Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Communication SkillsLaajuus (3 op)

Tunnus: YPOE3A3

Osaamistavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/)
-Kielijelppi
(http://www.kielijelppi.fi/)
- Kielikompassi

Ilmoittautumisaika

16.04.2022 - 12.10.2022

Ajoitus

24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Automaatio- ja tietotekniikka

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

16 - 30

Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
  • Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • AE22A
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material

Opetusmenetelmät

Scheduled contact classes
Lectures, tutorials and discussions
Peer group learning
Written assignments
Reading and writing comprehension exercises

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The total workload of the course is 81h comprising:

15 x 2 hour scheduled contact classes requiring:
- active participation;
- group work and peer learning;
- individual tasks.

51h hours of independent studies requiring:
- flipped learning tasks
- presentation preparation
- TED talk field-related comprehension exercises
- Field related written tasks

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- Teacher assessment (continuous)
- Peer assessment (presentation)
- Active participation in (and attendance of) contact lessons
- Timely completion of homework assignments

Students should attend 80 % of the contact lessons. The minimum attendance 50%. If missing more than 20 % of contact hours, the student will automatically receive a lowered final grade.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

16.04.2022 - 12.10.2022

Ajoitus

24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Bio- ja elintarviketekniikka sekä restonomi

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

16 - 30

Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
Opettaja
  • Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • AFE22A
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering, full time studies

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material

Opetusmenetelmät

Scheduled contact classes
Lectures, tutorials and discussions
Peer group learning
Written assignments
Reading and writing comprehension exercises

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The total workload of the course is 81h comprising:

15 x 2 hour scheduled contact classes requiring:
- active participation;
- group work and peer learning;
- individual tasks.

51h hours of independent studies requiring:
- flipped learning tasks
- presentation preparation
- TED talk field-related comprehension exercises
- Field related written tasks

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- Teacher assessment (continuous)
- Peer assessment (presentation)
- Active participation in (and attendance of) contact lessons
- Timely completion of homework assignments

Students should attend 80 % of the contact lessons. The minimum attendance 50%. If missing more than 20 % of contact hours, the student will automatically receive a lowered final grade.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

03.06.2022 - 12.10.2022

Ajoitus

24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Automaatio- ja tietotekniikka

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
  • Neil Mac Laverty
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • AE22B
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering, remote

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

03.06.2022 - 12.10.2022

Ajoitus

24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Bio- ja elintarviketekniikka sekä restonomi

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
Opettaja
  • Neil Mac Laverty
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • AFE22B
    Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering, full time studies

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022

Ajoitus

19.09.2022 - 31.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Sosiaali- ja terveysala

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Kampustalo

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Degree Programme in Nursing
Opettaja
  • Virpi Masonen
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • MRN22
    Degree Programme in Nursing, Nursing Branch, Registered Nurse, RN, (UAS)

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- opettajan ilmoittama materiaali
- SeAMK:n kirjallisten töiden ohje

Opetusmenetelmät

- Kontaktiopetus/etäopetus
- Itsenäinen opiskelu
- Kirjalliset ja suulliset tehtävät

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

Tentin ajankohta ilmoitetaan kurssin aikana.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 h, sis. 20 h luentoja

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- aktiivinen osallistuminen opetukseen
- kirjalliset tehtävät
- verkkotentti
- henkilökohtainen suullinen esitys
- pienryhmätehtävä ja -esitys
- tehtävien palauttaminen annetun aikataulun mukaisesti

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022

Ajoitus

05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK International Business

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

16 - 30

Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, DP in International Business
Opettaja
  • Christopher Hudson
Ajoitusryhmät
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Koko: 50. Avoin AMK: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Koko: 50. Avoin AMK: 0.)
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • IB22A
    Tradenomi (AMK), International Business
Koulutusryhmat
  • Pienryhmä 1
  • Pienryhmä 2

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material

Opetusmenetelmät

Scheduled contact classes
Lectures, tutorials and discussions
Peer group learning
Written assignments
Reading and writing comprehension exercises

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The total workload of the course is 81h comprising:

15 x 2 hour scheduled contact classes requiring:
- active participation;
- group work and peer learning;
- individual tasks.

