Skip to main content

Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Degree:
Bachelor of Engineering

Degree title:
Bachelor of Engineering

Credits:
240 ects

Name of the Degree Programme

Degree Programme in Automation Engineering (In English)

Field of study

Engineering, manufacturing and construction
The classification of the educational field is based on the international ISCED classification used by the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Specialisations

There are no the lines of specialisation in the Degree Programme in Automation Engineering

Qualification awarded

Bachelor of Engineering

In addition, students may complete a double degree together with the Aschaffenburg University of Applied Sciences in Germany.

Students who complete a double degree receive both a Finnish and German Bachelor's Degree in Engineering.

Level of qualification

The degree programme leads to a higher education degree which is a first cycle Bachelor-level degree in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). According to the eight-level classification of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF), the degree represents level 6.
The description of the level of the Degree is included in the Statute, at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120

Specific admission requirements

Eligibility for studies at a university of applied sciences is stipulated in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014.
The selection criteria are specified in the data of the Degree Programme at www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku

On the websites, application and instructions are in Finnish language for the degree programmes taught in Finnish.

Qualification requirements and regulations (incl. graduation requirements)

Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.

Examination regulations, assessment and grading

Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Link

Structure of the studies

In accordance with the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the studies of a Degree Programme consist of basic studies, professional studies, practical training promoting professional skills, free elective studies, and a final project/thesis. The extent of the studies is 60 credits a year.

The professional basics of the automation engineer are created during the first two years of the studies giving the important tools to the future engineers to use the languages, mathematics and physics. Simultaneously the basic studies of the automation engineering are studied consisting of automation engineering, electrical engineering, programming and mechanics depending on the specialization line chosen by the student. The specialization line is chosen after the first year of the studies.

In the third year of the studies the students get the deeper knowledge of the PLC (programmable logic controllers), electrical and mechanical planning, programming and robotics according to their choices. The students also participate in the actual projects commissioned by the industry (Project studies /Projektipaja, FramiPro). In the third study year the students can carry on the studies at the Faculty of Engineering of Aschaffenburg University of Applied Sciences in Germany making them possible to achieve the double degrees i.e. the students receive two engineering diplomas, one from Finland and the other one from Germany.

During the third study year's march to the the final study year's october the studies consists of the practical training in the industry where the students usually get the topic of their final theses finalizing their studies in the spring term of the fourth year. In the spring term the students have some courses of the professional studies, but mainly the spring term of the fourth year is reserved for writing their final theses/Bachelor theses.

The curriculum includes five seams permeating through the studies and extending over them. They are based on SeAMK’s reports, studies and strategy, as well as on the national and international recommendations and regulations related to education provided by universities of applied sciences.
- The Information Search seam strengthens the student’s professional and field-specific information search skills throughout the studies.
- The Internationalization seam secures the improvement of the student’s international competencies during their studies.
- The studies corresponding to the Entrepreneurship seam help the student understand the central and growing role of entrepreneurship in society.
- The Sustainable Development seam makes the student aware of social responsibility and helps them understand the diversity of sustainable development as a working life skill.
- The seam of Career Guidance helps the student recognise their competencies and own strengths. It also includes working life knowledge, job search skills, and lifelong learning.

Students have the opportunity to include multidisciplinary, working life-oriented project studies in their personal curricula (FramiPro).

In the degree program in automation, the competencies of sustainable development run through the curriculum of the degree program. The goal of sustainable development is to help students become aware of social responsibility and understand the multidimensional significance of sustainable development as a working life skill. In the degree program, the student is aware of and is able to apply the principles of sustainable development in practice.

Learning outcomes

OCCUPATIONAL PROFILES
Jobs for professionals possessing numerous areas of expertise do not rest with just one employer. Our diverse training in the fields of automation, electricity and IT opens up new job opportunities in a world that ever-increasingly depends on technology. For this reason, the job situation for automation engineers is excellent on both the national and international levels. Job titles include designer, technical expert, production manager, sales manager, purchasing manager, etc. Graduates may also work in teaching and as independent entrepreneurs.

Profile of the programme

The engineers that graduate from our Degree Programme in Automation Engineering possess diverse expertise in machine and electric automation. They create intelligent machines/devices and production lines and automate them using modern methods. Our inter-technological programme comprises study modules in Automation, Electrical and Machine Design, Control Systems and Programming, and Robotics. Designs acquire substance through modelling, visualisation and simulation in our "virtual cave".

Generic and subject specifc competences

Competencies are extensive knowledge entities, or combinations of the individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They describe qualifications, performance potential, and the ability to cope with professional duties.

Common/general competencies are fields of know-how common to different Degree Programmes, but their special characteristics and importance may vary between professions and work assignments. General competencies form the basis for professional activities, cooperation, and the development of expertise. According to Arene’s (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences) recommendations, general competencies include learning skills, ethical competence, cooperation skills, innovation skills, and internationalization skills. In addition to the above-mentioned competencies, entrepreneurial skills and quality management skills are emphasized in the degree studies of SeAMK as competencies common to all.

Degree programme-specific competencies form the basis for the development of the student’s professional expertise.

Pedagogical approach and learning environment

Teaching in the Degree Programme in Automation Engineering emphasises hands-on learning. This means that we combine theoretical information with practical skills for the working world in modern technology laboratories. Students experience great moments of insight doing a diverse range of assignments in our laboratories. The equipment in our laboratories is the same used in the working world. This allows students to routinely solve practical problems and acquire the readiness they need to work in the field. Moreover, designing, automating and using machines and devices with a team is fun.

In addition to skills in problem solving, the working world requires that employees are able to work with others and commit themselves to life-long learning. For this reason, teaching involves much group work and working in pairs. There are also visits by experts in the field, various assignments, projects, visits to various companies and trade fairs, as well as practical training in authentic working environments.

Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)

The RPL procedure means the identification and recognition of the student’s previously acquired learning. The student has the opportunity to apply for the recognition of their competencies if the competencies correspond to the learning goals of the Degree Programme. The identification process is closely connected with the preparation of the student’s personal curriculum and is updated during personal counselling discussions.

The identification and recognition practices are presented in the RPL Instruction of SeAMK. It specifies how recognition of competencies is applied for, how the application is processed, and how the student is informed of it. The instruction lists the RPL contact persons of each Degree Programme, who counsel students on matters related to the process.

In the assessment of prior learning, for example the following evidence is used:

- certificates on training programmes with similar content and other training programmes
- testimonials and further clarifications by an employer
- interviews of the student
- written and oral exams or reports
- functional or written assignments or other evidence
- presentations, portfolios

The final project/thesis and the Maturity Test cannot be submitted to the RPL procedure.

The Head of the Degree Programme, the Student Counsellor, and when necessary, the teacher of the course in question are responsible for RPL. Their task is to inform students of the recognition and assessment process, to discuss students' Personal Study Plan and to guide students in the demonstration of prior learning.

Project studies and the final thesis are not observed in RPL.

According to the degree regulation, prior learning of a subject expires in ten years.

Assessment is course-specific, defined by the teacher in question. Assessment methods are an exam (written or oral), practical assignment, a laboratory test, a field test or equivalent.

Work-based learning and work placements

The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Work-based learning and work placements

The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Work-based learning and work placements

The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Work-based learning and work placements

The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.

Occupational profiles

Jobs for professionals possessing numerous areas of expertise do not rest with just one employer. Our diverse training in the fields of automation, electricity and machinery opens up new job opportunities in a world that ever-increasingly depends on technology. For this reason, the job situation for automation engineers is excellent on both the national and international levels. Job titles include designer, technical expert, production manager, sales manager, purchasing manager, etc. Graduates may also work in teaching and as independent entrepreneurs.
After completing the vocational language studies the student is able to communicate in spoken and written situations related to his field of study. He can search for information and follow the development of his professional field in the target language.

Internationalization

Internationality is an essential part of our degree program. You can hear different languages - we have exchange students from all over the world.

The language of our lectures can be either (in Finnish or) in English; if exchange students are present the language is English. This encourages our students to take part in exchange programs; it contributes to their language skills and their knowledge of different cultures.

In our degree program you can accomplish both the Finnish and German Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering, that is to say, the double degree. Our partner university in Germany is Hochschule Aschaffenburg. After two years of studying you can choose whether you want continue your studies in Seinäjoki or apply to the Hochschule Aschaffenburg for the third academic year (this is for the double degree). The fourth academic year is spent in Seinäjoki again. The students can also do their internships abroad.

If you would rather choose a shorter time for studying abroad, there are various exchange possibilities ranging from 3 to 5 months in countries all over the world.

Access to further studies

After three years of work experience, the student will be eligible for further studies for a Master’s Degree in the field in question.

Graduation requirements

Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences and instructions for graduates at Intra.

Mode of study

Our students study full-time in the degree programme.

Head of degree programme

Mr Jorma Mettälä, tel. +358 40 830 7481, e-mail: jorma.mettala(at)seamk.fi

Student counsellor

Mr Jorma Mettälä, tel. +358 40 830 7481, e-mail: jorma.mettala(at)seamk.fi

Ms Pia-Mari Riihilahti, tel. +358 40 830 2355, e-mail: pia-mari.riihilahti(at)seamk.fi,

Coordination of Practical Training

Mr Jorma Mettälä, tel. +358 40 830 7481, e-mail: jorma.mettala(at)seamk.fi

Coordination of international mobility

Tiina Välimäki, 040-830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Outgoing student exchanges to Europe
Maria Loukola, 040-830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Incoming and outgoing student exchanges outside Europe

Student services

Tel. +358 20 124 5055, studentservices@seamk.fi

Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will learn to create 3D part models, sheet metal models, sub-assembly and assembly models. They will also learn to create assembly and component drawings by using CAD software. They will also learn basic knowledge of the theory of technical drawing and understand the symbols used in mechanical drawing.

Content

-Theory of technical drawing
-3D modelling and general theory of modelling systems
-3D modelling of products and assembly models
-Drawing planes and sheet metal designing
-Diagrams and their standardised symbols

Materials

Recommended or Required Reading
Hand-outs and the following literature as assigned by the lecturer:
Cesil Jensen et al. 2008. Engineering Drawing & Design, Seventh Edition, McGraW-Hill International Edition, ISBN 978-0-07-128420-2

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures
- Supervised computer work
- Assignments

Student workload

32h lectures, exercises
28h assignments, preparing for exams

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Satisfactory (2-1)
Students are familiar with the standard machine drawing symbols and be able to model 3D workpieces.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and small assemblies.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding product design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
Assignments and an examination

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student can model a basic workpiece and make a technical drawing for it

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student can model a basic workpiece and make a good technical drawing for it. In addition, student can make an assembly drawing and parts list.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student can utilize cad system very versatile. Student can model a basic workpiece and make a good technical drawing for it. In addition, student can make an assembly drawing and parts list, exploded views and sheet metal models.

Qualifications

No previous studies are required

Enrollment

01.08.2024 - 08.09.2024

Timing

23.08.2024 - 31.07.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Suzana Zegrea
  • Marika Toivonen
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Marjut Asunmaa
  • Virpi Rantanen
  • Kari Jokiranta
Student groups
  • MRN24
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
- Ethics in studies and working life

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
- Ethics in studies and working life

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Knows how to apply for a job in Finland. Is able to plan their studies according to curriculum.

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Enrollment

02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 30.04.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Päivi Uitti
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • IB24A
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • IB24B
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
- Ethics in studies and working life

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
- Ethics in studies and working life

Materials

Material provided by the lecturer (in Moodle)

Teaching methods

Lessons, visits, visiting lecturers

Exam schedules

No exam.

Completion alternatives

Online participation possible, if needed.

Student workload

54 hours of student's work.
40 hours of lessons and visits, 14 hours of independent studies (=learning diary).

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Knows how to apply for a job in Finland. Is able to plan their studies according to curriculum.

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Participation in the lessons and visits (min 50%)
Learning diary

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 13.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Anu Latva-Reinikka
  • Maiju Kinossalo
  • Pia-Mari Riihilahti
  • Jyri Lehto
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Maria Hemminki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
- Ethics in studies and working life

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
- Ethics in studies and working life

Location and time

- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher

Materials

- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Lectures, assignments, group work, presentations, online learning, guided exercises.
Please note: You have to participate in the lectures at the times given in your groups's timetable in the class room (if you are in Finland) or online (if you are not on Finland)

Student workload

53 hours, which consists of contact teaching, assignments, and exercises

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Pass: The student participates in the classes of the course and shows the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes of the course and/or by completing the required course assignments.

Fail: The student does not reach the learning outcomes of the course and is not able to show required knowledge and skills

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Knows how to apply for a job in Finland. Is able to plan their studies according to curriculum.

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Assessment methods and criteria

Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes of the course, by completing the required course assignments

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments and the test have not been completed successfully.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.

