Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Name of the Degree Programme
Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Field of study
Engineering, manufacturing and construction
The classification of the educational field is based on the international ISCED classification used by the Ministry of Education and Culture.
Specialisations
The line of specialization in the Degree Programme in Construction Engineering is Building Construction. During the 3rd and 4th academic year you can specialize in your studies either in
Structural Design or Production Technology.
Qualification awarded
Bachelor of Engineering
Level of qualification
The degree programme leads to a higher education degree which is a first cycle Bachelor-level degree in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). According to the eight-level classification of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF), the degree represents level 6.
The description of the level of the Degree is included in the Statute, at
http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170120
Specific admission requirements
Eligibility for studies at a university of applied sciences is stipulated in the Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014.
The selection criteria are specified in the data of the Degree Programme at www.opintopolku.fi and www.seamk.fi/haku
Applicant's Guide's instructions are written in Finnish for degree programmes taught in Finnish and in English for degree programmes taught in English. On the website, application and instructions are in Finnish language for the degree programmes taught in Finnish.
Qualification requirements and regulations (incl. graduation requirements)
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
On the websites, application and instructions are in Finnish language for the degree programmes taught in Finnish.
Examination regulations, assessment and grading
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
Link
Structure of the studies
In accordance with the Universities of Applied Sciences Act, the studies of a Degree Programme consist of basic studies, professional studies, practical training promoting professional skills, free elective studies, and a final project/thesis. The extent of the studies is 60 credits a year.
Courses in the Basic Studies introduce students to the engineering sciences and language studies and develop students' social skills.
The Professional Studies in the Line of Specialisation in Building Construction concentrate on structural design, building production, cost calculations, and business management.
The programme also includes supervised practical training (30 cr) in field-related companies, Project Studies (10 cr), elective studies (10 cr), and a final thesis (15 cr). The degree programme has strong ties with universities of applied sciences in Europe, which offers students excellent opportunities to study or work abroad.
The curriculum includes five seams permeating through the studies and extending over them. They are based on SeAMK’s reports, studies and strategy, as well as on the national and international recommendations and regulations related to education provided by universities of applied sciences.
- The Information Search seam strengthens the student’s professional and field-specific information search skills throughout the studies.
- The Internationalization seam secures the improvement of the student’s international competencies during their studies.
- The studies corresponding to the Entrepreneurship seam help the student understand the central and growing role of entrepreneurship in society.
- The Sustainable Development seam makes the student aware of social responsibility and helps them understand the diversity of sustainable development as a working life skill.
- The seam of Career Guidance helps the student recognise their competencies and own strengths. It also includes working life knowledge, job search skills, and lifelong learning.
Students have the opportunity to include multidisciplinary, working life-oriented project studies in their personal curricula (SeAMKPro).
Learning outcomes
What kind of society would You like to see built? The national wealth in Finland is based on built environment, and the environmental impact of building has a big social importance.
Technical professionals are needed to find energy efficient solutions, to use environmentally friendly materials and to diminish the carbon footprint of construction projects and the built environment. Utilizing natural resources and circular economy better in a cost-effective way open the doors to sustainable development. A comprehensive cooperation from planning to implementation guarantees buildings of better quality and a healthier built environment.
You will get a better knowledge as a builder and developer of a sustainable society.
Profile of the programme
Buildings and care for the environment is needed to house a modern building, economy and ecology skilful and implementers.
Construction Management trains the construction site production planning and managerial positions, as well as the management of construction projects or structural engineering positions. Jobs are provided by construction companies, structural engineering offices, building product industry, real estate and public sector organizations.
Generic and subject specifc competences
Competencies are extensive knowledge entities, or combinations of the individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They describe qualifications, performance potential, and the ability to cope with professional duties.
Common/general competencies are fields of know-how common to different Degree Programmes, but their special characteristics and importance may vary between professions and work assignments. General competencies form the basis for professional activities, cooperation, and the development of expertise. According to Arene’s (Rectors' Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences) recommendations, general competencies include learning skills, ethical competence, cooperation skills, innovation skills, and internationalization skills. In addition to the above-mentioned competencies, entrepreneurial skills and quality management skills are emphasized in the degree studies of SeAMK as competencies common to all.
Degree programme-specific competencies form the basis for the development of the student’s professional expertise.
Pedagogical approach and learning environment
The working world and expertise demand that employees have advanced skills in information acquisition and processing, problem-solving, the ability to collaborate with others and to always be open to new learning situations, as well as the ability to combine various types of information and various disciplines with practical work. This means that students must understand what they are taught. For this reason, teaching in the Degree Programme in Construction Engineering emphasises the constructivist theory of learning where the students' active role and world of experience form a significant part of the education. It is the teacher's duty to facilitate learning and coordinate studies.
A variety of teaching methods are used in the programme to support students' professional development, readiness for the working world and professional expertise. Students work in small groups, listen to lectures by experts, work in the laboratory, visit various companies, do assignments and practical training.
Specific arrangements for recognition of prior learning (RPL)
The RPL procedure means the identification and recognition of the student’s previously acquired learning. The student has the opportunity to apply for the recognition of their competencies if the competencies correspond to the learning goals of the Degree Programme. The identification process is closely connected with the preparation of the student’s personal curriculum and is updated during personal counselling discussions.
The identification and recognition practices are presented in the RPL Instruction of SeAMK. It specifies how recognition of competencies is applied for, how the application is processed, and how the student is informed of it. The instruction lists the RPL contact persons of each Degree Programme, who counsel students on matters related to the process.
In the assessment of prior learning, for example the following evidence is used:
- certificates on training programmes with similar content and other training programmes
- testimonials and further clarifications by an employer
- interviews of the student
- written and oral exams or reports
- functional or written assignments or other evidence
- presentations, portfolios
The final project/thesis and the Maturity Test cannot be submitted to the RPL procedure.
Head of the Degree Programme, Student Advisor, and when necessary, the teacher of the course in question are responsible for RPL. Their task is to inform students of the recognition and assessment process, to discuss students' Personal Study Plan and to guide students in the demonstration of prior learning.
According to the degree regulation, prior learning of a subject expires in ten years.
Assessment is course-specific, defined by the teacher in question. Assessment methods are an exam (written or oral), practical assignment, a laboratory test, a field test or equivalent.
Work-based learning and work placements
The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.
Work-based learning and work placements
The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.
Work-based learning and work placements
The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.
Work-based learning and work placements
The student’s salaried work during their studies and the competencies achieved through it can be used in order to complete a course. This is referred to as employment-integrated learning, and it can also be related to voluntary work or hobbies. It is essential that the things learnt through working contribute to the attainment of the learning goals of the course. Learning achieved through employment-integrated learning can be verified, for instance, through skills demonstrations and assignments.
Occupational profiles
Typical job positions for engineers having completed this programme include construction planning, production, management, import operations, and marketing in the field of construction. They may also work as entrepreneurs. Job titles include structural designer, financial planner, planning director, project manager, building inspector, developer, property manager or foreman.
After completing the vocational language studies the student is able to communicate in spoken and written situations related to his field of study. He can search for information and follow the development of his professional field in the target language.
Internationalization
Construction industry is developing and becoming more international fast. You can start developing international network, language skills and cooperation across borders already during your studies with a mobility period in the third year or by taking international project courses, for example. Study internationally in Seinäjoki by, for instance, taking multi-cultural courses in English or other studies related to international activities. You can also familiarize yourself with international construction projects by doing your internship or writing the thesis either entirely or partly abroad.
Access to further studies
Students who have completed this programme and in addition have acquired two years' field-related experience are eligible to continue on to a university of applied sciences master's degree programme in construction engineering.
Graduation requirements
Please see the Degree Regulations of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences and instructions for graduates at Intra.
Mode of study
The younger students study full-time in the degree programme, while the students in the adult education programme study part-time through various modes of study.
Head of degree programme
Ms Marita Viljanmaa, tel.: +358 40 830 2192, marita.viljanmaa(at)seamk.fi
Student counsellor
Ms Anne Vuokila, tel.: +359 40 830 1334, anne.vuokila(at)seamk.fi
Coordination of Practical Training
Ms Marita Viljanmaa, tel.: +358 40 830 2192, marita.viljanmaa(at)seamk.fi
Coordination of international mobility
Tiina Välimäki, 040-830 4127, tiina.valimaki(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Outgoing student exchanges to Europe
Maria Loukola, 040-830 2240, maria.loukola(at)seamk.fi, Coordinator, Incoming and outgoing student exchanges outside Europe
Student services
Tel. +358 20 124 5055, studentservices@seamk.fi
Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
Student groups
-
RKM22
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in planning various schedules for the construction project with the help of project management programmes.
Students are competent in planning cost-efficient schedules.
Competence in repair construction
Students are competent in planning various schedules for repair construction projects.
Content
- schedule planning for construction projects
- types of schedules
- general, stage-specific and weekly planning and planning of schedules
- project management programmes
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Manuals and instructions
Teaching methods
Assignments
Individual working
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student knows the different timetables of the construction site and is able to make simple schedules.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student masters the different timetables of the construction site and is also able to make more demanding schedules.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student masters the different timetables of the construction site and is also able to make more demanding schedules, also taking the resources of the construction site into account.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in planning various schedules for the construction project with the help of project management programmes.
Students are competent in planning cost-efficient schedules.
Competence in repair construction
Students are competent in planning various schedules for repair construction projects.
Content
- schedule planning for construction projects
- types of schedules
- general, stage-specific and weekly planning and planning of schedules
- project management programmes
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Manuals and instructions
Teaching methods
Assignments
Individual working
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student knows the different timetables of the construction site and is able to make simple schedules.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student masters the different timetables of the construction site and is also able to make more demanding schedules.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student masters the different timetables of the construction site and is also able to make more demanding schedules, also taking the resources of the construction site into account.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 20.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
Student groups
-
MRKM22
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in planning various schedules for the construction project with the help of project management programmes.
Students are competent in planning cost-efficient schedules.
Competence in repair construction
Students are competent in planning various schedules for repair construction projects.
Content
- schedule planning for construction projects
- types of schedules
- general, stage-specific and weekly planning and planning of schedules
- project management programmes
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Manuals and instructions
Teaching methods
Assignments
Individual working
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student knows the different timetables of the construction site and is able to make simple schedules.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student masters the different timetables of the construction site and is also able to make more demanding schedules.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the basics of schedule planning for a construction site and is able to make line and slash schedules. The student is able to use schedule software in schedule planning. The student masters the different timetables of the construction site and is also able to make more demanding schedules, also taking the resources of the construction site into account.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Riikka Ala-Sankila
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
• Students can describe technical devices, its use and features.
• Students can tell about companies.
• Students can write business letters.
• Students are able to summarize texts both orally and in writing.
• Students understand demanding, field-related texts and terminology.
• Students are able to use formal vocabulary both orally and in writing.
Content
- Reading and writing field-related texts
- Writing summaries and reports
- Using formal style
- Writing business letters
- Describing technical devices
- Presenting companies
Materials
- Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition or the electronic version.
- Other material as indicated by the teacher.
Teaching methods
Lectures, group work, independent work, classroom education
Student workload
80 h
Further information
Attendance 80% of the lessons
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The student masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The student masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The student masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam and oral presentation
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are many major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple but coherent and intelligible.
There are lots of mistakes and mispronunciations in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. Despite the problems, the message is mainly intelligible. If the text is read directly from written notes or slides, the maximum grade is 1 to 2.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, as well as written using basic structures correctly.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors and in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously, yet based to some extent on notes. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The students masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression; the student's pronunciation is authentic and their speed of speech is appropriate. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The students masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
The student knows how to manage the execution of concrete and masonry structures. They are able to organise the installation work and the construction of temporary support structures, attending to occupational safety.
Competence in the construction process
The student is able to acknowledge the effect of the follow-up steps and molding on concrete creep.
The student is familiar with the materials and mode of operation of usual masonry structures and the selection criteria for masonry units and mortar mixes. The student identifies the modes of usual masonry structures.
The student is familiar with the reinforcements of different structural members and the structural instructions of on-site cast structural members and the basics of prestressing structures. The student understands the effect of the mode of operation of prestressed structures on building work. The student is able to acknowledge the requirements of building services engineering in the execution of the framework (penetration drawings).
Content
- requirements for and general instructions of concrete construction
- design of concrete work and management on site
- execution of concrete work
- concrete floors
- cold weather concreting
- special methods of concreting
- special structures in concrete construction
- materials of masonry structures and their mode
- management of concrete work on site
- site visits
Materials
Eurocodes/regulations on concrete and masonry constructions where applicable
RunkoRYL 2010 General quality criteria for frame structures in house building (in Finnish)
BY71 RIL149-2019 Site implementation of concrete work (in Finnish)
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows how to manage safe and qualitative execution of concrete and masonry structures. The student knows the matters affecting the choice of material and concrete creep.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to recognise the most important structural members of concrete structures and different joints and supports. The student is able to recognise matters required by special methods and special structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well and is able to apply subjects learned. They can also analyse connections between subjects. The student can do versatile analyses and draw conclusions based on learned subjects.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Materials, Plans in Construction, Construction Design, Concrete Technology, Basics of Structural Design
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
- Janne Pihlajaniemi
Scheduling groups
- RAK22SU (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- RAK22TU (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- RAK22SU
- RAK22TU
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student will be capable of using computer programmes in the designing process.
Competence in structural engineering
Students will be competent in designing traditional concrete structures in ultimate and serviceability limit states according to the Eurocodes.
Content
- Characteristic and design strength of concrete and steel
- Elastic properties of concrete and steel
- Exposure class
- Design of beams, one-way slabs, columns, walls and footings in the ultimate limit state
- Anchorage of steel bars and laps
- Design in the serviceability limit state: cracking and deflection
- Constructional notes: reinforcement and structural parts
- Bracing of concrete structures
- Computer programmes for designing of concrete structures
Materials
Eurocodes for concrete structures and corresponding national annexes.
Betonirakenteiden suunnittelun oppikirja 2013 - Osa 1, by 211, Suomen betoniyhdistys (2013).
Betonirakenteiden suunnittelun oppikirja 2014 - Osa 2, by 211, BY-Koulutus (2014).
Betonirakenteiden suunnittelu ja mitoitus, BY 210.
Lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculation exercises, design exercise and laboratory exercise. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for concrete structures in the dimensioning of a simple beam.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for concrete structures in the dimensioning of different bar structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply very well the Eurocode for concrete structures in the dimensioning of different bar structures.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam. Design and laboratory exercises.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for concrete structures in the dimensioning of a simple beam.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for concrete structures in the dimensioning of different bar structures.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to apply very well the Eurocode for concrete structures in the dimensioning of different bar structures.
Qualifications
Statics, Strength of Materials, Statically indeterminate frame structures, Concrete Technology, Framework Systems and Basics of Structural Design.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students deepen their knowledge and skills in the designing of concrete structures.
Content
- Measuring columns and pile footing, two-way slabs, column slabs, fundaments and ground slabs at the ultimate limit state
- Flow line theory of slabs
- Designing of strained concrete structures and how they behave
- Precast concrete structures
- The basics of the design of masonry structures
- Introduction of and guidance in using computer-aided programmes for structural design
Materials
- Eurocodes for designing concrete structures and masonry and national documents concerning application
- Other material provided by the teacher
- Software
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments and excursion.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 133 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of the design of reinforced concrete structures and masonry. The student is able to dimension simple reinforced concrete structures. The student is able to read detail drawings of reinforced concrete structures and to understand the importance of planning in a construction project.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to dimension different reinforced concrete structures and masonry structures. The student is able to take precast concrete elements into account in planning. The student is able to make drawings related to the given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam.
Qualifications
Concrete structures 1
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Janne Pihlajaniemi
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are aware of occupational hazards related to working with concrete, e.g. damage to the eyes or chemical burns, and know how to prepare for the work, using proper equipment.
Competence in the construction process
Students know the ingredients of concrete and the principles of proportioning. They are familiar with the properties of fresh concrete mass, and know how to choose suitable consistency and the necessary admixtures. They know how to meet the special requirements of winter concreting and are able to evaluate the strength of concrete in cold conditions. Students also know how to avoid the temperature raise problems connected with massive structure concreting. Concrete structures stressed on site are studied especially from the viewpoint strength development.
Competence in repair construction
Students are familiar with the carbonation in concrete, with the related steel corrosion and cracking of concrete and with the challenges caused by frost and salt, and they know how to take these phenomena into consideration in their planning and production responsibilities.
Quality management competence
Students know the strength classification of concrete, the requirements for waterproof and frost resistant concrete and the related testing procedures. Based on the results, students are able to assess the quality of concrete.
Content
- proportioning methods and recipes for preparing concrete
- properties of the concrete mass
- production and conveyance techniques
- monitoring the development of strength
- methods in quality control and the properties they test
- classification of environmental conditions and common damage caused by environmental conditions
- requirements for materials and qualifications for employees.
- laboratory work
- visit to a company
Materials
- Betonitekniikan oppikirja by201-2004 or newer edition
- Betoninormit by50-2004 or newer edition
- Excel-based calculation models
- Material distributed by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching
- Exercises and tasks
- Laboratory exercises
- Group work
Student workload
Time usage 80h including:
- 13 x 2h
- Laboratory exercises 6h
- Self-study 48h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of concrete technology. Their knowledge may insufficient to some extent. The student knows the risks, their effects, the right equipment, and the work methods. The student knows the raw materials of concrete and the principles of batching. They know the properties of fresh concrete. The student knows the special requirements of winter concreting, and the carbonation of concrete.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the strength categories of concrete. The student is able to choose the right stress category for concrete and knows the different properties of concrete. The students is able to assess the development of the strength of concrete in cold and standard conditions and knows the heating problems related to the casting of massive structures. The student knows the stress caused by cold weather and salt to concrete structures and is able to take these requirements into account in planning and production.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and can apply it. They can also analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Passed exam and exercises.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Janne Pihlajaniemi
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are aware of occupational hazards related to working with concrete, e.g. damage to the eyes or chemical burns, and know how to prepare for the work, using proper equipment.
