Working Life CommunicationLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: KC00CC47
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Qualifications
Communication skills
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 11.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Viestintä Nimeämätön
Student groups
-
MKONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
AUTO22
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE22
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 21.02.2024
Timing
04.03.2024 - 05.05.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
MKONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
AUTO21
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
16 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE21
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 22.02.2023
Timing
01.04.2023 - 14.05.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
16 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
MKONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in pairs and in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
-
AUTO20
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Materials
Kauppinen, A., Nummi, J. & Savola, T. 2010. Tekniikan viestintä: Kirjoittamisen ja puhumisen käsikirja. Helsinki: Edita
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, work in pairs and in groups, spoken exercises, written assignments
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation in the lessons, Approved oral exercises and written assignments, self-assessment, peer review
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 16.10.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Noora Kivimäki
Student groups
-
KONE20
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
03.12.2021 - 23.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 27.02.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
AUTO19
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Qualifications
Communication skills
Enrollment
03.12.2021 - 30.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 15.05.2022
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
MKONE19
Objective
Upon completion of the course
- student will be competent in properly communicating and interacting with regard to professional field
- student will have skills in argumentation and debating
- student is able to produce proposals and instructive texts
- student has command of situations involving in goal-oriented discussions and negotiations
- student is able to analyze texts and is able to write them for internet
- student can write academic texts, use citations and create a bibliography
Content
Instructive texts, proposals, information bulletins, argumentation, goal-oriented discussions and negotiations, writing for internet, academic writing
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory 1 - 2
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3 - 4
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Qualifications
Communication skills