becomes familiar with the basics of image and sound editing

Content

Learning of editing software
Practising of image and sound editing

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognises the importance of editing in the film production process. Is able to edit a fllm with assistance and to use editing software to some extent. Does the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to assess editing as part of the film production process. Is able to edit a fllm and to use editing software. Does the required exercises.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to plan editing as part of the film production process. Is able to edit a film in a creative way and to use editing software very well. Does the required exercises.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jukka Saarela
Student groups
  • KITI22
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU22
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services

Objective

The student
- understands the opportunities of storification in brand building
- knows the process of storification from a manuscript to implementation in the framework of design management
- is able to design a visual identity for a brand and give reasons for how the visual solutions support the company's brand image
- is able to implement and produce a brand manual

Content

- storification as a brand building method
- design management
- visual identity and graphic instructions
- brand manual

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- understands storification as a brand building method
- knows concepts of design management and masters the design process
- is able to design a visual basis for a brand
- is able to produce a brand manual

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- masters storification as a brand building method
- knows concepts of design management and masters the design process
- is able to design a visual basis of good quality for a brand
- is able to produce a brand manual of good quality

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- masters storification as a brand building method
- knows concepts of design management and masters the design process
- is able to design a visual basis of excellent quality for a brand
- is able to produce a brand manual of excellent quality

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 16.05.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Meeri Karusaari
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to:
- identify the operating environment of digital communication
- understands the forms of digital communication and channels
- analyse the efficiency of digital communication
- design and implement content for digital platforms

Content

- digital communications operating environment
- search engine marketing and optimisation information sources
- analysis of results
- design, implementation and development of content on digital platforms

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student performs supported tasks and participates in discussions. The student recognizes the operating environment of digital communication and is able to describe its forms and channels. The student can describe the effectiveness of digital communication. The student participates in the design, implementation and development of the content in a guided manner.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student performs the assigned tasks and participates actively in the discussions. The student can explain and define the operating environment of digital communication and can analyze its forms and channels. The student is able to evaluate the effectiveness of digital communication. The student participates in the design, implementation and development of the contents.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student performs the assignments excellently and participates actively in the discussions. The student is able to define and evaluate the operating environment of digital communications and is able to analyse its forms and channels. The student can interpret the effectiveness of digital communication. The student participates in the design, implementation and development of the contents with an analytical approach.

Enrollment

01.11.2024 - 23.02.2025

Timing

01.03.2025 - 31.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

1.5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

5 - 30

Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Satu Lautamäki

Objective

The student is able to:
-structure experiential elements as part of services and their marketing
-apply service design principles in the development of experience services
-create a customer-oriented service concept that leverages experiential elements

Content

The concept and significance of experiential elements in service business
Introduction to the principles and methods of service design
Researching customer needs as part of building user experience
The role and methods of creative ideation in developing experience services

Teaching methods

Online, face-to-face, independent work.

Student workload

One credit (1 ECTS) is equivalent to approximately 27 hours of work. The student's calculated working time is around 54 hours.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: The student can describe the steps and work processes used in service design. Can use up-to-date information and tools to carry out the work. Can assess his/her own competence. Participate in one workshop to present the event you are planning.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • KUTU21
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student is able to recognise and forecast different evolutionary trends. The student is able to interpret how changes in consumer habits, market and technology as well as innovations influence their own professional field. The student understands the importance of their own choices and social choices in the creation of the future. The student is able to produce in a group a scenario report on an optional subject area.

Content

- Forecasting methods (futures table, images of the future, scenario, futures workshop, Delfoi)
- Forecasting as a strategic tool
- Choices as an element in the creation of the future
- Trends, mega-trends
- Changes in the operational environment
- Group work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognises different future scenario models and mega-trends. The student is able to write a scenario report in a group.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student searches for relevant information about the subject area in a diverse way and is able to derive from it credible images of the future for a scenario report. The student sees the factors influencing the operational environment in their own field and is able to assess their impacts on the development of the field.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to use an applicable forecasting method and bring out significant drivers and to form , with the help of them, credible alternative images of the future as well as to outline, also at a practical level, development paths for a scenario report. The student is able to apply scenarios as a development tool in practical-level choices. The student sees the factors influencing the operational environment in their own field and is able to assess their impacts on the development of the field.

Enrollment

01.08.2024 - 01.04.2025

Timing

01.10.2024 - 12.10.2025

Credits

35 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student is able to:
- apply what they have learned
- utilise their professional experience in work assignments
- act independently in work communities
- analyse the development needs at the workplace where the traineeship takes place
- analyse their own professional competencies in writing and orally
- recognise their own areas requiring development

Content

Guided traineeship at a workplace determined beforehand

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The grade is Pass, when the student
- participates in search for the traineeship post
- signs a traineeship agreement with the employer
- copes with the duties assigned during their traineeship
- gives ideas for improvement for the operations of the workplace
- recognises their own needs for development and leaning
- participates in the final processing of the traineeship period
- submits a traineeship report as required

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

23.09.2024 - 27.09.2024

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jussi Kareinen
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

05.08.2024 - 06.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 31.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

RD proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Merja Juppo
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Size: 40. Open UAS: 40.)
Education groups
  • Open UAS

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

16.12.2024 - 02.03.2025

Timing

17.03.2025 - 31.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

RD proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Merja Juppo
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 40. Open UAS: 40.)
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 01.12.2024

Timing

03.03.2025 - 14.03.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Laura Liikavainio
  • Viljo Arohonka
  • Mari Heinonen
  • Riina Heinämäki
  • Jarkko Loima
  • Matti-Pekka Pasto
  • Milka Volanto
  • Jussi Kareinen
  • Noora Kivimäki
  • Heli Simon
  • Pirkko Mäntykivi
  • Anna Rauha
  • Sari Rimpelä
  • Riku Uusi-Jaakkola
  • Satu Lautamäki
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • RESTO23
    Bachelor of Hospitality Management, Full-time studies
  • SOS23C
    Bachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
  • BIELI23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology, Full-time studies
  • AUTE23SA
    Degree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies
  • SOS23B
    Bachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
  • AUTE23KA
    Degree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies
  • AGRO23
    Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • SH23S
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • FYS23
    Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • TITE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Teaching methods

In English
The course is implemented as a week-long intensive course, SeAMK Innovation Week. During the week, students do not participate in any other SeAMK teaching.
In the multi-mode delivery, the course is delivered online according to a specified timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on course concepts and processes (design thinking, service design, group work)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer data using different methods
- Ideation of possible solutions using different methods
- Testing and development of solutions based on testing
- Presentation of the solution or concept

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

13.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

10.03.2025 - 04.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

RD proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Merja Juppo
Student groups
  • MTH24
    Bachelor of Health Care, Public Health Nursing
  • MGERO23
    Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology,Multimodal implementation
  • MRESTO24
    Bachelor of Hospitality Management, Part-time studies
  • MSH24K
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing, Multimodal implementation
  • MBIELI24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology, Part-time studies
  • MRKM24
    Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 08.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

RD proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Merja Juppo
Student groups
  • MKONE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • MAGRO23
    Bachelor of Natural Resources
  • MLITA23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management, Multimodal implementation
  • MSH23S
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing, Multimodal implementation

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 25.09.2024

Timing

11.11.2024 - 15.11.2024

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Marika Kääriäinen
  • Riina Heinämäki
  • Milka Volanto
  • Jussi Kareinen
  • Noora Kivimäki
  • Terhi Anttila
  • Merja Juppo
  • Heli Simon
  • Anna Rauha
  • Pia Haapala
  • Helena Myllymäki
  • Pekka Lager
  • Jaana Liukkonen
  • Saija Råtts
Student groups
  • SH24K
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing, Full-time studies
  • SOS23C
    Bachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
  • SOS23B
    Bachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
  • KONE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • AUTO23
  • LITA23B
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • LITA23C
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • RAK23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • LITA23D
    Tradenomi (AMK), Liiketalous
  • RKM23
    Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • LITA23A
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management

Objective

The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field

Content

In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work

Teaching methods

In English
The course is implemented as a week-long intensive course, SeAMK Innovation Week. During the week, students do not participate in any other SeAMK teaching.
In the multi-mode delivery, the course is delivered online according to a specified timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on course concepts and processes (design thinking, service design, group work)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer data using different methods
- Ideation of possible solutions using different methods
- Testing and development of solutions based on testing
- Presentation of the solution or concept

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 08.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Seats

15 - 30

Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • From Field to Fork
  • Gateway to Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
  • IGWCM24F
    Gateway to Cultural Management Studie
  • KITI22
  • KUTU22
  • IEPFF24F
    From Field to Fork
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies
  • VVO

Objective

After the course, the student will understand the differences in communication between different cultures. The student will be able to use the knowledge gained in the course on both nonverbal and verbal communication in situations where there are people from different cultures. The student will also understand what should be taken into consideration when interacting with people from different cultures.