Competence in the construction process
Students know the ingredients of concrete and the principles of proportioning. They are familiar with the properties of fresh concrete mass, and know how to choose suitable consistency and the necessary admixtures. They know how to meet the special requirements of winter concreting and are able to evaluate the strength of concrete in cold conditions. Students also know how to avoid the temperature raise problems connected with massive structure concreting. Concrete structures stressed on site are studied especially from the viewpoint strength development.
Competence in repair construction
Students are familiar with the carbonation in concrete, with the related steel corrosion and cracking of concrete and with the challenges caused by frost and salt, and they know how to take these phenomena into consideration in their planning and production responsibilities.
Quality management competence
Students know the strength classification of concrete, the requirements for waterproof and frost resistant concrete and the related testing procedures. Based on the results, students are able to assess the quality of concrete.
Content
- proportioning methods and recipes for preparing concrete
- properties of the concrete mass
- production and conveyance techniques
- monitoring the development of strength
- methods in quality control and the properties they test
- classification of environmental conditions and common damage caused by environmental conditions
- requirements for materials and qualifications for employees.
- laboratory work
- visit to a company
Materials
- Betonitekniikan oppikirja by201-2004 or newer edition
- Betoninormit by50-2004 or newer edition
- Excel-based calculation models
- Material distributed by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact teaching
- Exercises and tasks
- Laboratory exercises
- Group work
Student workload
Time usage 80h including:
- 13 x 2h
- Laboratory exercises 6h
- Self-study 48h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of concrete technology. Their knowledge may insufficient to some extent. The student knows the risks, their effects, the right equipment, and the work methods. The student knows the raw materials of concrete and the principles of batching. They know the properties of fresh concrete. The student knows the special requirements of winter concreting, and the carbonation of concrete.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the strength categories of concrete. The student is able to choose the right stress category for concrete and knows the different properties of concrete. The students is able to assess the development of the strength of concrete in cold and standard conditions and knows the heating problems related to the casting of massive structures. The student knows the stress caused by cold weather and salt to concrete structures and is able to take these requirements into account in planning and production.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and can apply it. They can also analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Passed exam and exercises.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
The student knows how to use CAD programmes. The student knows the characteristics of and differences between "traditional" drawings and BIM and the rules governing modelling.
Competence in the construction process
The student knows how to work in a construction project based on BIM. They understand the principles of BIM in the project and know the basics of BIM programs.
The student understands the roles and tasks of people taking part in a BIM project.
Content
- Using CAD more efficiently
- The basic use of BIM tools applicable for different sized subjects; the basics of BIM
(architectural and structural models)
- Basics of model checking programs
- Applying YTV
Materials
- Manuals and instructions
- YTV2012 and annexes ARK Tilaajan ohje and RAK Tilaajan ohje
- Jäväjä, P. Lehtoviita, T. Tietomallintaminen talonrakennustyömaalla. Rakennustieto Oy. 2016
Teaching methods
Face-to-face teaching: lectures
Exercises to be done on your own time
Student workload
80h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic competencies in the use and exploitation of CAD and BIM in structural engineering and at construction sites.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use CAD and produce a BIM model and to analyze a finished model.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to produce and use CAD programmes and BIM models in a diversified way in different situations. The student is able to apply what they have learned in practical situations.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation: The approved course is evaluated with a grade of 1-5.
Things that affect the evaluation: Exam, exercises, attendance
Qualifications
Building Construction, Construction Planning.
Timing
26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Objective
The objective of the Digitalization in Renovation Construction course is to equip students with the skills to utilize digital tools used in the construction industry. The course covers the basics of building information modeling (BIM) and, in particular, inventory modelling, introducing the principles of their use and application. Additionally, the course aims to present the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and explore how it can be applied in renovation construction.
Upon completion, the student will be able to:
• Utilize digital tools and artificial intelligence in renovation construction
• Apply general building information modelling (BIM) requirements in renovation construction
• Utilize tools designed for analysing building information models in renovation construction
Content
• Different digital tools and technologies in renovation construction
• Practical examples of applying digitalization in renovation projects
• Utilizing building information models in renovation construction
• Basics of building information modeling
• Using tools suitable for analyzing and commenting on building information models and other tasks
Materials
Lecturer's own material
YTV - Yleiset tietomallivaatimukset 2012
Teaching methods
Online implementation: recorded lectures, independently completed tasks
Student workload
53h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
renovation projects.
• The student is familiar with the concepts of building information modeling (BIM).
• The student can use software suitable for analyzing building information models.
• The student can retrieve and interpret data contained in building information models.
• The student has submitted all assignments required for the course.
Fail:
• The student does not demonstrate knowledge of digital tools or how they can be utilized in renovation construction.
• The student does not submit assignments at all, or the submitted assignments do not demonstrate even a minimal understanding of the course learning outcomes.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Criteria: Pass/Fail
Assessment criterion: Independent tasks
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student knows the basics of FEM.
Competence in structural engineering
The student will be competent in making finite element models for bar structures. They will be capable of solving displacements and internal forces of a bar structure by the finite element method.
Content
• Forming finite element model
• Degrees of freedom
• Stiffness matrix and load vectors
• Equilibrium equations of nodal forces
• Second order approach
• Finite element method in stability problems
Materials
Lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculation exercises. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to determine equilibrium equations of nodal forces of simple bar structures.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply the finite element method of bar structures to determine and solve stresses and displacements of different beams, trusses and frames. The student is able to determine the critical load of simple bar structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the finite element method of bar structures very well to solve displacements and stresses of different beams, trusses and frames. The student is able to determine the critical load of more complex bar structures.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to determine equilibrium equations of nodal forces of simple bar structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the finite element method of bar structures to determine and solve stresses and displacements of different beams, trusses and frames. The student is able to determine the critical load of simple bar structures.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to apply the finite element method of bar structures very well to solve displacements and stresses of different beams, trusses and frames. The student is able to determine the critical load of more complex bar structures.
Qualifications
Linear Algebra, Statically Indeterminate Frame Structures
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RKM21
Objective
Students know how to manage the installation of elements and how to prepare an installation plan, also considering occupational safety. They are also competent in planning logistics and in considering its requirements from the perspective of occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students know the basics of construction site logistics. They are aware of how the planning of logistics is part of the production planning for the entire construction project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students know how to draw up an installation plan for elements.
Content
- logistics for bringing elements to the site
- planning site logistics
- lifting equipment
- planning and contents of an installation plan for elements
- Visit to a factory
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study and possible factory visit
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic concepts of construction with prefabricated units and the measures required by occupational safety. The student is able to define how the installation of prefabricated units is done and they are able to make an acceptable installation plan for a simple construction site. The student is able to describe the importance of logistics in building with prefabricated units.
.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the concepts of construction with prefabricated units and find the occupational safety risks of chosen solutions and the ways to minimize them. The student is able to define how the installation of prefabricated units is done and they are able to make a good installation plan for a construction site. The student is able to exploit logistics solutions in the planning of a safe implementation of building with prefabricated units.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the concepts of construction with prefabricated units to different situations, paying attention to the occupational safety risks of chosen solutions and the ways to minimize them. The student is able to plan the implementation of the installation of prefabricated units very well and to make a very good installation plan for a construction site. The student is able to compare and apply different logistics solutions in the planning of a safe implementation of a production chain of building with prefabricated units.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
Construction economics
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
Students know how to manage the installation of elements and how to prepare an installation plan, also considering occupational safety. They are also competent in planning logistics and in considering its requirements from the perspective of occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students know the basics of construction site logistics. They are aware of how the planning of logistics is part of the production planning for the entire construction project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students know how to draw up an installation plan for elements.
Content
- logistics for bringing elements to the site
- planning site logistics
- lifting equipment
- planning and contents of an installation plan for elements
- Visit to a factory
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study and possible factory visit
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic concepts of construction with prefabricated units and the measures required by occupational safety. The student is able to define how the installation of prefabricated units is done and they are able to make an acceptable installation plan for a simple construction site. The student is able to describe the importance of logistics in building with prefabricated units.
.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the concepts of construction with prefabricated units and find the occupational safety risks of chosen solutions and the ways to minimize them. The student is able to define how the installation of prefabricated units is done and they are able to make a good installation plan for a construction site. The student is able to exploit logistics solutions in the planning of a safe implementation of building with prefabricated units.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the concepts of construction with prefabricated units to different situations, paying attention to the occupational safety risks of chosen solutions and the ways to minimize them. The student is able to plan the implementation of the installation of prefabricated units very well and to make a very good installation plan for a construction site. The student is able to compare and apply different logistics solutions in the planning of a safe implementation of a production chain of building with prefabricated units.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
Construction economics
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 08.11.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
MRKM22
Objective
Students know how to manage the installation of elements and how to prepare an installation plan, also considering occupational safety. They are also competent in planning logistics and in considering its requirements from the perspective of occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students know the basics of construction site logistics. They are aware of how the planning of logistics is part of the production planning for the entire construction project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students know how to draw up an installation plan for elements.
Content
- logistics for bringing elements to the site
- planning site logistics
- lifting equipment
- planning and contents of an installation plan for elements
- Visit to a factory
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study and possible factory visit
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic concepts of construction with prefabricated units and the measures required by occupational safety. The student is able to define how the installation of prefabricated units is done and they are able to make an acceptable installation plan for a simple construction site. The student is able to describe the importance of logistics in building with prefabricated units.
.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the concepts of construction with prefabricated units and find the occupational safety risks of chosen solutions and the ways to minimize them. The student is able to define how the installation of prefabricated units is done and they are able to make a good installation plan for a construction site. The student is able to exploit logistics solutions in the planning of a safe implementation of building with prefabricated units.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the concepts of construction with prefabricated units to different situations, paying attention to the occupational safety risks of chosen solutions and the ways to minimize them. The student is able to plan the implementation of the installation of prefabricated units very well and to make a very good installation plan for a construction site. The student is able to compare and apply different logistics solutions in the planning of a safe implementation of a production chain of building with prefabricated units.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
Construction economics
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Janne Pihlajaniemi
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students understand the role of geotechnics and foundation engineering as part of a construction project, and take into consideration their effect on the total cost of the project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students have basic knowledge of the formation of the soil and bedrock, of the composition of the various types of soil and of their suitability as a foundation for construction. They have basic knowledge of foundations built on soil and rock and of the relevant work methods.
Students know the most important regulations and instructions on foundation construction. They have basic knowledge of foundations built on soil and rock, of piling and of the relevant work methods.
Students know how to seek information independently to develop their quality management competence.
Content
- Finnish soil and bedrock
- Types of soil
- Soil properties
- Load capacity and the stability of subsoil structural design
- Ground pressure
- Ground surveys
- Regulations and instructions
- Rock and soil foundations
- Piling
- Drying and frost protection
- Excavations
- Filling and compacting
- Ground reinforcement
- Regulations and instructions
- Laboratory work
Materials
Jääskeläinen R. Geotekniikan perusteet
Jääskeläinen R. Pohjarakennuksen perusteet.
Building Information Foundation index (partly), lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures, laboratory work, assignments and excursion.
Student workload
Total work load of the course:134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic things about the formation of the soil and bedrock as well as the composition of soil. The student knows the applicability of different types of soil as a building ground and understands its importance in a construction project.
The student knows the key regulations and instructions regulating foundation engineering. The student knows the importance of ground surveys in foundation engineering and the related basic things. The student knows the importance of frost protection and drying at the different stages of a construction project.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the bearing strength, stability and contraction of soil and understands its importance in construction. The student is able to pay attention to soil pressure and its requirements.
The student is able to choose the mode of foundation according to the conditions and to take their requirements into account. The student can read and pay attention to the cabling and pipe maps of the area.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
The student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
For the interim tests and the assignments, the assessment scale in 1-5, for the laboratory work pass/fail. The tests account for 80 % and the assignments for 20 % of the final grade. Int the tests, students must pass 40 % of the maximum.
Qualifications
Structural Mechanics, Basics of Structural Design.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in regarding the effects of agreements from the perspective of occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
- The student is familiar with the most commonly used terms and conditions of building construction and their special features.
- The student is familiar with the modes of action of legislation and of terms of contract to contractual relations.
- The student knows the basics of contract management and understands the responsibilities and obligations of contracting parties. The student understands how the responsibilities and obligations are formed.
-The student knows the basics of planning and supervising on-site procurement.
- The student knows the main stages of procurement planning.
-The student knows the practices and processes of construction case laws
- The student understands the use of design contracts and contract works on site as tools for controlling a construction project
-Students become familiar with the application of KSE2018 contract terms in consultancy, interpretation of contract terms in case of conflict
-Students become familiar with the application of YSE 1998 contract terms in main and subcontracting, interpretation of contract terms in case of conflict
-Students become familiar with the application of RYHT2000 contract terms in procurement, interpretation of contract terms in case of conflict
-The student knows the content of contract negotiations and how they work
- The student is able to draw up a contract.
- The student knows the basics of consulting and contracting
-The student can distinguish between modifications and additional work and knows the special measures required in the contract
Content
- Legislation
- Responsibilities and obligations of contracting parties of a building contract
- Contract negotiations and basics of creating a contract
- General terms and conditions of works for YSE 1998
- General Terms and Conditions of Consulting Services KSE 2013
- General Terms and Conditions for Purchase and Delivery of Construction Products RYHT 2000
- Legal interpretations of disputes in construction
- Additional and modification work
- Retaining the right to speak during a building contract
- Preparation of the contract
- The effect of legislation on the meetings of a building project
- Purchase types
- Project procurement planning and management
- Procurement mission planning
- Individual procurement planning and implementation
- Client’s responsibility law
- Contract management
Materials
Junnonen, J-M. 2010. Talonrakennushankkeen tuotannonhallinta. Tampere: Tammerprint Oy.
Rakennusalan yleiset sopimusehdot (YSE).
Konsulttitoiminnan yleiset sopimusehdot (KSE 2013).
Rakennustuotteiden yleiset hankinta- ja toimitusehdot (RYHT 2000).
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
134 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The students have performed the given tasks. The students can define the basic terms in the conditions of contracts of procurements, consultancy and contracting. They know the fundaments of the stipulations KSE 2018, YSE 1998 and RYHT2000. They know the main principles of the mode of operation in legal praxis in construction. The students can draw up simple contracts based on the conditions of contract.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The students have performed the given tasks well and participated in the course actively. The students can define the terms in the conditions of contracts of procurements, consultancy and contracting. They know the main points of the stipulations KSE 2018, YSE 1998 and RYHT2000. They know the mode of operation in legal praxis in construction. The students can draw up contracts based on the conditions of contract. The students can apply their knowledge to different situations and challenges in construction projects.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The students have performed the given tasks well and participated in the course actively and constructively. The students can define the terms in the conditions of contracts of procurements, consultancy and contracting precisely. They know well the contents of the stipulations KSE 2018, YSE 1998 and RYHT2000. They know well the mode of operation in legal praxis in construction. The students can draw up good contracts based on the conditions of contract. The students can apply their knowledge well to different situations and challenges in construction projects.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved exam and assignments. Scale 1-5.
Qualifications
Site technology
Timing
02.05.2025 - 31.07.2025
Credits
10 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Marita Viljanmaa
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
The overall aim of the practical training is to familiarize students with essential work tasks in the field of construction and to provide them with an opportunity to apply their skills and knowledge in practice. Another aim is to integrate theoretical knowledge and practice and to give a realistic overview of the requirements and practices in the construction field.
Content
Familiarization with work tasks, construction techniques, occupational safety and various workplace practices in the field of construction. Students draw up a report of their practical training period. Students also regularly write learning diaries throughout the practical training period.
Materials
Seinäjoki UAS, instructions on practical training.
Teaching methods
Orientation to work tasks, construction techniques, work safety at site or in office.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 267 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student gives in the report, diary and testimonial to the supervisor.
Assessment methods and criteria
Report and diary on practical training, work contract and certificate of employment. Assessment pass/fail.
Further information
During the first and second years of study, students may undertake a maximum of 15 cr of practical training.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
24.02.2025 - 22.08.2025
Credits
20 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Students are familiar with the junior professional's work duties and their requirements.
Content
Familiarisation with work duties, construction techniques, occupational safety and various workplace practices in the field of construction. During this practical training period, students assist senior construction management professionals and engineers in construction management in real work places. Students draw up a report for their practical training period. Students also regularly write diaries throughout the practical training period.
Materials
Seinäjoki UAS, instructions on practical training.
Teaching methods
Orientation to work tasks, construction techniques, work safety at site or in office.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 534 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student gives in the report, diary and testimonial to the supervisor.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved work contract, internship diary, internship report and work certificate. Assessment on a pass/fail scale.
Further information
During the first and second year of study, students may undertake a maximum of 15 cr of practical training.
Enrollment
05.08.2024 - 06.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Merja Juppo
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Size: 40. Open UAS: 40.)
Education groups
- Open UAS
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
16.12.2024 - 02.03.2025
Timing
17.03.2025 - 31.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Merja Juppo
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 40. Open UAS: 40.)
