Business Communication in FinnishLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: YELVIEST02
Objective
After the course, the student is able to interact appropriately and draw up the most ordinary texts needed in the working life. He is acquainted with the conventions of the academic text, which are needed in the thesis, and is able to apply them in his own text. He can express himself coherently, convincingly and clearly.
Content
- basics of business communication
- essential texts within the field, business letters, informing
- basics of academic writing
Qualifications
Communication Skills
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can not take the objective, receiver or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is illogical and the argumentation is one-sided. Illustration is inadequate. The student can evaluate his communication only from his point of view.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can take only partly into consideration the objective, situation and receiver. He can maintain the interaction. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and the argumentation is versatile and credible. The illustration is appropriate. The student can in some part evaluate his communication realistically. He identifies the culturally bound character of the communication to some extent.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can take the objective, situation and receiver into consideration skilfully and credibly. He can act responsibly and according to the agreed ways of action. The structure of the text follows the structure which is characteristic of the text species. The text is logical and the argumentation is versatile and convincing. The illustration is appropriate and efficient. The student can estimate his communication realistically. He can identify the culturally bound character of the communication.
Materials
Food and Hospitality:
Kortetjärvi-Nurmi, S. & Murtola, K. 2015. Areena. Yritysviestinnän käsikirja. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013. Communicare: kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
Kielikello 4/1997 ja 1/2007 (ns. Ruokakello)
and Web material
Food Processing and Biotechnology:
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2012. Tekniikan viestintä. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013. Communicare: kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
and Web material
Agriculture:
Kortetjärvi-Nurmi, S. & Murtola, K. 2015. Areena. Yritysviestinnän käsikirja. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013. Communicare: kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
and Web material
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 17.09.2022
Timing
12.09.2022 - 11.12.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
10 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Sirkka Nieminen
Student groups
-
MBIELI21
Objective
After the course, the student is able to interact appropriately and draw up the most ordinary texts needed in the working life. He is acquainted with the conventions of the academic text, which are needed in the thesis, and is able to apply them in his own text. He can express himself coherently, convincingly and clearly.
Content
- basics of business communication
- essential texts within the field, business letters, informing
- basics of academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2012. Tekniikan viestintä. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013 (tai uudempi). Communicare! Kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
and online material
Teaching methods
- distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study
Exam schedules
Time of the exams will be announced during the course.
Student workload
54h, incl. online lectures 9h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can not take the objective, receiver or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is illogical and the argumentation is one-sided. Illustration is inadequate. The student can evaluate his communication only from his point of view.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can take only partly into consideration the objective, situation and receiver. He can maintain the interaction. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and the argumentation is versatile and credible. The illustration is appropriate. The student can in some part evaluate his communication realistically. He identifies the culturally bound character of the communication to some extent.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can take the objective, situation and receiver into consideration skilfully and credibly. He can act responsibly and according to the agreed ways of action. The structure of the text follows the structure which is characteristic of the text species. The text is logical and the argumentation is versatile and convincing. The illustration is appropriate and efficient. The student can estimate his communication realistically. He can identify the culturally bound character of the communication.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written and spoken assingments
- self-assessment and peer review
- exams
Qualifications
Communication Skills
Enrollment
19.04.2021 - 06.03.2022
Timing
07.03.2022 - 15.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Degree Programme in Food and Hospitality
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Sirkka Nieminen
Responsible person
Jukka Kauppila
Student groups
-
MRESTO21
Objective
After the course, the student is able to interact appropriately and draw up the most ordinary texts needed in the working life. He is acquainted with the conventions of the academic text, which are needed in the thesis, and is able to apply them in his own text. He can express himself coherently, convincingly and clearly.
Content
- basics of business communication
- essential texts within the field, business letters, informing
- basics of academic writing
Materials
Restonomi (AMK), Ravitsemispalvelut:
Kortetjärvi-Nurmi, S. & Murtola, K. 2015. Areena. Yritysviestinnän käsikirja. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013. Communicare! Kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
and online material
Teaching methods
- contact lessons and distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study
Exam schedules
Time of the exams will be announced during the course.