Content

- cultural differences
- nonverbal communication
- verbal communication

Materials

The material in Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, group work, independent studies

Student workload

80 h

Further information

Attendance 80% of the lessons

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is familiar with the basic course concepts.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the core concepts and is able to apply most of them in practice.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the course concepts and is able to apply them very well in practice.

Assessment methods and criteria

Spoken presentation

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is familiar with the basic course concepts.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the core concepts and is able to apply most of them in practice.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student knows the course concepts and is able to apply them very well in practice.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Katri Juppi
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student has a comprehensive view on work and the importance of a well-functioning work community. The student understands that the precondition for a well-functioning work community is the ability to recognise one's own person as part of the work community.
The student is able to develop and assess their own management (self-management), which is always management in relation to another person. The have the basic competencies in human resource management and are able to apply them in productions.Students are able to lead the production team, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the team. The student recognises economic planning and monitoring as a management tool. They have the basis knowledge of management and risk management.

Content

Key elements of a well-functioning work community
Self-management
Basics of leadership
Economic planning and monitoring as a management tool
Change and risk management as part of management

Materials

Järvinen, P. (2014). Esimiestyö ongelmatilanteissa. 8. uudistettu painos. Helsinki: Talentum.
Viitala, R. (2021). Henkilöstöjohtaminen: Keskeiset käsitteet, teoriat ja trendit.
Koppelomäki, I. (2007-2021). Itsensä johtaminen. Uskalla Innostua.
In addition material presented by the teacher during the course.

Teaching methods

Lectures, Flipped learning, individual work, exam.

Exam schedules

Online exam at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 ECTS equals to approximately 81 hours of work for student.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- The student recognises the features of a well-functioning work environment
- The student is able to act in the work community in compliance with the commonly agreed rules and goals
- The student understands the importance of leadership

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- The student clearly recognises the mission of the organisation and their own role as part of the work community
- The student is able to act as a leader of a work group and delegate tasks in a group
- The student understands the importance of economic management as part of management

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- The student has a comprehensive view on work and they are able to analytically consider their own professional persona as part of the work community
- The student is able to lead work groups in different operational environments
- The student can utilise budgeting as a management tool
- The student has the ability to manage the organisation also when it is undergoing changes

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation, online exam, individual assignment.

Timing

01.08.2024 - 31.12.2025

Credits

0 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Store
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

x

Content

x

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Timing

01.08.2024 - 31.12.2025

Credits

0 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Store
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

x

Content

x

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jussi Kareinen
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • KUTU21
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student
- is able to work in an international learning environment
- recognises international actors in their own professional field
- is able to communicate in an international operational environment
- understands the features of intercultural communication

Content

- International operational environment of cultural management
- Multicultural work community
- Cross-cultural communication
- Job search abroad

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to name some of the key international actors in their own professional field
Is able to communicate, though with challenges, in an international operational environment
Is able to work in an international environment

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Recognises international actors in their own field
Is capable of international communication in work assignments
Is able to act in international operational environments

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Recognises the key international actors in their field
Is capable of international communication in work assignments
Is able to act in international operational environments
Is able to forecast the effects of internationalisation on their own professional field

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 01.11.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student is able to

- understand the importance of concept development as part of product development
- compare the differences between concept development and product design
- take into account the concept as a resource-saving method
- apply the basics of concept development methods in the creation of a new product/service idea
- develop an innovative idea together with the commissioner and/or the user as a project
- analyse the risks and opportunities of concept development
- apply the principles of concept protection

Content

- concept development process
- methods of concept development
- customer and user cooperation
- risk assessment and protection

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- understands the importance of concept development as part of product design
- applies the basics of concept development methods in the creation of a new product/service idea
- develops an innovative idea together with the commissioner and/or user as a project
- analyses the risks and opportunities of concept development
- applies the principles of concept protection

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- understands the importance of concept development as part of product design
- applies well the basics of concept development methods in the creation of a new product/service idea
- develops an innovative idea together with the commissioner and/or user as a project
- analyses the risks and opportunities of concept development in a comprehensive way
- applies the principles of concept protection

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- understands very well the importance of concept development as part of product design
- applies very well the basics of concept development methods in the creation of a new product/service idea
- develops very well an innovative idea together with the commissioner and/or user as a project
- analyses the risks and opportunities of concept development in a comprehensive way
- applies the principles of concept protection in a diverse way

Enrollment

02.01.2025 - 15.01.2025

Timing

11.01.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Johanna Koivula
Student groups
  • MPK25
    Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Materials

Material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Online course.
Tasks to be performed independently in moodle

Student workload

Total 54 h of independent work

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Anu Katila
  • Anu Latva-Reinikka
  • Opiskelijapalvelut Nimeämätön
  • Eija Putula-Hautala
  • Marja Erkkilä
Student groups
  • MAGRO25
    Bachelor of Natural Resources

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Materials

- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Lectures, assignments, group work

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assignments

Enrollment

05.08.2024 - 17.11.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 31.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Johanna Koivula
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 51. Open UAS: 51.)
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Materials

Material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle

Student workload

Total 54 h of independent work

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Further information

The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.

Enrollment

16.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 31.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Johanna Koivula
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 50. Open UAS: 50.)
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Materials

Material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle

Student workload

Total 54 h of independent work

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Further information

The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.

Enrollment

01.01.2025 - 19.01.2025

Timing

01.01.2025 - 08.06.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Kristiina Store
  • Leena Koivumäki
  • Tiina Hemminki
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Virpi Rantanen
  • Kari Jokiranta
  • Tarja Knuuttila
Student groups
  • MTH25
    Bachelor of Health Care, Public Health Nursing

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Enrollment

05.08.2024 - 17.11.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 31.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Construction Site Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Hospitality Management
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Annukka Haapa-aho

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Materials

Material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle

Student workload

Total 54 h of independent work

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Further information

The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.