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 01.12.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 14.03.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Laura Liikavainio
- Viljo Arohonka
- Mari Heinonen
- Riina Heinämäki
- Jarkko Loima
- Matti-Pekka Pasto
- Milka Volanto
- Jussi Kareinen
- Noora Kivimäki
- Heli Simon
- Pirkko Mäntykivi
- Anna Rauha
- Sari Rimpelä
- Riku Uusi-Jaakkola
- Satu Lautamäki
- Jaana Liukkonen
Student groups
-
RESTO23Bachelor of Hospitality Management, Full-time studies
-
SOS23CBachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
-
BIELI23Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology, Full-time studies
-
AUTE23SADegree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies
-
SOS23BBachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
-
AUTE23KADegree Programme in Automation Engineering, Full-time studies
-
AGRO23Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
-
SH23SBachelor of Health Care, Nursing
-
KITI23Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
-
FYS23Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
-
TITE23Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Teaching methods
In English
The course is implemented as a week-long intensive course, SeAMK Innovation Week. During the week, students do not participate in any other SeAMK teaching.
In the multi-mode delivery, the course is delivered online according to a specified timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on course concepts and processes (design thinking, service design, group work)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer data using different methods
- Ideation of possible solutions using different methods
- Testing and development of solutions based on testing
- Presentation of the solution or concept
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
13.11.2024 - 19.02.2025
Timing
10.03.2025 - 04.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Merja Juppo
Student groups
-
MTH24Bachelor of Health Care, Public Health Nursing
-
MGERO23Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology,Multimodal implementation
-
MRESTO24Bachelor of Hospitality Management, Part-time studies
-
MSH24KBachelor of Health Care, Nursing, Multimodal implementation
-
MBIELI24Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology, Part-time studies
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 09.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 08.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
RD proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Merja Juppo
Student groups
-
MKONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
MAGRO23Bachelor of Natural Resources
-
MLITA23Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management, Multimodal implementation
-
MSH23SBachelor of Health Care, Nursing, Multimodal implementation
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 25.09.2024
Timing
11.11.2024 - 15.11.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Marika Kääriäinen
- Riina Heinämäki
- Milka Volanto
- Jussi Kareinen
- Noora Kivimäki
- Terhi Anttila
- Merja Juppo
- Heli Simon
- Anna Rauha
- Pia Haapala
- Helena Myllymäki
- Pekka Lager
- Jaana Liukkonen
- Saija Råtts
Student groups
-
SH24KBachelor of Health Care, Nursing, Full-time studies
-
SOS23CBachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
-
SOS23BBachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
-
KONE23Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
-
AUTO23
-
LITA23BBachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
-
LITA23CBachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
LITA23DTradenomi (AMK), Liiketalous
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
-
LITA23ABachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
Objective
The student can:
- solve real working-life development tasks (companies, organisations, associations) in small groups, consisting of students of different fields
- conduct a customer survey and, based on it, develop and test different solutions to the commissioner’s problem
- consider the business aspects while choosing their solution
- present the solution, or concept, chosen by the group to the commissioner in a professional way
- apply design thinking and its process in future in development tasks in their own field
Content
In the daytime implementation, the course is implemented as a one-week intensive course during SeAMK Innovation Week. During that time, the students do not attend any other courses at SeAMK.
In the multimodal implementation, the course is implemented online, following a separate timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on the concepts and processes of the course (design thinking, service design, groupwork)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer information with different methods
- Brainstorming of solution options with different methods
- Testing of solution options and their development based on the testing
- Presentation of a solution, or concept
- Teamwork skills and daily reporting on one’s work
Teaching methods
In English
The course is implemented as a week-long intensive course, SeAMK Innovation Week. During the week, students do not participate in any other SeAMK teaching.
In the multi-mode delivery, the course is delivered online according to a specified timetable.
- Preliminary assignment on course concepts and processes (design thinking, service design, group work)
- Analysis of the problem of the development task
- Collection of customer data using different methods
- Ideation of possible solutions using different methods
- Testing and development of solutions based on testing
- Presentation of the solution or concept
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- By completing the preliminary assignment successfully, the student shows their command of the stages and concepts of the customer-focused development project
- The student shows their command of the customer-focused development process by actively participating in the solving of the development task in the group
- The student can collect customer information using different methods and apply information to solve the development task
- The student has participated in the presentation of the group’s results to the commissioner
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students know the relevant labour legislation and understand the collective labour agreement for the construction field.
Competence in the construction process
Students are familiar with organizational models and management styles, know how to apply creative methods and know the basics of human resources management.
Content
- organizations, management competence and activities
- management models
- basics of work psychology and human resources management
- employment Contracts Act
- Working Hours Act
- Annual Holidays Act and collective agreement for the house construction field
Materials
Collective Agreement for the House Construction field.
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 107 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of management. The student knows the basics of the labour law and is able to search for information in a collective agreement.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the principal matters about management. They are able to apply different methods and modify their own activities in different working-life situations and when working with different people. The student knows the basics of the labour law and is able to search for information in a collective agreement.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the principal matters about management very well. They are able to fluently apply different methods and modify their own activities in different working-life situations and when working with different people, adjusting their management to match each situation and the needs of the subordinates. The student knows the basics of the labour legislation well and is able to search for information in a collective agreement as well as to apply the labour law and the collective agreement in practical problems of working life.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students know the relevant labour legislation and understand the collective labour agreement for the construction field.
Competence in the construction process
Students are familiar with organizational models and management styles, know how to apply creative methods and know the basics of human resources management.
Content
- organizations, management competence and activities
- management models
- basics of work psychology and human resources management
- employment Contracts Act
- Working Hours Act
- Annual Holidays Act and collective agreement for the house construction field
Materials
Collective Agreement for the House Construction field.
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 107 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of management. The student knows the basics of the labour law and is able to search for information in a collective agreement.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the principal matters about management. They are able to apply different methods and modify their own activities in different working-life situations and when working with different people. The student knows the basics of the labour law and is able to search for information in a collective agreement.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the principal matters about management very well. They are able to fluently apply different methods and modify their own activities in different working-life situations and when working with different people, adjusting their management to match each situation and the needs of the subordinates. The student knows the basics of the labour legislation well and is able to search for information in a collective agreement as well as to apply the labour law and the collective agreement in practical problems of working life.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
30.09.2024 - 24.01.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students know the relevant labour legislation and understand the collective labour agreement for the construction field.
Competence in the construction process
Students are familiar with organizational models and management styles, know how to apply creative methods and know the basics of human resources management.
Content
- organizations, management competence and activities
- management models
- basics of work psychology and human resources management
- employment Contracts Act
- Working Hours Act
- Annual Holidays Act and collective agreement for the house construction field
Materials
Collective Agreement for the House Construction field.
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 107 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of management. The student knows the basics of the labour law and is able to search for information in a collective agreement.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the principal matters about management. They are able to apply different methods and modify their own activities in different working-life situations and when working with different people. The student knows the basics of the labour law and is able to search for information in a collective agreement.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the principal matters about management very well. They are able to fluently apply different methods and modify their own activities in different working-life situations and when working with different people, adjusting their management to match each situation and the needs of the subordinates. The student knows the basics of the labour legislation well and is able to search for information in a collective agreement as well as to apply the labour law and the collective agreement in practical problems of working life.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
0 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Heli Simon
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
x
Content
x
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
x Assessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
0 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Heli Simon
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
x
Content
x
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
xAssessment is based on academic criteria for oral and written proficiency.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Henrik Turja
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process.
The student knows the main features of the zoning process in Finland. The student understands the basic principles of land use planning and the possibilities of the society to guide construction through urban planning.
The student knows the different levels of urban planning in Finland and the steps of planning. The student is familiar with the fundaments of the legislation on urban planning.
The student is able to interpret plans and zoning ordinances from the perspective of construction. The student understands the possibilities of zoning ordinances to influence the site practices, finances and quality of construction.
Content
- land use planning and national direction system
- regional plan, master plan and town plan
- symbols on different plans
- zoning process and legislative definitions guiding it
- the possibilities of urban planning to guide construction
- land acquisition, site layout plan, street plans
- acknowledging sustainable development in urban planning
Materials
Land Use Planning and Building Law and Act in part, plan symbols and planning ordinance.
Lecturer´s own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent study.
Student workload
80 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the different levels of urban planning and the basics of zoning process. The student is able to find information in a town plan for a construction process. The student is familiar with the basic principles of the distinctive features of urban planning and land use planning and their effect on construction projects.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the different levels of urban planning and the zoning process. The student is able to find information in a town plan and apply it in different situations in working life and different construction projects. The student understands the effect of urban planning on the implementation of construction projects. The student knows the main features of the consequences of zoning ordinances in a construction project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the different levels of urban planning and the zoning process comprehensively. The student is able to find information on different plans, interpret plans and apply information from them in demanding situations in working life and construction projects. The student understands the effect of urban planning on the implementation of construction projects. The student knows the consequences of zoning ordinances in a construction project.
Assessment methods and criteria
Passed exam and assignment.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
RKM22
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students appreciate the existing body of buildings and the built environment.
Competence in repair construction
Students are able to determine why repair is needed and to list typical deficiencies in and damages of buildings from different eras. Students are competent in preparing a condition assessment report on a repair construction target chosen by themselves. They also know how to read old drawings and repair drawings.
Content
- the role of repair construction in national economy
- reasons for the need to repair buildings
- basic concepts in repair construction
- damage in various materials
- building styles, techniques and materials from different eras, structural deficiencies, typical damages and repair techniques
- clearing for repair construction
- study of old drawings
- drawing up repair drawings
- condition assessment, contents and how to prepare one
Materials
- Lecturer's own material
- Building Information Index RT and RATU (assigned parts)
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of repair construction, yet possibly with some minor imperfections. The student knows the damage of the key structural components and the repair methods as well as the different methods of construction of different epochs.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has the basic knowledge of repair construction and knows the key working methods as well as the different methods of construction and structures of different epochs. The student masters the most common stress factors, types of damage, and the repair methods .The student knows the changing effects of conditions on structures and the risks caused by them. The student is able to make commonly-used analyses and draw conclusions based on basic information.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Indoor Air Climate.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students appreciate the existing body of buildings and the built environment.
Competence in repair construction
Students are able to determine why repair is needed and to list typical deficiencies in and damages of buildings from different eras. Students are competent in preparing a condition assessment report on a repair construction target chosen by themselves. They also know how to read old drawings and repair drawings.
Content
- the role of repair construction in national economy
- reasons for the need to repair buildings
- basic concepts in repair construction
- damage in various materials
- building styles, techniques and materials from different eras, structural deficiencies, typical damages and repair techniques
- clearing for repair construction
- study of old drawings
- drawing up repair drawings
- condition assessment, contents and how to prepare one
Materials
- Lecturer's own material
- Building Information Index RT and RATU (assigned parts)
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of repair construction, yet possibly with some minor imperfections. The student knows the damage of the key structural components and the repair methods as well as the different methods of construction of different epochs.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has the basic knowledge of repair construction and knows the key working methods as well as the different methods of construction and structures of different epochs. The student masters the most common stress factors, types of damage, and the repair methods .The student knows the changing effects of conditions on structures and the risks caused by them. The student is able to make commonly-used analyses and draw conclusions based on basic information.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Indoor Air Climate.
Timing
22.02.2025 - 31.05.2025
Credits
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Objective
The objective of the Renovation Construction and the New Construction Act course is to provide participants with a comprehensive overview of the new Construction Act and its impact on renovation construction. The course addresses the key provisions and interpretations of the law, as well as their practical application in renovation projects.
Upon completion, the student will be able to:
• Define the key changes in the new Construction Act coming into effect in 2025 and their impact on renovation construction
• Apply the changes in the Construction Act to practical renovation projects
Content
• Key provisions and interpretations of the new Construction Act from the perspective of renovation construction
• The impact of the new law on the planning, permit process, and execution of renovation projects
• Practical examples of applying the new law
• Current legislative changes and future outlooks
• Tasks related to the subject area
Materials
Lecturer's own material
New Construction Act
Teaching methods
Online implementation: recorded lectures, independently completed tasks
Student workload
27h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass:
• The student recognizes the requirements brought by the new Construction Act in renovation construction.
• The student can apply the changes brought by the new Construction Act to renovation construction in practice.
• The student has submitted all assignments required for the course.
Fail:
• The student does not demonstrate knowledge of the new Construction Act or its obligations regarding renovation construction.
• The student does not submit assignments at all, or the submitted assignments do not demonstrate even a minimal understanding of the course learning outcomes.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment Criteria: Pass/Fail
Assessment criterion: Independent tasks
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Marita Viljanmaa
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Anne Vuokila
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
Material in Moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures and independent tasks.
Student workload
53h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Participation in lectures. Doing and turning in tasks within the given schedule.
Enrollment
02.01.2025 - 15.01.2025
Timing
11.01.2025 - 25.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Tiina Välimäki
- Johanna Koivula
Student groups
-
MPK25Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Online course.
Tasks to be performed independently in moodle
Student workload
Total 54 h of independent work
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 27.04.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Anu Katila
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
- Opiskelijapalvelut Nimeämätön
- Eija Putula-Hautala
- Marja Erkkilä
Student groups
-
MAGRO25Bachelor of Natural Resources
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
- website and intranet of Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences: http://www.seamk.fi
- curricula of degree programmes: ops.seamk.fi
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, group work
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments
Enrollment
05.08.2024 - 17.11.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Johanna Koivula
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 51. Open UAS: 51.)
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle
Student workload
Total 54 h of independent work
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Further information
The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.
Enrollment
16.12.2024 - 20.04.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 31.05.2025
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Johanna Koivula
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 50. Open UAS: 50.)
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle
Student workload
Total 54 h of independent work
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Further information
The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.
Enrollment
05.08.2024 - 17.11.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Library and Information Services
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management
- Bachelor of Social Services
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Business Administration, SME Business Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Culture and Arts, Cultural Management
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Annukka Haapa-aho
Objective
Learning goals
The student knows how to
- Act at the university of applied sciences
- Develop their learning and study skills
- Exploit different learning environments in diverse ways
- Become familiar with their field of study and its job opportunities (incl. abroad)
- Plan their studies from the perspective of their career aspirations
Content
Academic studies:
- The structure of the studies and the different opportunities to complete the studies (incl. internationalisation)
- The regulations guiding academic studies, the student’s rights and responsibilities, SeAMK’s operating principles and rules
- The activities and services of the Student Association
- Study and learning skills and self-knowledge, and their development
- The welfare services at SeAMK
Career planning:
- Job opportunities in the student’s field, familiarisation with the interest groups, the international operational environment of the field
- Opportunities for further studies and career planning
Materials
Material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Online course. Tasks to be performed independently in moodle
Student workload
Total 54 h of independent work
realization.localizedApproveRejectDescription
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Further information
The teacher sends a start-up message of the course, where the details of the MOODLE to SeAMK's e-mail once a week for new entrants.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass
• Is able to recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is able to use the key electronic tools of SeAMK and find information useful for their studies in the Intranet. Recognises their personal learning style and finds ways to develop it. Recognises job opportunities in their field.
• Knows their curriculum and can interpret it while planning their studies
Fail
• Does not recognise and find SeAMK's regulations and principles guiding the studies. Is not able to use SeAMK’s electronic tools and Intranet as support to their studies. Does not recognise their personal learning style and find ways to develop it. Is not able to define the career opportunities in their field.
• Does not know their curriculum.
Assessment methods and criteria
Restoration of all exercises according to the assessment criteria.
Enrollment
23.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
The student knows the methods of cost management in the construction sector and identifies the methods used in the different phases of the project to identify and monitor costs. The student is able to anticipate the costs in the different phases of a construction project.
Content
• The role of planning in cost management
• Estimation of construction costs
• Cost control
• Cost management methods
• Managing the risks affecting costs
Materials
• Lindholm, M. (2009). Kustannushallinta rakennushankkeessa. Suomen Rakennusmedia.
• Koskenvesa, A., & Soila, J. (2018). Rakennushankkeen kustannushallinta. Rakennustieto Oy.
• Teacher's own material
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of cost management. The student can identify cost management methods at different stages of a project.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the key elements of cost management and can apply them to the specificities of the project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has a comprehensive knowledge of cost management methods and is able to select the right methods according to the specificities of the project. The student understands the methods of managing the risks affecting projects and is able to identify risk management tools for different types of projects.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RKM21
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in preparing site quality management plans and task-specific quality management plans, also regarding occupational safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students are familiar with quality management systems and know how to apply them in construction projects. Students know the contents of the quality management system selected and are able to draw up quality management plans for construction sites.
Content
- ISO 9000 quality standards
- quality management systems in industry and in construction companies
- quality management plans for sites and specific tasks
- the construction company's quality management system
- CE marking in construction
Materials
Rakennustöiden laatu.
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the quality concepts and the basics of quality management. The student knows the basics of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a simple quality plan and an acceptable task plan for a single task.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the quality concepts and the key matters of quality management well. The student knows the key aspects of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a high-quality quality plan and a task plan for the construction site.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the quality concepts and the key matters of quality management very well. The student knows the key aspects of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a high-quality quality plan and a task plan for the construction site in a comprehensive way. The student is able to manage and develop the quality functions of a company/construction site.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
Construction economics
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in preparing site quality management plans and task-specific quality management plans, also regarding occupational safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students are familiar with quality management systems and know how to apply them in construction projects. Students know the contents of the quality management system selected and are able to draw up quality management plans for construction sites.