51h hours of independent studies requiring:
- flipped learning tasks
- presentation preparation
- TED talk field-related comprehension exercises
- Field related written tasks

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- Teacher assessment (continuous)
- Peer assessment (presentation)
- Active participation in (and attendance of) contact lessons
- Timely completion of homework assignments

Students should attend 80 % of the contact lessons. The minimum attendance 50%. If missing more than 20 % of contact hours, the student will automatically receive a lowered final grade.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022

Ajoitus

05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK International Business

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

16 - 30

Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, DP in International Business
Opettaja
  • Christopher Hudson
Ajoitusryhmät
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Koko: 50. Avoin AMK: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Koko: 50. Avoin AMK: 0.)
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • IB22B
    Tradenomi (AMK), International Business
Koulutusryhmat
  • Pienryhmä 1
  • Pienryhmä 2

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material

Opetusmenetelmät

Scheduled contact classes
Lectures, tutorials and discussions
Peer group learning
Written assignments
Reading and writing comprehension exercises

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The total workload of the course is 81h comprising:

15 x 2 hour scheduled contact classes requiring:
- active participation;
- group work and peer learning;
- individual tasks.

51h hours of independent studies requiring:
- flipped learning tasks
- presentation preparation
- TED talk field-related comprehension exercises
- Field related written tasks

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- Teacher assessment (continuous)
- Peer assessment (presentation)
- Active participation in (and attendance of) contact lessons
- Timely completion of homework assignments

Students should attend 80 % of the contact lessons. The minimum attendance 50%. If missing more than 20 % of contact hours, the student will automatically receive a lowered final grade.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022

Ajoitus

05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK International Business

Toimipiste

SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

16 - 30

Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, DP in International Business
Opettaja
  • Christopher Hudson
Ajoitusryhmät
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Koko: 50. Avoin AMK: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Koko: 50. Avoin AMK: 0.)
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • IB22C
    Tradenomi (AMK), International Business
Koulutusryhmat
  • Pienryhmä 1
  • Pienryhmä 2

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins)
- online material

Opetusmenetelmät

Scheduled contact classes
Lectures, tutorials and discussions
Peer group learning
Written assignments
Reading and writing comprehension exercises

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The total workload of the course is 81h comprising:

15 x 2 hour scheduled contact classes requiring:
- active participation;
- group work and peer learning;
- individual tasks.

51h hours of independent studies requiring:
- flipped learning tasks
- presentation preparation
- TED talk field-related comprehension exercises
- Field related written tasks

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- Teacher assessment (continuous)
- Peer assessment (presentation)
- Active participation in (and attendance of) contact lessons
- Timely completion of homework assignments

Students should attend 80 % of the contact lessons. The minimum attendance 50%. If missing more than 20 % of contact hours, the student will automatically receive a lowered final grade.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

25.09.2021 - 07.11.2021

Ajoitus

25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Tekniikka

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

15 - 30

Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
  • Cory Isaacs
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • AE21
    Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- Isaacs et al. 2019. Engineer Your English. Edita Publishing: Helsinki.
- SeAMK Instructions for Written Work
- Further course material available on Moodle

Opetusmenetelmät

Contact lessons
Independent studies
Written and spoken assignments in groups and independently
Peer learning

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

The time of the exam will be announced during the course.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 h

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- Written assignments
- Online exams
- Exam on the Instructions for Written Work (passed / failed)
- Active participation and submitting assignments on time

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

30.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

Ajoitus

06.09.2021 - 12.11.2021

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Liiketoiminta ja kulttuuri

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, DP in International Business
Opettaja
  • Cory Isaacs
  • Virpi Masonen
Ajoitusryhmät
  • Pienryhmä 1 (Koko: 1. Avoin AMK: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Koko: 1. Avoin AMK: 0.)
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • IB21
    Tradenomi (AMK), International Business
Koulutusryhmat
  • Pienryhmä 1
  • Pienryhmä 2

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

Isaacs et al. 2020. Eye For Business. Edita Publishing: Helsinki.

