Study Guide

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning.

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning.

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material provided by lecturer and
- Verkkomateriaali esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMKin kirjallisten töiden APA -ohje

Teaching methods

Web based learning and online course. Web-based lectures and materials.
Independent and group work, flipped.

Student workload

Total about 80 h
Lectures and online materials about 20 h
Independent study about 40 h
Materials 20 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

e-learning
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning
- Online material

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Student workload

Total 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is not able to pass the assignments of the class.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- online and other material will be announced in the beginning of the course
- Instructions for Written Work (APA)

Teaching methods

- distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstrations of competencies (timetable, see intra)

Student workload

81h, incl. lectures 13h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

written and spoken assignments, self-assessment, peer review and exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and the exam / exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material provided by lecturer
- Online material esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMK's instructions of written work (APA)

Teaching methods

Lectures, web based learning, assignments, potentially exam / exams, independent stydy

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L.2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and the exam / exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielitoimiston sanakirja (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online teaching if and when applicable
Online exams

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h, including 21 h contact learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation in lessons
Written and spoken assignments
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Online exams
Submitting assignments on time

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielitoimiston sanakirja (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online teaching if and when applicable
Online exams

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h, including 21 h contact learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation in lessons
Written and spoken assignments
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Online exams
Submitting assignments on time

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielitoimiston sanakirja (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online teaching if and when applicable
Online exams

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h, including 20 h contact learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation in lessons
Written and spoken assignments
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Online exams
Submitting assignments on time

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi
- SeAMK instructions of written work

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Arviointi koostuu seuraavista osioista: kirjalliset ja suulliset oppimistehtävät, itsearviointi ja vertaisarviointi ja tentit.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielitoimiston sanakirja (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online teaching if and when applicable
Online exams

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h, including 32 h contact learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation in lessons
Written and spoken assignments
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Online exams
Submitting assignments on time

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material proveded by lecturer and
- Verkkomateriaali esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Teaching methods

Online lectures and web based learning.
Independent stydy and group work.

Student workload

Total about 80 h
Lectures and online materials about 20 h
Independent study about 40 h
Materials 20 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exam / exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- online and other material will be announced in the beginning of the course
- Instructions for Written Work (APA)

Teaching methods

- contact lessons and distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstrations of competencies (timetable, see intra)

Student workload

81h incl. 26h lectures

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

written and spoken assignments, self-assessment, peer review and exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- online and other material (will be announced in the beginning of the course)
- Instructions for Written Work

Teaching methods

- contact lessons, distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstrations of competencies (timetable, see intra)

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

written and oral assignments, self assessment, peer review and online exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material provided by lecturer
- Online material esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMK's instructions of written work (APA)

Teaching methods

Lectures, web based learning, assignments, potentially exam / exams, independent stydy

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material provided by lecturer
- Online material esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMK's instructions of written work (APA)

Teaching methods

Lectures, web based learning, assignments, potentially exam / exams, independent stydy

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material provided by lecturer
- Online material esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMK's instructions of written work (APA)

Teaching methods

Lectures, web based learning, assignments, potentially exam / exams, independent stydy

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Material provided by lecturer
- Online material esim. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) - Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/), - Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMK's instructions of written work (APA)

Teaching methods

Lectures, web based learning, assignments, potentially exam / exams, independent stydy

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual and group assignments, exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

e-learning
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning
- Online material

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Student workload

Total 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is not able to pass the assignments of the class.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielitoimiston sanakirja (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online teaching if and when applicable
Online exams

Exam schedules

Exam times will be announced during the course.

Student workload

81 h, including 20 h contact learning

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Active participation in lessons
Written and spoken assignments
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Online exams
Submitting assignments on time

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

e-learning
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning
- Online material

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Student workload

Total 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is not able to pass the assignments of the class.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g.
- Kirjoittajan ABC-kortti. (i.a.). http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/
- Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskus (i.a.).Kielijelppi. http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Jyväskylän yliopisto Kielikeskus. (i.a.) Kielikompassi. https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/puheviestinta/tietomajakka/maja_tietomajakka.shtml
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences. (2022)Instuctions for written work..https://seamk.libguides.com/instructionsforwrittenwork
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Network exams
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L. 2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and network exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

81 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
- Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/),
- Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml
https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMKin kirjallisten töiden ohje
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Grammar exam. Other exams when conceivable.
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L.2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Helsinki: Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and the exam / exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- independent study

Exam schedules

Examination at the end of the course

Student workload

- total workload 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment. An examination if needed.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

- total workload 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

- total workload 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- examinations
- independent study

Student workload

- total workload 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment and examinations.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
- Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/),
- Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml
https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMKin kirjallisten töiden ohje
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Grammar exam. Other exams when conceivable.
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L.2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Helsinki: Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and the exam / exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
- Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/),
- Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml
https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMKin kirjallisten töiden ohje
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Grammar exam. Other exams when conceivable.
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L.2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Helsinki: Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and the exam / exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

Web sites e.g. Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
- Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/),
- Kielikompassi https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/opetus/kirjoitus/kirjoituskurssi/index.shtml
https://kielikompassi.jyu.fi/uploads/document_userfiles/kokoustekn/
- SeAMKin kirjallisten töiden ohje
Other materials recommended by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Contact learning, e-learning as applicable.
- Written and oral assignments and exercises, group work
- Grammar exam. Other exams when conceivable.
- Self-access learning.

Employer connections

Does not include any practise period.

Exam schedules

Announced during the course.

Student workload

Total 81 hours, icluding contact learning (attendance 80 % required)

Further information

Health care and social work:
Roivas, M. & Karjalainen, A. L.2013. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan viestintä. Helsinki: Edita.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation based on active participation, written and oral assignments and exercises, self-assesment , assesment by equals and the exam / exams.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- independent study

Student workload

- total workload 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment. An examination if needed.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Teaching methods

- face-to-face teaching, online teaching when applicable
- written and spoken assignments individually or in a team
- independent study

Student workload

- total workload 81 hours

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment. An examination if needed.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- online and other material will be announced in the beginning of the course
- Instructions for Written Work

Teaching methods

- contact lessons and distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstrations of competencies (timetable, see intra)

Student workload

- 81h, incl. lectures 10h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

written and spoken assignments, self-assessment, peer review and Moodle exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.

Objective

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions for written work

Content

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction
- group communication skills (discussions, negotiations, meetings)
- writing formal texts
- SeAMK instructions for written work

Materials

- online and other material (will be announced in the beginning of the course)
- Instructions for Written Work

Teaching methods

- contact lessons, distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study

Exam schedules

Time of the Moodle exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstrations of competencies (timetable, see intra)

Student workload

81h, incl. lectures 27h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognize the culturally-bound character of communication to some extent. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognize the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logical, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

written and oral assignments, self assessment, peer review and online exams

Qualifications

No prerequisites.
Recommended optional programme components
The student advisor will recommend optional programme components for each student based on their individual study plan.