Content
- ISO 9000 quality standards
- quality management systems in industry and in construction companies
- quality management plans for sites and specific tasks
- the construction company's quality management system
- CE marking in construction
Materials
Rakennustöiden laatu.
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the quality concepts and the basics of quality management. The student knows the basics of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a simple quality plan and an acceptable task plan for a single task.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the quality concepts and the key matters of quality management well. The student knows the key aspects of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a high-quality quality plan and a task plan for the construction site.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the quality concepts and the key matters of quality management very well. The student knows the key aspects of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a high-quality quality plan and a task plan for the construction site in a comprehensive way. The student is able to manage and develop the quality functions of a company/construction site.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
Construction economics
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
16.12.2024 - 18.02.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
MRKM22
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in preparing site quality management plans and task-specific quality management plans, also regarding occupational safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students are familiar with quality management systems and know how to apply them in construction projects. Students know the contents of the quality management system selected and are able to draw up quality management plans for construction sites.
Content
- ISO 9000 quality standards
- quality management systems in industry and in construction companies
- quality management plans for sites and specific tasks
- the construction company's quality management system
- CE marking in construction
Materials
Rakennustöiden laatu.
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the quality concepts and the basics of quality management. The student knows the basics of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a simple quality plan and an acceptable task plan for a single task.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the quality concepts and the key matters of quality management well. The student knows the key aspects of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a high-quality quality plan and a task plan for the construction site.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the quality concepts and the key matters of quality management very well. The student knows the key aspects of the quality management of a company and construction site. The student is able to make a high-quality quality plan and a task plan for the construction site in a comprehensive way. The student is able to manage and develop the quality functions of a company/construction site.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
Construction economics
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student knows different composite structures and where they are typically used. The student also understands the function of composite structures.
Competence in structural engineering
The student will be competent in designing reinforced concrete composite structures according to the Eurocodes.
Content
- Designing bent reinforced concrete composite structures (beams and plates) in ultimate and serviceability limit states according to the Eurocodes
- Designing composite columns according to the Eurocodes
Materials
Eurocodes EN 1994, EN 1992 and EN 1993. Liittorakenteiden suunnittelu ja mitoitus, Eurocode 4 –oppikirja by58. Lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculation exercises. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of composite structures in the design of a simple bent structure.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of composite structures in the design of different bar structures, such as a bar and a pillar .
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of composite structures very well in the design of different bar structures, such as a bar and a pillar .
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of composite structures in the design of a simple bent structure.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of composite structures in the design of different bar structures, such as a bar and a pillar .
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to use the Eurocode of composite structures very well in the design of different bar structures, such as a bar and a pillar .
Qualifications
Concrete Structures 1, Steel Structures 1.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning competence
Upon completion of the course, the student will be competent in doing 2D- and 3D-vectors calculations, using vectors to solve problems pertaining to plane and space geometry, calculating basic matrix functions, using calculation tools, using their acquired knowledge in their Professional Studies and the working world.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of linear algebraic problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. Students are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for linear algebraic problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Vectors
- Sum and difference of vectors
- Unit vector
- Dot product
- Cross product
- Scalar and vector components
- Vector applications in statics: resultant, moment
Matrices
- Matrix algebra
- Matrix inverse
- Determinants
- Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
Materials
To be announced at the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises, independent study
Student workload
80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to calculate sums and moments using the methods of vector calculus. They master the basic rules of matrix calculus and are also able to use their graphical calculator to solve vector and matrix problems in an efficient way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply methods of vector calculus in 3D vector problems. They are able to utilize methods of matrix calculus in applications of different types in the spreadsheet environment.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use methods of vector and matrix calculus in non-standard problems. If necessary, they are also able to find further information about the topic.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam
Qualifications
Mathematical Analysis
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student can apply the basic concepts to common stress cases.
Competence in structural engineering
Students will understand the basic concepts associated with the strength of materials. They will be competent in determining axial, bending, shearing and torsional stresses for simple bar structures. Students will be able to determinate the amount of strains and displacements in various cases. Students will be able to solve simple buckling problems and utilize the theory of plasticity for simple bar structures. Students will be able to calculate principal stresses.
Content
- Stress and strains
- Material constants
- Material laws, Hooke's law
- Temperature effects
- Bending stress
- Geometric quantities of cross section
- Shear stress
- Torsion
- Statically indeterminate bar
- Deflection
- Buckling
- Basics of plasticity
Materials
Outinen, Koski, Salmi: Lujuusopin perusteet, Pressus Oy, Tampere.
Karhunen, Lassila, Pyy, Ranta, Räsänen, Saikkonen & Suosara: Lujuusoppi, Otatieto.
F. P. Beer, E.R. Johnston: Mechanics of Materials. (Metric Edition), McGraw-Hill.
Lecturer’s own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculation exercises. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to apply the principles of strength of materials to solve simple problems in a satisfactory way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply the principles of strength of materials to solve different bar structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the principles of strength of materials to solve the stress strain states of different bar structures.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply the principles of strength of materials to solve simple problems in a satisfactory way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the principles of strength of materials to solve different bar structures.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to apply the principles of strength of materials to solve the stress strain states of different bar structures.
Qualifications
Statics, Mathematical Analysis.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
06.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Olli Isopahkala
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are aware of the impact of site preparation (e.g. clearing, excavation, quarrying) on occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students understand the role of geotechnics and foundation construction as part of a construction project, and take into consideration their effect on the total cost of the project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students know the important building properties of various types of soil and the impact the soil and the working conditions have on the earthwork. Students know the work stages and methods in earthwork. They know how to choose the necessary machinery and equipment. They know the concepts related to volume and mass coefficients in earthwork.
Content
- Construction properties of soil
- Appropriate machinery for earthwork
- Execution of the earthwork project.
- Important stages of earthwork (e.g. clearing, excavation, quarrying, piling, filling and compaction, plumbing, yard structures and preparing the area)
- Compatibility of the loading and transport machinery
- Concepts of volume and mass coefficients
- Effect of contaminated soil on construction
Materials
Building Information Index RATU (partly), lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 133 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic things about geotechnics and foundation engineering. The student knows the work phases and work methods of earthwork.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Based on source material, the student is able to calculate the dimensions of a building and building lot and, based on that, to place the building in the lot. The student is able to apply mass coefficients and volume concepts based on given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. The are also to analyze connections between different things. Teh student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Basics of Geotechnics and Foundation Engineering (Construction Site Management)
Geotechnics and Foundation Engineering. (Construction Engineering)
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Olli Isopahkala
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are aware of the impact of site preparation (e.g. clearing, excavation, quarrying) on occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students understand the role of geotechnics and foundation construction as part of a construction project, and take into consideration their effect on the total cost of the project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students know the important building properties of various types of soil and the impact the soil and the working conditions have on the earthwork. Students know the work stages and methods in earthwork. They know how to choose the necessary machinery and equipment. They know the concepts related to volume and mass coefficients in earthwork.
Content
- Construction properties of soil
- Appropriate machinery for earthwork
- Execution of the earthwork project.
- Important stages of earthwork (e.g. clearing, excavation, quarrying, piling, filling and compaction, plumbing, yard structures and preparing the area)
- Compatibility of the loading and transport machinery
- Concepts of volume and mass coefficients
- Effect of contaminated soil on construction
Materials
Building Information Index RATU (partly), lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits.
Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 133 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic things about geotechnics and foundation engineering. The student knows the work phases and work methods of earthwork.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Based on source material, the student is able to calculate the dimensions of a building and building lot and, based on that, to place the building in the lot. The student is able to apply mass coefficients and volume concepts based on given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. The are also to analyze connections between different things. Teh student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5
Qualifications
Basics of Geotechnics and Foundation Engineering (Construction Site Management)
Geotechnics and Foundation Engineering. (Construction Engineering)
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Olli Isopahkala
Scheduling groups
- RAK22SU (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- RAK22TU (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- RAK22SU
- RAK22TU
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are aware of the impact of site preparation (e.g. clearing, excavation, quarrying) on occupational and environmental safety.
Competence in the construction process
Students understand the role of geotechnics and foundation construction as part of a construction project, and take into consideration their effect on the total cost of the project.
Competence in structural engineering
Students know the important building properties of various types of soil and the impact the soil and the working conditions have on the earthwork. Students know the work stages and methods in earthwork. They know how to choose the necessary machinery and equipment. They know the concepts related to volume and mass coefficients in earthwork.
Content
- Construction properties of soil
- Appropriate machinery for earthwork
- Execution of the earthwork project.
- Important stages of earthwork (e.g. clearing, excavation, quarrying, piling, filling and compaction, plumbing, yard structures and preparing the area)
- Compatibility of the loading and transport machinery
- Concepts of volume and mass coefficients
- Effect of contaminated soil on construction
Materials
Building Information Index RATU (partly), lecturer's own material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 106 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basic things about geotechnics and foundation engineering. The student knows the work phases and work methods of earthwork.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Based on source material, the student is able to calculate the dimensions of a building and building lot and, based on that, to place the building in the lot. The student is able to apply mass coefficients and volume concepts based on given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. The are also to analyze connections between different things. Teh student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Basics of Geotechnics and Foundation Engineering (Construction Site Management)
Geotechnics. Foundation Engineering. (Construction Engineering)
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Petri Koistinen
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student knows the principles of massive timber production processes. The student knows the repair methods of a log building.
Competence in structural engineering
The student understands the special characteristics of massive timber as construction material. The student understands the leading principles of planning and dimensioning of log and CLT structures.
Content
- Log and CLT as construction material
- Common solid timber production and working methods
- Other structures associated with log structures
- Basic principles of log building design, structural functions and erection
- Basics of repair methods of log buildings
- Basics of dimensioning of solid timber structures
Materials
Material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Video lectures and independent assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course 54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to name the key concepts of log and CLT construction and explain their meaning.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the abilities above, the student is able to apply the basic concepts of log and CLT construction in different tasks and to give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a comprehensive idea of log and CLT construction. They are able to apply their knowledge in specific problems of solid timber construction and to give reasons for their solutions in a logical manner.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam and independent assignments
Qualifications
Timber Structures / Timber Structures 1
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Petri Koistinen
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student understands the special characteristics of massive timber structures (log and CLT). The student understands the basics of building massive timber structures.
Competence in structural engineering
The student understands the basics of planning massive timber structures.
Content
- History of log construction
- Log and CLT as construction material
- Building a log frame and connected structures
- Basics of dimensioning log and CLT structures
- Building physical functioning of massive timber structures
- Repair of log buildings
Materials
Material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Video lectures and independent assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course 54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve tasks related to the basics of the course, similar to the tasks in the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the abilities above, the student is able to apply the basics of the course in different tasks and to give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a comprehensive idea of the topics of the course. They are able to choose right methods to solve problems presented in the course and to give reasons for their solutions in a logical manner.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam and independent assignments
Enrollment
06.01.2025 - 14.02.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 27.04.2025
Credits
2 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Petri Koistinen
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 100. Open UAS: 100.)
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student understands the special characteristics of massive timber structures (log and CLT). The student understands the basics of building massive timber structures.
Competence in structural engineering
The student understands the basics of planning massive timber structures.
Content
- History of log construction
- Log and CLT as construction material
- Building a log frame and connected structures
- Basics of dimensioning log and CLT structures
- Building physical functioning of massive timber structures
- Repair of log buildings
Materials
To be announced during lectures.
Teaching methods
Video lectures and independent assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course 54 h
Further information
Attention! Final Exam in Exam.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve tasks related to the basics of the course, similar to the tasks in the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the abilities above, the student is able to apply the basics of the course in different tasks and to give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a comprehensive idea of the topics of the course. They are able to choose right methods to solve problems presented in the course and to give reasons for their solutions in a logical manner.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning outcomes of the course
Students will be competent in using mathematical programs (Excel, Mathcad, Matlab) to solve practical mathematical problems.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of mathematical problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. Students are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for mathematical problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work.
Content
Basics of the mathematical programs (Excel, Mathcad, Matlab) and their use in the solution of mathematical problems
Materials
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculations and assignments
Student workload
80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the basic concepts and methods of mathematical programs (Excel, Mathcad, Matlab) and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mathematical programs (Excel, Mathcad, Matlab), and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mathematical programs (Excel, Mathcad, Matlab), and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination, assessment 0-5
Qualifications
Algebra, Geometry in Construction Engineering
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning competence
The student is able to utilize the necessary concepts and units that are used in modeling mechanical phenomena. The student is able to build and solve physical models that describe different mechanical phenomena. The student is able to analyze the motion of solid bodies and fluids, and to understand the empirical nature of the physical science. The student is able to evaluate his/her skills on mechanics and apply his/her expertise in the subsequent advanced studies.
Innovation competence
The student is able to interpret a physical model as an approximate description of the real world phenomenon.
Content
- Kinematics
- Newton's laws
- Work, power, energy, impulse
- Linear momentum
- Rotary movement
- Mechanics of solids and fluids
Materials
Material in Moodle
Lecture notes
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises and independent study.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows and understands to a satisfactory extent the mechanical basic concepts and methods, and is able to apply them to usual problems.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to different types of problems. The student is able to combine the accumulated knowledge and skills with previous experiences in the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is familiar with the concepts and methods of mechanics, and is able to apply them to a variety of different problems. The student has demonstrated creativity and innovation, and is able to find new meanings when applying what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written course-end examination
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 31.07.2025
Credits
15 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Arto Saariaho
- Marita Viljanmaa
- Tero Turja
- Paula Pihlaja
- Jarkko Piikkilä
- Olli Isopahkala
- Veli Autio
- Martti Perälä
- Petri Koistinen
- Juho Lohilahti
- Janne Pihlajaniemi
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
The thesis prepares students for their future profession. It enables students to apply the knowledge they have learned during their studies in practice and to find new knowledge to solve problems. More detailed information about the thesis is available in the Guidelines for Writing a Thesis.
Content
- Planning, producing and reporting of a thesis
- Presentation of the topic
- Presentation of the results
- Maturity Test
Materials
Literature and other reliable source material related to the topic of the thesis.
Teaching methods
Independent work, regular contact with your supervisor, mid-term and final seminars.
Student workload
400 hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS's Instructions for Writing a Thesis
Assessment criteria, good (3)
More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS's Instructions for Writing a Thesis
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
More detailed information about evaluation: Seinäjoki UAS's Instructions for Writing a Thesis
Assessment methods and criteria
SeAMK thesis evaluation criteria. Approved report, participation in mid-term and final seminars, approved maturity essay.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 26.01.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
Student groups
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
1. The aim of the project studies is to strengthen the student's knowledge of the construction industry and develop the ability to combine theory with practice.
2. The student is able to dimension simple structures in a project in accordance with current building regulations and to draw up structural drawings for a small house project.
3. The student will be able to define the quantity surveying of materials for a construction project.
Content
Structural design of a small house
- Dimensioning of simple structures.
- Preparation of structural drawings using CAD software.
Managing a project on a small building site
-Quantity surveying of materials.
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Software vendor's instructions and manual
Teaching methods
Individual project work
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Passed:
The student is able to dimension simple building structures and draw up construction plans for a small house in accordance with current building regulations. The student is able to calculate the quantity of materials.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction materials, building construction, construction planning
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Veli Autio
- Martti Perälä
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student can use computer programmes in dimensioning of wooden structures. The student understands the special characteristics of wood on construction site.
Competence in structural engineering
The student is able to design common load-bearing timber structures. They know how to determine the static model of the structures and are able to make load combinations to be examined at the ultimate limit state and at the service limit state using Eurocodes. The student knows the distinctive properties of wood when dimensioning load-bearing wooden structures. The course is part of the theoretical training required of A-level structural designers.
Content
- Properties of materials
- Structural designing of load-bearing timber structures
- Static models of structures and actions of structures
- Massive beams, columns, glued, thin-laminated beams, double tapered beams and single tapered beams, wooden trusses
- Design at the ultimate limit state for bending, shear and normal force, as well as for combined stresses
- Desing of connections
- Bracing of timber structures
- Design at the service limit state for bending and vibration
- Utilising software in designing and dimensioning wooden structures
- Laboratory work
Materials
Eurocode 5: Design of structural timber. National documents for applying the Eurocodes as applies.
RIL 201-1-2017:
Other material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments, laboratory work. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve problems related to the basic content of the course that are similar to the assignments dealt with during the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the criteria above, the student is able to use the basic content of the course and apply it in different assignments, as well as give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the criteria above , the student has a comprehensive understanding of the content of the course. They are able to choose the right methods to solve problems related to the course content and to give reason for their solutions in a logical way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam. Laboratory work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to solve problems related to the basic content of the course that are similar to the assignments dealt with during the course.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the criteria above, the student is able to use the basic content of the course and apply it in different assignments, as well as give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
In addition to the criteria above , the student has a comprehensive understanding of the content of the course. They are able to choose the right methods to solve problems related to the course content and to give reason for their solutions in a logical way.
Qualifications
Statics, Strength of Materials, Framework Systems and Basics of Structural Design.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Veli Autio
- Martti Perälä
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students can use computer programmes in the dimensioning of wooden structures.
Competence in structural engineering
Upon completion of the course, students are able to design independently joints in wooden structures that are assembled with mechanic fasteners. They understand the principles behind the dimensioning of heavy-duty wooden structures. The course is part of the theoretical training required of A-level structural designers.