Enrollment

19.08.2024 - 20.10.2024

Timing

01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
  • Bachelor of Social Services
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
  • Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
  • Meri Matala-Aho
  • Paula Paloniemi

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK

Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jussi Kareinen
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student knows the key players in the art sector and the position of the cultural manager in the art sector
The student understands the structures of cultural administration and their role in decision-making
The student is able analyze the importance of culture in society

Content

- Structures of cultural administration
- Cultural manager's role in different arts
- Role of culture in society from the perspective of vitality and welfare

Materials

Kulttuuripolitiikan strategia 2021-25 (OKM 2020)

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fair
The student mainly understands the structures of cultural administration
The student recognizes some of the cultural manager's job descriptions in arts
The student is able to analyze the importance of culture in society in a satisfactory way

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good
The student is well aware of the structures of cultural administration
The student recognizes the cultural manager's key job descriptions in arts
The student is able to analyze the importance of culture in society in an adequate way

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent
The student is well aware of the structures of cultural administration and their importance and role in society
The student knows the cultural manager's different job descriptions in arts very well and is also able to recognize new job descriptions in the art sector
The student is able to analyze the changing role of culture in society in an comprehensive way

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Margit Mannila
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • KUTU21
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student
-recognise the importance of incorporeal rights in their own professional field
- can interpret the meaning of grant of rights in an agreement related to copyright
- knows differences and similarities between the different areas of the law of industrial property
- is able to search for and utilise different forms of protection to protect intellectual property

Content

- copyrights, industrial property rights, business name
- transfer and licensing of copyrights
- IPR portfolio

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- recognise the importance of copyrights in their own professional field
- can interpret the meaning of grant of rights in an agreement related to copyright
- is able to interpret agreements related to copyright at some level

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- recognise the importance of copyrights in their own professional field
- can interpret the meaning of grant of rights in an agreement related to copyright
- is able to interpret agreements related to copyright well and is able to make a memo of it for paralegal purposes
- is able to apply different forms of protection in their own professional field
- is able to utilise the differences and similarities between industrial property rights and copyrights

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- recognise the importance of copyrights in their own professional field
- can interpret the meaning of grant of rights in an agreement related to copyright
- is able to interpret agreements related to copyright well, is able to make a memo of it for paralegal purposes and draft a foundation of an agreement for a lawyer to complement
- is able to apply different forms of protection in their own professional field
- is able to utilise the differences and similarities between industrial property rights and copyrights
- is able to analyse and itemise different options and select the best ones for themselves
- is able to build and manage their own IPS portfolio

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 30.04.2025

Timing

02.09.2024 - 25.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Ari Haasio
Student groups
  • KUTU20
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KITI24
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
  • KITI22
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU22
  • KITI21
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services

Objective

Understands the main turning points of cultural history. Student understands how different phenomena are dependent on each other and what influences they have.

Content

The basic terminology and turning points of culture are studied on the course. All students become familiar with an optional part of culture history and write an essay about it. The aim is to understand better modern cultural phenomena by understanding the historical perspective of culture and its development.

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Literature, online teaching

Exam schedules

No exam

Student workload

135 h independent online learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

(1-2)
Understands the basics of historical development and knows the basic terminology. The written content produced by the student is poor and does not show much effort.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

(3-4)
Understands the main lines of cultural history and knows its most important turning points. The student is active and can justify their opinions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5
Excellent understanding of cultural phenomena and their influence on modern culture. The student is also able to show critical thinking in their answers.

Assessment methods and criteria

points from essays and excercises.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Not all assignments were returned and/or the student received less than 50% of the maximum course score.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Poor skills, but no big mistakes in the basics.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Key things well held. Answers justified and key issues held.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The whole and the cause-and-effect relationships of the things are excellently held. Answers justified and analytical.

Qualifications

None

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 07.01.2025

Timing

14.01.2025 - 07.03.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Elina Muotio
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student knows the business opportunities of the cultural field and the structures supporting entrepreneurship. The student knows the economic preconditions of entrepreneurship. The student is able to network and lean on the clusters of their own field. The student is able to develop and test their business idea in practice.

Content

- operational environments of entrepreneurship
- support systems, networks, and channels of growth
- assessment of the student's own business idea
- processes and methods of business idea development and customer-oriented product development

Materials

Suggested literature:
Petäjä, E., Peltoniemi, J., & Viljamaa, A. (2015). Kehitä sivutoimiyritystäsi: Työkirja sivutoimiyrityksen tulevaisuuden pohdintaan. Seinäjoen ammattikorkeakoulu.
Sekki, A., & Härkönen, O. (2020). Kevytyrittäjyys: Opas sivutoimiseen yrittäjyyteen. Kauppakamari.
Uusyrityskeskus (2023). Perustamisopas alkavalle yrittäjälle.
Other learning materials, e.g. podcasts and videos on entrepreneurship in creative fields

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions and assignments.

Student workload

81 hours, of which lessons 15 hours and independent work 66 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognises the principles and potential of entrepreneurship in the cultural field. The student is able to search for information and networks to develop their own business idea.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student recognises the potential of cultural business from the customer perspective. The student recognises the potential of entrepreneurship and their own starting point as an entrepreneur in the creative sector. The student is able to search for support and networks to develop their own business idea.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has a comprehensive view of the potential, operational environment and networks of entrepreneurship in the cultural field. The student is able to apply information by developing and testing their business idea from the customer perspective.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved course assignment

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students identify entrepreneurial opportunities and financial perspectives in their field. Opiskelija knows the alternative forms and basic financial aspects of entrepreneurship. Students will bring up ideas related to entrepreneurship and related productization opportunities.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students are able to analyze the operating environments and forms of entrepreneurship and describe the possibilities and financial perspectives of entrepreneurship in their field and as a career option. Students are able to develop, productize and test entrepreneurial ideas.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students are able to critically evaluate and analyze the operating environments and forms of entrepreneurship. Student considers entrepreneurship-related opportunities and financial perspectives in her own field and as part of her own career path. Student is able to actively and diversely develop, productize and test several entrepreneurial ideas.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Leena Uusitalo
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student knows

- how to define the basic functions of the financial administration of a company and utilize information in the profession of cultural manager
- the principles of pricing
- how to describe how the financial result is formed in productions of the cultural field and take into account what factors influence the financial result
- how to account the possibilities of circular economics in economic calculations

Content

- description of the basic functions of financial administration: management accounting and financial accounting, budget, types of income and expenditure, pricing, VAT
- use of a spreadsheet program for basic calculations and budgeting
- financial planning in productions of the cultural field: budgeting, sensitivity analysis of budgets, and risk analysis of events

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognises the basic functions of financial administration and understands how they can be utilised in the cultural manager's work. The student is able to prepare a budget using a spreadsheet program.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to define and utilise the basic functions of financial administration in a diverse way.. The student is able to apply the principles of budgeting and prepare a budget for a production in the cultural field as well as to assess the effects of different types of income and expenditure.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to apply the basic concepts of financial administration appropriately from the perspective of the cultural manager's work. The student can apply the principles of budgeting, prepare a well-founded budget, and critically assess the factors influencing the financial result of a production in the cultural field.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

0 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The law pertaining to studies at the university of applied sciences level (352/2003)states that students are required to sit a Maturity Test to receive their univerity of applied sciences degree. Students write about a topic related to the thesis, which indicates their knowledge of the topic and of Finnish or Swedish language. If a student has received their education in a language other than Finnish or Swedish, the head of the degree program may allow the student to take the Maturity Test in another language.

Content

Students must demonstrate that they master the content of their thesis and produce a clear and consistent written presentation.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

In accordance with the principle of a joint assessment of the maturity test.

Enrollment

12.03.2025 - 16.04.2025

Timing

28.04.2025 - 31.07.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jukka Saarela
Student groups
  • VVO

Objective

The student
Participates in event production as an expert in the field
Is able to recognise the importance of audiovisual production in the production process of a big event
Is able to deepen their filming and post-production skills

Content

Implementation of a commission related to live production
Making of short animations
Use of different techniques in (almost) real-time video productions

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: Active participation in production, approved exercises, fluent use of tools needed in production


Fail: Absence from production, dereliction of exercises, the student needs continuous help with the use of production tools

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Mika Karhumaa
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student recogniszes the various audiences of the modern cultural business and the operating enviroment.
The student is able to build a strategic foundation to the article they represent.
The student internalizes the meaning of passive promotion and is able to take advantage of it when increasing the capital of social media.
The student is able to develop the brand image of the artist and understands the components associated with it.
The student is able to discuss, create and implement action plans together with the artist.
The student internalizes the earning logic of management activities.