Enrollment

02.09.2024 - 05.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 23.02.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Anu Latva-Reinikka
  • Jarmo Alarinta
  • Tiina Välimäki
  • Sarita Ventelä
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
- Ethics in studies and working life

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
- Ethics in studies and working life

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Knows how to apply for a job in Finland. Is able to plan their studies according to curriculum.

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Enrollment

30.09.2024 - 20.10.2024

Timing

02.10.2024 - 31.05.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Suzana Zegrea
  • Andres Mendez
  • Marjut Asunmaa
  • Terhi Voltti
  • Kari Jokiranta
Student groups
  • TURN24
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing

Objective

Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
- Ethics in studies and working life

Content

Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
- Ethics in studies and working life

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Knows how to apply for a job in Finland. Is able to plan their studies according to curriculum.

Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will understand the construction of electronic devices and will get acquainted with the designing limitations and definations. The students will also learn to understand the safety, EMC and material demands of electronic devices. Students will understand power supply requirements, life time demands and integration of digital and aanlog electronics.

Content

Theoretical basics of electronics and practical design of electronic equipment and devices

Materials

Internet sources for electronics

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the principles of electronics design. Can select components for simple circuits and implement the circuit.
Knows how to document electronics

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to design and implement electronics with simple circuits. Can repaired simple faults in circuits.
Good documentation of electronics

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice.
The student is able to design and implement complex electronics circuits.
Can repaired faults in circuits.
Excellent documentation of electronics

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and practical exercises

Qualifications

Basics of electronics

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 13.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Tommi Ylimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

- Basic algebra
- Basic trigonometry
- Analytic geometry
- Trigonometric functions
- Exponential and logarithm functions

Materials

All needed material will be provided in electric form (from Moodle or Teams)

Teaching methods

Lectures and independent study. All contact sessions can be attended either on-site or via Teams.

Completion alternatives

Course grade will be assessed according to returned homework assignments and pre-lesson queries.

Student workload

Total 4cr*27h/cr = 108h of work consisting of lectures 45h, independent study and homework 63h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

Course grade will be assessed according to returned homework assignments.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 06.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 08.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

- Basic algebra
- Basic trigonometry
- Analytic geometry
- Trigonometric functions
- Exponential and logarithm functions

Materials

to be announced

Teaching methods

lectures and independent study

Student workload

lectures 39 h, independent study

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of algebra and geometry, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Laplace transform
Fourier transform
Probability and statistics
Data analysis

Materials

to be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

lectures, independent study

Student workload

108h

Further information

80% attendance in lectures and exercises

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods described in the course contents, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods described in the course contents, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods described in the course contents, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.

Assessment methods and criteria

exercises+exam

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry, Vectors and matrices, Differential and integral calculus

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be able to differentiate between various automation systems and identify the components used in them. They will understand how automation systems works. Students will be knowledgeable of the structure, function and connections of relays and PLC drivers and the more common types of sensors and actuators. They will learn the idea behind the logic needed in automation technology.

Content

- Development of automation and automation technology
- What is automation?
- Control and regulation, control systems for automation, sensors, actuators, programmable logics, components for a control system
- Common connections for sensors and actuators into programmable logics
- Practice making connections in the lab
- Familiarisation with various automation control system.

Materials

- Lecturer's material
- Lecture demonstrations
- Exercises
- Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Lectures, - Demonstrations, - Exercises, - Group work in the laboratory

Student workload

Will be announced at the beginning of the course.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student know the basics and terminology, but he/she have shortcomings in applying the key things. However, student can satisfactorily implement the basic controls of automation circuits.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student know the basic components of automation technology and know how to make holistically justified choices between them. He/She understand very different connections of automation circuits. Student know how to use the programming environment so well that you can make a working application and modify existing larger programs according to good practices.
He/She know how to use tools to monitor and simulate a program well and are able to locate simple faults in the system.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student manage key issues and are able to apply them creatively from system entities to the field device level. You can make a critical comparison between solution options.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises and a written and practical examination

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 06.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Ismo Tupamäki
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students will be able to differentiate between various automation systems and identify the components used in them. They will understand how automation systems works. Students will be knowledgeable of the structure, function and connections of relays and PLC drivers and the more common types of sensors and actuators. They will learn the idea behind the logic needed in automation technology.

Content

- Development of automation and automation technology
- What is automation?
- Control and regulation, control systems for automation, sensors, actuators, programmable logics, components for a control system
- Common connections for sensors and actuators into programmable logics
- Practice making connections in the lab
- Familiarisation with various automation control system.

Materials

- Lecturer's material
- Lecture demonstrations
- Exercises
- Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Lectures, - Demonstrations, - Exercises, - Group work in the laboratory

Student workload

Will be announced at the beginning of the course.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student know the basics and terminology, but he/she have shortcomings in applying the key things. However, student can satisfactorily implement the basic controls of automation circuits.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student know the basic components of automation technology and know how to make holistically justified choices between them. He/She understand very different connections of automation circuits. Student know how to use the programming environment so well that you can make a working application and modify existing larger programs according to good practices.
He/She know how to use tools to monitor and simulate a program well and are able to locate simple faults in the system.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student manage key issues and are able to apply them creatively from system entities to the field device level. You can make a critical comparison between solution options.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises and a written and practical examination

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 13.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will be able to process digital data and use it to solve logical problems and design and program logical circuits. Students will be able to utilize the modern semiconductor technology.

Content

Digital data, logic gates, boolean algebra, reducing methods, flip-flops, registers, counters, number systems, memory circuit technology, programmable logic circuits.

Materials

The necessary material can be found online. Material will also be distributed during the lessons.

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises and computerized simulation

Student workload

Will be announced at the beginning of the course.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student master number systems and know how to make number system transformations using examples.
You will be able to analyze simple digital technology problems and design solutions based on examples.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student master number systems and know how to make demanding number system conversions. You master the basics of logical design and Boolean algebra and know how to simplify expressions. You know the basics of combination logic. You will be able to analyze digital technology problems and design creative solutions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student master number systems and can do demanding number system conversions. You master the Boolean algebra and can simplify expressions. You master logical design, combinatorial logic and sequence logic and are able to apply knowledge in technical design. You will be able to independently analyze demanding problems and design creative solutions

Assessment methods and criteria

Examination, assignments and acitvity

Qualifications

No previous studies are required

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be knowledgeable of basic electronic components and will make simple connections for filters and amplifiers. They will calculate and measure how the connections function and the properties of components.

Content

General properties of active and passive components, independent semi-conductors, operational amplifiers and optical components. Common connections, test and measurement connections, analysing connections. Writing relevant reports.

Materials

-Online material.
-Paul Scherz: Practical Electronics Inventors

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises and reports

Student workload

Will be announced at the beginning of the course.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has satisfactory knowledge of the theory of basic electronic components and is able to satisfactorily design and implement basic circuits according to a specific specification.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has a commendable command of the theory of electronic components and is commendably able to design and implement circuits according to a specific specification. The work is innovative.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has excellent knowledge of the theory of electronic components and is excellent at designing and implementing circuits according to a specific specification. You will be able to independently analyze and develop functions.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam, exercises and reports

Qualifications

No previous studies are required

Enrollment

02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Harrison Okuogume
Student groups
  • IB24A
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business

Objective

The student
• Masters the main features of entrepreneurial competencies, recognises their own entrepreneurial competencies and attitudes, as well as recognises the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their actions and interaction
• Can name and define the phases of setting up a business
• Recognises, from the perspective of their business idea, the key customers, and their role for profitable business
• Knows and can name entrepreneurship-related opportunities at SeAMK, and related support services.

Content

• Personal entrepreneurial competencies, such as self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation values, tolerance for ambiguity, and the importance of one’s own attitudes for choices
• Value production in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts and revenue model of entrepreneurship and business activity, economic literacy, risk management
• Phases of business establishment
• Business plan as a tool for the structuration of a business idea
• Business activity as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Familiarization with the entrepreneurship services provided by SeAMK

Materials

Effective Small Business Management; Fifth edition. Norman M. Scarborough and Thomas W. Zimmerer. (1996): Prentice Hall. Inc. A Simon and Schuster Company

Lecturer will provide the presentation slides in Moodle, other entrepreneurship books in SeAMK Library. Students are also advice to research for other information to support their learning and group assignments.

Further readings and materials will be provided by the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lecturing
Class activities
Group or teamwork
Presentation

Student workload

There will be total of 81 hours.

- 20 hours for lecturing and in-class activities
- 53 hours for Individual or teams activities
- 8 hours for presentations

Content scheduling

• Entrepreneurial competence, self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation, human systems of thought, uncertainty tolerance, and processing of disappointments
• Value creation, recognition of value chains and networks in different environments, value creation in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts of entrepreneurship and business and earnings logic, economic literacy, risk management
• Stages of the establishment of business activities
• Business plan as a tool for structuring a business idea (for fields of study other than Business)
• Business activities as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Deepening of the student’s entrepreneurial skills at SeAMK (SeAMK Yritystalli, SeAMKPro, SeiES)

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service

Assessment methods and criteria

% Grade
51 - 59 = 1
69 - 60 = 2
79 - 70 = 3
89 - 80 = 4
100 - 90 = 5

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Dario Liberona
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student
• Masters the main features of entrepreneurial competencies, recognises their own entrepreneurial competencies and attitudes, as well as recognises the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their actions and interaction
• Can name and define the phases of setting up a business
• Recognises, from the perspective of their business idea, the key customers, and their role for profitable business
• Knows and can name entrepreneurship-related opportunities at SeAMK, and related support services.

Content

• Personal entrepreneurial competencies, such as self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation values, tolerance for ambiguity, and the importance of one’s own attitudes for choices
• Value production in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts and revenue model of entrepreneurship and business activity, economic literacy, risk management
• Phases of business establishment
• Business plan as a tool for the structuration of a business idea
• Business activity as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Familiarization with the entrepreneurship services provided by SeAMK

Materials

The Business Model: Nature and
Benefits
Ramon Casadesus-Masanell
John Heilbron
Harvard Business School Working Paper

Teaching methods

Basics of Entrepreneurship

Know Entrepreneurial and Business concepts
Identifying business oportunities
Business Models
The startups approach – Entreprenurial approach
Team Work

Reading Material
Team work
Lective lectures

Student workload

12 hours Lectures Classes
54 hours Home preparation and reading

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service

Assessment methods and criteria

Reading Quiz (1) (Individual) 10%
Exam ( 1 ) (Individual) 25%
Individual Report (assestment - Survey) 15%

Develop a Product/Service (Group-Jobs to be done) 10%
Develop 2 Business Models and a marketing mix (Groups) 20%
Students Presentations /Idea-B. Model Video (Groups)20%

3 Students per Group:

% Grade
90 - 100 5
80 -89 4
70 to 79 3
60 to 69 4
51 to 59 1

Enrollment

02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Harrison Okuogume
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
  • IB24B
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

The student
• Masters the main features of entrepreneurial competencies, recognises their own entrepreneurial competencies and attitudes, as well as recognises the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their actions and interaction
• Can name and define the phases of setting up a business
• Recognises, from the perspective of their business idea, the key customers, and their role for profitable business
• Knows and can name entrepreneurship-related opportunities at SeAMK, and related support services.

Content

• Personal entrepreneurial competencies, such as self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation values, tolerance for ambiguity, and the importance of one’s own attitudes for choices
• Value production in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts and revenue model of entrepreneurship and business activity, economic literacy, risk management
• Phases of business establishment
• Business plan as a tool for the structuration of a business idea
• Business activity as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Familiarization with the entrepreneurship services provided by SeAMK

Materials

Effective Small Business Management; Fifth edition. Norman M. Scarborough and Thomas W. Zimmerer. (1996): Prentice Hall. Inc. A Simon and Schuster Company

Lecturer will provide the presentation slides in Moodle, other entrepreneurship books in SeAMK Library. Students are also advice to research for other information to support their learning and group assignments.

Further readings and materials will be provided by the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lecturing
Class activities
Group or teamwork
Presentation

Student workload

There will be total of 81 hours.

- 20 hours for lecturing and in-class activities
- 53 hours for Individual or teams activities
- 8 hours for presentations

Content scheduling

• Entrepreneurial competence, self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation, human systems of thought, uncertainty tolerance, and processing of disappointments
• Value creation, recognition of value chains and networks in different environments, value creation in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts of entrepreneurship and business and earnings logic, economic literacy, risk management
• Stages of the establishment of business activities
• Business plan as a tool for structuring a business idea (for fields of study other than Business)
• Business activities as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Deepening of the student’s entrepreneurial skills at SeAMK (SeAMK Yritystalli, SeAMKPro, SeiES)

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service

Assessment methods and criteria

% Grade
51 - 59 = 1
69 - 60 = 2
79 - 70 = 3
89 - 80 = 4
100 - 90 = 5

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 01.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Nina Sillvan
Student groups
  • AFE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

The student
• Masters the main features of entrepreneurial competencies, recognises their own entrepreneurial competencies and attitudes, as well as recognises the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their actions and interaction
• Can name and define the phases of setting up a business
• Recognises, from the perspective of their business idea, the key customers, and their role for profitable business
• Knows and can name entrepreneurship-related opportunities at SeAMK, and related support services.