Content
- Joints in wooden structures
- Joints assembled with mechanical couplers: connections with nails, screws, bolts, and dowels
- Dimensioning punched metal plate fastener joints
- Heavy-duty wooden structures
- Bracing of timber structures
- Utilising software in dimensioning joints
- Laboratory work
Materials
Eurocodes for designing wooden structures and national documents for applying the Eurocodes as applies RIL 205-1-2009. Lecturer's material.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculation exercises and laboratory work. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve problems related to the basic content of the course, which are similar to the assignments dealt with during the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition, the student is able to use the basic content of the course and apply it in different assignments, as well as give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition, the student has a comprehensive understanding of the content of the course. They are able to choose the right methods to solve problems related to the course content and to give reason for their solutions in a logical way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam. Laboratory work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to solve problems related to the basic content of the course, which are similar to the assignments dealt with during the course.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition, the student is able to use the basic content of the course and apply it in different assignments, as well as give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
In addition, the student has a comprehensive understanding of the content of the course. They are able to choose the right methods to solve problems related to the course content and to give reason for their solutions in a logical way.
Qualifications
Timber Structures 1
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 15.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Jarkko Piikkilä
- Petri Koistinen
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
The student learns to connect theory and practice.
The student draws up structural design documents of a one-family house.
Content
Structural design of a one-family house
- loads
- stresses
- designing and bracing of the load-bearing structures
- structural design documents using CAD
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Manuals and instructions
Teaching methods
Individual project work
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 hours
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Fail:
The criteria for the grade Pass are not met.
Pass:
The student is able to design the structure of a timber-framed one-family house and to make a construction drawing based on that.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
- Construction planning
- framework systems and basics of structural design
- timber structures 1
- building physics 1
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Juho Lohilahti
- Petri Koistinen
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
The student draws up structural design documents of a big building. Reporting. The student knows how to connect theory and practice. Reporting.
Content
- loads
- stresses
- designing and bracing of load-bearing structures
- inspection of connections
- structural design documents using CAD
- reporting
Materials
Material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignment
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 133 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Fail:
The criteria for the grade Pass are not met.
Pass:
The student knows the structure of a structural design project and is able to take part in different phases of design in larger projects as well.
Assessment methods and criteria
The assignments assessment scale in 1-5.
Qualifications
- construction planning
- framework systems and basics of structural design
- timber structures 1
- building physics 1
- concrete structures 1
- steel structures 1
- timber structures 2
- concrete structures 2
- geotechnics and foundation engineering
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student is able to read construction and structural drawings.
The student is able to calculate the basic areas and volumes of a construction project.
Content
- symbols of construction and structural drawings
- calculation methods of basic areas and volumes
- ability to read construction and structural drawings
Materials
Lecturer's own material. RT-Cards.
Rakentamisen piirustusmerkintöjä, Rakennustieto.
Teaching methods
Face-to-face teaching: lectures, class assignments.
Exercises to be done on your own time
Student workload
80h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of the drawings in construction. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning in construction projects..
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read construction and structural drawings of new and repair construction. The student is able to calculate quantities in CAD drawings.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
A passed course is graded on a scale of 1-5.
Things that affect the evaluation: Exam, exercises, class exercises, attendance
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 01.11.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student is able to read construction and structural drawings.
The student is able to calculate the basic areas and volumes of a construction project.
Content
- symbols of construction and structural drawings
- calculation methods of basic areas and volumes
- ability to read construction and structural drawings
Materials
Lecturer's own material.
The Building Information Foundation's index (partly).
Rakentamisen piirustusmerkintöjä, Rakennustieto.
Teaching methods
Face-to-face teaching: lectures, class assignments.
Exercises to be done on your own time
Student workload
80h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of the drawings in construction. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning in construction projects..
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read construction and structural drawings of new and repair construction. The student is able to calculate quantities in CAD drawings.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation: The approved course is evaluated with a grade of 1-5.
Things that affect the evaluation: Exam, exercises, class exercises, attendance
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student is able to read construction and structural drawings.
The student is able to calculate the basic areas and volumes of a construction project.
Content
- symbols of construction and structural drawings
- calculation methods of basic areas and volumes
- ability to read construction and structural drawings
Materials
Lecturer's own material.
The Building Information Foundation's index (partly).
Rakentamisen piirustusmerkintöjä, Rakennustieto.
Teaching methods
Face-to-face teaching: lectures, class assignments.
Exercises to be done on your own time
Student workload
80h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of the drawings in construction. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning in construction projects..
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read construction and structural drawings of new and repair construction. The student is able to calculate quantities in CAD drawings.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
A passed course is graded on a scale of 1-5.
Things that affect the evaluation: Exam, exercises, class exercises, attendance
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Veli Autio
- Petri Koistinen
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student can take account of the circumstances on construction site and run the insulation work to achieve a good result.
Competence in structural engineering
Students will be competent in calculating the U-value and the temperature distribution of a structure. They will also be competent in interpreting the effect of moisture on structures and understand the principles of diffusion and convection calculations. Students will understand the basics of the physical function of buildings and structures and the basic measurement methods. They will be competent in utilising software to model phenomena related to building physics.
Content
- Basic concepts of building physics
- Air pressure and air flow in buildings
- Calculation of diffusion, convection and U-values
- Heat and moisture transfer, drying of structures
- Planning heat and moisture insulation and the associated structural solutions
- Software used in building physics
- Measurements
Materials
- RakMK as applies
- RIL 255-2014
- Other material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact lessons: Lectures, assignments and laboratory works
Student workload
Total work load of the course 107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve problems related to the basic content of the course that are similar to the assignments dealt with during the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition, the student is able to use the basic content of the course and apply them in different assignments, as well as give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition, the student has a comprehensive understanding of the content of the course. They are able to choose the right methods to solve problems related to the course content and to give reason for their solutions in a logical way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam and approved assignment
Qualifications
Building Construction. Construction Materials.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Petri Koistinen
- Janne Pihlajaniemi
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students are competent in propagation, absorption and insulation of sound.
Students know the regulations, guidelines and recommendations associated with sound and noise.
Content
Wave motion
Sound and acoustic absorption:
- Acoustic pressure and sound pressure level
- Absorption
- Reverberation time
Sound insulation
- Flanking transmission
- Airborne sound insulation
- Impact sound insulation
Measurements
Materials
Material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Video lectures, independent assignments and laboratory work
Student workload
Total work load of the course 54 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows and satisfactorily masters the principles of propagation, absorption and insulation of sound and is able to apply them to solve simple situations.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows and satisfactorily masters the principles of propagation, absorption and insulation of sound and is able to apply them to solve problems of different kinds.They are able to associate what they have learned with their previous experiences with the subject area.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows very well the principles of propagation, absorption and insulation of sound and is able to apply them in a diversified way to solve problems of different kinds.They are able to associate what they have learned with their previous experiences with the subject area.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam and approved assignment
Qualifications
Building Construction.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Veli Autio
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students are familiar with house construction materials, their properties, manufacturing processes, types and uses of products, and the required installations and work methods. Students are aware of the health and environmental impact of materials. They are also capable of seeking information independently to develop their communication and interaction skills.
Content
- Manufacturing methods of the more common materials
- Properties of the materials
- Products manufactured of the materials
- Health and environmental impacts
- The fire characteristics of the materials
Materials
Building Information Index (assigned parts) Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma RakMK
Other material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, Laboratory exercise
Student workload
53 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the properties and production methods of common construction materials, as well as their applicability to different targets of use. The student masters the health and environmental effects of construction materials. The student knows some of the most common materials used in heating, plumbing and air conditioning installations. The student is able to search independently for information, which develops their communication and interactive skills.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the correct warehousing and installation conditions of common construction materials. The student is able to combine construction materials into an appropriate product group and take the effect of humidity on materials into account. The student is able to recognize the key properties of construction materials, which influence their use in construction. The student knows the risks and health effects of construction materials.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the knows well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They are also able to analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment scale 1-5 for the examination: students must have 33% correct to pass and pass/fail for the assignment.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Veli Autio
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 0. Open UAS: 0.)
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Education groups
- Small group 1
- Small group 2
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students are familiar with house construction materials, their properties, manufacturing processes, types and uses of products, and the required installations and work methods. Students are aware of the health and environmental impact of materials. They are also capable of seeking information independently to develop their communication and interaction skills.
Content
- Manufacturing methods of the more common materials
- Properties of the materials
- Products manufactured of the materials
- Health and environmental impacts
- The fire characteristics of the materials
Materials
Building Information Index (assigned parts) Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma RakMK
Other material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, Laboratory exercise
Student workload
53 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the properties and production methods of common construction materials, as well as their applicability to different targets of use. The student masters the health and environmental effects of construction materials. The student knows some of the most common materials used in heating, plumbing and air conditioning installations. The student is able to search independently for information, which develops their communication and interactive skills.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the correct warehousing and installation conditions of common construction materials. The student is able to combine construction materials into an appropriate product group and take the effect of humidity on materials into account. The student is able to recognize the key properties of construction materials, which influence their use in construction. The student knows the risks and health effects of construction materials.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the knows well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They are also able to analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment scale 1-5 for the examination: students must have 33% correct to pass and pass/fail for the assignment.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students are competent in reading structural drawings.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in reading and combining construction drawings and structural drawings. Students know construction permit process.
Competence in repair construction
Students know how to read and combine construction drawings and structural drawings pertaining to repair construction.
Content
- Applying of the drawing symbols
- Primary, workshop and detail drawings
- Required drawings for construction permit and obtaining a construction permit
- Learning to use CAD
Materials
Lecturer's own material.
The Building Information Foundation's index (partly).
CAD handbooks.
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 106 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of construction planning. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning in construction projects. The student knows the basics of drawing by means of CAD.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read structural drawings and construction drawings. The student is able to make CAD drawings related to the given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam. The tests account for 80 % and the assignments for 20 % of the final grade. Int the tests, students must pass 40 % of the maximum.
Qualifications
Drawings in Construction
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
28.10.2024 - 07.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students are competent in reading structural drawings.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in reading and combining construction drawings and structural drawings. Students know construction permit process.
Competence in repair construction
Students know how to read and combine construction drawings and structural drawings pertaining to repair construction.
Content
- Applying of the drawing symbols
- Primary, workshop and detail drawings
- Required drawings for construction permit and obtaining a construction permit
- Learning to use CAD
Materials
Lecturer's own material.
The Building Information Foundation's index (partly).
CAD handbooks.
Teaching methods
Face-to-face teaching, lectures, class assignments.
Exercises to be done on your own time
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of construction planning. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning in construction projects. The student knows the basics of drawing by means of CAD.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read structural drawings and construction drawings. The student is able to make CAD drawings related to the given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation: The approved course is evaluated with a grade of 1-5.
Things that affect the evaluation: Exam, exercises, class exercises, attendance
Qualifications
Drawings in Construction
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in structural engineering
Students are competent in reading structural drawings.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in reading and combining construction drawings and structural drawings. Students know construction permit process.
Competence in repair construction
Students know how to read and combine construction drawings and structural drawings pertaining to repair construction.
Content
- Applying of the drawing symbols
- Primary, workshop and detail drawings
- Required drawings for construction permit and obtaining a construction permit
- Learning to use CAD
Materials
Lecturer's own material.
The Building Information Foundation's index (partly).
CAD handbooks.
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 106 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of construction planning. The student knows the standard symbols and the importance of planning in construction projects. The student knows the basics of drawing by means of CAD.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read structural drawings and construction drawings. The student is able to make CAD drawings related to the given assignments.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze connections between things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam.The tests account for 80 % and the assignments for 20 % of the final grade. Int the tests, students must pass 40 % of the maximum.
Qualifications
Drawings in Construction
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Learning competence
Students are competent in basic real number calculations. They know how to calculate values of expression by means of calculation instruments. Students are familiar with exponential and polynomial rules. They are able to solve simple algebraic equations and systems of equations. They know how to do linear interpolation for table values.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of algebraic problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. They are competent in graphical illustration of mathematical models. Students are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for algebraic problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Arithmetic:
- Representation of real numbers, calculations and order of operations
- Approximations and precision
Algebraic expressions:
- mathematical expression and its value
- Extended concept of exponentiation
- Calculation rules for exponentation and roots
- Polynomials
Algebraic equations:
- First and second degree equations and how to solve them
- Systems of linear equations and how to solve them
- Direct and inverse proportionality
- Proportional to power and root
- Linear interpolation
Function and its graph
- Graphs of first and second degree polynomial functions
- Fractional functions and their graphs
Materials
Tekniikan Kaavasto, Tammertekniikka.
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculation exercises and homework.
Student workload
Supplementary studies 53 h
Actual course of study 80 h
Total: 133 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve simple basic first and second-degree equations and systems of equations. They know the basics of exponentiation and logarithm calculation and are able to solve simple exponential equations. The student knows the basics of linear interpolation and is able to solve an interpolation problem formulated in a simple way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to solve also non-standard equations and systems of equations. They are able apply linear interpolation also in non-standard problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is masters well the steps to solve different equations. They are able apply to convert a mathematical problem into an equation on their won and solve it. They are able to independently search for information when looking for solutions to mathematical problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination, assessment 0-5
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
1 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning competence
Students are competent in basic real number calculations. They know how to calculate values of expression by means of calculation instruments. Students are familiar with exponential and polynomial rules. They are able to solve simple algebraic equations and systems of equations. They know how to do linear interpolation for table values.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of algebraic problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. They are competent in graphical illustration of mathematical models. Students are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for algebraic problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Arithmetic:
- Representation of real numbers, calculations and order of operations
- Approximations and precision
Algebraic expressions:
- mathematical expression and its value
- Extended concept of exponentiation
- Calculation rules for exponentation and roots
- Polynomials
Algebraic equations:
- First and second degree equations and how to solve them
- Systems of linear equations and how to solve them
- Direct and inverse proportionality
- Proportional to power and root
- Linear interpolation
Function and its graph
- Graphs of first and second degree polynomial functions
- Fractional functions and their graphs
Materials
Tekniikan Kaavasto, Tammertekniikka.
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculation exercises and homework.
Student workload
Supplementary studies 53 h
Actual course of study 80 h
Total: 133 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve simple basic first and second-degree equations and systems of equations. They know the basics of exponentiation and logarithm calculation and are able to solve simple exponential equations. The student knows the basics of linear interpolation and is able to solve an interpolation problem formulated in a simple way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to solve also non-standard equations and systems of equations. They are able apply linear interpolation also in non-standard problems.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is masters well the steps to solve different equations. They are able apply to convert a mathematical problem into an equation on their won and solve it. They are able to independently search for information when looking for solutions to mathematical problems.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination, assessment 0-5
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Learning competence
Students are aware of the basic properties of trigonometric functions. They know how to solve rectangular and oblique triangles. They are familiar with the more common plane figures and solid bodies and know how to calculate their areas and volumes.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of geometrical problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. They are competent in graphical illustration of mathematical models. Students are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for geometrical problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Trigonometry:
- Trigonometric functions, especially the sine, cosine and tangent.
- Common trigonometric formulae
- Rectangular and oblique triangles and how to solve them
Plane figures:
- Areas of the more common plane figures
- The concept and application of similarity
- Centre of gravity
- Second moment of area, modulus of section
Space geometry:
- Common solid bodies: cylinder, cone, truncated cone, ball, and their parts
- Calculating volumes and areas
- Scale in three-dimensional space
Materials
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculations and assignments.
Student workload
107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve the sides and angles of a right-angled triangle using the Pythagorean theorem and trigonometric functions. They are able to use the Sine and Cosine rules when calculating an oblique-angled triangle. They master the principles of calculating areas of simple plane figures. They are able to calculate the position of the centroid and moment of inertia of a simple cross section.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply the solution methods of a right-angled and oblique-angled triangle also in a non-standard problems. They are able to calculate the position of the centroid and moment of inertia of a cross section consisting of arbitrary rectangular parts .
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the solution methods of triangles in practical problems. They master the calculation of the position of the centroid and moment of inertia of a cross sections. The student independently searches for information in different sources and utilizes it in practical problem solving.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination and assignments, assessment 0-5
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
4 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning competence
Students are aware of the basic properties of trigonometric functions. They know how to solve rectangular and oblique triangles. They are familiar with the more common plane figures and solid bodies and know how to calculate their areas and volumes.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of geometrical problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. They are competent in graphical illustration of mathematical models. Students are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for geometrical problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Trigonometry:
- Trigonometric functions, especially the sine, cosine and tangent.
- Common trigonometric formulae
- Rectangular and oblique triangles and how to solve them
Plane figures:
- Areas of the more common plane figures
- The concept and application of similarity
- Centre of gravity
- Second moment of area, modulus of section
Space geometry:
- Common solid bodies: cylinder, cone, truncated cone, ball, and their parts
- Calculating volumes and areas
- Scale in three-dimensional space
Materials
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculations and assignments.
Student workload
107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve the sides and angles of a right-angled triangle using the Pythagorean theorem and trigonometric functions. They are able to use the Sine and Cosine rules when calculating an oblique-angled triangle. They master the principles of calculating areas of simple plane figures. They are able to calculate the position of the centroid and moment of inertia of a simple cross section.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply the solution methods of a right-angled and oblique-angled triangle also in a non-standard problems. They are able to calculate the position of the centroid and moment of inertia of a cross section consisting of arbitrary rectangular parts .
