Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Sisältö

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.

Opetusmenetelmät

Lähiopetus.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 h

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Läsnäolovelvollisuus kontaktitunneilla

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Suullinen ja kirjallinen koe

Lisätiedot

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Tavoitteet

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Sisältö

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.

Opetusmenetelmät

Lähiopetus

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 h

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Läsnäolovelvollisuus kontaktitunneilla

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Suullinen esitys ja kirjallinen koe

Lisätiedot

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Tavoitteet

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Sisältö

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material on Moodle as indicated by the teacher

Opetusmenetelmät

Luennot, itsenäiset tehtävät

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Luennot 28 h ja itsenäiset tehtävät.

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Suullinen ja kirjallinen koe kurssin lopussa. Läsnäolo tunneilla 80%.

Lisätiedot

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Tavoitteet

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Sisältö

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material on Moodle as indicated by the teacher

Opetusmenetelmät

Suulliset ja kirjalliset harjoitukset, itsenäinen opiskelu

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 t.

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Aktiivinen osallistuminen kontaktiopetukseen 80%.

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Suullinen ja kirjallinen koe kurssin lopussa.

Lisätiedot

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Tavoitteet

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Sisältö

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Aika ja paikka

Etäopetus

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material on Moodle as indicated by the teacher

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Oppitunnit 28h ja itsenäiset tehtävät

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Suullinen ja kirjallinen koe kurssin lopussa. Läsnäolo oppitunneilla 80%.

Lisätiedot

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.

Tavoitteet

The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing

Sisältö

- effective communication
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition.
Other material on Moodle as indicated by the teacher

Opetusmenetelmät

Suulliset ja kirjalliset harjoitukset, itsenäinen opiskelu

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 t.

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Aktiivinen osallistuminen kontaktiopetukseen 80%.

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible. There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2. The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly. There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech. The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text. There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations. The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Suullinen ja kirjallinen koe kurssin lopussa.

Lisätiedot

Prerequisite: English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.