Content

Various audiences and operating environment of the cultural business
The capital of social media and its importance in setting up a manager relationship
Brand thinking and commitments to the features and wishes of an artist
Communication with an artist
Subject and content of the management agreement
The importance of intermediation as a part of the management

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognizes the structures and terminology of different sectors of art. The student is able to act as an intermediary post in assisting tasks. The student understands the basic idea of manager activity.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student recognizes the structures and terminology of different sectors of art and understands the professional requirements of the intermediator. The student understands the content of manager’s tasks and how the manager supports the articles, they represent. The student is able to interpret a manager agreement.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student recognizes the structures and terminology of different sectors of art and knows well the professional requirements of the intermediator. The student is able to act in manager’s positions. The student is able to build different action plans with the artist, discuss fluently and to productize the artist’s know-how, name and likeliness. The student is able to interpret manager agreement strategically and is able to include tailor-made operating models.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

19.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services

Objective

The student
- understands the importance of negotiating skills in the cultural manager's work
- masters the principles of different types of negotiations
'- masters the theory related to negotiation and meeting skills and is able to apply theory in practical situations
- knows the documentation practices related to negotiations and meetings
- is able to assure convince their audience

Content

- theory on meeting and negotiation skills
- different negotiator types
- working life negotiations and meetings and the related documentation
. simulation of negotiations and meetings and their assessment
- exercises in making presentations

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student

- finds the strengths and targets for development of their own negotiating style
- masters some of the key principles of meetings and negotiations
- is able to act as a participant in meetings in such a way that they can express their ideas clearly when requested
- is able to act with assistance as chair or secretary of a meeting
- as a participant in a negotiation/discussion, is able to express their opinion when requested
- is able to receive feedback about their activity as a group member in negotiations and meetings
- is able to appear before the public and to convey their ideas

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student

- understands the importance of good interactive skills in working life and in life in general
- finds the strengths and targets for development of their own negotiating style and seeks to develop their negotiating style
- is able to act as a participant in meetings in such a way that they can express their ideas clearly
- is able to act independently as chair or secretary of a meeting
- as a participant in a negotiation/discussion, is able to act in an adequate way and to address the meeting in such a way that it promotes the negotiation
- is able to lead a negotiation/discussion
- is able to receive feedback about their own activity as a group member in negotiations and meetings and seeks to improve their skills based on the feedback
- is able to appear adequately before different target audiences

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student

- understands well the importance of good interactive skills in working life and in life in general
- finds the strengths and targets for development of their own negotiating style and is able to develop their negotiating style
- masters the key theory on meetings and negotiations skills
- is able to act as a participant in meetings in such a way that they can express their ideas constructively and clearly
- is able to act independently as chair or secretary of a meeting
- as a participant in a negotiation/discussion, is able to act in an adequate way and to address the meeting in such a way that it promotes the negotiation and is able to contribute positively to the atmosphere of the negotiation
- is able to lead a negotiation/discussion
- is able to receive feedback about their own activity as a group member in negotiations and meetings and seeks to improve their skills based on the feedback
- is able to appear adequately before different target audiences

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 15.11.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Leena Elenius
  • Satu Lautamäki
  • Virpi Masonen
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student is able to
- observe research subjects relevant for their professional field and to assess research and theses on the field
- define the research problem and questions
- use the key qualitative research methods and assess their applicability to different research subjects
- name the key producers of research knowledge in their field and use national and international sources of research information in their own field (databases and online services)
- analyse their topic and related needs for information
- describe their research or development subject with concepts and search terms and structure them hierarchically
- assess the information they have found
- use information in an ethically right way

Content

- research approaches and methods applicable to the cultural field
- assessment of previous theses
- stages of the thesis project, instructions, and assessment criteria
- definition of the research problem and questions as well as analysis of the theoretical framework
- familiarization with the use of research methodology and the analysis of the results with a research assignment
- the databases of the student's own field, including international databases, and assessment of the quality of data sources
- information search as part of professional and research/development competencies
- information search process for the student's own thesis
- application of the SeAMK's Guide for Written Work
- following information

Materials

Hakala, J. T. (2022). Hyvä, parempi, valmis: Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus.
Kananen, J. (2019). Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas: Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kostamo, P., Airaksinen, T. & Vilkka, H. (2022). Kirjoita itsesi asiantuntijaksi: Opas toiminnalliseen opinnäytetyöhön. Art House.
Kniivilä, S., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Mäntynen, A. (2017). Tiede ja teksti: Tehoa ja taitoa tutkielman kirjoittamiseen. Kolmas, uudistettu painos. [Helsinki]: Gaudeamus Oy.
SeAMK thesis instructions, Instructions and template for written work.
SeAMK Library web pages and other SeAMK Library online material (Library guides)

Teaching methods

Lectures, work shops, assignments/tests

Student workload

Lectures, exercises and workshops 27 hours, individual work 81 hours

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass:

The student is able to
- define a research problem and questions
- use research methods in their thesis
- analyse the results of their thesis
- structure their information needs and approach it form different perspectives
- name concepts related to their topic and structure them
- name and choose professional and scientific sources of information relevant for their information need
- use databases and the Internet as well as other sources of information in the cultural field
- analyse search results
- interpret databases and web pages as well as apply SeAMK's Guide for Written Work in their work

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:

The student is able to
- define a research problem and questions
- use research methods in their thesis
- analyse the results of their thesis
- structure their information needs and approach it form different perspectives
- name concepts related to their topic and structure them
- name and choose professional and scientific sources of information relevant for their information need
- use databases and the Internet as well as other sources of information in the cultural field
- analyse search results
- interpret databases and web pages as well as apply SeAMK's Guide for Written Work in their work

Assessment methods and criteria

- Approved assignments

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 25.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Satu Lautamäki
  • Johanna Ikola
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The final project/ / thesis develops and demonstrates the student's ability to apply their competencies in a practical expert assignment related to the professional studies. In the thesis process, the student learns problem-solving, a research-oriented and developing way of thinking, independent information search, and the presentation of results in writing. The student is able to present in their report the results of a production in a logical way, using good language as well as professional and scientific terminology. The thesis project allows for creativity, experiments and original applications. The thesis can be written as an individual work or as part of a more extensive research or development project. In addition to a written part, the thesis may include a productive part.

Content

For the student, the thesis is a learning process, which includes the following features:
- usability in practice
- research-orientation
- close presence of working-life representatives in the process, e.g., as supervisors or evaluators
- connection between the supervisor and the student
- application of theory in practice
- creativity and innovation
Planning of the thesis: choice of subject, preparation of a research plan and its presentation at a seminar, agreement with the commissioner, and possible research permission
Implementation of the thesis: Implementation of the thesis taking the related requirements and criteria into account
Reporting on the thesis: written report and oral presentation. Observing SeAMK's Instructions for thesis work and written work. Check with Urkund, publication of the thesis

Materials

The student works independently to search information and material to one's own thesis

Teaching methods

Reporting on the thesis is based on student's independent work:
Written report and oral presentation. Observing SeAMK's Instructions for thesis work and written work. Check with Ouriginal. Publication of the thesis.

Student workload

Reporting for the thesis is part of Thesis process (15 credits), of which Reporting is 5 credits:
-independent work 135 hours, including presentation in the final thesis seminar

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Based on the assessment criteria of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is evaluated based on the assessment criteria of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Satu Lautamäki
  • Johanna Ikola
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The final project/ / thesis develops and demonstrates the student's ability to apply their competencies in a practical expert assignment related to the professional studies. In the thesis process, the student learns problem-solving, a research-oriented and developing way of thinking, independent information search, and the presentation of results in writing. The student is able to present in their report the results of a production in a logical way, using good language as well as professional and scientific terminology. The thesis project allows for creativity, experiments and original applications. The thesis can be written as an individual work or as part of a more extensive research or development project. In addition to a written part, the thesis may include a productive part.

