Leadership and ManagementLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: 2B00BP36
Objective
The student has a comprehensive view on work and the importance of a well-functioning work community. The student understands that the precondition for a well-functioning work community is the ability to recognise one's own person as part of the work community.
The student is able to develop and assess their own management (self-management), which is always management in relation to another person. The have the basic competencies in human resource management and are able to apply them in productions.Students are able to lead the production team, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the team. The student recognises economic planning and monitoring as a management tool. They have the basis knowledge of management and risk management.
Content
Key elements of a well-functioning work community
Self-management
Basics of leadership
Economic planning and monitoring as a management tool
Change and risk management as part of management
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
- The student recognises the features of a well-functioning work environment
- The student is able to act in the work community in compliance with the commonly agreed rules and goals
- The student understands the importance of leadership
Assessment criteria, good (3)
- The student clearly recognises the mission of the organisation and their own role as part of the work community
- The student is able to act as a leader of a work group and delegate tasks in a group
- The student understands the importance of economic management as part of management
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
- The student has a comprehensive view on work and they are able to analytically consider their own professional persona as part of the work community
- The student is able to lead work groups in different operational environments
- The student can utilise budgeting as a management tool
- The student has the ability to manage the organisation also when it is undergoing changes
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
- Katri Juppi
Student groups
-
KUTU21
Objective
The student has a comprehensive view on work and the importance of a well-functioning work community. The student understands that the precondition for a well-functioning work community is the ability to recognise one's own person as part of the work community.
The student is able to develop and assess their own management (self-management), which is always management in relation to another person. The have the basic competencies in human resource management and are able to apply them in productions.Students are able to lead the production team, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the team. The student recognises economic planning and monitoring as a management tool. They have the basis knowledge of management and risk management.
Content
Key elements of a well-functioning work community
Self-management
Basics of leadership
Economic planning and monitoring as a management tool
Change and risk management as part of management
Materials
Järvinen, P. (2014). Esimiestyö ongelmatilanteissa. 8. uudistettu painos. Helsinki: Talentum.
Viitala, R. (2021). Henkilöstöjohtaminen: Keskeiset käsitteet, teoriat ja trendit.
Koppelomäki, I. (2007-2021). Itsensä johtaminen. Uskalla Innostua.
In addition material presented by the teacher during the course.
Teaching methods
Lectures, Flipped learning, individual work, exam.
Exam schedules
Online exam at the end of the course.
Student workload
3 ECTS equals to approximately 81 hours of work for student.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
- The student recognises the features of a well-functioning work environment
- The student is able to act in the work community in compliance with the commonly agreed rules and goals
- The student understands the importance of leadership
Assessment criteria, good (3)
- The student clearly recognises the mission of the organisation and their own role as part of the work community
- The student is able to act as a leader of a work group and delegate tasks in a group
- The student understands the importance of economic management as part of management
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
- The student has a comprehensive view on work and they are able to analytically consider their own professional persona as part of the work community
- The student is able to lead work groups in different operational environments
- The student can utilise budgeting as a management tool
- The student has the ability to manage the organisation also when it is undergoing changes
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation, online exam, individual assignment.
Enrollment
17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
Timing
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
- Katri Juppi
Student groups
-
KUTU20
Objective
The student has a comprehensive view on work and the importance of a well-functioning work community. The student understands that the precondition for a well-functioning work community is the ability to recognise one's own person as part of the work community.
The student is able to develop and assess their own management (self-management), which is always management in relation to another person. The have the basic competencies in human resource management and are able to apply them in productions.Students are able to lead the production team, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the team. The student recognises economic planning and monitoring as a management tool. They have the basis knowledge of management and risk management.
Content
Key elements of a well-functioning work community
Self-management
Basics of leadership
Economic planning and monitoring as a management tool
Change and risk management as part of management
Materials
Järvinen, P. (2014). Esimiestyö ongelmatilanteissa. 8. uudistettu painos. Helsinki: Talentum.
Viitala, R. (2021). Henkilöstöjohtaminen: Keskeiset käsitteet, teoriat ja trendit.
Koppelomäki, I. (2007-2021). Itsensä johtaminen. Uskalla Innostua.
In addition material presented by the teacher during the course.
Teaching methods
Lectures, Flipped learning, individual work, online exam.
Exam schedules
Online exam at the end of the course.
Student workload
3 ECTS equals to approximately 81 hours of work for student.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
- The student recognises the features of a well-functioning work environment
- The student is able to act in the work community in compliance with the commonly agreed rules and goals
- The student understands the importance of leadership
Assessment criteria, good (3)
- The student clearly recognises the mission of the organisation and their own role as part of the work community
- The student is able to act as a leader of a work group and delegate tasks in a group
- The student understands the importance of economic management as part of management
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
- The student has a comprehensive view on work and they are able to analytically consider their own professional persona as part of the work community
- The student is able to lead work groups in different operational environments
- The student can utilise budgeting as a management tool
- The student has the ability to manage the organisation also when it is undergoing changes
Assessment methods and criteria
Active participation, online exam, individual assignment.
Enrollment
16.04.2022 - 12.10.2022
Timing
24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
Teachers
- Katri Juppi
Student groups
-
KUTU19
Objective
The student has a comprehensive view on work and the importance of a well-functioning work community. The student understands that the precondition for a well-functioning work community is the ability to recognise one's own person as part of the work community.
The student is able to develop and assess their own management (self-management), which is always management in relation to another person. The have the basic competencies in human resource management and are able to apply them in productions.Students are able to lead the production team, accepting its diversity, and appreciating and respecting the other members of the team. The student recognises economic planning and monitoring as a management tool. They have the basis knowledge of management and risk management.
Content
Key elements of a well-functioning work community
Self-management
Basics of leadership
Economic planning and monitoring as a management tool
Change and risk management as part of management
Materials
Material presented by the teacher during the course.
Teaching methods
Lectures, individual work, online exam.
Exam schedules
Online exam.
Student workload
3 ECTS equals to approximately 81 hours of work for student.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
- The student recognises the features of a well-functioning work environment
- The student is able to act in the work community in compliance with the commonly agreed rules and goals
- The student understands the importance of leadership
Assessment criteria, good (3)
- The student clearly recognises the mission of the organisation and their own role as part of the work community
- The student is able to act as a leader of a work group and delegate tasks in a group
- The student understands the importance of economic management as part of management
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
- The student has a comprehensive view on work and they are able to analytically consider their own professional persona as part of the work community
- The student is able to lead work groups in different operational environments
- The student can utilise budgeting as a management tool
- The student has the ability to manage the organisation also when it is undergoing changes
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation scale is from 1 to 5 and it is introduced in the curriculum.