Content

• Personal entrepreneurial competencies, such as self-knowledge and self-efficacy, motivation values, tolerance for ambiguity, and the importance of one’s own attitudes for choices
• Value production in different structures, such as companies and associations
• Basic concepts and revenue model of entrepreneurship and business activity, economic literacy, risk management
• Phases of business establishment
• Business plan as a tool for the structuration of a business idea
• Business activity as part of society, entrepreneurship as part of life
• Familiarization with the entrepreneurship services provided by SeAMK

Materials

To be provided by the lecturer.
Other supporting literature will be available from the SeAMK library.

Teaching methods

Lecturing
Class activities
Teamwork or groupwork

Student workload

There will be total of 81 hours.

- 12 hours for lecturing and in-class activities
- 69 hours for individual work and teamwork

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student can
- take responsibility for their tasks (acts in an entrepreneur-like way)
- recognise their entrepreneurial competences and realize the importance of tolerance for ambiguity in their own actions
- recognise the customer’s key role in the planning of business activity
- recognise, in the business plan, their own competence and the customers and key partners of their company

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess their own potential for acting as an entrepreneur
- can assess the chance of success of business operations and becoming an entrepreneur
- can recognise the partners and networks most important for their business
- is familiar with the knowledge base of business and the connection of responsibility with business
- knows the basics of business calculations

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

In addition to the above things, the student
- can assess the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship
- can analyse competitors’ importance for business
- analyse and assess their strategic choices and is aware of the social importance of business activities
- recognises, from the perspective of their business plan, the key risks, masters business calculations, and the pricing of their product or service

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Petteri Mäkelä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student knows how the development in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) affects to the manufacturing industry and to its products and services.
Student can utilize IoT platforms and cloud services. Student can develop application, which collects data from automatic machines and industrial processes and sends that data to IoT services.

Content

- Principles of Industrial Internet of Things
- Cloud services and IoT platforms
- Standards and protocols used with Industrial Internet of Things (HTTP, REST, OPC UA, MQTT)
- Programming of IIoT applications

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Exam schedules

The exam is in the last lesson

Student workload

Lectures 37 %, independent studying 63 %.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows how the development in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) affects to the manufacturing industry and to its products and services. Student can utilize IoT platforms.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student knows how the development in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) affects to the manufacturing industry and to its products and services.
Student can utilize IoT platforms and cloud services. Student can develop application, which collects data from automatic machines and industrial processes and sends that data to IoT services.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student knows how the development in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) affects to the manufacturing industry and to its products and services.
Student can utilize IoT platforms and cloud services. Student can develop application, which collects data from automatic machines and industrial processes and sends that data to IoT services. Student can develop web-based applications which displays and stores the process data.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam 75 % and exercises 25 %

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Panula
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will have command of the basic structures of programming and structural programme design. They can design, code, document and test small-scale programmes with a console user interface.

Content

Basics language structures: types, statements, input/output, selection, looping, branching, methods.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic programming structures and is able to apply them to usual programming problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is familiar with the basic programming structures and is able to apply them to programming problems.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to plan independently, implement and utilise various programming structures in his programming exercises.

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Juha Yli-Hemminki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student knows the basic concept of the object-oriented programming. Student can design modular programs using subprograms and classes. Student can define a class and use objects of a class. Student can utilize list and dictionary data structures and files in his program. Student can write a small program having a graphical user interface.

Content

- List and dictionary
- Class definition
- Creating an object and using it
- Files
- Graphical user interface. GUI design and event handling

Materials

Lecture material and examples

Teaching methods

Lectures and assignments

Student workload

108h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows the basic concept of the object-oriented programming. Student can define a class and use objects of a class. Student can utilize list data structure and files in his program. Student can write a small program having a graphical user interface.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student knows the basic concept of the object-oriented programming well. Student can design modular programs using subprograms and classes. Student can define a class and use objects of a class. Student can utilize list data structure and files in his program. Student can write a small program having a graphical user interface.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student knows the basic concept of the object-oriented programming excellently. Student can design modular programs using subprograms and classes. Student can define a class and use objects of a class. Student can utilize list and dictionary data structures and files in his program. Student can write a program having a graphical user interface.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam

Qualifications

Basics of Programming 1

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Juha Yli-Hemminki
Student groups
  • TITE22

Objective

Upon completion of the course the student can create C++ applications into micro controller based platform, create function libraries and user interfaces.

Content

The features of the embedded platform and microcontroller, programming of measures and controls, user interface with microcontroller platform, user interface by remote, memory usage, multitasking principle and realization.

Materials

Lecture material and examples

Teaching methods

Lectures, examples and assignments

Student workload

80h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basics of C++ programming like using pointers.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters the creation of applications in C++ and is able to use the language's features in a versatile way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can create versatile applications consisting of several source code files independently and use the features of the C++ language broadly and appropriately.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam

Qualifications

Basics of programming.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Juha Yli-Hemminki
Student groups
  • TITE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology

Objective

Upon completion of the course the student can create C++ applications into micro controller based platform, create function libraries and user interfaces.

Content

The features of the embedded platform and microcontroller, programming of measures and controls, user interface with microcontroller platform, user interface by remote, memory usage, multitasking principle and realization.

Materials

Lecture material and examples

Teaching methods

Lectures, examples and assignments

Student workload

80h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basics of C++ programming like using pointers.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters the creation of applications in C++ and is able to use the language's features in a versatile way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can create versatile applications consisting of several source code files independently and use the features of the C++ language broadly and appropriately.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam

Qualifications

Basics of programming.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Juha Yli-Hemminki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Upon completion of the course the student can create C++ applications into micro controller based platform, create function libraries and user interfaces.

Content

The features of the embedded platform and microcontroller, programming of measures and controls, user interface with microcontroller platform, user interface by remote, memory usage, multitasking principle and realization.

Materials

Lecture material and examples

Teaching methods

Lectures, examples and assignments

Student workload

80h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basics of C++ programming like using pointers.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters the creation of applications in C++ and is able to use the language's features in a versatile way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can create versatile applications consisting of several source code files independently and use the features of the C++ language broadly and appropriately.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam

Qualifications

Basics of programming.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student knows how to build client-side single-page and multipage web-applications. Student can develop interactive functionality to HTML pages using modern technologies.

Content

Basics:
- HTML
- CSS
- Javascript

Tools and frameworks:
- npm as a build tool
- React
- Webpack
- Redux

Practical exercises

Materials

Information about the materials are in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Contact teaching and independent work.

Student workload

3 cu * 27 h/cu = 81 hours, of which around one third is contact teaching and two thirds independent work.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basic terms and technologies used in client-side programming.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters well the principles of client-side programming and is able to apply them to different exercises.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters well the principles of client-side programming and is able to adopt new client-side technolgies on his own. He is also able to apply them to even the most demanding cases.

Assessment methods and criteria

Activities including exam.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Panula
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student knows the concepts related to cloud services and their purposes of use. The student knows the interfaces and functionalities of the cloud services introduced during the course. Student can make applications which send data to the cloud services in question.

Content

Service models of cloud services:
-Software as a Service (SaaS)
-Platform as a Service (PaaS)
-Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)

Getting acquainted with different cloud services e.g.:
-Microsoft Azure
-Siemens MindSphere
-Wapice IoT-Ticket

Practical exercises on the cloud services mentioned above are included in the course.

Materials

Lecture materials

Teaching methods

Lectures and assignments

Student workload

Contact teaching 28h, independent study 53h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has satisfactory knowledge of the basics of cloud services. Student can make a simple application which sends data to some cloud service introduced during the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has good knowledge of the basics of cloud services. The student is able to apply the gained knowledge and to utilize already existing code examples in order to make applications which communicate with cloud services.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has excellent knowledge of the basics of cloud services. The student can create independently applications that communicate with different cloud services and also test them and search for possible mistakes in them.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and assignments

Enrollment

01.08.2024 - 20.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 28.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Heli Simon
  • Christopher Hudson
Student groups
  • MRN24
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing

Objective

The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Content

- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Materials

Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals

Teaching methods

Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment

Student workload

108 hours

Further information

80% attendance of class or grade affected.

50% minimum

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

fi
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review

Enrollment

02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Christopher Hudson
Scheduling groups
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 50. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 50. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • IB24A
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Education groups
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Content

- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Materials

fi
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals

Teaching methods

Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment

Student workload

108 hours

Further information

80% attendance of class or grade affected.

50% minimum

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review

Enrollment

02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Christopher Hudson
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
  • IB24B
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
  • Small group 1
  • Small group 2

Objective

The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Content

- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Materials

Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals

Teaching methods

Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment

Student workload

108 hours

Further information

fi
80% attendance of class or grade affected.

50% minimum

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Christopher Hudson
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Content

- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Materials

fi
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals

Teaching methods

fi
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment

Student workload

108 hours

Further information

fi
80% attendance of class or grade affected.

50% minimum

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.

Assessment methods and criteria

fi
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Christopher Hudson
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Content

- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work

Materials

fi
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals

Teaching methods

Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment

Student workload

108 hours

Further information

80% attendance of class or grade affected.

50% minimum

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in selecting and using electrical components of control systems. They will also be able to size the components of control system.

Content

Components of control systems, sizing and selection.

Materials

- Lecture material
- Demonstrations during lectures
- Assignments
- Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises/assignments

Student workload

Contact lessons 28 h. Self-learning and assignments about 50h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows basic components of control systems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student knows basics components of control systems. Student can select and size components.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge to demanding projects.

Assessment methods and criteria

Completion of assignments, exam

Qualifications

Electrical and Thermal Physics
Electrical Engineering

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Niko Ristimäki
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will master the basics of control technology and be able to apply the control theory to practical control systems. Students will learn to design control systems for different purposes. They will also be able to tune control systems.

Content

- Basics of control technology
- Transfer function
- Controller blocks in time domains
- Control loop tuning
- Structure and the types of controllers
- Designing a control systems

Materials

Lecture handouts, lecture demonstrations, assignments, product and programming manuals.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, assignments and group work

Student workload

Total work load 81 h of which scheduled 32 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basics of control technology and can identify the terms used.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters well principles of control system design and tuning.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can utilize learned skills in demanding projects.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises and an examination

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the basics of control technology and can identify the terms used.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters well principles of control system design and tuning.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student can utilize learned skills in demanding projects.

Qualifications

Sensor Technology
Automation Technology Mathematics

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Panula
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student masters TCP / IP communication and a whole range of different communication connections and their properties, concepts and different relationships. He understands the principles behind IP addresses and subnets, TCP / IP protocols and how they work. The student learns the basics of computer networks and threats and how to protect against them.

Content

Students will become familiar with data communications protocols and how they work. They will understand the principles of data transfer and data communications systems.
-TCP / IP Security
- Security Protocols
- Network Security
- Firewalls and IDS -
- Malware

Materials

Teacher's material.

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Student workload

Lectures 40 h and independent study 40 h

Content scheduling

1. System Model of OSI structure and operation of IP and TCP /
2. Principles of IP addresses and subnetting as well as the most common TCP / IP protocols and their function.
3. Connecting the Device to the TCP / IP Network
4. Security data communications
5. IoT devices securely to the network
6. Cyber security

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1 - 2 The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent telecommunications and security concepts and methods.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3 - 4 The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of telecommunications and security , and is able to apply them to different types of problems.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of telecommunications , and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. Students are able to commendable rate issues and know how to apply them.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and assignment.

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student can implement fundamental data structures and algorithms and compare their properties. Student can use different data structures, such as lists, sets, dictionaries, trees and hashing, and algorithms associated to them. Student can develop applications, which utilizes different kind of data structures and algorithms efficiently.

Content

- Lists, stack, queue
- Dictionaries
- Trees
- Sorting
- Searching
- Hashing
- Principles of algorithm analysis
- Collection classes of C#, Java or C++

Materials

Information about the materials are in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Contact teaching and independent work.

Student workload

4 cu * 27 h/cu = 108 hours, of which around one third is contact teaching and two thirds independent work.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student can implement fundamental data structures and algorithms. Student can use lists and dictionaries, and algorithms associated to them.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student can implement fundamental data structures and algorithms and compare their properties. Student can use different data structures, such as lists, sets, dictionaries, trees and hashing, and algorithms associated to them. Student can develop applications, which utilizes different kind of data structures and algorithms.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student can implement fundamental data structures and algorithms and compare their properties. Student can use different data structures, such as lists, sets, dictionaries, trees and hashing, and algorithms associated to them. Student can develop applications, which utilizes different kind of data structures and algorithms efficiently. Student can analyze the running time of the algorithms.

