Working Life EnglishLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: KK00DS46
Objective
The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
KONE24ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
Materials
Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching
Student workload
80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment methods and criteria
written exam and spoken presentation
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides or can be suspected to be created by AI, the grade is 0.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
KONE24BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
Materials
Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching
Student workload
80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment methods and criteria
written exam and spoken presentation
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides or can be suspected to be created by AI, the grade is 0.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.