Supervised Clinical Training in Clinical Nursing 5 (14 cr)
Code: BA00CJ78-3001
General information
Enrollment
02.02.2023 - 31.05.2023
Timing
11.09.2023 - 03.12.2023
Credits
14 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Riikka Halmesmäki
- Minna Laitila
- Raila Kärnä
- Terhi Voltti
- Pasi Alanen
- Kirsi Kivistö-Rahnasto
- Tiina Koskela
Student groups
-
RN20
Objective
The student
- understands that a client-centred approach, nursing ethics and professionalism form the foundation of the nurse's work.
- bases his/her actions and decisions on evidence.
- understands how the promotion of health and functional capacity are both the starting point and the goal of the nurse's work. -- evaluates and develops clinical nursing, teaching and counselling from the perspective of future competence requirements.
- is able to act and prioritise in nursing situations, which involve multiple simultaneous problems.
- knows how to work in multidisciplinary, multicultural and multiprofessional health and social services, while taking into account current development strategies in the setting.
- knows how to act as an expert in multidisciplinary, multicultural and multiprofessional work groups, teams and networks.
- is able to manage work groups and teams.
- makes use of eHealth, health technology and digital services in nursing.
- promotes data security and patient safety.
- is able to evaluate and develop the quality of nursing.
Content
Practical training in settings which allow the student to practise advanced nursing expertise. The eDrug Care Certificate. Assignments.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Fail
The student
- demonstrates no understanding of the role of nursing scientific knowledge in decision-making.
- does not know nursing scientific concepts, their meaning or connection to the practice of nursing.
- does not know how to seek information in the most important health science databases.
- learning assignments are lacking in relation to the instructions, with major errors in the referencing system.
- his/her work is unplanned and of poor quality.
- presentations on learning assignments are inadequate or he/ she fails to give the presentations.
- has a limited understanding of the concept of peer feedback, or completely fails to give feedback.
- is passive in seminars, with little or no contribution.
Qualifications
Previous practical training periods.