Practical Training (30 cr)
Code: 8B00DA82-3001
General information
- Enrollment
- 07.04.2025 - 06.10.2025
- Registration for the implementation has begun.
- Timing
- 31.07.2026
- The implementation has not yet started.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 30 cr
- Local portion
- 30 cr
- RDI portion
- 30 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Teaching languages
- English
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-food Engineering
- Teachers
- Matti-Pekka Pasto
- Groups
-
AFE23Bachelor of Engineering, Agri-Food Engineering , full time studies
- Course
- 8B00DA82
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Objective
The aim of the practical training is to deepen the knowledge and skills of the student's fields of specialization and to get to know the requirements of the working life. Students are able to view and reflectively their own progress in the professional interest and as a member of the working community. Doing the practical training either completely or in part abroad is recommended
Content
Choosing a place of training according to one's career plans. Training plan (content and duties), approved by the training supervisor. Duties: managing, consultation, marketing, product development, etc. Report about training and seminar
Materials
Moodle -guide.
Teaching methods
Working as a member of work community and portfolio.
Employer connections
SeAMK's separate instructions.
International connections
Practical training can be done abroad and also in parts.
Completion alternatives
Separate guidance in Moodle.
Student workload
Practical training 1 360 h and Practical training 2 360 h.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Approved: Career plan, reports and documentation.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
Students have a good concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field.
They can reflect critically their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.
Fail
Students have not complied their practical training plan or they have no concept of their professional tasks and future visions of the field. They are not able to study their own progress in the field and as a member of the work community.