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the solution methods of triangles in practical problems. They master the calculation of the position of the centroid and moment of inertia of a cross sections. The student independently searches for information in different sources and utilizes it in practical problem solving.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination and assignments, assessment 0-5
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Timo Mantila
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are aware of the responsibilities of the actors involved in a house building project
Competence in the construction process
Students are aware of the significance of construction in society and they know the actors involved and the stages and progress of a construction project. They are able to seek information independently to develop their communication and interaction skills. Students are also introduced to how to choose a planner and make a planning contract.
Students will be competent in making a project plan and the documents pertaining to construction.
Content
- Parties involved in a construction project
- Scheduling
- General conditions for consulting
- Preliminary planning and planning of a project
- Building design
- Preparing for building
- Construction stage
- Contracts for the various stages in a construction project
Materials
To be announced during the lectures.
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, independent work and assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of construction project management. The student is able to describe how a construction project is developed and at what stages the properties of the project must be influenced, and how. The student is able to make a simple project plan acceptably.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the key aspects of construction project management. The student is able to develop a construction project and to influence the properties of the project at its different stages. The student is able to make a project plan for a project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the key aspects of construction project management very well. The student is able to develop different construction projects and to influence the properties of the project at its different stages. The student is able to make a project plan for a complex project.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises and final exam
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students will be competent in making basic tender calculations and learn the basics of construction production and area planning.
Competence in construction economics
Students will be competent in making basic tender calculations.
Content
- Nomenclature systems
- quantity calculations and pricing
- costs of construction services
- tender calculations
- production planning
- schedules
- general planning of a construction site
- materials deliveries
- financial planning
- monitoring and control
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 134 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make quantity and cost calculations close to the basic level. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make quantity and cost calculations. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make complicated quantity and cost calculations. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students will be competent in making basic tender calculations and learn the basics of construction production and area planning.
Competence in construction economics
Students will be competent in making basic tender calculations.
Content
- Nomenclature systems
- quantity calculations and pricing
- costs of construction services
- tender calculations
- production planning
- schedules
- general planning of a construction site
- materials deliveries
- financial planning
- monitoring and control
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 134 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make quantity and cost calculations close to the basic level. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make quantity and cost calculations. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make complicated quantity and cost calculations. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
17.02.2025 - 16.05.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students will be competent in making basic tender calculations and learn the basics of construction production and area planning.
Competence in construction economics
Students will be competent in making basic tender calculations.
Content
- Nomenclature systems
- quantity calculations and pricing
- costs of construction services
- tender calculations
- production planning
- schedules
- general planning of a construction site
- materials deliveries
- financial planning
- monitoring and control
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures, Assigments, Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 134 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make quantity and cost calculations close to the basic level. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make quantity and cost calculations. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the nomenclature systems used in housing construction. The student is able to make complicated quantity and cost calculations. The student also knows the basics of the planning of construction sites and time-use planning.
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Petri Koistinen
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student knows the principles of the standards concerning structural design
Competence in the structural engineering
The student understands framed systems, how they work and the criteria for choosing an appropriate framed system for a building. They learn about the duties of structural designers and how to determine the basic loads of structures.
Content
- Framed systems
- Requirements set for building frames
- Bracing frames
- Criteria for choosing an appropriate frame
- Loads on structures and load combinations
- Making calculations for structural design
Materials
Eurocodes for the basis of structural design and actions of structures. National documents for applying the Eurocodes as applies.
RIL 201-1-2017.
Other material as indicated by the teacher
Teaching methods
Contact lessons: Lectures and assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to solve assignments related to the basics, which are similar to the assignments dealt with during the course.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In addition to the above-mentioned, the student is able to use the basics included in the course and to apply them in different assignments, and to give reasons for their solutions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the above-mentioned, the student has a comprehensive understanding of the things included in the course. They are able to choose the right methods to problems related to the topicis dealt with during the course and give reasons for their solutions in a logical way.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final exam and approved assignment
Qualifications
Statics. Building Construction.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
The students can communicate in Swedish both orally and in writing in working life situations. They are able to discuss field related topics in Swedish. They are able to develop their expertise using literature as well as other sources in Swedish.
Students:
- can tell about themselves, their education and work experience
- can write a cv and a job application and can handle job interviews
- can write work relevant messages (e.g. e-mails) and manage work related telephone conversations, company presentations and other spoken communication situations
- can use polite phrases
- know the basic terminology of the field
Content
- telling about oneself and one´s studies
- job application, cv, job interview
- polite phrases and small talk
- basic written messages and spoken work life communication (e.g. company presentations, e-mails)
- texts on field specific topics
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Also used: Pietilä: Kontakt - Teknisk svenska. Edita.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course. Oral exam face-to-face.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
81 h. Contact lessons + independent studying and training.
Further information
Compulsory attendance in lessons. Minimum attendance 80 %.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple, partly incoherent and unintelligible.
There are lots of mistakes in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. The main message is conveyed despite the deficiencies, but disturbing influence of other languages. The student masters the most basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, mistakes do not lead to misunderstandings.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Fairly good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The student masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The student masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
The course is assessed on a scale of 1 to 5
- active participation in contact teaching
- written and oral assignments submitted
- oral and written exams passed
After passing the course, the students will get “virkamiesruotsi” (the Swedish language skills described in Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies, Act 424/2003). Oral and written Swedish language skills will then be evaluated separately on a scale of good (4-5) and satisfactory (1-3).
Qualifications
Swedish studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
The students can communicate in Swedish both orally and in writing in working life situations. They are able to discuss field related topics in Swedish. They are able to develop their expertise using literature as well as other sources in Swedish.
Students:
- can tell about themselves, their education and work experience
- can write a cv and a job application and can handle job interviews
- can write work relevant messages (e.g. e-mails) and manage work related telephone conversations, company presentations and other spoken communication situations
- can use polite phrases
- know the basic terminology of the field
Content
- telling about oneself and one´s studies
- job application, cv, job interview
- polite phrases and small talk
- basic written messages and spoken work life communication (e.g. company presentations, e-mails)
- texts on field specific topics
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Also used: Pietilä: Kontakt - Teknisk svenska. Edita.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course. Oral exam face-to-face.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
81 h. Contact lessons + independent studying and training.
Further information
Compulsory attendance in lessons. Minimum attendance 80 %.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
There are lots of major errors in the student's written expression and problems with the fluency of text. Their text is simple, partly incoherent and unintelligible.
There are lots of mistakes in the student's oral expression and the pronunciation differs from that of the target language. The main message is conveyed despite the deficiencies, but disturbing influence of other languages. The student masters the most basic vocabulary and key grammatical structures in a limited way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
There are some minor errors in the student's written expression, but the message is still conveyed without problems. Their text is fluent and consistent, mistakes do not lead to misunderstandings.
There are some mispronunciations and grammatical errors in the student's oral expression, but they do not disturb the conveying of the message. Fairly good, fluent basic language skills, presented relatively spontaneously. Hesitation slows down the student's speech.
The student masters the basic vocabulary and field-specific vocabulary quite well. The student uses key grammatical structures quite faultlessly.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student's written expression is faultless, very fluent, and the student pays attention to stylistic matters required by professional-life communication situations. They also use complex syntactic structures in their text.
There are no mistakes in oral expression. Overall, their speech is spontaneous, fluent narration, which the listener can easily follow. The student reacts in an adequate way in interactive situations.
The student masters a large vocabulary and uses grammatical structures fluently and in a varied way.
Assessment methods and criteria
The course is assessed on a scale of 1 to 5
- active participation in contact teaching
- written and oral assignments submitted
- oral and written exams passed
After passing the course, the students will get “virkamiesruotsi” (the Swedish language skills described in Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies, Act 424/2003). Oral and written Swedish language skills will then be evaluated separately on a scale of good (4-5) and satisfactory (1-3).
Qualifications
Swedish studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Marita Viljanmaa
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in constrution
Students understand the impacts dust, moisture, mould, fibres and gas, which may occur during the various construction phases of a building, have on the health and well-being of humans. They learn to avoid the adverse impacts and dangers of being in buildings during the demolition and consruction phases. They are competent in selecting clean materials and supplies.
Competence in the construction process
Students also learn how to determine the condition of the indoor climate and how to fix problems associated with indoor air.
Content
- Desired values for indoor climate
- Controlling moisture in construction
- Damage caused by moisture and microbes
- Vaporizing organic compounds, dust, asbestos, radon
- Emissions classifications for construction materials and classification of cleanliness for ventilation products
- Clean construction and classification of cleanlines,s defining cleanliness and cleaning, cleaning HVAC systems, surveying the cleanliness of indoor air
- Measuring the amount of moisture and drying techniques
- Eliminating odours
- Impacts of tearing down old constructions on one's health and protecting oneself
- Building for people prone to allergies
Materials
- RT 07-10946 Sisäilmastoluokitus 2008
- Asumisterveysopas, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2008
- RT 07-10805 & RT 07-10832
- Criteria and guidelines for building facilities and homes
- Other material distributed by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignment, exam
Student workload
54 hours
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of indoor air climate and understands the adverse effects of dust, humidity, mold, fibres and gases, occurring at the different stages of construction, on people's health and comfort. The student is familiar with the principles of clean construction and is able to avoid risks during the construction work and the use and demolition of a building, as well as is able to choose clean materials and supplies. They may not fully know the basics.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student also knows methods to survey indoor air and different methods to tackle indoor air problems. The student knows the cleanliness categories for indoor air and their effects on working methods.
The student is able to conduct common analyses and draw conclusions based on their basic knowledge.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student masters well and is able to apply what they have learned. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved assignment and final exam (1-5)
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Marita Viljanmaa
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in constrution
Students understand the impacts dust, moisture, mould, fibres and gas, which may occur during the various construction phases of a building, have on the health and well-being of humans. They learn to avoid the adverse impacts and dangers of being in buildings during the demolition and consruction phases. They are competent in selecting clean materials and supplies.
Competence in the construction process
Students also learn how to determine the condition of the indoor climate and how to fix problems associated with indoor air.
Content
- Desired values for indoor climate
- Controlling moisture in construction
- Damage caused by moisture and microbes
- Vaporizing organic compounds, dust, asbestos, radon
- Emissions classifications for construction materials and classification of cleanliness for ventilation products
- Clean construction and classification of cleanlines,s defining cleanliness and cleaning, cleaning HVAC systems, surveying the cleanliness of indoor air
- Measuring the amount of moisture and drying techniques
- Eliminating odours
- Impacts of tearing down old constructions on one's health and protecting oneself
- Building for people prone to allergies
Materials
- RT 07-10946 Sisäilmastoluokitus 2008
- Asumisterveysopas, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2008
- RT 07-10805 & RT 07-10832
- Criteria and guidelines for building facilities and homes
- Other material distributed by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignment, exam
Student workload
54 hours
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of indoor air climate and understands the adverse effects of dust, humidity, mold, fibres and gases, occurring at the different stages of construction, on people's health and comfort. The student is familiar with the principles of clean construction and is able to avoid risks during the construction work and the use and demolition of a building, as well as is able to choose clean materials and supplies. They may not fully know the basics.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student also knows methods to survey indoor air and different methods to tackle indoor air problems. The student knows the cleanliness categories for indoor air and their effects on working methods.
The student is able to conduct common analyses and draw conclusions based on their basic knowledge.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student masters well and is able to apply what they have learned. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Approved assignment and final exam (1-5)
Qualifications
No previous studies are required.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student recognizes a typical statically indeterminate bar structure.
Competence in structural engineering
The student will be competent in recognising statically indeterminate bar structures. They will know how to solve strains, displacements and internal forces of statically indeterminate bar structures in different load cases.
Content
• Degree of statical indeterminancy
• Force method
• Sway- and non-sway structure
• Moment method
• Temperature effects
• Effect of support movement
Materials
Lecturer's material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculation exercises. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 107 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student identifies statically indeterminate frame structures. The student is able to determine the degree of statical indeterminancy and lateral expansion. The student is able to solve stresses of a simple statically indeterminate structure.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to apply different methods to solve statically indeterminate beams, trusses and frames.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply very well different methods to solve statically indeterminate beams, trusses and frames.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student identifies statically indeterminate frame structures. The student is able to determine the degree of statical indeterminancy and lateral expansion. The student is able to solve stresses of a simple statically indeterminate structure.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply different methods to solve statically indeterminate beams, trusses and frames.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to apply very well different methods to solve statically indeterminate beams, trusses and frames.
Qualifications
Statics, Linear Algebra.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student knows different bar structures (beam, truss and frame).
Competence in structural engineering
Students will be competent in correctly using basic variables in statics, drawing free body diagrams for structures and forming equilibrium equations for simple bar structures such as trusses, beams and frames. Moreover, they will be able to define stress resultant diagrams for simple bar structures using equilibrium equations.
Content
- Force, components of force and force resultants
- Momentum and force couple
- Free body diagram
- Equilibrium equations
- Surface center of area
- Support reactions
- Recognising a statically determinate structure
- Member forces of truss structure
- Internal forces and stress resultant diagrams of beam- and frame structures
- Inclined beam
- Pinned beam and -frame
- Linearly changing load
Materials
Tapio Salmi: Statiikka. Pressus Oy, Tampere.
Hannu Outinen: Statiikka tekniikan opiskelijoita varten, Osat 1 ja 2, Pressus Oy, Tampere.
Hannu Outinen: Mekaniikan harjoitustehtäviä, I osa Statiikka, Pressus Oy, Tampere.
R.C. Hibbeler: Engineering Mechanics, Statics, 13th Edition. Prentice Hall.
Lecturer's material.
Teaching methods
Lectures and calculation exercises. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to use the general principles of statics to solve simple problems in a satisfactory way.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the general principles of statics to define the stress of bar, lattice and framed structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the general principles of statics very well to define the stress of bar, lattice and framed structures.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the general principles of statics to solve simple problems in a satisfactory way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the general principles of statics to define the stress of bar, lattice and framed structures.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to use the general principles of statics very well to define the stress of bar, lattice and framed structures.
Qualifications
Algebra in Construction Technology, Geometry, Mechanics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 06.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Marita Viljanmaa
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students understand and consider occupational safety on construction site.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in starting a construction project, they know common frame structures, the related practices and quality requirements. Students know how structural members of frames and custom structures are constructed. They are familiar with supplementary structures and their quality requirements. Students have knowledge of surface treatments and materials, they know the working conditions and the quality technology of a finished building.
Competence in structural engineering
Students are familiar with the regulations on fire resistance, sound insulation and heat insulation.
Content
- Fire resistance of buildings and building materials
- Heat and sound insulation requirements
- Foundations
- Base floor structures
- Frame structures: wood, concrete, masonry, steel
- Supplementary structures: non-load-bearing structures, windows, doors, fixtures, roofs and facades
- Custom structures
- Site visits
Materials
Building Information Index (assigned parts)
Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma RakMK:
Other material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, possible site visits. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of building construction, yet possibly with some minor imperfections. The student knows the risks in building construction, their effects, the right outfit, and the work methods. The student knows the starting assignments at the building site and the common foundation and frame structure solutions, work assignments and quality requirements. The student knows the building regulations concerning fire safety categories, sound insulation, and thermal insulation. The student knows the machinery and equipment used.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the basics and key working methods of building construction. The student masters the modes of implementation and the solutions of structures based on usual foundations, framework, and roof covering. The student knows the completing elements of a building and their quality requirements. The student knows surface materials, the right working conditions, and their effects on the quality of building. The student knows the classification of an emergency center.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They are also able to analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment scale 1-5 for the examination
Pass/fail for the assignment.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students understand and consider occupational safety on construction site.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in starting a construction project, they know common frame structures, the related practices and quality requirements. Students know how structural members of frames and custom structures are constructed. They are familiar with supplementary structures and their quality requirements. Students have knowledge of surface treatments and materials, they know the working conditions and the quality technology of a finished building.
Competence in structural engineering
Students are familiar with the regulations on fire resistance, sound insulation and heat insulation.
Content
- Fire resistance of buildings and building materials
- Heat and sound insulation requirements
- Foundations
- Base floor structures
- Frame structures: wood, concrete, masonry, steel
- Supplementary structures: non-load-bearing structures, windows, doors, fixtures, roofs and facades
- Custom structures
- Site visits
Materials
Building Information Index (assigned parts) Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma RakMK,
Other material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of building construction, yet possibly with some minor imperfections. The student knows the risks in building construction, their effects, the right outfit, and the work methods. The student knows the starting assignments at the building site and the common foundation and frame structure solutions, work assignments and quality requirements. The student knows the building regulations concerning fire safety categories, sound insulation, and thermal insulation. The student knows the machinery and equipment used.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the basics and key working methods of building construction. The student masters the modes of implementation and the solutions of structures based on usual foundations, framework, and roof covering. The student knows the completing elements of a building and their quality requirements. The student knows surface materials, the right working conditions, and their effects on the quality of building. The student knows the classification of an emergency center.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They are also able to analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 06.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Marita Viljanmaa
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students understand and consider occupational safety on construction site.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in starting a construction project, they know common frame structures, the related practices and quality requirements. Students know how structural members of frames and custom structures are constructed. They are familiar with supplementary structures and their quality requirements. Students have knowledge of surface treatments and materials, they know the working conditions and the quality technology of a finished building.
Competence in structural engineering
Students are familiar with the regulations on fire resistance, sound insulation and heat insulation.