Assessment methods and criteria

Activities and exam.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jarkko Loima
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student understands the concept of database and database management system. Student knows how database is designed and how information is analyzed and modeled. Student can transform entity-relationship model to a relational model, and the to relation database. Student knows the SQL programming language and can make queries and other operations to database, also from other programs. Student knows the basics of NoSQL databases.

Content

- Concepts of databases and database management systems
- Relational databases
- Conceptual modelling
- ER (Entity-Relationship) modelling
- SQL (Structured Query Language)
- Basics of NoSQL databases

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student understands the concept of database. Student knows how database is designed and how information is modeled. Student knows the basics of SQL programming language and can make queries and other operations to database.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the concept of database and database management system. Student knows how database is designed and how information is analyzed and modeled. Student can transform entity-relationship model to a relational model, and the to relation database. Student knows the SQL programming language and can make queries and other operations to database. Student knows the basics of NoSQL databases.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the concept of database and database management system. Student knows how database is designed and how information is analyzed and modeled. Student can transform entity-relationship model to a relational model, and the to relation database. Student masters the SQL programming language and can make queries and other operations to database, also from other programs. Student can develop applications, which use NoSQL databases.

Qualifications

- Basics of programming

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Perälä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will acquire the ability to interpret drawings in the fields of electrical and automation engineering. They will be competent in using CAD programmes for electrical and automation designing, and they will understand their features and areas where the programmes can be used. Upon completion of the course, students will possess the readiness they need to make simple, field-related drawings using CAD and to choose appropriate ways to present their work.

Content

Basic knowledge of drawings for electrical and automation engineering:
- Command of symbols and drawing techniques
- Ways to use computers in designing
- Practice in designing and drawing general, field-related diagrams
- Functions of the CAD system

Materials

Lecture material, Lecture demonstrations, Assignments, EPLAN software.

Teaching methods

Lectures, Demonstrations, Assignments.

Student workload

Contact teaching about 35 h. Self-learning and assignments about 70h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts of electrical CAD software, and is able to draw basic level main circuits, control circuits and panel layouts and apply them to basic level design of electrical and automation system.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is familiar with the concepts of electrical CAD software, and is able to draw different types of main circuits, control circuits and panel layouts and is able to apply them to to different types design of electrical and automation system.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electrical CAD software, and is able to apply them well to a variety of different types design of electrical and automation system.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam.

Qualifications

Electrical engineering
Components of control systems

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Derivative, interpretation as slope,
geometric and physical applications
Integral, interpretation as area,
geometric and physical applications
Differential equations

Materials

to be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

lectures, independent study

Student workload

lectures 32h, independent study

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of differential and integral calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of differential and integral calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of differential and integral calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

exercises + exam

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry, Vectors and matrices

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
  • AFE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Derivative, interpretation as slope,
geometric and physical applications
Integral, interpretation as area,
geometric and physical applications
Differential equations

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of differential and integral calculus, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of differential and integral calculus, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of differential and integral calculus, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry, Vectors and matrices

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 27.08.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Perälä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will learn about the basic principles of electric motors, the functions of direct current motors (DC motors) and alternating current motors (AC motors). Adjustable drives and control system engineering are also discussed. The aim of the course is to give students a general idea of electric motors as an integral part of automation engineering. Upon completion of the course, students will know how to choose the correct electrical drives and connect them to an electrical network.

Content

- Basic principles of electric motors
- Direct current motors (DC motors)
- Cage induction motors
- Frequency converters
- Servo-motors
- Servo-controls
- Stepping motors and their controls

Lab work: Connecting motors and motor controls
- Testing
- Measuring

Materials

- Lecture material
- Lecture demonstrations
- Exercises
- Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Lectures and laboratory exercises.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the electric drives concepts and methods, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electric drives, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electric drives and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam, laboratory work reports, peer review.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

After completion of the course, students will understand the factors influencing electric properties and know how to explain them. They will able to mathematically solve basic problems associated with direct current circuits and alternating current circuits.

Content

- Electodynamics
- DC and AC circuits calculations. (Kirchoff current and voltage law)
- Electrical circuit measurement in theory
- Three-phase systems

Materials

Aura & Tonteri: Teoreettinen sähkötekniikka ja sähkökoneiden perusteet (WSOY)
or Practical electronics for inventors, Paul Scherz.
Lectures, measuring devices in the laboratory.

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises and autonomous studies.

Student workload

To be announced at beginning of the studies.

Content scheduling

- Electodynamics
- DC and AC circuits
- Electrical circuit measurement
- Three-phase systems
- Using a multimeter and oscilloscope

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student is able to use quantities and units of electrostatics. Student is able to analyze the accuracy of the results obtained and solve simple problems which resemble exemplary problems given during the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to previous, student is also able to utilize the basic laws of electrostatics and justify the solutions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student has a comprehensive understanding of the basic laws in electrostatics, the interrelations between the laws and utilization of them in problem-solving. Student is fluent in analyzing problems and justifying the solutions.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam.

Qualifications

Electrical and thermal physics

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Perälä
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student can explain what electrical work can skilled person do. He can search and apply valid regulations of electrical safety. He can do electrical installations safely. In addition he can do the right things when electrocution happens. He can do the initial inspection of the electrical installations and the technical documentation.

Content

- The law of electrical safety
- Protection against electric shock
- Safety of electrical work
- Circumstances of electrical installations and degrees of protection
- First aid in accident
- Measurements of verification

Materials

The law of electrical safety 2017, D1- handbook of electrical installations in buildings, standards of low voltage directive, handouts and web sites.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and understands of Electrical safety and standards to a satisfactory extent and is able to apply them to usual problems

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Electrical safety and standards , and is able to apply them to different types of problems

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of Electrical safety and standards, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Qualifications

No previous studies are required

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pekka Sahimaa
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling thermal and electrical phenomena
- be able to analyze the thermodynamic properties of materials and solid bodies with equilibrium models
- be able to interpret thermal and electrical laws as approximate empirical descriptions
- is able to analyze electrostatic interactions between electric fields and charged particles
- be able to solve even complicated DC circuits
- be able to identify electricity production and transmission processes, such as the use of three-phase power, transformer, generator and induction motor operation
- be able to evaluate his/her skills on thermal and electrical physics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies

Content

- Basics of thermal physics
- Electrostatics
- Direct current
- Alternating current
- Basics of magnetism

Materials

Benson: University Physics. Revised Edition (Wiley)
Upadhyaya: University Physics, ebook (Himalaya Pub. House)
Bhat: University Physics, ebook (Alpha Science International)
Technical formulas, reference book (Tammertekniikka)
Lecture notes

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises. Independent studying.

Employer connections

None

Completion alternatives

None

Student workload

Total work load 80 h. Scheduled studies 28 h, autonomous studies 52 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of both electricity and thermal physics. The student is able to apply electricity and thermal physics to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electricity and thermal physics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of electricity and thermal physics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.

Assessment methods and criteria

Final examination

Qualifications

Mechanics

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will verify the basic structures and function of micro-controllers and will realize a defined embedded system using a micro-controller. Additionally, students will be able to adapt hardware-oriented programming in C language to embedded systems. Students will solve various applications and exercises using hardware-oriented programming. Students will be able to develop a program and electronics for a small embedded system.

Content

- Hardware-oriented C language and Assembly language
- Development environment; installation, usage and maintenance
- C compiler, simulator and hardware measurement
- 8-bit or 32-bit micro-controller and peripheral devices

Materials

Internet sources for electronics

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student will do the job of the course assignments successfully. The student is familiar with general features of embedded system. The student knows the simple circuits and the basics of embedded system software

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will do the job of the course assignments well.
The student is able to design and implement embedded system circuits and embedded system software. Knows the documentation of the embedded system.
The student is familiar with embedded system and is able to utilize basic features.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will do the job of the course assignments perfectly. The student is able to design and implement the connections and embedded system software of an extensive and complicated embedded system.
The student is familiar with embedded system and is able to utilize most of features.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and practical exercises

Qualifications

Basics of Programming 1

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 13.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students know some basic vocabulary, grammar and phrases of the Finnish language. After the course, they are able to tell and write about themselves using simple expressions and to communicate in simple everyday situations. Furthermore, students are acquainted with Finland as a country and also have a better understanding of the Finnish way of life.

Content

This course provides students with an introduction to Finland and the Finnish language and culture:
- greetings, basic phrases, numbers
- introducing and telling about oneself (name, address, age, country, nationality, language skills), family and housing
- some expressions of time (weekdays, months, seasons, telling time)
- weather
- basic vocabulary (e.g. numbers, time, family, home, weather)
- simple everyday situations, e.g. telling about oneself, shopping and asking prices (Level A1)
- grammar, e.g. personal pronouns, possessive construction, verb conjugation, question and negative sentence, partitive case, genitive, local cases, consonant gradation
- main features of the spoken language
- basic information about Finland and Finnish culture.

Materials

Online material
Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 1. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Teaching methods

Contact lessons / distance learning, independent studies, spoken and written assignments, online exam

Exam schedules

Exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days) or YKI certificate, intermediate level

Student workload

81 h, incl. 28 h lectures

Further information

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Level A1

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows some vocabulary and polite phrases learnt during the course. He can use simple constructions but mistakes can impede comprehension. The student can communicate in some everyday situations when helped. Other languages strongly influence the pronunciation. The student can tell only a few main facts about the country and its culture.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the most of the vocabulary and polite phrases learnt during the course. He can use simple constructions almost without mistakes. He manages independently in most everyday situations. The pronunciation is mainly understandable. The student knows detailed facts widely - although some false information might appear - and is therefore relatively well acquainted with the country and its culture.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the vocabulary and polite phrases learnt during the course. He can use simple constructions making hardly any mistakes. He manages independently and fluently in everyday situations. The pronunciation is close to that of a native speaker. The student knows precise and detailed facts and is well acquainted with the country and its culture.

Assessment methods and criteria

- active participation in lessons (min. 50% to pass the course & min. 80% to get the highest grade)
- written and spoken assignments
- exam (written and oral part, min 50% of the points to pass the exam)

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students are more confident in using Finnish. After the course, they are able to tell and write about their daily life by using simple expressions and to communicate in everyday situations, such as ordering food and drinks at a restaurant or telling about their daily lives and travelling. They extend their knowledge of the basic vocabulary, grammar and typical structures of the Finnish language. They are further acquainted with the Finnish way of life.

Content

Students are able to communicate in simple everyday situations e.g.:
- ordering food and drinks in restaurant, travelling
- telling about their daily lives and hobbies
- asking the way, telling about places and explaining directions in daily life
- travelling (Level A1)
- grammar e.g. verb conjugation, partitive case, more about consonant gradation, some typical sentence types.

Materials

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 1. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.
Online material will be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Contact lessons / distance learning
Independent study: exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exam

Exam schedules

The time of the exam and retake exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days) or YKI certificate, intermediate level

Student workload

81h, incl. lectures 28h

Further information

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Level A1

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows some vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences but mistakes can impede comprehension. He can communicate in some everyday situations when helped. He understands slow and clearly articulated speech to some extent and he recognizes the topic of written texts and understands some words and expressions in them. The student is able to write short and simple texts, but mistakes impede comprehension. Other languages strongly influence the pronunciation.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the most of the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making a few mistakes. He manages independently in the most everyday situations, mistakes do not impede comprehension. He understands most of the normal speed speech and the content of written texts. He is able to write mainly understandable texts while still making some mistakes. The pronunciation is mainly understandable.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making hardly any mistakes. He manages independently and fluently in everyday situations. He understands normal speed speech and the content of written texts and he can write understandable texts, which may contain minor mistakes.The pronunciation is close to that of a native speaker.

Assessment methods and criteria

- active participation in lessons (min. 50% to pass the course & min. 80% to get the highest grade)
- written and spoken Moodle assignments and tests
- exam (written and oral part, min 50% of the points to pass the exam)

Qualifications

Finnish 1

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Virpi Masonen
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students are more confident in using Finnish. After the course, they are able to tell and write about their daily life by using simple expressions and to communicate in everyday situations, such as ordering food and drinks at a restaurant or telling about their daily lives and travelling. They extend their knowledge of the basic vocabulary, grammar and typical structures of the Finnish language. They are further acquainted with the Finnish way of life.

Content

Students are able to communicate in simple everyday situations e.g.:
- ordering food and drinks in restaurant, travelling
- telling about their daily lives and hobbies
- asking the way, telling about places and explaining directions in daily life
- travelling (Level A1)
- grammar e.g. verb conjugation, partitive case, more about consonant gradation, some typical sentence types.

