CAD -continuation studiesLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: 8C00CK72
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Materials
- Material provided during the classes
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 06.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 10.11.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
AUTO22
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
22.01.2024 - 14.04.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
KONE21
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 27.11.2022
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
RD proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
1 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
KONE20
-
AUTO20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2
Enrollment
03.12.2021 - 27.02.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 08.05.2022
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
30 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.
Content
-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design
Materials
Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.
Teaching methods
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently
Used CAD-program is SolidEdge
Student workload
35h lectures, exercises
35h practical work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.
Qualifications
Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2