Communication SkillsLaajuus (4 op)
Tunnus: XX00DM10
Osaamistavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Ilmoittautumisaika
01.08.2024 - 20.10.2024
Ajoitus
21.10.2024 - 22.02.2026
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK Nursing
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Kampustalo
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
MRN24Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
108 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
fi
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Ajoitus
21.10.2024 - 18.12.2024
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK Automaatio- ja tietotekniikka
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
AE24Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
fi
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
fi
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
108 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
fi
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
fi
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024
Ajoitus
02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK International Business
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
IB24ABachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
fi
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
108 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
02.09.2024 - 15.09.2024
Ajoitus
02.09.2024 - 18.12.2024
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK International Business
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
IB24BBachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
108 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
fi
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024
Ajoitus
08.01.2024 - 22.03.2024
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK International Business
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Ajoitusryhmät
- Pienryhmä 1 (Koko: 40. Avoin AMK: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Koko: 40. Avoin AMK: 0.)
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
IB23BBachelor of Business Administration, International Business
-
IB23ABachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Koulutusryhmat
- Pienryhmä 1
- Pienryhmä 2
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
81 t,
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Ajoitus
23.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK Automaatio- ja tietotekniikka
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Paikat
16 - 40
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
AE23Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
81 h
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
01.08.2023 - 24.09.2023
Ajoitus
18.09.2023 - 31.12.2023
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK Nursing
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Kampustalo
Opetuskielet
- Suomi
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
MRN23Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
81 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
04.09.2023 - 17.09.2023
Ajoitus
04.09.2023 - 17.12.2023
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK International Business
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Suomi
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Business Administration, International Business
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
IB23ABachelor of Business Administration, International Business
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
81 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review
Ilmoittautumisaika
17.04.2023 - 11.10.2023
Ajoitus
28.08.2023 - 17.12.2023
Laajuus
4 op
Yksikkö
SeAMK Bio- ja elintarviketekniikka sekä restonomi
Toimipiste
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Tutkinto-ohjelma
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
Opettaja
- Christopher Hudson
Opiskelijaryhmät
-
AFE23Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies
Tavoitteet
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Sisältö
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Oppimateriaalit
Moodle material
Web-based literature
Academic journals
Opetusmenetelmät
Independent study
Written an spoken assignments
Peer assessment
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
81 hours
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
80% attendance of class or grade affected.
50% minimum
Arviointiasteikko
1-5
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
Teacher based assessment of work produced
Peer review