Thesis ReportLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: GERAOP300
Objective
Students know how to implement a research-oriented development process accepted by worklife representatives, using a reflective, development-oriented approach. They use their information seeking skills in many ways during the research and development process. They are able to carry out long-term research or development projects. They have assimilated the research ethical principles. Students know how to report on the research process and how to apply the knowledge to practice. They evaluate their action and learning.
Content
- implementation of the research plan, use of research methods, data collection and analysis
- cooperation with worklife representatives
- reporting on the research or development results, self and peer-evaluation
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The evaluation criteria are attached to the thesis guide.
Materials
- Instructions for written work
- Guidelines for Writing UAS Degree Thesis
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 16.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Aino Asunmaa
- Maria Valli
- Anna-Kaarina Koivula
- Tua Niemelä
Student groups
-
MGERO22
Objective
Students know how to implement a research-oriented development process accepted by worklife representatives, using a reflective, development-oriented approach. They use their information seeking skills in many ways during the research and development process. They are able to carry out long-term research or development projects. They have assimilated the research ethical principles. Students know how to report on the research process and how to apply the knowledge to practice. They evaluate their action and learning.
Content
- implementation of the research plan, use of research methods, data collection and analysis
- cooperation with worklife representatives
- reporting on the research or development results, self and peer-evaluation
Materials
- Instructions for written work
- Guidelines for Writing UAS Degree Thesis
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The evaluation criteria are attached to the thesis guide.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
01.01.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Aino Asunmaa
- Anna-Kaarina Koivula
- Maria Valli
- Tua Niemelä
Student groups
-
MGERO21
Objective
Students know how to implement a research-oriented development process accepted by worklife representatives, using a reflective, development-oriented approach. They use their information seeking skills in many ways during the research and development process. They are able to carry out long-term research or development projects. They have assimilated the research ethical principles. Students know how to report on the research process and how to apply the knowledge to practice. They evaluate their action and learning.
Content
- implementation of the research plan, use of research methods, data collection and analysis
- cooperation with worklife representatives
- reporting on the research or development results, self and peer-evaluation
Materials
- Instructions for written work
- Guidelines for Writing UAS Degree Thesis
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The evaluation criteria are attached to the thesis guide.
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
25.04.2022 - 31.12.2023
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Marita Lahti
- Anna-Kaarina Koivula
- Maria Valli
- Tua Niemelä
- Kari Jokiranta
Student groups
-
MGERO20
Objective
Students know how to implement a research-oriented development process accepted by worklife representatives, using a reflective, development-oriented approach. They use their information seeking skills in many ways during the research and development process. They are able to carry out long-term research or development projects. They have assimilated the research ethical principles. Students know how to report on the research process and how to apply the knowledge to practice. They evaluate their action and learning.
Content
- implementation of the research plan, use of research methods, data collection and analysis
- cooperation with worklife representatives
- reporting on the research or development results, self and peer-evaluation
Materials
Literature required for the thesis.
Teaching methods
Reporting your own thesis. Participation in joint seminars.
Student workload
135 h.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The evaluation criteria are attached to the thesis guide.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written thesis reporting. Presentation of the thesis. Opposition. Self-assessment.
Enrollment
01.05.2021 - 10.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 31.12.2022
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
5 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Marita Lahti
- Maria Valli
- Anna-Kaarina Koivula
- Tua Niemelä
- Kari Jokiranta
Student groups
-
MGERO19
Objective
Students know how to implement a research-oriented development process accepted by worklife representatives, using a reflective, development-oriented approach. They use their information seeking skills in many ways during the research and development process. They are able to carry out long-term research or development projects. They have assimilated the research ethical principles. Students know how to report on the research process and how to apply the knowledge to practice. They evaluate their action and learning.
Content
- implementation of the research plan, use of research methods, data collection and analysis
- cooperation with worklife representatives
- reporting on the research or development results, self and peer-evaluation
Teaching methods
Seminars
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The evaluation criteria are attached to the thesis guide.