Student workload
54h, incl. lectures 9h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can not take the objective, receiver or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is illogical and the argumentation is one-sided. Illustration is inadequate. The student can evaluate his communication only from his point of view.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can take only partly into consideration the objective, situation and receiver. He can maintain the interaction. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and the argumentation is versatile and credible. The illustration is appropriate. The student can in some part evaluate his communication realistically. He identifies the culturally bound character of the communication to some extent.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can take the objective, situation and receiver into consideration skilfully and credibly. He can act responsibly and according to the agreed ways of action. The structure of the text follows the structure which is characteristic of the text species. The text is logical and the argumentation is versatile and convincing. The illustration is appropriate and efficient. The student can estimate his communication realistically. He can identify the culturally bound character of the communication.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written and spoken assingments
- self-assessment and peer review
- exams
Qualifications
Communication Skills
Enrollment
19.04.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 06.03.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Degree Programme in Food and Hospitality
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Sirkka Nieminen
Responsible person
Jukka Kauppila
Student groups
-
BIELI20
Objective
After the course, the student is able to interact appropriately and draw up the most ordinary texts needed in the working life. He is acquainted with the conventions of the academic text, which are needed in the thesis, and is able to apply them in his own text. He can express himself coherently, convincingly and clearly.
Content
- basics of business communication
- essential texts within the field, business letters, informing
- basics of academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2012. Tekniikan viestintä. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013 (tai uudempi). Communicare! Kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
and online material
Teaching methods
- contact lessons and distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study
Exam schedules
Time of the exams will be announced during the course.
Student workload
54h, incl. lectures 16h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can not take the objective, receiver or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is illogical and the argumentation is one-sided. Illustration is inadequate. The student can evaluate his communication only from his point of view.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can take only partly into consideration the objective, situation and receiver. He can maintain the interaction. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and the argumentation is versatile and credible. The illustration is appropriate. The student can in some part evaluate his communication realistically. He identifies the culturally bound character of the communication to some extent.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can take the objective, situation and receiver into consideration skilfully and credibly. He can act responsibly and according to the agreed ways of action. The structure of the text follows the structure which is characteristic of the text species. The text is logical and the argumentation is versatile and convincing. The illustration is appropriate and efficient. The student can estimate his communication realistically. He can identify the culturally bound character of the communication.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written and spoken assingments
- self-assessment and peer review
- exams
Qualifications
Communication Skills
Enrollment
19.04.2021 - 06.09.2021
Timing
30.08.2021 - 15.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Degree Programme in Food and Hospitality
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
- Sirkka Nieminen
Responsible person
Jukka Kauppila
Student groups
-
RESTO20
Objective
After the course, the student is able to interact appropriately and draw up the most ordinary texts needed in the working life. He is acquainted with the conventions of the academic text, which are needed in the thesis, and is able to apply them in his own text. He can express himself coherently, convincingly and clearly.
Content
- basics of business communication
- essential texts within the field, business letters, informing
- basics of academic writing
Materials
Restonomi (AMK), Ravitsemispalvelut:
Kortetjärvi-Nurmi, S. & Murtola, K. 2015. Areena. Yritysviestinnän käsikirja. Edita.
Juholin, E. 2013. Communicare! Kasva viestinnän ammattilaiseksi. MIF.
and online material
Teaching methods
- contact lessons and distance learning
- written and spoken assignments
- independent study
Exam schedules
Time of the exams will be announced during the course.
Student workload
54h, incl. lectures 16h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can not take the objective, receiver or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is illogical and the argumentation is one-sided. Illustration is inadequate. The student can evaluate his communication only from his point of view.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student can take only partly into consideration the objective, situation and receiver. He can maintain the interaction. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and the argumentation is versatile and credible. The illustration is appropriate. The student can in some part evaluate his communication realistically. He identifies the culturally bound character of the communication to some extent.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student can take the objective, situation and receiver into consideration skilfully and credibly. He can act responsibly and according to the agreed ways of action. The structure of the text follows the structure which is characteristic of the text species. The text is logical and the argumentation is versatile and convincing. The illustration is appropriate and efficient. The student can estimate his communication realistically. He can identify the culturally bound character of the communication.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written and spoken assingments
- self-assessment and peer review
- exams
Qualifications
Communication Skills