Content

For the student, the thesis is a learning process, which includes the following features:
- usability in practice
- research-orientation
- close presence of working-life representatives in the process, e.g., as supervisors or evaluators
- connection between the supervisor and the student
- application of theory in practice
- creativity and innovation
Planning of the thesis: choice of subject, preparation of a research plan and its presentation at a seminar, agreement with the commissioner, and possible research permission
Implementation of the thesis: Implementation of the thesis taking the related requirements and criteria into account
Reporting on the thesis: written report and oral presentation. Observing SeAMK's Instructions for thesis work and written work. Check with Urkund, publication of the thesis

Materials

The student works independently to search information and material to one's own thesis subject and plan

Teaching methods

Planning of the thesis is based on student's independent work and participation in seminars:
choice of subject, preparation of a research plan and its presentation at a seminar, agreement with the commissioner, and possible research permission

Student workload

Planning for the thesis is part of Thesis (15 credits), of which planning is 4 credits:
-independent work 108 hours, including participation in seminars marked in schedules

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Based on the assessment criteria for theses of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is evaluated based on the assessment criteria of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 23.02.2025

Credits

6 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Satu Lautamäki
  • Jussi Kareinen
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The final project / thesis develops and demonstrates the student's ability to apply their competencies in a practical expert assignment related to the professional studies. In the thesis process, the student learns problem-solving, a research-oriented and developing way of thinking, independent information search, and the presentation of results in writing. The student is able to present in their report the results of a production in a logical way, using good language as well as professional and scientific terminology. The thesis project allows for creativity, experiments and original applications. The thesis can be written as an individual work or as part of a more extensive research or development project. In addition to a written part, the thesis may include a productive part.

Content

For the student, the thesis is a learning process, which includes the following features:
- usability in practice
- research-orientation
- close presence of working-life representatives in the process, e.g., as supervisors or evaluators
- connection between the supervisor and the student
- application of theory in practice
- creativity and innovation
Planning for the thesis: choice of subject, preparation of a research plan and its presentation at a seminar, agreement with the commissioner, and possible research permission
Implementation of the thesis: Implementation of the thesis taking the related requirements and criteria into account
Reporting on the thesis: written report and oral presentation. Observing SeAMK's Instructions for thesis work and written work. Check with Urkund, publication of the thesis

Materials

The student works independently to search information and material to one's own thesis subject and plan

Teaching methods

Implementation of the thesis is based on student's independent work taking the related requirements and criteria into account

Student workload

Implementation of the thesis is part of Thesis process (15 credits), of which Implementation is 6 credits:
-independent work 162 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Based on the assessment criteria for theses of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is evaluated based on the assessment criteria of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

6 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to
- innovate, design and develop services and products so that they meet the company's business goals and the customer's needs
- find out about customers' needs using different methods
- apply processes of service design in different contexts
- involve users and staff in the development of services
- perceive the experiential contact points and processes of a service/event/production
- design and build a storified and physical framework for a service
- develop and change existing processes taking the commissioner's wishes into account, exploiting user-orientation
- apply business principles and opportunities in the development of services
- take into account the possibilities of the circular economy in the development of services

Content

- Service design process
- Opportunities of service design in different contexts
- Acquisition and interpretation of customer insight
- Elements of value creation and quality of services
- Meeting the needs of service users and analysis of the operational environment
- Contact points of the service experience and their design and modelling
- Improvement of services, development of new services and spin-offs
- Taking the company brand into account in service and product design
- Implementation of new services in the organization
- Commercialization of the service concept (BMC)
- The course may include a development project carried out for an external commissioner

Materials

provided by teatcher

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises, exams, project

Student workload

Contact studies 66h and independent studies 90h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to implement a well-working solution for a customer and to present it in an intelligible way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student presents the opportunities of service design to the commissioner and is able to produce several alternative solutions. The student is able to take customers' needs into account and involve users in the development process. The student recognizes the methods of service design and is able to apply them.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to illustrate the opportunities of service design for the development of the commissioner's functions and to create well-working alternative solutions for the commissioner, as well as to present them in a marketing manner. The student is able to take customers' needs into account and involve them in the development process. The student is able to convert theory into practical development activities.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exams 20%, Project work 60%, Peer review 20%

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Toni Annala
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KITI22
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services

Objective

The student is able to
- recognise the history of digital games
- recognise phenomena of digital games and gaming and to assess the relation of digital games to technology and other media culture
- perceive concepts related to the content-based interpretation and understanding of games and to utilise methods of gamification in the development of different services
- assess digital games from the perspective of library services and to take account of the opportunities of gamification in library work and collection policies

Content

- history and contexts of digital playing
- gamification of the activitities of services and users
- game literacy
- games as library material

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of the course

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1-2
The student understands the importance of games as library material and masters the basics of game literacy and the basic principles of gamification.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3-4
The student has a good knowledge of game literacy and is able to apply it to library work from the perspective of media literacy. The student knows well the evolutionary trends of the history of gaming and is capable of working with gamification alone and in a group.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5
The student has an excellent knowledge of the history of gaming and they can innovate and apply the idea of gamification alone and in a group. The student can also concretely and theoretically apply and consider game literacy as part of media literacy.

Qualifications

No previous studies required

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

13.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

0 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Store
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student knows the main grammatical structures and general vocabulary in Swedish. They can write simple texts.
They can develop their language skills.
The course will help students to complete the compulsory Swedish language course of their degree program.

Content

The main grammatical structures
Texts and exercises to practice general language and vocabulary
Spoken and written exercises

Materials

Course material in Moodle

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: The student completes the given exercises and the exam with a pass grade.
The student uses basic structures and a limited vocabulary in spoken and written communication. Mistakes have some impact on comprehension. The student understands slow and clear speech and simple texts about familiar everyday situations. Pronunciation is understandable.

Fail: Exercises and assignments and/or exam are not passed.

Qualifications

Previous Swedish language studies at the upper secondary level are required. The student has a basic knowledge of Swedish, but their language proficiency is below level B1 of the European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Further information

The minimum attendance 50 %.
The course cannot be completed by competence demonstration (recognition of prior learning).

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 24.03.2025

Timing

24.03.2025 - 16.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

1 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Miia Koski
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student knows
- the strategic and operative process, basic concepts and the competitive tools of systematic marketing
- ho to analyse topical themes of marketing

Content

- Modern marketing thinking
- Internal and external marketing
- Analysis of the operational environments of marketing
- Segmentation
- Positioning
- Marketing strategies, goals, and indicators
- Competitive tools of marketing
- Topical themes in marketing: marketing in social media

Teaching methods

- Lessons and exercises
- Writing marketing plan
- Marketing simulation and reporting

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has done the assigned exercises and attended the course. The student has competencies corresponding to the learning goals of systematic marketing. They are able to apply the basics of marketing in practical situations in a satisfactory way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has done the assigned exercises well and actively attended the course. Students will be able to analyse the knowledge and skills related to systematic marketing. They will recognise the links between the different aspects of marketing. They are able to apply the basics of marketing in practical situations well

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has done the assigned exercises very well and attended the course actively and constructively. Students will be able to analyse the knowledge and skills related to systematic marketing. They can analyse the links between the different aspects of marketing. They are able to apply the basics of marketing in practical situations very well

Assessment methods and criteria

- Marketing plan 50% (Grading 0 - 5)
- Marketing simulation 50% (Grading 0 - 5)

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Store
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

Students will know how to communicate in everyday and work-related situations in spoken and written Swedish. They will learn to seek and apply work-related information and use basic professional terminology. They will know how to develop their language skills to meet worklife requirements. Students will be able to describe themselves, their education, work experience and competence. They will learn to sell and market their know-how and services and to maintain and promote customer relationships. Students will learn to attend to various tasks and market their products and services using a variety of media. Students will learn to describe typical professional tasks/projects and their implementation. They will know how to act and give advice and instructions in work-related situations.

Content

Describing personal details and education, compiling a CV, describing the cultural management field and competence, acquiring commisssions and/or seeking employment, customer meetings, giving instructions and customer situations, written communication, e.g. quotations and reports, small talk, giving and justifying one's opinion, telephone communication and electronic communication

Materials

Teacher's material

Teaching methods

Contact lessons, spoken and written assignments, listening exercises, group and pair work, independent work.

Exam schedules

Oral and written exams by the end of the course. re-take written exams in EXAM.
Assessments need to be completed before the last lesson.