Content
- Fire resistance of buildings and building materials
- Heat and sound insulation requirements
- Foundations
- Base floor structures
- Frame structures: wood, concrete, masonry, steel
- Supplementary structures: non-load-bearing structures, windows, doors, fixtures, roofs and facades
- Custom structures
- Site visits
Materials
Building Information Index (assigned parts)
Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma RakMK:
Other material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, possible site visits. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of building construction, yet possibly with some minor imperfections. The student knows the risks in building construction, their effects, the right outfit, and the work methods. The student knows the starting assignments at the building site and the common foundation and frame structure solutions, work assignments and quality requirements. The student knows the building regulations concerning fire safety categories, sound insulation, and thermal insulation. The student knows the machinery and equipment used.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the basics and key working methods of building construction. The student masters the modes of implementation and the solutions of structures based on usual foundations, framework, and roof covering. The student knows the completing elements of a building and their quality requirements. The student knows surface materials, the right working conditions, and their effects on the quality of building. The student knows the classification of an emergency center.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They are also able to analyze connections between the things they have learned. The student is able to make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment scale 1-5 for the examination
Pass/fail for the assignment.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students are able to read blueprints of building engineering. Students recognize most typical building installations and know their selection criteria. Students perceive the role of building engineering in the construction process and in the building's maintenance.
Content
- Symbols used in the blueprints for building engineering
- Most typical HVAC, electrical and fire safety systems.
- Consideration of Building Installations on construction sites
- When choosing devices, efficiency and energy efficiency must be considered
- Taking building technical services into account on a site
- Municipal engineering services
- Construction site visits
Materials
As indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures and assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 53 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of building engineering. The student knows the symbols used in blueprints and understands the importance of building engineering in a construction project.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read technical building blueprints related to new construction and renovation. The student is able to take the requirements of building engineering into account in building.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well and is able to apply what they have learned. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Planning
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 07.03.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students are able to read blueprints of building engineering. Students recognize most typical building installations and know their selection criteria. Students perceive the role of building engineering in the construction process and in the building's maintenance.
Content
- Symbols used in the blueprints for building engineering
- Most typical HVAC, electrical and fire safety systems.
- Consideration of Building Installations on construction sites
- When choosing devices, efficiency and energy efficiency must be considered
- Taking building technical services into account on a site
- Municipal engineering services
- Construction site visits
Materials
As indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 53 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of building engineering. The student knows the symbols used in blueprints and understands the importance of building engineering in a construction project.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read technical building blueprints related to new construction and renovation. The student is able to take the requirements of building engineering into account in building.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well and is able to apply what they have learned. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Planning
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Arto Saariaho
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
Students are able to read blueprints of building engineering. Students recognize most typical building installations and know their selection criteria. Students perceive the role of building engineering in the construction process and in the building's maintenance.
Content
- Symbols used in the blueprints for building engineering
- Most typical HVAC, electrical and fire safety systems.
- Consideration of Building Installations on construction sites
- When choosing devices, efficiency and energy efficiency must be considered
- Taking building technical services into account on a site
- Municipal engineering services
- Construction site visits
Materials
As indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures and exercises.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 53 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of building engineering. The student knows the symbols used in blueprints and understands the importance of building engineering in a construction project.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to read technical building blueprints related to new construction and renovation. The student is able to take the requirements of building engineering into account in building.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student masters well and is able to apply what they have learned. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Planning
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Learning competence
Students are competent in basic percentage calculation. They know how to calculate simple and compound interests. They apply various investment calculation methods to evaluate profitability of investments. Students are able to interpret indexes and to apply them to monetary value calculation. They are familiar with the more common statistical indicators and their use in the analysis of measurement results. Students are competent in the basic use of the more common mathematical calculation software.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of business mathematical and statistical problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. Students are competent in graphical illustration of business mathematical and statistical research results and able to apply indicators to summarise data. Students are able to make economic decisions based on business mathematical and statistical observations. They are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for business mathematical and statistical problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Business mathematics:
- Basic percentage calculations
- Percentage changes
- Simple and compound interest
- Discount
- Methods for evaluating the profitability of investments
- Indexes
Statistics:
- Common statistical key figures
- Concepts and applications related to average, dispersion, correlation and regression
- Common statistical distributions
- Statistical research: planning, implementation, analysis of the results and reporting
- Measurement errors and their management
Mathematical software
- Microsoft Excel
Materials
Tekniikan Kaavasto, Tammertekniikka.
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculations, computer work and assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of simple calculation of interest and compound interest. They are able to calculate indicators needed in statistical analysis from measuring data.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use methods of calculation of interest to solve practical problems. They are able to use statistical analysis methods needed in the processing of measuring data.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student masters calculation of interest well and is able to use investment calculation methods in investment profitability calculations. They are able to search for information about statistical analysis methods to solve practical problems of different types.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination and assigments, assessment 0-5
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Juhani Paananen
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Learning competence
Students are competent in basic percentage calculation. They know how to calculate simple and compound interests. They apply various investment calculation methods to evaluate profitability of investments. Students are able to interpret indexes and to apply them to monetary value calculation. They are familiar with the more common statistical indicators and their use in the analysis of measurement results. Students are competent in the basic use of the more common mathematical calculation software.
Working community competence
Students are able to present the stages of business mathematical and statistical problem solving orally and in writing and also via online and virtual communication. Students are competent in graphical illustration of business mathematical and statistical research results and able to apply indicators to summarise data. Students are able to make economic decisions based on business mathematical and statistical observations. They are able to function in various groups and teams and to manage teams, which seek solutions for business mathematical and statistical problems.
Quality management competence
Students are able to apply both exact and approximate methods to determine the correctness of mathematical work. Students know how to estimate the inaccuracy of measurements and take it into consideration.
Content
Business mathematics:
- Basic percentage calculations
- Percentage changes
- Simple and compound interest
- Discount
- Methods for evaluating the profitability of investments
- Indexes
Statistics:
- Common statistical key figures
- Concepts and applications related to average, dispersion, correlation and regression
- Common statistical distributions
- Statistical research: planning, implementation, analysis of the results and reporting
- Measurement errors and their management
Mathematical software
- Microsoft Excel
Materials
Tekniikan Kaavasto, Tammertekniikka.
Lecture material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculations, computer work and assignments
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of simple calculation of interest and compound interest. They are able to calculate indicators needed in statistical analysis from measuring data.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use methods of calculation of interest to solve practical problems. They are able to use statistical analysis methods needed in the processing of measuring data.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student masters calculation of interest well and is able to use investment calculation methods in investment profitability calculations. They are able to search for information about statistical analysis methods to solve practical problems of different types.
Assessment methods and criteria
Final examination and assigments, assessment 0-5
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
Student groups
-
RKM22
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student is competent in making cost estimates.
Competence in construction economics
The student is competent in counting cost estimates.
Content
- Calculations pertaining to the construction job using the nomenclature system
- Quantity calculations and pricing
- Costs for construction management duties and jobs around a construction site
- Writing up an tender
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Individual working
Project work
Individual project work
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to calculate quantities for a construction site and the expenses of their implementation. The student is able to calculate the operating and joint costs of a construction site.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to make more demanding quantity and cost calculations for a construction site. The student is able to plan functions of the site and, based on that, calculate the operating and joint costs of a construction site for the project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to make very demanding quantity and cost calculations for a construction site. The student is able to plan functions of the site and, based on that, calculate the operating and joint costs of a construction site for the project.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Jarkko Piikkilä
Student groups
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student is competent in making cost estimates.
Competence in construction economics
The student is competent in counting cost estimates.
Content
- Calculations pertaining to the construction job using the nomenclature system
- Quantity calculations and pricing
- Costs for construction management duties and jobs around a construction site
- Writing up an tender
Materials
Material distributed by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Individual working
Project work
Individual project work
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 hour
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to calculate quantities for a construction site and the expenses of their implementation. The student is able to calculate the operating and joint costs of a construction site.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to make more demanding quantity and cost calculations for a construction site. The student is able to plan functions of the site and, based on that, calculate the operating and joint costs of a construction site for the project.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to make very demanding quantity and cost calculations for a construction site. The student is able to plan functions of the site and, based on that, calculate the operating and joint costs of a construction site for the project.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exercises are evaluated based on the criteria set for the course on a scale of 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Veli Autio
- Martti Perälä
Student groups
-
RAK22SUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student will make use of computer programmes in the designing process of steel structures.
Competence in structural engineering
Students will be competent in designing steel structures in ultimate and serviceability limit states according to the eurocodes. Students will be competent in designing joints for steel structures according to eurocodes.
Content
- Steel as building material
- Strength and elastic properties of structural steel
- Steel grades
- Cross-section classes
- Resistance of cross-section under tension, compression, bending, shearing and torsion
- Resistance of cross-section under combination of internal forces
- Designing for deflection
- Resistance in case of stability phenomena as buckling and lateral torsional buckling
- Basics of designing bolted connections
- Basics of designing welded connections
- Bracing of steel structures
- Using computer programmes in the designing of steel structures
- Laboratory work
Materials
Eurocodes and corresponding national annexes for steel structures.
Lecturer's material.
Hitsatut profiilit EN 1993 -käsikirja, Ruukki.
Rakenneputket EN 1993 -käsikirja, Ruukki.
Teräsrakenteiden suunnittelu- ja mitoitus Eurocode 3 -oppikirja, TRY.
N.S. Trahair, M.A. Bradford, D.A. Nethercot, L. Gardner: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3, Taylor and Francis.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculation exercises, designing exercise and laboratory exercise. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for steel structures in a simple basic dimensioning situation. The student is able to define the cross-section class.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for steel structures in the dimensioning of different bar structures.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the Eurocode for steel structures very well in the dimensioning of different bar structures, paying attention to the stability of the structures.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam and designing exercise.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for steel structures in a simple basic dimensioning situation. The student is able to define the cross-section class.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the Eurocode for steel structures in the dimensioning of different bar structures.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to apply the Eurocode for steel structures very well in the dimensioning of different bar structures, paying attention to the stability of the structures.
Qualifications
Statics, Strength of Materials, Statically indeterminate frame structures, Framework Systems and Basics of Structural Design.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Martti Perälä
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 5. Open UAS: 5.)
Student groups
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Competence in the construction process
The student will make use of computer programmes in the designing process of steel structures.
Competence in structural engineering
Students will be competent in designing more demanding design cases. Students will be competent in designing more complicated joints for steel structures according to Eurocodes. They will also be competent in making use of plasticity in the designing process.
Content
- Resistance of steel member under combination of internal forces when stability phenomena are critical
- Resistance in local buckling
- Design of bracings in steel structures
- Designing steel connections (continuation for basics)
- Basics of fire design for steel structures
- Using computer programmes in the designing of steel structures
Materials
Eurocodes and corresponding national annexes for steel structures. Lecturer's material. Hitsatut profiilit EN 1993 -käsikirja, Ruukki. Rakenneputket EN 1993 -käsikirja, Ruukki. Teräsrakenteiden suunnittelu- ja mitoitus Eurocode 3 -oppikirja, TRY.
Teaching methods
Lectures, calculation exercises and homeworks. Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of steel structures in basic bar design situations and in the design of simple joints.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of steel structures in basic bar design situations, the design of joints, and fire protection design.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to apply the Eurocode of steel structures very well in the design of different bar structures, the design of joints, fire protection design, and in design in the presence of combined stress factors, paying attention to the stability of the structures.
Assessment methods and criteria
Two mid-term exams or one final exam. Home works.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of steel structures in basic bar design situations and in the design of simple joints.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to use the Eurocode of steel structures in basic bar design situations, the design of joints, and fire protection design.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is able to apply the Eurocode of steel structures very well in the design of different bar structures, the design of joints, fire protection design, and in design in the presence of combined stress factors, paying attention to the stability of the structures.
Qualifications
Steel Structures 1, Strength of Materials, Basics of FEM.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 13.12.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Juho Lohilahti
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
- The student is able to use office software, various online services and online learning environment, taking into account data protection and copyright issues.
- The student will be able to apply basic IT skills in new hardware and software environments
Content
Introduction to office software
Word processing
- settings according to the instructions for written work
- document standard
Spreadsheet
- calculation models
- diagrams
Presentation graphics
- presentation content and structure
- presentation settings
Use of online services
Cloud computing
- web conferencing as a working tool
Data protection
Copyright
Materials
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Face-to-face teaching, lectures, class assignments.
Exercises to be done on your own time
Student workload
107h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students will identify the most common office software and online services. The student will be able to use simple basic office software and understand the importance of data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student will be able to identify the use of office software and online services and understand how they work and how they can be used as tools for personal work. The student is able to use office software in a variety of situations, taking into account data protection and copyright.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student will identify office software and online services and understand how they can be used. The student is able to apply office software and online services independently and in a variety of ways, taking into account data protection and copyright issues in different situations.
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation: The approved course is evaluated with a grade of 1-5.
Things that affect the evaluation: Exam, exercises, class exercises, attendance
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
- Anu Latva-Reinikka
Student groups
-
RAK21TUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
-
RAK21SUInsinööri (AMK), Rakennustekniikka
Objective
The student is able to
- identify differences in scientific and everyday thinking
- define different approaches to research and basics concepts of research
- present the stages of a research process and reporting (structure)
- explain the importance of critical thinking in research and development work
- give examples of the meaning of research ethics
Content
- scientific and everyday thinking
- general research ethics
- central research methods
- basic concepts and structure of research
- states of research process and report
- research&development approach to work
Materials
- Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15th edition. Helsinki: Tammi.
- material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
- contact lessons
- lectures
- reading and analysing research reports and articles in the student's own field
- independent work
- groupwork
Student workload
54 h
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
- Pass/fail
Pass:
The student demonstrates the competencies defined as the learning goals of the course and acceptably carries out the possible assignments related to the course.
Fail:
The student does not achieve the learning goals of the course and is not able to demonstrate their competencies.
Assessment methods and criteria
- written learning assignments
- active participation
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anne Vuokila
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
- The students can describe their own education both orally and in writing.
- The students are familiar with the job application process and the related vocabulary.
- The students recognize the different levels of formality and are able to use formal style in professional communication.
- The students can communicate politely and professionally both on the phone and when writing emails.
- The students are familiar with the vocabulary related to meetings and negotiations.
- The students are able to give presentations on field related topics.
- The students know the most central vocabulary of their field of education and are able to use it both orally and in writing
Content
- effective communication
- education and work
- meetings and negotiations
- customer contacts
- presentations
- field-related terminology
Materials
- Isaacs, Pesso, Rasimus, Rönkä: Engineer Your English. Edita. Latest edition or the electronic version.
- Other material as indicated by the teacher.
Teaching methods
Classroom teaching: oral and written exercices and task by working individually, in pairs and in small groups.
Exam schedules
Exam will be taken during the last lessons of the course. A failed exam can be retaken twice within a year after the course has ended.
Student workload
Contact lessons 28h. Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Further information
As a starting point: upper secondary school studies, or corresponding level in English language.
Attendance in classroom teaching required.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
1
Comprehensibility
Expressing thoughts by separate comprehensible sentences which do not always form a logical whole. Incoherence, insufficiency and/or defectiveness of the text disturb.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Usually communicating in a comprehensible manner although defects and ambiguity occur.
Structures
Satisfactorily using structures and using basic structures rather well although the influence of other languages may be clearly detectable. Despite mistakes, message is conveyed.
Speech
Giving a short, simple, and rehearsed presentation. Usually pronouncing in a comprehensible manner despite errors.
2
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper, although it does not meet in all respects the demands of the communication situation.
Vocabulary
Satisfactorily using the basic vocabulary of the field of expertise and occupational environment although often only with verbal aids. Lapses do not disturb understanding.
Structures
Command of grammatical structures relatively good. Lapses do not cause misunderstandings.
Speech
Speaking in a consistent manner – frequent pauses or corrections may occur. Pronouncing in a comprehensible manner although with a clear foreign accent.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
3
Comprehensibility
Text is predominantly clear, coherent, and stylistically proper with systematic development of argument.
Vocabulary
Using wide field specific vocabulary, but inaccuracy may occur in the choice of words. Paraphrasing so that it helps deliver the message.
Structures
Usually using structures properly although lapses may occur in sentence structures, but this usually does not cause misunderstanding.
Speech
Describing various subjects in his/her own words in an uninterrupted, detailed, and clear manner although with some occasional hesitation. Pronouncing in a clear and natural manner.
4
Comprehensibility
Text is clear, precise, and well structured. Various professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary
Skillfully using a wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment
using idiomatic expressions or finding alternative expressions although small occasional lapses in vocabulary may occur.
Structures
Skillfully using varied structures although occasional lapses occur in more demanding structures.
Speech
Expressing oneself in a rather effortless manner using appropriate verbal expressions. Pronouncing in a very rich and natural manner using natural and varying rhythm and stress to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Comprehensibility:
Text is very clear, precise, and well structured. Various and demanding professional topics are handled fluently. The used style has been chosen according to the communication situation and recipient.
Vocabulary:
Text is written using a very wide range of vocabulary in relation to the field of expertise and occupational environment. Idiomatic expressions are used correctly and effortlessly.
Structures:
Varied structures are used very well and precisely.
Speech:
Thoughts are expressed spontaneously, very fluently and precisely. Pronouncing is very fluent and natural. Natural and varying intonation and stress are used to indicate different shades of meaning.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written exam, oral presentation, active partisipation in lessons.
Qualifications
English studies at an upper secondary school or corresponding knowledge gained otherwise.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
RKM22
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing construction sites. They know how to draw up a site plan.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing construction sites. They know how to draw up construction site, target and work technique plans. They know how to utilize virtual environment in drawing up a site plan.
Competence in repair construction
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing repair construction sites. They know how to draw up construction site, target and work technique plans for repair construction.
