Supervised Clinical Training in Clinical Nursing 5Laajuus (14 cr)
Code: BA00CJ78
Objective
The student
- understands that a client-centred approach, nursing ethics and professionalism form the foundation of the nurse's work.
- bases his/her actions and decisions on evidence.
- understands how the promotion of health and functional capacity are both the starting point and the goal of the nurse's work. -- evaluates and develops clinical nursing, teaching and counselling from the perspective of future competence requirements.
- is able to act and prioritise in nursing situations, which involve multiple simultaneous problems.
- knows how to work in multidisciplinary, multicultural and multiprofessional health and social services, while taking into account current development strategies in the setting.
- knows how to act as an expert in multidisciplinary, multicultural and multiprofessional work groups, teams and networks.
- is able to manage work groups and teams.
- makes use of eHealth, health technology and digital services in nursing.
- promotes data security and patient safety.
- is able to evaluate and develop the quality of nursing.
Content
Practical training in settings which allow the student to practise advanced nursing expertise. The eDrug Care Certificate. Assignments.
Qualifications
Previous practical training periods.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Fail
The student
- demonstrates no understanding of the role of nursing scientific knowledge in decision-making.
- does not know nursing scientific concepts, their meaning or connection to the practice of nursing.
- does not know how to seek information in the most important health science databases.
- learning assignments are lacking in relation to the instructions, with major errors in the referencing system.
- his/her work is unplanned and of poor quality.
- presentations on learning assignments are inadequate or he/ she fails to give the presentations.
- has a limited understanding of the concept of peer feedback, or completely fails to give feedback.
- is passive in seminars, with little or no contribution.
Enrollment
02.02.2023 - 31.05.2023
Timing
11.09.2023 - 03.12.2023
Credits
14 op
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Teachers
- Riikka Halmesmäki
- Minna Laitila
- Raila Kärnä
- Terhi Voltti
- Pasi Alanen
- Kirsi Kivistö-Rahnasto
- Tiina Koskela
Student groups
-
RN20
Objective
The student
- understands that a client-centred approach, nursing ethics and professionalism form the foundation of the nurse's work.
- bases his/her actions and decisions on evidence.
- understands how the promotion of health and functional capacity are both the starting point and the goal of the nurse's work. -- evaluates and develops clinical nursing, teaching and counselling from the perspective of future competence requirements.
- is able to act and prioritise in nursing situations, which involve multiple simultaneous problems.
- knows how to work in multidisciplinary, multicultural and multiprofessional health and social services, while taking into account current development strategies in the setting.
- knows how to act as an expert in multidisciplinary, multicultural and multiprofessional work groups, teams and networks.
- is able to manage work groups and teams.
- makes use of eHealth, health technology and digital services in nursing.
- promotes data security and patient safety.
- is able to evaluate and develop the quality of nursing.
Content
Practical training in settings which allow the student to practise advanced nursing expertise. The eDrug Care Certificate. Assignments.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Fail
The student
- demonstrates no understanding of the role of nursing scientific knowledge in decision-making.
- does not know nursing scientific concepts, their meaning or connection to the practice of nursing.
- does not know how to seek information in the most important health science databases.
- learning assignments are lacking in relation to the instructions, with major errors in the referencing system.
- his/her work is unplanned and of poor quality.
- presentations on learning assignments are inadequate or he/ she fails to give the presentations.
- has a limited understanding of the concept of peer feedback, or completely fails to give feedback.
- is passive in seminars, with little or no contribution.
Qualifications
Previous practical training periods.