Student workload

Total work load 81 h
- contact lessons 26-30 h
- independent work 51-55 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Grade 1: Students use simple structures and limited vocabulary. Mistakes impede comprehension. They understand slow and clear speech and easy field-related texts. They manage predictable working life situations when assisted. Pronunciation is influenced by other languages.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Grade 3: Students can use grammatical structures and field-related vocabulary correctly making only minor mistakes. They manage fairly well in the most common predictable field-related situations. The pronunciation is understandable.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Grade 5: Students have an excellent command of grammatical structures and field-related vocabulary. They are active and can interact independently and fluently in written and spoken work life situations. Pronunciation close to that of a native speaker.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation in contact lessons, spoken exercises, written assignments, spoken and written exam.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to
- name the key stylistic tendencies of different arts
- recognise opportunities of the applied use of art
- position a single artifact as part of a more extensive framework
- recognise the importance of art in society
- analyse their artistic experiences in writing

Content

Key stylistics tendencies and representatives of different arts
Opportunities of applied art in different fields (e.g. the welfare sector)

Strcture of art criticism and practising it from the cultural manager's perspective

Materials

Mäki, T (2020). Taiteen tehtävä:esseitä

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to name some principal stylistic tendencies of art and their areas of application
Is able to write about their artistic experiences in a descriptive way

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to name the principal stylistic tendencies of different arts
Knows several opportunities for the use of applied art in different contexts
Is able to write about their artistic experiences in an analytic way

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student Is able to write about their artistic experiences in an analytic way and to find new meanings for them
The student is able to name the principal stylistic tendencies of different arts and their key representatives
The student knows several opportunities for the use of applied art in different contexts and is able to find a new context or combination of methods for an applied use

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

06.11.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU22
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services

Objective

The content and aims of this course are defined depending on what matters(s) in the cultural field are topical at the time of the implementation and what competencies the students express they need.
Can also be implemented based on a commission or in connection with the thesis.

Content

The content of this course is defined depending on what are aims of the course.

Location and time

Wednesdays 12:15-15:45 between 23.10.-27.11. (no lessons on 30.11.)

Materials

https://www.sitra.fi/en/topics/megatrends/#latest

Teaching methods

Lectures
Teamwork
Independent Working

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student be able to:
- explain what is meant by trend
- name a few current trends in the cultural sector
- satisfactorily analyze the causal relationships of trends

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student be able to:
- explains the multidimensional meaning of the trend
- showcase current trends in the cultural sector
- analyze the causal relationships of trends

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student be able to:
- explains the multidimensional meaning of the trend
- classify topical trends in the cultural sector
- interpret the causal relationships of trends

Assessment methods and criteria

2 cr Group work (max. three people). Students will prepare a presentation/presentation of one lesson (approx. 45 min.) on a trend of interest to them. The lesson should be as interactive as possible, so that the other students in the class can join in the discussion. Assessment: 1-5
1 ECTS Examination based on previously assigned literature Assessment: 1-5
2 EC Written assignment (5-7 pages) Assessment 1-5

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the meaning of a trend
The student outlines some current trends in the cultural sector
The student is able to analyse satisfactorily the cause and effect relationships of trends

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the multidimensional meaning of a trend
The student has a clear understanding of current trends in the cultural sector
The student is able to analyse the cause and effect relationships of trends well.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student has an in-depth understanding of the multidimensional meaning of a trend
The student has a clear overview of trends and their significance in society.
The student is able to analyse in depth the cause and effect relationships of trends.

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to
- recognize and understand the requirements of the different operational environments in the cultural field, e.g. regarding safety, scheduling, staff, infrastructure, public services, and permission policies
- produce, as part of a production team, an event/cultural service/media product in a profitable and customer-oriented way

Content

- familiarization with the operational environments of different productions, their characteristics, and requirements
- production process, financing and budgeting, marketing and information distribution
- partnership and cooperation in productions
- required permissions and agreements
- copyright matters - sustainable development in productions - implementation of the above-mentioned information in productions of the first year

Materials

Saksala, E. (2015). Tuottajan käsikirja. Like
Huhtaniska, T., Tirronen, J. (2019). Faktaa ja fiilistä tapahtumatuottajalle. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognizes different operational environments of cultural management and understands a production as a project

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the requirements, challenges and opportunities of different operational environments and is able to take the above things into account in production.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the requirements, challenges and opportunities of different operational environments and is able to take the above things into account in production. They realize the opportunities of different operational environments from the perspective of production.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

19.03.2025 - 16.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU21
  • VVO

Objective

Students will be able to:
- write a grant application (including a realistic budget and a comprehensive production plan)
- identify the main funding channels used and write an application to match them - price their work
- determine the level of admission fees in relation to the content and production costs
- calculate the costs for the different stages of production

Content

- EU funding programmes
- Finnish Cultural Foundation
- provincial funds
- TAIKE
- local bank foundations
- municipal operating grants
- pricing of own expertise
- pricing (tickets)
- production costs

Further information

The course can be integrated as a workshop course. Lectures are generally held face-to-face on Wednesday afternoons from 12.15 to 16.00.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:
- can write a grant application
- can price their own work
- can calculate production costs

Fail:
- unable to write a grant application independently
- unable to price own work
- production costs calculated in an unrealistic way

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

28.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to:

- perform the planning of the production-related assignments under guidance
- evaluate the activities of the production team
- evaluate his own activities as a member of the production team

Content

- Writing a personal learning diary
- Writing a production report

Teaching methods

Writing a production report

Student workload

The student's estimated time is 54 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- the learning diary is poor and superficial
- evaluation of the production team is poor
- evaluation of the own activities as a member of the production team is poor
- the production report has made according to the instructions

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- the learning diary is made according to the instructions
- evaluation of the production team is wide-ranging
- evaluation of the own activities as a member of the production has made by conscientiously
- the production report has made by conscientiously

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- the learning diary is made by regularly and evaluation of the own activities is wide-ranging
- evaluation of the production team is accurate and detailed
- the production report is versatile and has made by conscientiously

Assessment methods and criteria

The student follows the instructions given on production reporting.

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to
- recognize production-related tasks
- plan the production under guidance
- perform the planning of the production-related assignments under guidance
- recognize critical point in production
- solve production-related problems under guidance
- take into account the sustainability aspect in the planning process, especially from the economic and ecological perspective
- act in production, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the group.

Content

The student performs different tasks in production. The design and implementation of the productions of the first year.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student

- understands the subareas of production and the production process
- is able to plan the production under guidance
- is able to take into account the sustainability aspect of production planing

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student

- understands the subareas of production and the production process
- is able to perform production-related assignments under guidance
- is able to assess their own activities in a production group
- is able to act in a constructive way in their production group
- is able to take comprehensively into account the sustainability aspect of production planing

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student

- understands the subareas of production and the production process
- is able to perform production-related assignments independently and to recognize critical points in production
- is able to assess their own activities in a production group, and, if needed, change them
- is able to act in their production group in a constructive and solution-oriented way, prioritizing the success of the production
- is able to pay extensive attention to the principles of sustainable development in the planing of production

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 30.04.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to:

- recognize production-oriented tasks
- perform the implementation of the production-related tasks under guidance
- implement the production under guidance
- recognize critical points in production
- solve production-related problems under guidance
- take into account the sustainability aspect in the planning process, especially from the economic and ecological perspective
- act in production, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the group.