Content
- planning site technology
- site plan
- target planning
- planning techniques to be used
- HVAC, plumbing, automation and electricity
- schedule and financial planning
Materials
Rakentamisen tuotantotekniikka, RATU-kortisto
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits
Contact lessons.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of site engineering, yet possibly with minor imperfections. The student is able to make a construction site plan and knows seasonal variation.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to make a construction site plan and do project and method planning. The student knows the basics of site engineering and seasonal variation, its effects on building, and the properties of a repair construction site. The student is able to pay attention to factors with effects on the quality of building and to common problems. The student is able to pay attention to dangers and risks caused by the work stages and working methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 20.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
MRKM22
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing construction sites. They know how to draw up a site plan.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing construction sites. They know how to draw up construction site, target and work technique plans. They know how to utilize virtual environment in drawing up a site plan.
Competence in repair construction
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing repair construction sites. They know how to draw up construction site, target and work technique plans for repair construction.
Content
- planning site technology
- site plan
- target planning
- planning techniques to be used
- HVAC, plumbing, automation and electricity
- schedule and financial planning
Materials
Building Information Index (assigned parts) Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma.
Other material as indicated by the lecturer
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits
Contact lessons.
Employer connections
assignments on the construction site and site visits
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of site engineering, yet possibly with minor imperfections. The student is able to make a construction site plan and knows seasonal variation.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to make a construction site plan and do project and method planning. The student knows the basics of site engineering and seasonal variation, its effects on building, and the properties of a repair construction site. The student is able to pay attention to factors with effects on the quality of building and to common problems. The student is able to pay attention to dangers and risks caused by the work stages and working methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assessment scale 1-5 for the examination: students must have 33% correct to pass and pass/fail for the assignment.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 21.02.2025
Credits
5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Olli Isopahkala
Student groups
-
RAK22TUBachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Occupational and environmental safety in construction
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing construction sites. They know how to draw up a site plan.
Competence in the construction process
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing construction sites. They know how to draw up construction site, target and work technique plans. They know how to utilize virtual environment in drawing up a site plan.
Competence in repair construction
Students are competent in the issues pertaining to managing repair construction sites. They know how to draw up construction site, target and work technique plans for repair construction.
Content
- planning site technology
- site plan
- target planning
- planning techniques to be used
- HVAC, plumbing, automation and electricity
- schedule and financial planning
Materials
Rakentamisen tuotantotekniikka, RATU-kortisto
Lecturer's own material
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, site visits
Contact lessons.
Employer connections
assignments on the construction site and site visits
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 134 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has the basic knowledge of site engineering, yet possibly with minor imperfections. The student is able to make a construction site plan and knows seasonal variation.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is able to make a construction site plan and do project and method planning. The student knows the basics of site engineering and seasonal variation, its effects on building, and the properties of a repair construction site. The student is able to pay attention to factors with effects on the quality of building and to common problems. The student is able to pay attention to dangers and risks caused by the work stages and working methods.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments and examination, the assessment scale is 1-5.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Exam failed or not taken. tasks not submitted.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has the basic knowledge of site engineering, yet possibly with minor imperfections. The student is able to make a construction site plan and knows seasonal variation
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to make a construction site plan and do project and method planning. The student knows the basics of site engineering and seasonal variation, its effects on building, and the properties of a repair construction site. The student is able to pay attention to factors with effects on the quality of building and to common problems. The student is able to pay attention to dangers and risks caused by the work stages and working methods.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
In addition to the abilities above, the student has a good command of what they have learned and is able to apply it. They can also analyze the connections between different things. The student can make diversified analyses and draw conclusions based on what they have learned.
Qualifications
Construction Economics.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Paula Pihlaja
Student groups
-
RKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
Competence in the Construction Process
Students are competent in duties on sites as defined by labour protection and occupational safety regulations.
Competence in Repair Construction
Students are competent in duties on repair construction sites as defined by labour protection and occupational safety regulations.
Content
- Occupational Safety and Health Act
- Government decision on the safety of construction work
- Occupational Safety Card
Materials
Occupational Safety and Health Act, Government documents VNp 629/94 and VNa 426/04 : rakennustyön turvallisuus, STMp 156/98 - telineiden ja kaiteiden käyttö rakennustyössä, VNp 578/03 : elementtirakentamisen työturvallisuus
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of occupational safety on a construction site and is able to act safely on a site. The student knows the responsibilities and obligations of the parties to a construction project in occupational safety. The student has participated in the safety level measurement at a construction site and knows how measurement is done on a simple construction site.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the key matters related to occupational safety on a construction site. The student is able to act safely on a site and shows good safety thinking in their action. The student knows the responsibilities and obligations of the parties to a construction project in occupational safety. The student has participated in the safety level measurement on a construction site and is able to do a measurement on a construction site.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the key matters related to occupational safety on a construction site in a comprehensive way. The student is able to act safely on a site and shows good safety thinking in their action. The student knows the responsibilities and obligations of the parties to a construction project in occupational safety. The student has participated in the safety level measurement on a construction site and is able to do a measurement even on a challenging construction site. The student is able to develop occupational safety and related functions.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments, examination. Assessment 1-5.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Paula Pihlaja
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
Competence in the Construction Process
Students are competent in duties on sites as defined by labour protection and occupational safety regulations.
Competence in Repair Construction
Students are competent in duties on repair construction sites as defined by labour protection and occupational safety regulations.
Content
- Occupational Safety and Health Act
- Government decision on the safety of construction work
- Occupational Safety Card
Materials
Occupational Safety and Health Act, Government documents VNp 629/94 and VNa 426/04 : rakennustyön turvallisuus, STMp 156/98 - telineiden ja kaiteiden käyttö rakennustyössä, VNp 578/03 : elementtirakentamisen työturvallisuus
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments.
Student workload
Total work load of the course: 80 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student knows the basics of occupational safety on a construction site and is able to act safely on a site. The student knows the responsibilities and obligations of the parties to a construction project in occupational safety. The student has participated in the safety level measurement at a construction site and knows how measurement is done on a simple construction site.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student knows the key matters related to occupational safety on a construction site. The student is able to act safely on a site and shows good safety thinking in their action. The student knows the responsibilities and obligations of the parties to a construction project in occupational safety. The student has participated in the safety level measurement on a construction site and is able to do a measurement on a construction site.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student knows the key matters related to occupational safety on a construction site in a comprehensive way. The student is able to act safely on a site and shows good safety thinking in their action. The student knows the responsibilities and obligations of the parties to a construction project in occupational safety. The student has participated in the safety level measurement on a construction site and is able to do a measurement even on a challenging construction site. The student is able to develop occupational safety and related functions.
Assessment methods and criteria
Assignments, examination. Assessment 1-5.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
07.01.2025 - 21.02.2025
Credits
2 op
Teaching languages
- roo.sv
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Petra Syri
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
The student knows the basic grammatical structures and essential daily vocabulary.
The student is able to find information on the language.
Content
- the most essential grammatical structures
- key daily vocabulary
Materials
Material for the course on Moodle.
The material will be provided by the teacher.
Teaching methods
- contact lessons, spoken and written exercises, group and pair work
- independent learning
Exam schedules
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course.
A failed exam can be retaken twice.
Student workload
54 h.
Necessary amount of Independent studying and training in addition to the contact lessons.
Further information
Prerequisites: Previous studies of Swedish language at the upper secondary level of education. Students have the basics of Swedish, but the level of language skills is lower than CEFR B1.
The course helps pass the Swedish course, which is part of the degree.
Mandatory attendance is 50% in the course.
Written exam in virtual Exam-room at the end of the course.
Skills demonstration not possible.
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has a one-sided command of the basic vocabulary and grammar.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student has a fairly good command of the vocabulary of standard language. The student uses basic structures of the language almost without mistakes.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has a good command of vocabulary and uses structures fluently.
Assessment methods and criteria
The course is assessed pass/fail.
Written exam and exercises.
Students must pass the exam and exercises.
Pass: exercises submitted and passed. exam passed
Fail: exercises not submitted, and exam failed or not taken. Attendance is less than the mandatory 50%.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 24.11.2024
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
RAK24Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
- Juholin, E. (2022). Communicare! Ota viestinnän ilmiöt ja strategiat haltuun (8. uud. p.). Infor / Management Institute of Finland MIF.
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work https://seamk.libguides.com/KirjallistenToidenOhje
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielijelppi http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Opintokeskus Sivis https://www.kokouskaytannot.fi/
Teaching methods
Contact lessons
Independent study: data acquisition and exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exams
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
108 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written and spoken assignments
Online exams
Active participation in the assignments and submitting the assignments on time
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE24ABachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
- Juholin, E. (2022). Communicare! Ota viestinnän ilmiöt ja strategiat haltuun (8. uud. p.). Infor / Management Institute of Finland MIF.
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work https://seamk.libguides.com/KirjallistenToidenOhje
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielijelppi http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Opintokeskus Sivis https://www.kokouskaytannot.fi/
Teaching methods
Contact lessons
Independent study: data acquisition and exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exams
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
108 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written and spoken assignments
Online exams
Active participation in the assignments and submitting the assignments on time
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 23.02.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Anna Vierula
Student groups
-
KONE24BBachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Materials
- Material provided by the teacher
- Juholin, E. (2022). Communicare! Ota viestinnän ilmiöt ja strategiat haltuun (8. uud. p.). Infor / Management Institute of Finland MIF.
- SeAMK's Instructions for Written Work https://seamk.libguides.com/KirjallistenToidenOhje
- Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/
- Kielijelppi http://www.kielijelppi.fi/
- Opintokeskus Sivis https://www.kokouskaytannot.fi/
Teaching methods
Contact lessons
Independent study: data acquisition and exercises
Written and spoken individual and group assignments
Online exams
Completion alternatives
Demonstrations of competencies
Student workload
108 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Written and spoken assignments
Online exams
Active participation in the assignments and submitting the assignments on time
Self assessment
Peer assessment
Enrollment
11.11.2024 - 15.01.2025
Timing
07.01.2025 - 27.04.2025
Credits
4 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Health Care, Nursing
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
- Bachelor of Hospitality Management
- Bachelor of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Rural Enterprises
- Bachelor of Engineering, Information Technology
- Bachelor of Engineering, Automation Engineering
- Bachelor of Engineering, Food Processing and Biotechnology
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
Teachers
- Helena Myllymäki
Student groups
-
MAGRO25Bachelor of Natural Resources
Objective
The student can
- act adequately in different public presentation and group communication situations
- act in interactive situations in digital environments, too
- analyse and assess communication skills as part of professional growth
- produce formal style text and apply SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Content
- Communication style analysis
- Public presentation skills and interaction
- Group communication skills (e.g., meetings and negotiations, incl. online)
- Principles of a digital environment and interaction
- Production of formal style texts
- SeAMK’s Instructions for Written Work
Materials
Juholin, E. (2022). Communicare! Ota viestinnän ilmiöt ja strategiat haltuun (8. uud. p.). Infor / Management Institute of Finland MIF.; Kielitoimiston ohjepankki (Kotus) http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/; Opintokeskus Sivis https://www.kokouskaytannot.fi/; SeAMKin kirjallisten töiden ohje https://seamk.libguides.com/KirjallistenToidenOhje
Teaching methods
Team learning
Student workload
108 h
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student can communicate in a sender-focused manner: they cannot pay sufficient attention to the goal, receiver, or situation. Text structure is incoherent and illogical, and argumentation is biased and scarce. Illustration is limited and irrelevant. The student can only assess their communication from the perspective of the sender of the message. They recognise the principles of digital communication only partially.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
In their communication, the student can only partially pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message. Can maintain interaction in communication. Recognises to some extent the cultural-specific character of communication. Can take the principles of digital communication into account. Text structure is mainly clear and consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate. The student can assess their communication to some extent and partly in a realistic way.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
In their communication, the student can pay attention to the goal, situation, and the receiver of the message in a commendable and convincing manner, they can act responsibly and according to the agreed principles. Interaction in communication is very skilful. Can recognise the cultural-specific character of communication. Masters the policies of digital communication and can apply them. Text structure is typical of the genre, text is logical, clear, coherent, and argumentation is varied, unbiased, and convincing. consistent, and argumentation is varied and trustworthy. Illustration is adequate, efficient, and thought-out. The student can assess their own communication in a varied and realistic way from the perspective of the goal, purpose, receiver, and their own professional field.
Assessment methods and criteria
Self and peer aevaluation, teacher's evaluation
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Communication is sender orientated; student is not able to take the objective, recipient or the situation into account sufficiently. The structure of the academic texts is disconnected and illogical. Argumentation is biased and scant. The student is not able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess communication only from the viewpoint of the sender of the message.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student is able to take the objective, recipient and the situation into account in most parts. Student is able to uphold interaction and is able to recognize some cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts is mainly consistent and coherent. Argumentation is versatile and convincing. Student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts sufficiently. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills for the most part.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Student is very good at taking the objective, recipient and the situation into account. Student is able to perform in accordance with the agreed upon method. Interaction in communication situations is very skilled. The student recognizes the cultural aspects of communication. The structure of the academic texts complies with the given instructions, and is logical and cohesive. Argumentation is versatile and convincing and takes different viewpoints into account. The student is able to illustrate required parts of the texts effectively and in a considered way. Student is able to assess his/her communication skills with regard to professional field.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Rak Nimeämätön
Student groups
-
RKM23Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Objective
The student
- is able to describe the prerequisites of a profitable business activity
- is able to describe the main features of entrepreneurship and reflect on personal aims and strengths
- knows the stages of the establishment of a company
- knows the challenges of building trade as a small-scale entrepreneur
- understands the meaning of bookkeeping in operations
- is able to draw up a tender in construction
- is able to present and market business activities
- knows the financing options of a business activity
Content
- personal relationship to entrepreneurship
- the meaning of entrepreneurship in the society
- business plan
- stakeholders
- understanding the activities of competitors
- accountability
- risk assessment
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to describe and reflect on entrepreneurship and business activities
- knows the financing options of a business activity, bookkeeping
- knows the stages of the establishment of a company
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to assess personal possibilities to act as entrepreneur
- is able to assess possibilities for entrepreneurship and starting a business
- is able to recognise and describe personal networks
- knows the theoretical framework of business activities and the connection of accountability with business activities
- is able to present and market business activities
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to assess personal possibilities to act as entrepreneur
- is able to recognise and describe personal networks
- knows well the theoretical framework of business activities and the connection of accountability with business activities
- is able to assess the challenges and possibilities of entrepreneurship
- is able to analyse and evaluate business opportunities, strategic choices and business models
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
03.03.2025 - 25.04.2025
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Rak Nimeämätön
Student groups
-
RAK23Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
Objective
The student
- is able to describe the prerequisites of a profitable business activity
- is able to describe the main features of entrepreneurship and reflect on personal aims and strengths
- knows the stages of the establishment of a company
- knows the challenges of building trade as a small-scale entrepreneur
- understands the meaning of bookkeeping in operations
- is able to draw up a tender in construction
- is able to present and market business activities
- knows the financing options of a business activity
Content
- personal relationship to entrepreneurship
- the meaning of entrepreneurship in the society
- business plan
- stakeholders
- understanding the activities of competitors
- accountability
- risk assessment
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to describe and reflect on entrepreneurship and business activities
- knows the financing options of a business activity, bookkeeping
- knows the stages of the establishment of a company
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to assess personal possibilities to act as entrepreneur
- is able to assess possibilities for entrepreneurship and starting a business
- is able to recognise and describe personal networks
- knows the theoretical framework of business activities and the connection of accountability with business activities
- is able to present and market business activities
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to assess personal possibilities to act as entrepreneur
- is able to recognise and describe personal networks
- knows well the theoretical framework of business activities and the connection of accountability with business activities
- is able to assess the challenges and possibilities of entrepreneurship
- is able to analyse and evaluate business opportunities, strategic choices and business models
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024
Timing
12.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Credits
3 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Engineering, Construction Engineering
- Bachelor of Construction Site Management
Teachers
- Tero Turja
Student groups
-
MRKM24Bachelor of Construction Site Management, Multimodal implementation
Objective
The student
- is able to describe the prerequisites of a profitable business activity
- is able to describe the main features of entrepreneurship and reflect on personal aims and strengths
- knows the stages of the establishment of a company
- knows the challenges of building trade as a small-scale entrepreneur
- understands the meaning of bookkeeping in operations
- is able to draw up a tender in construction
- is able to present and market business activities
- knows the financing options of a business activity
Content
- personal relationship to entrepreneurship
- the meaning of entrepreneurship in the society
- business plan
- stakeholders
- understanding the activities of competitors
- accountability
- risk assessment
Materials
Additional material provided by the teacher
Teaching methods
Lectures
Assigments
Self study
Student workload
Classroom teaching and independent studying all in all 80 work hours.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to describe and reflect on entrepreneurship and business activities
- knows the financing options of a business activity, bookkeeping
- knows the stages of the establishment of a company
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to assess personal possibilities to act as entrepreneur
- is able to assess possibilities for entrepreneurship and starting a business
- is able to recognise and describe personal networks
- knows the theoretical framework of business activities and the connection of accountability with business activities
- is able to present and market business activities
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student
- takes the responsibility of personal tasks
- is able to assess personal possibilities to act as entrepreneur
- is able to recognise and describe personal networks
- knows well the theoretical framework of business activities and the connection of accountability with business activities
- is able to assess the challenges and possibilities of entrepreneurship
- is able to analyse and evaluate business opportunities, strategic choices and business models
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation criteria will be announced at the beginning of the course.