Skip to main content

Master's thesis (25cr)

Code: BH00DC36-3002

General information


Enrollment
13.08.2023 - 06.09.2023
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
01.08.2023 - 31.12.2024
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
25 cr
Local portion
25 cr
Mode of delivery
Contact learning
Unit
SeAMK Master School
Teaching languages
Finnish
Teachers
Katja Valkama
Tiina Hautamäki
Teacher in charge
Tiina Hautamäki
Course
BH00DC36

Evaluation scale

1-5

Objective

Students are able to carry out a development project or a study, which will contribute to their professional competence and to the development of their expertise. Students know how to seek information, explore national and international research relevant to the topic, write scientific texts, think critically and solve problems emerging during the process.

Content

Students set a professionally relevant research or development task and plan and implement a process that will bring the task to a conclusion.
Students gather data that is essential for the process and combine them into a coherent, comprehensible report.
Students will be supported by a supervising lecturer during the process.

Materials

Ks. Opinnäytetyöohjeet SeAMK intra

Suositeltavaa kirjallisuutta esim.

Kananen, J. (2017). Laadullinen tutkimus pro graduna ja opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. Liiketoiminta- ja palvelut yksikkö.

Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. (2009). Tutki ja kirjoita.Tammi.

Ronkainen, S., Pehkonen, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Paavilainen, E. (2011). Tutkimuksen voimasanat. WSOYpro.

Ruusuvuori, J. & Hyvärinen, M. (2019). Haastattelun analyysi. Vastapaino.

Tietoarkisto. Tutkimusmenetelmien verkkokäsikirja. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/#tutkimusmenetelmien-verkkokasikirja

Vilkka, H. (2021). Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä. PS-kustannus.

Vilkka, H. (2021). Tutki ja kehitä. PS-kustannus.

Teaching methods

Seminaarit

Student workload

Seminaarit, opinnäytetyön eri vaiheiden esittäminen seminaarissa, itsenäinen työ

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Assessment is be based on SeAMK Thesis Assessment Criteria that can be found at the end of the Guidelines on Writing a Master’s Thesis.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Assessment is be based on SeAMK Thesis Assessment Criteria that can be found at the end of the Guidelines on Writing a Master’s Thesis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assessment is be based on SeAMK Thesis Assessment Criteria that can be found at the end of the Guidelines on Writing a Master’s Thesis.

Go back to top of page