Materials

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 1. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Web-material given in the beginning of the course

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days)
or YKI certificate, intermediate level

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows some vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences but mistakes can impede comprehension. He can communicate in some everyday situations when helped. He understands slow and clearly articulated speech to some extent and he recognizes the topic of written texts and understands some words and expressions in them. The student is able to write short and simple texts, but mistakes impede comprehension. Other languages strongly influence the pronunciation.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the most of the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making a few mistakes. He manages independently in the most everyday situations, mistakes do not impede comprehension. He understands most of the normal speed speech and the content of written texts. He is able to write mainly understandable texts while still making some mistakes. The pronunciation is mainly understandable.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making hardly any mistakes. He manages independently and fluently in everyday situations. He understands normal speed speech and the content of written texts and he can write understandable texts, which may contain minor mistakes.The pronunciation is close to that of a native speaker.

Qualifications

Finnish 1

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students are more confident in using Finnish. After the course, they are able to tell and write about their daily life by using simple expressions and to communicate in everyday situations, such as telling about their daily life at work and running errands in a bank, post office and hotel. They are acquainted with the Finnish enterprises and working life.

Content

Students are able to communicate in everyday situations, e.g.:
- telling about daily life, holiday and travelling
- telling about work and professions
- running errands in bank, post office and hotel
- seeking a job (Level A1)
- telling the basic information of an enterprise in Finnish.
- grammar e.g. the most common noun types, object, more about the consonant gradation and the use of the local cases

Materials

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 1. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Teacher's material and Web-material given in the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Independent study: exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Exam at school

Exam schedules

The time of the exam and retake exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days) or YKI certificate, intermediate level

Student workload

81h, incl. lectures 28h

Further information

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Level A1

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows some vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences but mistakes can impede comprehension. He can communicate in some everyday situations when helped. He understands slow and clearly articulated speech to some extent and he recognizes the topic of written texts and understands some words and expressions in them. The student is able to write short and simple texts, but mistakes impede comprehension. Other languages strongly influence the pronunciation. The student can tell only a few main facts about Finnish enterprises.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the most of the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making a few mistakes. He manages independently in most of the everyday situations, mistakes do not impede comprehension. He understands most of the normal speed speech and the content of written texts. He is able to write mainly understandable texts while still making some mistakes. The pronunciation is mainly understandable. The student knows detailed facts widely about Finnish enterprises - although some false information might appear.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making hardly any mistakes. He manages independently and fluently in everyday situations. He understands normal speed speech and the content of written texts and he can write understandable texts, which may contain minor mistakes.The pronunciation is close to that of a native speaker. The student knows precise and detailed facts about Finnish enterprises.

Assessment methods and criteria

- active participation in lessons (min. 50% to pass the course & min. 80% to get the highest grade)
- written and spoken Moodle assignments and tests
- exam (written and oral part, min 50% of the points to pass the exam)

Qualifications

Finnish 1 and Finnish 2

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students are more confident in using Finnish in everyday situations. After the course, they are able to tell and write about their daily life by using typical expressions in Finnish and to communicate in everyday situations, such as telling about their daily life, work, health and running errands. They are able to give a short presentation in Finnish.

Content

Students are able to communicate in everyday situations, e.g.:
- telling about daily life and leisure time
- telling about business and work
- telling about health and running errands in a health care center (Level A1 - A2)
- grammar e.g. past tense, more noun and sentence types, plural

Materials

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 1. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 2. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Teacher's material and Web-material given in the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Independent study: exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Exam at school

Exam schedules

The time of the exam and retake exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days).

The course cannot be completed with a YKI certificate of any level.

Student workload

81h, incl. lectures 28h

Further information

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Level A2

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows some vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences but mistakes can impede comprehension. He can communicate in some everyday situations when helped. He understands slow and clearly articulated speech to some extent and he recognizes the topic of written texts and understands some words and expressions in them. The student is able to write short and simple texts, but mistakes impede comprehension. Other languages strongly influence the pronunciation.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the most of the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making a few mistakes. He manages independently in most of the everyday situations, mistakes do not impede comprehension. He understands most of the normal speed speech and the content of written texts. He is able to write mainly understandable texts while still making some mistakes. The pronunciation is mainly understandable.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making hardly any mistakes. He manages independently and fluently in everyday situations. He understands normal speed speech and the content of written texts and he can write understandable texts, which may contain minor mistakes. The pronunciation is close to that of a native speaker.

Assessment methods and criteria

- active participation in lessons (min. 50% to pass the course & min. 80% to get the highest grade)
- written and spoken Moodle assignments and tests
- exam (written and oral part, min 50% of the points to pass the exam)

Qualifications

Finnish 1, Finnish 2, Finnish 3

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 10.03.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students are more confident in using Finnish in everyday situations. After the course, they are able to tell and write about their daily life by using typical expressions in Finnish and to communicate in everyday situations, such as telling about their daily life, work, health and running errands. They are able to give a short presentation in Finnish.

Content

Students are able to communicate in everyday situations, e.g.:
- telling about daily life and leisure time
- telling about business and work
- telling about health and running errands in a health care center (Level A1 - A2)
- grammar e.g. past tense, more noun and sentence types, plural

Materials

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 1. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Gehring, Sonja & Heinzmann, Sanni: Suomen mestari 2. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Teacher's material and Web-material given in the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Contact lessons
Independent study: exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Exam at school

Exam schedules

The time of the exam and retake exams will be announced during the course.

Completion alternatives

Demonstration of competences (on SeAMK demonstration days).

The course cannot be completed with a YKI certificate of any level.

Student workload

81h, incl. lectures 28h

Further information

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Level A2

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows some vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences but mistakes can impede comprehension. He can communicate in some everyday situations when helped. He understands slow and clearly articulated speech to some extent and he recognizes the topic of written texts and understands some words and expressions in them. The student is able to write short and simple texts, but mistakes impede comprehension. Other languages strongly influence the pronunciation.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the most of the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making a few mistakes. He manages independently in most of the everyday situations, mistakes do not impede comprehension. He understands most of the normal speed speech and the content of written texts. He is able to write mainly understandable texts while still making some mistakes. The pronunciation is mainly understandable.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the vocabulary learnt during the course. He can use simple sentences making hardly any mistakes. He manages independently and fluently in everyday situations. He understands normal speed speech and the content of written texts and he can write understandable texts, which may contain minor mistakes. The pronunciation is close to that of a native speaker.

Assessment methods and criteria

- active participation in lessons (min. 50% to pass the course & min. 80% to get the highest grade)
- written and spoken Moodle assignments and tests
- exam (written and oral part, min 50% of the points to pass the exam)

Qualifications

Finnish 1, Finnish 2, Finnish 3

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Janne Perälä
  • Kimmo Kitinoja
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will learn about the controls and actuators used in hydraulic and pneumatic systems. They will be competent in designing and creating hydraulic and pneumatic systems. They are capable of the design of the system and selection of the components.

Content

Hydraulic pumps, hydraulic valves, hydraulic actuators, types of compressors, valve types, pneumatic timers and logic valves, control systems for pneumatic circuits, principles of designing a pneumatic system.

Materials

Lecture material and information
Lecture book:
Hydraulitekniikka
Kauranne, Heikki ; Kajaste, Jyrki ; Vilenius, Matti
ISBN 978-952-63-0707-7
Pneumatiikka
Ellman, Asko ; Hautanen, Juha ; Järvinen Kari ; Simpura, Antti
ISBN. 951-37-3736-5

Teaching methods

Lectures and laboratory study
Self study theory and calculation exercises

Student workload

Lectures and laboratory 50%
Self-study and calcuation 50%

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basics of hydraulics and pneumatics.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student can design pneumatic/hydraulic systems similar to the exercises.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can design pneumatic/hydraulic systems by the given requirements of the system functionality.

Assessment methods and criteria

Returns of calculation exercises
Laboratory exercise report returns
Exam

Enrollment

01.08.2024 - 25.08.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jarkko Loima
Student groups
  • MRN24
    Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing

Objective

- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments

Content

Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 15.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Katri Juppi
Student groups
  • IB24A
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business

Objective

- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments

Content

Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright

Materials

Internet tutorials, teacher's material

Teaching methods

Contact teaching, online teaching, independent assignments.

Student workload

4 x 27h = 108h

Content scheduling

- introduction to office software
- word processing
standard for written work in SeAMK
document standard
- spreadsheet calculation
calculation models
diagrams
- presentation graphics
content and structure of presentations
presentation settings
- use of online services
cloud services
video conferencing as a tool

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assignments, computer exercises, quick tests

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 08.09.2024

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Katri Juppi
Scheduling groups
  • Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
  • IB24B
    Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Education groups
  • Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)

Objective

- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments

Content

Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright

Materials

Internet tutorials, teacher's material

Teaching methods

Online teaching, independent assignments.

Student workload

4 x 27h = 108h

Content scheduling

- introduction to office software
- word processing
standard for written work in SeAMK
document standard
- spreadsheet calculation
calculation models
diagrams
- presentation graphics
content and structure of presentations
presentation settings
- use of online services
cloud services
video conferencing as a tool

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assignments, computer exercises, quick tests

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 13.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Panula
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments

Content

Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright

Materials

Lecture materials

Teaching methods

Lectures and assignments

Student workload

Contact teaching 28h, self study 80h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and assignments

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jarkko Loima
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments

Content

Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
  • TITE21

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Minimization by gradient descent
Linear regression
Logistic regression
Neural networks

Materials

to be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

lectures and exercises

Student workload

81h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods discussed in the course, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods discussed in the course, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods discussed in the course, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

assignments

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry, Vectors and matrices, Differential and integral calculus, Automation technology mathematics

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Minimization by gradient descent
Linear regression
Logistic regression
Neural networks

Materials

to be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

lectures and exercises

Student workload

81h

Further information

80% attendance in lectures and exercises

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods discussed in the course, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods discussed in the course, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods discussed in the course, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

assignments

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry, Vectors and matrices, Differential and integral calculus, Automation technology mathematics

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Juha Yli-Hemminki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student is able to
- explain the character of project work and determine when the project work model is useful
- present the basic knowledge and skills on the basis of which he/she can participate in project work and project planning
- explain concepts connected with projects, content of a project plan, project time planing and supervising (life circle)
- present tasks connected with the different phases of the project cycle

Content

- concepts and methods of project work
- project phases and process
- project plan (time, resource and cost planning)
- project organisation and interest groups
- changes, risks and problems in project work
- project communication and reporting
- concluding a project

Materials

A textbook in project management and Project management competence 3.0
(http://www.pry.fi/UserFiles/33fa4818-2dbf-44aa-a497-0e74914327b1/Web/IPMA-sertifiointi/ENG/PMAF_NCB_3.0_v1.3.pdf )

Project management basics (or equivalent book recommended by course lecturer):
Pratt, David. Great Lessons in Project Management. Vienna, US: Management Concepts, Incorporated, 2014. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 17 January 2017. http://libts.seamk.fi:2101/lib/seamkebrary/reader.action?ppg=11&docID=11011874&tm=1484647850806

Teaching methods

Lectures

Student workload

80h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can name and can define the central concepts which describe Project and Project management. Student can define basic skills required for working as part of Project team. Student can explain different phases of the project cycle.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student can explain the central concepts which describe Project and Project management. Student can explain well different phases of the project cycle and can define skills required for working as part of Project team. Student has basic Project work skills.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can name and define very well the central concepts of Project and Project management. Student can explain very well different phases of the project cycle and can define skills required for working as part of Project team. Student has Basic Project work skills.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and practical work

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Enrollment

19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Anu Latva-Reinikka
  • Pia-Mari Riihilahti
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics

Content

- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work

Materials

- Material provided by the teacher

Teaching methods

Contact teaching: Lectures and assignments

Student workload

53 h
- lectures and exercises in class,
- library exercises
- self-study

Further information

PLEASE NOTE THAT ATTENDANCE IN CLASSES IS MANDATORY

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.

Assessment methods and criteria

Participating in the classes of the course, showing the knowledge and skills listed in the learning outcomes in class, by completing the required course assignments. Assignments 100 %
PLEASE NOTE THAT ATTENDANCE IN CLASSES IS MANDATORY

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments have not been completed successfully.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy.

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Ismo Tupamäki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in configuring and programming control systems (PLC) associated with the automation of bulk goods. They will create automation applications for complex process modules utilizing and testing the knowledge and skills they have learned during their studies. In the implementations, the aim is to make the equipment controls as energy efficient as possible.

Content

Students complete exercises in the laboratory using a diverse range of automation devices. The software and devices are those that are commonly used in industry, and therefore students are able to apply the experience they have obtained in the laboratory directly to situations in industry. The devices students use include Siemens and Omron programmable logic controllers, touch-screens, PC monitoring stations, industrial terminals, and RFID (radio frequency identification) sensors. Students also gain experience in using electric motors and pneumatic cylinders.

Materials

Material distributed by the lecturer, examples presented in the lectures, online material for the exercises, product and programming manuals.

