Culture history (5 cr)
Code: KD18BAKM04-3012
General information
Enrollment
01.05.2021 - 14.04.2022
Timing
30.08.2021 - 31.05.2022
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
Teachers
- Ari Haasio
Student groups
-
KUTU20
-
KITI21
-
KUTU21
-
KITI19
-
KUTU19
-
KITI20
-
KITI18
-
KUTU18
Objective
Understands the main turning points of cultural history. Student understands how different phenomena are dependent on each other and what influences they have.
Content
The basic terminology and turning points of culture are studied on the course. All students become familiar with an optional part of culture history and write an essay about it. The aim is to understand better modern cultural phenomena by understanding the historical perspective of culture and its development.
Location and time
-
Materials
Will be given to the participants.
Teaching methods
E-learning, literature
Employer connections
-
Exam schedules
No exam.
International connections
-
Completion alternatives
-
Student workload
Literature 70 h, e-learning 65 h
Content scheduling
-
Further information
-
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
(1-2)
Understands the basics of historical development and knows the basic terminology. The written content produced by the student is poor and does not show much effort.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
(3-4)
Understands the main lines of cultural history and knows its most important turning points. The student is active and can justify their opinions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
5
Excellent understanding of cultural phenomena and their influence on modern culture. The student is also able to show critical thinking in their answers.
Assessment methods and criteria
Essays, excercises
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Incomplete answers. Not all tasks have been done.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Poor skills, but no big mistakes in the basics.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Key things well held. Answers justified and key issues held.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The whole and the cause-and-effect relationships of the things are excellently held. Answers justified and analytical.
Qualifications
None