Content

The student performs different tasks in production. The implementation of the productions of the first year.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student

- understands the subareas of production and the process of production
- is able to perform production-related assignments under guidance
- knows how to incorporate the sustainability aspect into production

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student

- understands the subareas of production and the process of production
- is able to perform production-related assignments under guidance
- is able to assess their own activities in the production team
- is able to act in a constructive way in their production team with the appreciation of others
- knows how to incorporate into production a lot of sustainability perspective

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student

- understands the subareas of production and the process of production
- is able to perform production-related assignments independently and recognizes critical points in production
- is able to assess their own activities in the production team, and, if needed, change them
- is able to act in their production team in a constructive and solution-oriented way, prioritizing the success of the production
- is able to implement each stage of production from the starting points of sustainable development

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student is able to:
- perform the planning of the production-related assignments
- evaluate in the production report his own activities in production
- analyse the production process from a sustainable development perspective

Content

Students regularly document the production process and produce a production report at the end of production analysing the production process.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- evaluation of the own activities as a member of the production team is poor
- the production report has made according to the instructions
- the production report shows the sustainability aspect

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- evaluation of the own activities as a member of the production has made by conscientiously
- the production report has made by conscientiously
-the production report clearly shows the sustainability aspect

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- evaluation of the own activities is wide-ranging
- evaluation of the production team is accurate and detailed
- the production report is versatile and has made by conscientiously
- the production report has comprehensively taken into account the sustainability aspect

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student is able to:

- organize the tasks required in production
- apply what they have learned in production-related assignments
- interpret critical points in production
- design a concept for a new service or product
- analyze the profitability of a production
- how to plan the sustainability aspects of production

Content

The student performs different production-related tasks. In the production, a new concept is designed or an old one is renewed.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student

- understands the subareas and the process of production
- is able to perform production-related tasks under guidance
- finishes a concept with their team under guidance
- is able to prepare a budget for a production under guidance
- is able to take into account the sustainability aspect of production planing

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student

- understands the subareas and the process of production
- is able to perform production-related tasks independently
- is able to analyze their activities in a production team
- finishes a concept with their team
- is able to prepare a budget for a production independently
- is able to take comprehensively into account the sustainability aspect of production planing

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student

- understands the subareas and the process of production
- is able to perform production-related tasks independently and recognize critical points in production
- is able to analyze their activities in a production team, and, if needed, change them
- is able to act in their production team in a constructive and solution-oriented way, prioritizing the success of the production
- is able to measure the profitability of a production
- is able to pay extensive attention to the principles of sustainable development in the planing of production

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jukka Saarela
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student is able to:
- organize the tasks needed in production
- apply what they have learned in production-related assignments
- interpret critical points in production
- design a concept for a new service or product
- analyze the profitability of a production
- to implement the sustainability aspects of production

Content

The student performs different assignments in a production, in which a new concept is designed or an old one is renewed.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform production-related assignments under guidance
- finishes a concept with their team under guidance
- is able to prepare a budget for a production under guidance
- knows how to incorporate the sustainability aspect into production

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform production-related assignments independently
- is able to analyze their own activities in the production team
- finishes a concept with their team under guidance
- is able to prepare a budget for a production independently
- knows how to incorporate into production a lot of sustainability perspective

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform production-related assignments independently and to recognize critical points in production
- is able to analyze their own activities in the production team, and, if needed, change them
- is able to act in their production team in a constructive and solution-oriented way, prioritizing the success of the production
- is able to measure the profitability of a production
- is able to implement each stage of production from the starting points of sustainable development

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student is able to:
- perform the planning of the production-related assignments under guidance
- evaluate the activities of the production team
- evaluate his own activities as a member of the production team
- analyse the production process from a sustainable development perspective

Content

Students regularly document the production process and produce a production report at the end of production analysing the production process.

Materials

No need

Teaching methods

Production report

Student workload

The student's estimated time is 54 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- the learning diary is poor and superficial
- evaluation of the production team is poor
- evaluation of the own activities as a member of the production team is poor
- the production report has made according to the instructions
- the production report shows the sustainability aspect

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- the learning diary is made according to the instructions
- evaluation of the production team is wide-ranging
- evaluation of the own activities as a member of the production has made by conscientiously
- the production report has made by conscientiously
-the production report clearly shows the sustainability aspect

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- the learning diary is made by regularly and evaluation of the own activities is wide-ranging
- evaluation of the production team is accurate and detailed
- the production report is versatile and has made by conscientiously
- the production report has comprehensively taken into account the sustainability aspect

Assessment methods and criteria

The student follows the instructions given on production reporting.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student is able to:
- organize the tasks needed in a production
- apply thing they have learned in production-related assignments
- design and and implement a production independently
- analyze the competitive conditions in the operational environment of the production
- choose a production in such a way that it will support their employment in the field
- build a profitable production
- manage a production in difficult situations

Content

During the course, one or two (min. 4 credits) productions are implemented alone or with a fellow student. In possible larger commissions, the size of the production team may be bigger, and the number of credits earned larger. The student prepares a portfolio based on the production, and it will serve as a tool for learning and assessment and as a demonstration of skills. The production or part of the productions are presented in public.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- copes with a production with much support

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform production-related tasks independently
- is able to analyze their own activities in the production team
- is able to implement a profitable production

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform production-related tasks independently and to recognize critical points in production
- is able to analyze their own activities in the production team, and, if needed, change them
- is able to propose changes to a production in a constructive and solution-oriented way
- is able to measure the profitability of a production

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 13.11.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Esa Leikkari
  • Jussi Kareinen
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student is able to:
- organize the tasks needed in a production
- apply what they have learned in production-related assignments
- design and implement a production independently
- analyze the competitive conditions of the operational environment of the production
- choose a production is such a way that it will support their employment in the field
- build a profitable production
- manage a production in difficult situations

Content

During the course, one or two (min. 4 credits) productions are implemented alone or with a fellow student. In possible larger commissions, the size of the production team may be bigger, and the number of credits earned may be larger. Based on the production(s), the student makes a portfolio, which serves as a tool for learning and assessment. The production or parts of the productions are presented in public.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- copes with the production with much support

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform in production-related assignments independently
- is able to analyze their own activities in the production team
- is able to implement a profitable production

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- understands the subareas and process of production
- is able to perform in production-related assignments independently and recognizes critical points in production
- is able to analyze their own activities in the production team, and, if needed, change them
- is propose changes to a production in a constructive and solution-oriented way
- is able to measure the profitability of a production

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

04.11.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student
- understands the characteristics of a productization process
- is able to recognize opportunities of productization in their professional field
- is able to productize a service or product idea
- is able to protect the targets of productization from competitors

Content

- productization process
- spin-offs
- customer-orientation as a basis for productization
- protection of intellectual property

Materials

Parantainen, J. (2007). Tuotteistaminen : rakenna palvelusta tuote 10 päivässä. Talentum.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student
- understands the characteristics of a productization process
- understands the opportunities of productization in their own professional field
- understands the importance of customer-orientation in productization
- knows methods of protection of intellectual property

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student
- masters the characteristics of a productization process
- has a clear idea of the opportunities of productization in their own professional field
- has a clear idea of the importance of customer-orientation in productization
- has a clear idea of methods of protection of intellectual property

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student
- masters the productization process
- masters the opportunities of productization in their own professional field
- masters and is able to apply customer-orientation in productization
- masters and is able to apply methods of protection of intellectual property

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

2 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Hannu Tuuri
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • KUTU22
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics

Content

- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work

Materials

Hirsjärvi, Remes & Sajavaara 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. Kirjayhtymä

Kananen, J. (2008). Kvali: Kvalitatiivisen tutkimuksen teoria ja käytänteet. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu, liiketalous : Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun kirjasto [jakaja].

Heikkilä, T. (2014). Tilastollinen tutkimus (9. uudistettu painos.). Edita.

Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T., & Ritalahti, J. (2009). Kehittämistyön menetelmät: Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. WSOYpro.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

x

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

30.09.2024 - 30.11.2024

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Johanna Ikola
  • Saija Råtts
  • Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
  • KUTU22

Objective

The student is able to:
- Set the competencies and job descriptions of the cultural field in proportion to their own competencies
- Systematically brand their own competencies through different publishing channels
- Use the tools of the marketing of personal competencies and create content designed for them

Content

- Reflecting on one's own professional identity from the perspective of professional growth
- Tools of personal brand building: visibility in social media, blog, vlog, LinkedIn, portfolio
- demonstrations of skill and accumulating a portfolio

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: The student attends the meetings related to the course and shows their competencies defined in the learning goals during them and/or completing the possible assignments related to them adequately.
Fail: The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to show their competencies.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

1 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Johanna Ikola
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student is able to:
- Utilize tests designed for career counselling and their results when making a competency plan
- Describe the competencies they have accumulated during their traineeship period and recognize the stage of their own professional development

Content

Analysis of the student's traineeship period
Self-assessment of the traineeship period
Competency plan

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: The student attends the meetings related to the course and shows the competencies defined in the learning goals during them and/or completes the possible assignments related to the course adequately.
Fail: The student does not reach the learning goals of the course and is not able to show their competencies.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student is able to:
- Clearly describe their own competencies in the cultural field
- Create a professionally made public profile displaying competencies and experience
- Explain the nature of gig economy and analyze their own economy
- Interpret the rules and structures of working life in their own action
- Understand the fiscal effects of different company and employment forms on their own economy
- Plan their job search process

Content

- Labour relations matters and safety at work in the professional field
- Employee's responsibilities and duties
- Job search processes (applications, CV, preparation for interviews)
- Professional portfolio
- Hidden jobs
- Ability to jump out of the traditions of one's own field and apply one's competencies in new contexts
- Nature of temporary jobs and project work as well as the management of one's own economy and taxation

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: The student attends the meetings related to the course and shows the competencies defined in the learning goals during them and/or completes the possible assignments related to the course adequately.
Fail: The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to show their competencies.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

17.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
  • KUTU21
  • KITI23
    Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services

Objective

- The student is familiar with the field of modern media and the development trajectory of media
- The student masters the basic concepts of concept development and is able to create and design new concepts in a team. They are also able to present their plan and concept in a convincing way.
- The student is able to recognize and foresee changes and different development trends in the operational environment
- The student understands why changes in markets and technologies as well as innovations influence in the emergence of different media and in changes in exiting media.

Content

During the course, different media concepts are produced and tested, or an entire publication is produced. The student performs different assignments of production.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

For the grade Pass, the student is required to the return of a production plan, learning diary and final report according to the criteria specified at the beginning of the course.

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 31.01.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Noora Kivimäki
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Content

- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher
- Juholin, E. (2022). Communicare! Ota viestinnän ilmiöt ja strategiat haltuun (8. uud. p.). Infor / Management Institute of Finland MIF.
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work https://seamk.libguides.com/KirjallistenToidenOhje
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielijelppi http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Opintokeskus Sivis https://www.kokouskaytannot.fi/

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Independent study: data acquisition and exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exams

Exam schedules

Exam and assignment times will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days)

Student workload

108 h, including 30 h contact learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exams
Active participation in the assignments and submitting the assignments on time
Self assessment
Peer assessment

Enrollment

23.08.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 23.02.2025

Credits

5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Juhani Haarala
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU24
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student
- is able to analyze the principles of typography and design of graphical symbols
- is able to apply the basics of visual communication in graphical design assignments and commissions
- is able to apply the basics of image processing in assignments
- knows the basics of layout and is able to apply different grids
- is able to utilize the opportunities to apply graphic design in different media and productions

Content

- Basics of chromatics
- Basics of typography
- Graphic design software
- Basics of layout design
- Printed communication and electronic communication

Materials

Itkonen, M. (2007). Typografian käsikirja. RPS-yhtiöt.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:
- Student attends classes.
- Student can adapt the basics of visual communications in tasks and commissions and in different mediums and productions.
- He understands basics of layout design, colors and typography.
- Student can identify differences between print and digital media.

Fail:
- Student does not return his tasks at all or they do not show that he understands the substance of the course at all.
- Student does not understand basics of layout design, colors or typography.
- Student does not attend classes.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Christopher Hudson
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

Students understand basic concepts and vocabulary relating to the field of culture.
They are competent in presenting their education, competence, professional field and projects.
They competently manage in communication situations at work, using a variety of communication channels and correct style.
Students learn the basics of project communication in English (e.g. project presentations, reporting, networking). They know how to communicate with project and production teams, how to give instructions and seek information. They know how to sell and market their own know-how, e.g. regarding projects and self-employment.

Content

Europass CV
spoken presentations
documentation
written messages
information seeking

Materials

Teachers material
fi
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals

Teaching methods

fi
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment

Student workload

81 hours

Further information

fi
80% attendance of class or grade affected.

50% minimum to be eligible to pass

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1- Students can manage in the most common spoken and written communication situations. They use simple structures and limited vocabulary. They can describe themselves, their education and competence. Students can deliver a simple and intelligible presentation on a topic they are familiar with using ready-made material and tools.
Students understand slow and well-articulated speech as well as some parts of easy texts related to their professional field.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3 - Students can competently manage in the most common spoken and written communication situations related to their field.They can spontaneously describe themselves, their education and their competence. Students use the vocabulary of their own field almost flawlessly. They can independently prepare and deliver a brief but easy-to-understand presentation. Students adapt their communication style according to the situation and audience. Students understand common professional texts and manage relatively well in predictable working-life situations.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 - Students manage in demanding, spoken and written communication situations related to their own field competently and efficiently. They are able to spontaneously describe themselves, their education and competence. Students use the vocabulary of their own field almost flawlessly. They can prepare and deliver a convincing, well-structured presentation with appropriate supplementary material. Students express themselves using appropriate style and are able to extensively respond to spontaneous questions. Students know how to adapt their communication style to various situations and audiences. They understand both the main points and details in texts of their professional field and are able to apply and explain what they have read.

Assessment methods and criteria

fi
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review

Qualifications

No previous studies required

Enrollment

01.09.2024 - 18.10.2024

Timing

01.11.2024 - 25.05.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Johanna Ikola
Student groups
  • KUTU21

Objective

The student
- understands the importance and goals of audience development in cultural management
- is able to make a audience development plan
- recognizes different methods of audience development and is able to apply some method in an audience development project
- understands target groups' different needs and cultural backgrounds and is able to set the goals of audience development accordingly
- is able to develop the commissioner's operations through audience development

Content

- goals, methods and forms of audience development
- definition of the target group's needs
- design and implementation of an audience development plan in a production included in the studies preferably as a commission
- audience-focus, diversity of audiences, and taking diverse accessibility into account

Materials

Taide- ja kulttuurilaitosten yleisötyön muodot, laajuus ja tuloksellisuus. (2015). Cuporen verkkojulkaisuja 27

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to design and implement an audience development project or part of it.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the importance of audience development as part of the production process and as an independent work form in cultural management. They are able to design and implement an audience development project according to the commissioner's wishes.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the importance of audience development as part of the production process and as an independent work form in cultural management. They are able to design and implement an audience development project according to the commissioner's wishes. They are able to analyze and develop the commissioner's operations with an audience development plan.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 25.05.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
  • Kutu Nimeämätön
Student groups
  • KUTU23
    Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management

Objective

The student is able to:
- recognize the business opportunities of the cultural field and the structures supporting entrepreneurship
- explain the economic preconditions of entrepreneurship
- network and lean on the clusters of their own field
- develop and test their business idea in practice

Content

- operational environments of entrepreneurship
- personal relationship to entrepreneurship
- support systems, networks, and channels of growth
- assessment of the student's own business idea
- processes and methods of business idea development and customer-oriented product development
- accountability
- risk assessment
- business plan

Materials

Oppaat eri yrittäjyysmuotoihin, esim. Uusyrityskeskus (2023). Perustamisopas alkavalle yrittäjälle.
Muita oppimateriaaleja mm. podcastit ja videot luovien alojen yrittäjyydestä

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student recognises the principles and potential of entrepreneurship in the cultural field. The student is able to search for information and networks to develop their own business idea.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student recognises the potential of cultural business from the customer perspective. The student recognises the potential of entrepreneurship and their own starting point as an entrepreneur in the creative sector. The student is able to search for support and networks to develop their own business idea.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has a comprehensive view of the potential, operational environment and networks of entrepreneurship in the cultural field. The student is able to apply information by developing and testing their business idea from the customer perspective.