Teaching methods

Guided programming exercises in the laboratory with practical equipment

Student workload

Will be announced at the beginning of the course.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student can make the configuration of the programmable logic according to a given instruction. He can program and test the basic functions of the controlled PLC device. The student is able to act and solve oncoming basic problems together with the members of the group.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to a satisfactory level, the student is able to independently apply, program and test special functions of logics. In addition, he will be able to work with the team to ensure and insist that the programs are safe to use.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows how to work together with a group in an effective and systematic way. In addition to device configuration, he is able to find and fix various hardware and programming errors. Together with the team, he ensures that the team results in a reliable, secure, and well-documented program.

Assessment methods and criteria

Peer review among group students.
Approved exercises and the teacher's assessment of the functionality of the programming.

Qualifications

Machine Automation 1

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Niko Ristimäki
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be able to configure and programme discrete automation control systems (PLC). Students will learn how to develop a multi-axis motion control system using frequency converters, cage induction motors, servo-drives and servo-motors. They will be competent in constructing various data transfer solutions needed for motion control in automation systems using fieldbuses.

Content

Students will practise how to programme and configure the control for a goods-processing station using programmable logic, a servo-drive and a servo-motor, as well as a frequency converter and cage induction motor. Students will also programme a multi-axis, PC-based motion controller and they will also practice configuring different fieldbus systems.

Materials

Lecture handouts, lecture demonstrations, assignments, product and programming manuals of various manufacturers.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, assignments and group work.

Student workload

Total work load of the course:107 h (scheduled and autonomous studies).

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Approved, written reports pertaining to the laboratory assignments

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved written reports of laboratory exercises.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Perälä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will learn about the basic connections involved in electrical and automation engineering. They will be competent in constructing an automation system, and they will gain insight into the regulations and technical aspects of installing electrical instruments.

Content

During the course, students will construct a small-scale automation system. The automation systems involve mechanics, programmable logic controllers, and various sensors, actuators and motor output. Students will design and programme a functioning system.

Materials

- Lecture material
- Lecture demonstrations
- Assignments
- Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Laboratory assignmet: manufacturing, testing and programming of motor feeder cubicles

Student workload

Contact teaching 32 h. Self-learning and exercises about 50h.

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

Approved completion of assignments.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to self-implement small-scale electrical switching, as well as its control, based on the plan they have made. In addition, students must be familiar with the basic workings of the control systems components used. Competence is measured by exam and practical practice.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved completion of assignments.

Qualifications

Components of control systems

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
  • TITE22

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be able to use measuring devices and software. Students will apply measuring devices and sensors, handle and verify collected signals. They will be able to develop and design various measuring equipment and methods.

Content

- Various sensor circuits: temperature, moisture, light, force, etc.
- Signal amplifiers
- Measuring methods
- Sensor module connections
- Analyzing measurements
- Post-processing with an appropriate software

Materials

Internet sources for electronics

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student will do the job of the course assignments successfully. Laboratory work is documented. The student is very sufficiently familiar with subjects.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will do the job of the course assignments well. Laboratory work is well documented. The student is very familiar with subjects.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will do the job of the course assignments perfectly. The student is very well familiar with subjects. Laboratory work is
excellent documented. Independently studies the operation of the components

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and practical exercises

Qualifications

Basics of electronics

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be able to use measuring devices and software. Students will apply measuring devices and sensors, handle and verify collected signals. They will be able to develop and design various measuring equipment and methods.

Content

- Various sensor circuits: temperature, moisture, light, force, etc.
- Signal amplifiers
- Measuring methods
- Sensor module connections
- Analyzing measurements
- Post-processing with an appropriate software

Materials

Internet sources for electronics

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student will do the job of the course assignments successfully. Laboratory work is documented. The student is very sufficiently familiar with subjects.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student will do the job of the course assignments well. Laboratory work is well documented. The student is very familiar with subjects.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student will do the job of the course assignments perfectly. The student is very well familiar with subjects. Laboratory work is
excellent documented. Independently studies the operation of the components

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and practical exercises

Qualifications

Basics of electronics

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Ismo Tupamäki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will be competent in analysing the structures and functions of the control systems used in machine automation systems. They will be able to utilise the IEC standardised programming tools and to develop reliable and energy efficient control software and a user interface for a materials handling device.

Content

- Structural programming (sequence)
- Function block programming
- Standard functions (timers, calculators, comparisons and other commonly used functions)
- Analogue signals
- Recipes
- User interfaces.

Students will engage in hands-on learning of pneumatically and electrically controlled actuators for automation systems using programmable logic and touch screens.

Materials

* Lecturers' handouts
* Lecture demonstrations
* Assignments
* Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

* Lectures
* Demonstrations
* Programming exercises

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 88 h,
- of which scheduled studies 35 h
- of which self-access learning 53 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and masters satisfactorily the basics of using the IEC standard programming tool. He is able to make a functional and safe logic program for a simple automation device using ready-made models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows well the basic concepts which are related to the machine automation and the standard programming methods. He is able to adapt and use ready-made function blocks to solve various problems. The student can test the operation of the automation program and can track possible mistakes which endanger safety by using simulation.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can create and debug independently a clear structured standard logic program. He can make, test and adapt own function blocks to different applications without forgetting safety.
The student understands the function of the programmable devices which are used in the machine automation and can locate and repair errors by using different simulation and diagnostics tools.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved assignments, homework and an exam

Qualifications

- Basics of automation
- Programmable logic controllers

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 22.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Niko Ristimäki
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will learn how to create multi-axis motion control systems using frequency converters, AC motors, servo-drives and servo-motors. They will also learn to create data transfer solutions for various types of motion control systems using fieldbuses.

Content

Controlling a goods processing station using programmable logic, servo-drive and servo-motor, PLC, frequency converters and AC motors, multi-axis motion control using a PC-based controller, signals and data transmission solutions commonly used in motion control instruments

Materials

Lecture handouts, lecture demonstrations, assignments, product and programming manuals of various manufacturers.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, assignments and group work.

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 108 h
- of which scheduled studies: 40 h
- of which autonomous studies: 68 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the basics of motion control.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student masters well principles of multi-axis motion control and fieldbus communication.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can utilize learned skills in demanding multi-axis motion control projects.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises and an examination

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows the basic concepts of single-axis motion control.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters well principles of multi-axis motion control and fieldbus communication.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

In addition to the above, the student can utilize learned skills in demanding projects.

Qualifications

Machine Automation 1

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Ismo Tupamäki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in making basic measurements safely and correctly. They will be able to determine and locate possible faults by interpreting the measuring results. The student is able to tune the equipment to operate energy efficiently based on the measurement results obtained. They will take into account the impact of external interferences on measurement results. Students will learn about the characteristics of computer-based measuring devices and their possible uses in different applications.

Students will understand industrial processes, instrumentation diagram drawings and possess the eadiness they need to design industrial control and adjustment systems. Students will be competent in using the more common methods of measurement used in industry and be capable of planning, measuring and installing instruments for industrial processes. They will also be competent in selecting measurement and control instruments and plan the installation, purchase and startup of them.

Content

- Basic concepts of industrial instrumentation
- Instrumentation diagrams and documents
- Principles of instrumentation and measurement technology
- Instrument installation and field engineering for industrial processes
- Maintenance documents and how to make them
- Measurements in the lab.

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of each lesson by teacher.

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises and laboratory works

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 60 h,
- of which scheduled studies 30 h
- of which self-access learning 30 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the measuring methods of basic quantities and the selection criteria of the sensor types. He can place the sensors according to the instruction and can connect the sensors and regulating units. Furthermore, he can read the PI schemes and can locate the devices from the processes according to the code.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the previous, the student knows the operating principles of modern regulating units and can locate using the information within reach of the fault and indicators. He can make the measurings of the automation according to the instruction using PC based measurement systems.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can dimension independently and can choose the correct measuring devices and regulating units to the basic processes of the automation and can search for information about the special measurement equipment and can apply the knowledge got by it. The student can measure the condition of the measuring devices which are used in the processes and if necessary, command the tuning and calibration of them.

Assessment methods and criteria

The evaluation of the course is based on:
- Exam
- Exercises (homework)
- Group work in the lab

Qualifications

Electrical engineering
Automation technology basic courses

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
Teachers
  • Ismo Tupamäki
Student groups
  • AFE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies
  • BIELI23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology, Full-time studies

Objective

Students will be competent in making basic measurements safely and correctly. They will be able to determine and locate possible faults by interpreting the measuring results. The student is able to tune the equipment to operate energy efficiently based on the measurement results obtained. They will take into account the impact of external interferences on measurement results. Students will learn about the characteristics of computer-based measuring devices and their possible uses in different applications.

Students will understand industrial processes, instrumentation diagram drawings and possess the eadiness they need to design industrial control and adjustment systems. Students will be competent in using the more common methods of measurement used in industry and be capable of planning, measuring and installing instruments for industrial processes. They will also be competent in selecting measurement and control instruments and plan the installation, purchase and startup of them.

Content

- Basic concepts of industrial instrumentation
- Instrumentation diagrams and documents
- Principles of instrumentation and measurement technology
- Instrument installation and field engineering for industrial processes
- Maintenance documents and how to make them
- Measurements in the lab.

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of each lesson by teacher.

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises and laboratory works

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 60 h,
- of which scheduled studies 30 h
- of which self-access learning 30 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows the measuring methods of basic quantities and the selection criteria of the sensor types. He can place the sensors according to the instruction and can connect the sensors and regulating units. Furthermore, he can read the PI schemes and can locate the devices from the processes according to the code.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

In addition to the previous, the student knows the operating principles of modern regulating units and can locate using the information within reach of the fault and indicators. He can make the measurings of the automation according to the instruction using PC based measurement systems.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student can dimension independently and can choose the correct measuring devices and regulating units to the basic processes of the automation and can search for information about the special measurement equipment and can apply the knowledge got by it. The student can measure the condition of the measuring devices which are used in the processes and if necessary, command the tuning and calibration of them.

Assessment methods and criteria

The evaluation of the course is based on:
- Exam
- Exercises (homework)
- Group work in the lab

Qualifications

Electrical engineering
Automation technology basic courses

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Tommi Ylimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Upon completion of the course, student will
- be able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling mechanical phenomena
- be able to build and solve physical models that describe different mechanical phenomena
- be able to interpret a physical model as an approximate description of the real world phenomenon
- be able to analyze the motion of solid bodies and fluids, and to understand the empirical nature of the physical science
- be able to evaluate his/her skills on mechanics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies

Content

- Kinematics
- Newton's laws
- Work, power, energy, impulse
- Linear momentum
- Rotary movement
- Mechanics of solids and fluid

Materials

Benson, University Physics. Revised Edition (Wiley)
Upadhyaya, University Physics, ebook (Himalaya Pub. House)
Bhat, University Physics, ebook (Alpha Science International)
Technical Formulas, reference book (Tammertekniikka)
Lecture notes

Teaching methods

Lectures and excercises, independent studying

Employer connections

None

Completion alternatives

None

Student workload

Total work load 80 h. Scheduled studies 32 h, autonomous studies 48 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Satisfactory (1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the mechanical basic concepts and methods, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.

Assessment methods and criteria

Final examination

Qualifications

No previous studies are required

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jarkko Loima
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in assembling computers from parts and installing an operating system and other necessary applications in it. They will be able to perform the initial start-up of a computer and carry out the processes needed to maintenance computers and expand their functionality.

Content

- Structure of the more common peripheral devices for computers and how they function
- PC structure, processors, and connections
- RAM/ROM memory
- Magnetic and optic memory
- SSD Hard Drives
- Monitors, voice cards, scanners and printers

Materials

Teacher's lecture material.

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises and laboratory assignments

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 32 h
- of which autonomous studies: 48 h

Content scheduling

- Structure of the more common peripheral devices for computers and how they function
- PC structure, motherboard ,processors,RAM/ROM memories and connections
- Hard Drive and SSB
- power supply
- Magnetic and optic memory,graphics card

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1-2 The student knows the basics of computer structure.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3-4 The student is well versed in the basic concepts and methods of computer technology. He is able to apply to solve problems.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 The student is admirably familiar with the concepts and methods related to computer technology. He is able to apply them in a variety of ways to solve different types of issues and problems.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course assessment comprises the following:
- Lab work
- Assignment
- Exam

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student can develop client-server applications. Student can develop concurrent and distributed applications with different techniques and programming languages. Student can develop simple web-based applications and utilize REST API's.

Content

- Client-server model
- Socket programming
- HTTP protocol
- Concurrent programs
- Threads and synchronization
- Web-based applications and REST API
- MQTT

Materials

Information about the materials are in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Contact teaching and independent work.

Student workload

3 cu * 27 h/cu = 81 hours, of which around one third is contact teaching and two thirds independent work.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student can develop simple client-server applications.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student can develop client-server applications. Student can develop concurrent and distributed applications with different techniques. Student can develop simple web-based applications and utilize REST API's.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student can develop client-server applications. Student can develop concurrent and distributed applications with different techniques and programming languages. Student can develop web-based applications and utilize REST API's.