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins) - online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) -Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/) - Kielikompassi

Opetusmenetelmät

Lectures
Independent study
Presentations

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

- total workload 81 hours

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment. An examination if needed.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

01.08.2021 - 12.09.2021

Ajoitus

31.08.2021 - 31.10.2021

Laajuus

3 op

Virtuaaliosuus (op)

2 op

Yksikkö

Seinäjoen Ammattikorkeakoulu Oy

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Degree Programme in Nursing
Opettaja
  • Sirkka Nieminen
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • RN21
    Degree Programme in Nursing, Nursing Branch, Registered Nurse, RN, (UAS)

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

SeAMK:n kirjallisten töiden ohje ja verkkomateriaali

Opetusmenetelmät

- kontaktiopetus/etäopetus, itsenäinen opiskelu, kirjalliset ja suulliset Moodle-tehtävät

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

Tentin ajankohta ilmoitetaan kurssin aikana.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

81 h, sis. 26 h luentoja

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- kirjallinen tehtävä, kirjallisten töiden ohje
- verkkotentti, kirjallisten töiden ohje (hyväksytty/hylätty)
- suullinen esitys
- oppimispäiväkirja (hyväksytty/hylätty)
- aktiivinen osallistuminen ja tehtävien palauttaminen aikataulun mukaan

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita

Ilmoittautumisaika

01.09.2020 - 30.09.2020

Ajoitus

01.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

Laajuus

3 op

Yksikkö

SeAMK Liiketoiminta ja kulttuuri

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, DP in International Business
Opettaja
  • Cory Isaacs
Opiskelijaryhmät
  • IB20
    Tradenomi (AMK), International Business

Tavoitteet

Students are able to
- act appropriately in different presentation and group communication situations
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional development
- apply and follow the SeAMK instructions of written work

Sisältö

- analysis of communication styles
- presentation skills and interaction (in service situations)
- group communication skills (conversational skills, giving and receiving feedback, meeting procedures, document standards, minutes of a meeting, memoranda)
- reporting instructions of written work (referencing, correct language, templates, Urkund)

Oppimateriaalit

- material assigned by the teacher (will be specified when the course begins) - online material, for example Kirjoittajan ABC (http://webcgi.oulu.fi/oykk/abc/) -Kielijelppi (http://www.kielijelppi.fi/) - Kielikompassi

Opetusmenetelmät

Lectures
Independent study
Presentations

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

- total workload 81 hours

Arviointiasteikko

1-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

- Satisfactory (2-1):
The student is able to communicate in a sender-oriented way. He/she is not able to take the objective, recipient or situation into consideration sufficiently. The structure of the text is disconnected and illogical and argumenting is one-sided and scarce. Illustration is limited and impractical. The student is able to assess his/her communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

- Good (4-3)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in most parts. He/she is able to maintain interactive communication and recognise the culturally-bound character of communication to some exten. The structure of the text is mainly clear and consistent and argumenting is versatile and convincing. Illustration is appropriate. The student is able to assess his/her communication realistically for the most part.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

- Excellent (5)
The student is able to take the objective, situation and recipient into consideration in an excellent and convincing way. He/she can act responsibly and in accordance with agreed procedures. Interaction in communication is skillful. He/she is able to recognise the culture-bound character of communication. The text is logic, clear, coherent and argumenting is solid, multi-perspective and convincing. He/she is able to illustrate his/her presentation appropriately, effectively and purposefully. The student is able to assess his/her communication in a versatile and realistic way with regard to purpose, recipient and professional field.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Assessment is based on the following: written and spoken assignments, self assessment and peer assessment. An examination if needed.

Esitietovaatimukset

Edeltäviä opintoja ei tarvita