Assessment methods and criteria

Activities including exam.

Qualifications

- Object-oriented programming

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will learn how to apply object-oriented paradigms and how to develop object-oriented PLC and PC software

Content

Class, object, encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, programming language syntaxand object-oriented programming in automation applications

Materials

Information about the materials are in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Contact teaching and independent work.

Student workload

4 cu * 27 h/cu = 108 hours, of which around one third is contact teaching and two thirds independent work.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Satisfactory (1-2): The student knows basics
The student recognizes the concepts and theory of object-oriented programming. The student is able to design, document and implement simple object-oriented structures.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3-4): The student masters well principles of object oriented paradigms in PLC and PC programming.
The student masters the concepts and theory of object-oriented programming. The student is able to design, document and implement demanding classroom structures. The student knows the object-oriented programming language and is able to use it to implement programs that implement practical needs.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): The student can utilize learned skills in demanding projects.
The student knows the concepts and theory of object-oriented programming. The student is able to design, document and implement demanding classroom structures. The student has a comprehensive knowledge of object-oriented programming language and is able to implement programs that implement practical needs in a versatile way with the help of object-oriented programming.

Assessment methods and criteria

Activities including exam.

Qualifications

Basics of Programming 1

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

4 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

1 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will
be familiar with the concepts associated with production management and the problematic, can be used by production management for future assignments.

Content

Supply-Chain management and ERP,
Production management,
Sales and Operations management,
Master Production Scheduling,
Manufacturing Resource Planning,
Inventory Management,
Introduction to production management system

Materials

Tuotannonohjaus pk-konepajateollisuuden alihankintaprosesseissa, Häkkinen Kai, VTT Tiedotteita 2225. Espoo 2003
Uusi-Rauva, E. 1993. Teollisuustalous Tammer-paino. Tampere. 1993. ISBN 951-96765-0-3
Antti Sääksvuori & Anselmi. Immonen. Tuotetiedon hallinta – PDM. 2002 Talentum Media Oy. ISBN 951-762-796-3
Miettinen, Pauli. 1993 Tuotannonohjaus ja logistiikka. ATK-instituutti. s. 102. ISBN 951-37-1193-5
Harju, A. 1987. Teollisuustalous Painatuskeskus Oy. Helsinki. ISBN 951-860-378-2
Lehtonen Juha-Matti, 2004 Tuotantotalous WSOY. Helsinki ISBN 951-0-28104-2

Teaching methods

Lectures and excersices

Student workload

Lectures 24h practical work 12h and exam

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Satisfactory (1-2) The student knows the basics functions of production management, sales and operations management, master production scheduling, manufacturing resource planning and iInventory management,

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3-4): The student masters well the principles of the ERP and production management, sales and operations management, master production scheduling, manufacturing resource planning and iInventory management. The student is able to interpret the key figures of production control.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): The student masters well the principles of the ERP and production management, sales and operations management, master production scheduling, manufacturing resource planning and iInventory management, The student can utilize the learned skills in the exercises, exam and in the demo Enterprise. The student is able to form and interpret the key figures of production control.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam and assignments: 70/30

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control.The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control.The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures. The student is also extensively familiar with different levels and systems of production control, such as PDM, ERP, MES and is able to utilize them in digitalized production environments.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
  • AUTE21SA
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

• Students can describe technical devices, its use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.

Content

- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Telling about field related companies

Materials

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material as indicated by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Lectures, group work, independent work

Student workload

80 h

Further information

Attendance 80% of the lessons

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam and oral presentation

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Further information

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Christopher Hudson
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

• Students can describe technical devices, its use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.

Content

- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Telling about field related companies

Materials

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material as indicated by the teacher.

Teaching methods

en
Independent study
Written assignments
Oral presentations
Peer review

Student workload

81 hours

Further information

Students must attend 80% of the contact classes before it affects their grade.
Students must attend 50% of the classes to be eligible to pass.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Assessment methods and criteria

Continuous teacher assessment
Written assignments
Oral assignments
Timely completion of class activities

Further information

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Heli Simon
  • Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
  • AFE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

• Students can describe technical devices, its use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.

Content

- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Telling about field related companies

Materials

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material as indicated by the teacher.

Teaching methods

Lectures, group work, independent work

Student workload

80 h

Further information

Attendance 80% of the lessons

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam and oral presentation

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides or can be suspected to be created by AI, the grade is 0.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Further information

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Ismo Tupamäki
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student knows the role of the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) in machine automation, control systems and process industries. Student can develop sequence-based PLC programs, which control simple automatic machines. Student understands how the sequence logic is implemented utilizing the theory of finite state machines. Student can develop PLC programs with Function Block Diagram (FBD) and Structured Text (ST) programming languages. Student can design simple user interfaces for industrial automation applications.

Content

- Stucture of PLC devices and programming environment
- Programming with FBD and ST programming languages
- Sequence-based programming and finite state machines
- Function blocks
- Designing and programming a user interface

Materials

Lecturer's material.
Instructions for the manufacturers of programmable logic, as well as the IEC 61131-3 standard

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, practical programming exercises in class, as well as homework

Student workload

Total work load 60 h of which scheduled about half contact and half self studies

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows the role of the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) in machine automation, control systems and process industries. Student can develop sequence-based PLC programs, which control simple automatic machines. Student can develop PLC programs with Function Block Diagram (FBD) programming language.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student knows the role of the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) in machine automation, control systems and process industries. Student can develop sequence-based PLC programs, which control simple automatic machines. Student understands how the sequence logic is implemented utilizing the theory of finite state machines. Student can develop PLC programs with Function Block Diagram (FBD) programming language. Student can design simple user interfaces for industrial automation applications.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student knows the role of the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) in machine automation, control systems and process industries. Student can develop sequence-based PLC programs, which control automatic machines. Student understands how the sequence logic is implemented utilizing the theory of finite state machines. Student can develop PLC programs with Function Block Diagram (FBD) and Structured Text (ST) programming languages. Student can design user interfaces for industrial automation applications.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises (homework) and an examination (100%)

Qualifications

- Basics of programming
- Basics of industrial automation

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Professional Studies in Technology
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jarkko Pakkanen
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
  • IEPIP24
    International Professional Studies

Objective

Students will learn about various types of robots and examine robots and how to use them in factory automation and other areas where robots are needed. The will know the structure, features and coordinate systems of robots as well as the periphery devices used in robotics. Students will be competent in handling and programming industrial robots on- and offline. The course provides fundamental knowledge of robotics and an ability to design and select equipment for the automatic handling of products.

Content

Robots types, Industrial robots: mechanical structure, control systems, features, coordinate systems and periphery devices, Handling an ABB industrial robot and basic online programming. Handling a Yaskawa welding robot and programming in offline. Handling and programming Fanuc industrial robot using machine vision system. Working with collaborative robots in assembly tasks based on force sensing.

Materials

- Lecturer's material
- Demonstrations during lectures
- Assignments
- Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises, laboratory assignments with ABB, Fanuc, Yaskawa, Omron (mobile) and Universal robots.

Student workload

A total of 100 hours studying, which includes 20 hours of classroom education and 20 hours of laboratory assignments.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Rating 1-2 Students master the learning outcomes satisfactorily. Student has completed laboratory exercises and passed theory- and practical programming exams

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Rating 3-4 Students master the learning outcomes well. Students can apply lecture- and laboratory experiments in exam.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Rating 5 Students master the learning outcomes to be commended. Students can apply lecture- and laboratory experiments in exam by showing deeper understanding of industrial robotics.

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination (50%) and robot programming examination (50%).
The course grade scales between 1-5.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student has not passed theoretical or practical exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has completed the assignments/sections assigned approvingly. The student knows and mastered to a satisfactory degree the basic concepts and methods associated with the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has completed the assignments/sections and actively participated in the course. Students are familiar with the basic concepts and methods involved and are able to apply them when solving normal questions. The student is able to combine what he/she has learned with his previous experience in the subject matter.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student has completed the assignments/sections and actively participated in the course. Students are familiar with the basic concepts and methods involved and are able to apply them when solving normal questions. The student has demonstrated the ability to create new meanings and ideas within the framework of the subject, applying what he/she has previously learned.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

2 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Matti Perälä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will understand the qualifications required for working with electricity and acquire the knowledge and skills needed to work safely with electricity, abiding by the installationa dn standards recommended by manufacturers. Students will comply with the principles of electrical safety, which include the right attitude, responsibility, the right tools and safe working methods.

Content

- Electrical Safety Act and Decree
- Electrical Safety Standard SFS 6002
- Electrical installations/SFS 6002 series
- Familiarisation with lab work involving electricity
- Checklists and forms for electrical safety
- Working conditions and protective gear
- First-aid

Materials

Material of SETI Personal and Company Assessment Ltd in pdf format and exercises.
Textbook: SFS 6002 in practice

Teaching methods

Lectures: material of SETI Personal and Company Assessment Ltd in pdf format and exercises.

Exam schedules

Exam at the end of the course

Student workload

Contact lessons 20 h. Self-learning about 30h.

realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription

An exam by SETI Personal and Company Assessment Ltd. The required score for passing is 67% of the maximum score.

Further information

Students who already have experience in electrical engineering issues receive a Professional electrical work safety card with an approved exam. A Professional's electrical work safety card is valid for 5 years.

Students who have no previous experience in electrical engineering issues will receive a Student's electrical work safety card upon passing the exam. The student's electrical work safety card is valid for 3 years.

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student describes the basic challenges of electrical work safety and is able to apply electrical safety requirements in normal situations. The student must also pass the exam successfully.

Qualifications

Electrical safety (2cr)

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Sami Rinta-Valkama
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will learn about the basic sensors used in machine automation. They will understand how sensors work, their electrical and mechanical properties and performance characteristics. They will be competent in selecting appropriate sensors for solving problems with detection and measuring. They will be able to make electrical connections for sensors and connect them to control units and fieldbuses.

Content

- Basics in sensor technology
- Protection classes
- On-off sensors
- Sensors that detect presence
- Sensors that measure magnitudes
- Detection techniques
- Measuring movement
- Computer vision
- Connecting sensors and practice making measurements in the lab

Materials

Lecture material, demonstrations during lectures, assignments, product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Contact teaching. Lectures, demonstrations, exercises, seminar work and group work in the lab.

Student workload

Total work load 81 h. 28 h of classroom training which includes lab exercises. 53 h of self-study.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and commands the basic operation of sensors and the concepts - in the one to be been satisfied with numbers. He is able to solve faults in the basic sensors and is able to replace with the similar sensor of the one which had been damaged.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows well the basic concepts which are related to the sensors and their operating principles. He is able to adapt his knowledge in the solving of problems of different types and either in place of the one which had been damaged or to a new target the sensor which is suitable for choosing.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the concepts and operating principles of different sensors well. In addition to the basic sensors, he is able to choose special sensors also to different applications and environments.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises, lab work+reports, seminar and an exam.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows and commands the basic operation of sensors and the concepts - in the one to be been satisfied with numbers. He is able to solve faults in the basic sensors and is able to replace with the similar sensor of the one which had been damaged.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows well the basic concepts which are related to the sensors and their operating principles. He is able to adapt his knowledge in the solving of problems of different types and either in place of the one which had been damaged or to a new target the sensor which is suitable for choosing.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student knows the concepts and operating principles of different sensors well. In addition to the basic sensors, he is able to choose special sensors also to different applications and environments.

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Petteri Mäkelä
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student knows the fundamentals of web applications. Student can develop web-based applications, which utilize REST APIs. Student can program the server side of the application with JavaScript and Node.js. Student can use relational and NoSQL databases for storing the application's data. User can develop tests for the server program.

Content

- Fundamentals of web applications
- HTTP, REST API
- JavaScript, TypeScript
- Programming server with Node.js and Express
- Testing server programs
- User administration

Materials

To be announced at the beginning of the course

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises

Exam schedules

The exam is in the last lesson

Student workload

Lectures 37 %, independent studying 63 %.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student knows the fundamentals of web applications. Student can develop simple web-based applications with Node.js.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student knows the fundamentals of web applications. Student can develop web-based applications, which utilize REST APIs. Student can program the server side of the application with JavaScript and Node.js. Student can use relational or NoSQL databases for storing the application's data.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student knows the fundamentals of web applications. Student can develop web-based applications, which utilize REST APIs. Student can program the server side of the application with JavaScript and Node.js. Student can use relational and NoSQL databases for storing the application's data. User can develop tests for the server program.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam 75 % and exercises 25 %

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Student is familiar with the basic knowledge of the software process. Student knows the different types of software project documentation. Student learns to use software development tools and methods.

Content

Software life cycle models, agile methods, UML-modelling, requirements specification, testing and version control.

Materials

Information about the materials are in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Contact teaching and independent work.

Student workload

3 cu * 27 h/cu = 81 hours, of which around one third is contact teaching and two thirds independent work.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student recognizes UML-models, testing plans and other types of software project documentation. Student knows how to create repository for version control.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Student can write a program from UML-model and is able test program with help of testing plan. Student is also able to write other types of software project documentation. Student is able to keep project's files updated with version control system.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Student can design and apply UML-models, testing plans and other types of software documentation for software project. Student is able to fork another student's projects with version control system.

Assessment methods and criteria

Activities including case and exam.

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Timing

01.08.2024 - 31.07.2025

Credits

15 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Marko Hietamäki
  • Jarkko Pakkanen
  • Jouni Björkman
  • Juha Yli-Hemminki
  • Jarkko Loima
  • Jorma Mettälä
  • Matti Perälä
  • Niko Ristimäki
  • Ismo Tupamäki
  • Raine Kauppinen
  • Petteri Mäkelä
  • Sami Rinta-Valkama
  • Matti Panula
Student groups
  • AE21
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

As a rule, students write their final thesis during their fourth year of studies. Students should choose their thesis topic as early as possible, during their internship completed in the autumn of their fourth year of studies at the latest.

Students do their thesis as an independent project in design, development, or as a survey. The thesis may also be a part of a more extensive research or development project. The purpose of the thesis is to give students an opportunity to show their competence in independently utilising theoretical information to solve a practical problem.

With few exceptions, students usually do their thesis for an enterprise. This gives students an excellent opportunity to pave their way into the working world and the services of the enterprise for which they have written their thesis.

Content

More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS’s Instructions for Writing a Thesis.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS’s Instructions for Writing a Thesis.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS’s Instructions for Writing a Thesis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS’s Instructions for Writing a Thesis.

Qualifications

More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS’s Instructions for Writing a Thesis.

Further information

More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS’s Instructions for Writing a Thesis.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jarkko Pakkanen
Student groups
  • AUTE22KA
    Degree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies

Objective

Students will be competent in explaining how discrete simulation can be used in production material flow optimization. Student will be adept in verifying production control methods and designing resources by using simulation software. Students will also be competent in identifying problems in production and making a simulation model to improve a given situation.

Content

Fundamental principles of simulation and application examples, properties of simulation tools, areas of use and limitations, phases of a simulation project and what it involves, use of simulation software.

Materials

Lecture material, Lecture demonstrations, Assignments, Product and programming manuals

Teaching methods

Lectures, Demonstrations, Assignments, Course Exercise (group work). used software during cource is Siemens Plant Simulation

Student workload

A total of 80 hours studying, which includes 30 hours of classroom education.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1 Student knows the basics of the course. Students will be competent in explaining how discrete simulation can be used in production material flow optimization. Student will be adept in verifying production control methods and designing resources by using simulation software.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3 Student knows the contents of the course well. Students will be competent in explaining how discrete simulation can be used in production material flow optimization. Student will be adept in verifying production control methods and designing resources by using simulation software. Students will also be competent in identifying problems in production.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 Student knows the contents of the course well and can apply their knowledge in practice. Students will be competent in explaining how discrete simulation can be used in production material flow optimization. Student will be adept in verifying production control methods and designing resources by using simulation software. Students will also be competent in identifying problems in production and making a simulation model to improve a given situation.

Assessment methods and criteria

Course Exercise (60%), Written theory exam (30%), Other exercises (10%)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Student has not passed theoretical exam or course exercise is rejected.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students has passed theoretical exam and shows satisfactorily learning outcomes in exercises.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students has passed theoretical exam well and shows well learning outcomes in exercises.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students has passed theoretical exam commendably and shows commendably learning outcomes in exercises.

Qualifications

No previous studies are required.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024

Timing

21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • AUTE22KA
    Degree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will
be familiar with the concepts associated with production management and the problematic, can be used by production management for future assignments.

Content

Supply-Chain management and ERP,
Production management,
Sales and Operations management,
Master Production Scheduling,
Manufacturing Resource Planning,
Inventory Management,
Introduction to production management system
Economics of production and consideration for sustainable development

Materials

Tuotannonohjaus pk-konepajateollisuuden alihankintaprosesseissa, Häkkinen Kai, VTT Tiedotteita 2225. Espoo 2003
Uusi-Rauva, E. 1993. Teollisuustalous Tammer-paino. Tampere. 1993. ISBN 951-96765-0-3
Antti Sääksvuori & Anselmi. Immonen. Tuotetiedon hallinta – PDM. 2002 Talentum Media Oy. ISBN 951-762-796-3
Miettinen, Pauli. 1993 Tuotannonohjaus ja logistiikka. ATK-instituutti. s. 102. ISBN 951-37-1193-5
Harju, A. 1987. Teollisuustalous Painatuskeskus Oy. Helsinki. ISBN 951-860-378-2
Lehtonen Juha-Matti, 2004 Tuotantotalous WSOY. Helsinki ISBN 951-0-28104-2

Teaching methods

Lectures and excersices

Student workload

80 h, of which scheduled studies 28h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL. The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL. The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures. The student is also extensively familiar with different levels and systems of production control, such as PDM, ERP, MES and is able to utilize them in digitalized production environments.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
Exam and assignments: 70/30

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL.
The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL.
The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures. The student is also extensively familiar with different levels and systems of production control, such as PDM, ERP, MES and is able to utilize them in digitalized production environments.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • AUTE22SA
    Degree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will
be familiar with the concepts associated with production management and the problematic, can be used by production management for future assignments.

Content

Supply-Chain management and ERP,
Production management,
Sales and Operations management,
Master Production Scheduling,
Manufacturing Resource Planning,
Inventory Management,
Introduction to production management system
Economics of production and consideration for sustainable development

Materials

Tuotannonohjaus pk-konepajateollisuuden alihankintaprosesseissa, Häkkinen Kai, VTT Tiedotteita 2225. Espoo 2003
Uusi-Rauva, E. 1993. Teollisuustalous Tammer-paino. Tampere. 1993. ISBN 951-96765-0-3
Antti Sääksvuori & Anselmi. Immonen. Tuotetiedon hallinta – PDM. 2002 Talentum Media Oy. ISBN 951-762-796-3
Miettinen, Pauli. 1993 Tuotannonohjaus ja logistiikka. ATK-instituutti. s. 102. ISBN 951-37-1193-5
Harju, A. 1987. Teollisuustalous Painatuskeskus Oy. Helsinki. ISBN 951-860-378-2
Lehtonen Juha-Matti, 2004 Tuotantotalous WSOY. Helsinki ISBN 951-0-28104-2

Teaching methods

Lectures and excersices

Student workload

80 h, of which scheduled studies 28h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL. The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control - MRP, JIT, Lean ja OPT. Furthermore, student have a comprehensive understanding of critical production control metrics, including delivery reliability, lead time, utilization rate, productivity, and OOE/KNL. The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures. The student is also extensively familiar with different levels and systems of production control, such as PDM, ERP, MES and is able to utilize them in digitalized production environments.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
Exam and assignments: 70/30

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control.The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student understands the basic theories and concepts of production control.The student is able to use PDM (Product Data Management) system and is able to apply it to simple product structures. The student is also extensively familiar with different levels and systems of production control, such as PDM, ERP, MES and is able to utilize them in digitalized production environments.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Niko Ristimäki
Student groups
  • AE22
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will learn how to evaluate different user interfaces and how to identify user groups. They will also learn how to design a user interface according to human-centred design processes and the principles of the sustainable development, and how to create a user interface using SCADA software.

Content

Evaluating user interfaces, identifying users, designing user interfaces, visually designing user interfaces, cognition and SCADA software.

Materials

Lecture material, lecture demonsrations, assignments, product and programming manuals of various manufacturers.

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises.

Student workload

Lectures and exercises 40 h, self-study 40 h.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows and commands the basic structure of the user interfaces in the one to be been satisfied with numbers and can tell its opinion on the function of the user interface. Furthermore, he can make the user interface according to the basic rules.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows well the basic concepts which are related to the user interface, the rules and the structure of the functioning user interface. He can create the user interface to the different applications using known programming tools.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows the rules which are well used in the planning of the user interface and can make user interfaces to the different applications and environments which are in accordance with the rules. Furthermore, he is able to adapt in the solving of questions and problems from many sides of different types the matters learned by him.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises and an examination

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows and commands the basic structure of the user interfaces in the one to be been satisfied with numbers and can tell its opinion on the function of the user interface. Furthermore, he can make the user interface according to the basic rules.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows well the basic concepts which are related to the user interface, the rules and the structure of the functioning user interface. He can create the user interface to the different applications using known programming tools.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student knows the rules which are well used in the planning of the user interface and can make user interfaces to the different applications and environments which are in accordance with the rules. Furthermore, he is able to adapt in the solving of questions and problems from many sides of different types the matters learned by him.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Tommi Ylimäki
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Vectors in plane and space
Matrix algebra
Linear system of equations
Rotations and coordinate changes

Materials

Lecture notes
Material in Moodle

Teaching methods

lectures and exercises

Student workload

81h (Scheduled studies 32 h + autonomous studies 49 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam + exercises

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Pasi Mikkonen
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

Students will be competent in using the mathematical methods described in the course contents to solve practical mathematical problems.

Content

Vectors in plane and space
Matrix algebra
Linear system of equations
Rotations and coordinate changes

Materials

Lecture notes

Teaching methods

lectures and exercises

Student workload

81h (Scheduled studies 32 h + autonomous studies 49 h

Further information

80% attendance in lectures and exercises

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

satisfactory (1-2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to usual problems.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

good (3-4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

excellent (5): ): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of vectors and matrices, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam + exercises

Qualifications

Algebra and geometry

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • TITE22

Objective

Students are able to design, deploy, and maintain a variety of virtualized server environments.

Content

The course installs virtualized server environments using VmWare, Microsoft and Linux virtualization methods, for example.
- VmWare
- Citrix XenServer
- KVM (Kernel Based Virtual Machine)
- PROXMOX VE

Materials

Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures and practical exercises in the laboratory

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 28 h
- of which autonomous studies: 52 h

Content scheduling

The course installed in virtualized server environments, for example VMware and Microsoft virtualization methods.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1-2 Students are able to rate the basics.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3-4 Students are able to rate the key issues

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 Students are able to commendable rate issues and know how to apply them.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercise and exam

Qualifications

No prior information requirements.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Raine Kauppinen
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students are able to design, deploy, and maintain a variety of virtualized server environments.

Content

The course installs virtualized server environments using VmWare, Microsoft and Linux virtualization methods, for example.
- VmWare
- Citrix XenServer
- KVM (Kernel Based Virtual Machine)
- PROXMOX VE

Materials

Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures and practical exercises in the laboratory

Student workload

Total work load of the course: 80 h
- of which scheduled studies: 28 h
- of which autonomous studies: 52 h

Content scheduling

The course installed in virtualized server environments, for example VMware and Microsoft virtualization methods.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1-2 Students are able to rate the basics.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3-4 Students are able to rate the key issues

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 Students are able to commendable rate issues and know how to apply them.

Assessment methods and criteria

Exercises and exam.

Qualifications

No prior information requirements.

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Jouni Björkman
Student groups
  • AE23
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

Students will possess basic knowledge of the physics associated with technology in the areas described in the course contents, and the readiness they will need to acquire advanced knowledge in technology in their further studies and the working world. They will be competent in solving various problems in physics using models (magnitude equations) and presenting their results appropriately.

Content

- Harmonic oscillation
- Wave motion
- Sound
- Optics
- Quantum physics
- Atom- and nuclear physics

Materials

Benson: University Physics (Wiley)
Upadhyaya: University Physics, ebook (Himalaya Pub. House)
Bhat: University Physics, ebook (Alpha Science International)
Technical formulas, reference book (Tammertekniikka)
Lecture notes

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises and autonomous studies

Employer connections

None

Student workload

Totally 80 hours. Scheduled studies 28 hours and independent studies 52 hours.

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

(1 ... 2): The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of wave and modern physics, and is able to apply them to usual problems. The student is aware of the limitations of classical physics, and identifies the status of the modern physics in the world view.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

(3 ... 4): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of both wave and modern physics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

(5): The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of wave and modern physics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.

Assessment methods and criteria

Final examination

Qualifications

No previous studies are required. Basic knowledge about mechanics and electromagnetism is strongly recommended.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
  • AE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Objective

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Content

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Materials

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.

Teaching methods

Classroom teaching.

Student workload

81 h

Further information

Compulsory attendance in the lessons

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Assessment methods and criteria

Oral and written exam

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides or can be suspected to be created by AI, the grade is 0.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Further information

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Enrollment

11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025

Timing

03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Teachers
  • Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
  • AFE24
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies

Objective

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Content

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Materials

- Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
- Other material as indicaed by the teacher

Teaching methods

classroom teaching

Student workload

80 h

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

written and spoken exercise

Assessment criteria, good (3)

There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides or can be suspected to be created by AI, the grade is 0.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Further information

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.