Management and Quality Management in Organizations (2cr)
Code: KG00CA59-3004
General information
- Enrollment
- 17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 18.09.2023 - 01.12.2023
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 2 cr
- Local portion
- 1 cr
- Virtual portion
- 1 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Blended learning
- Unit
- SeAMK Physiotherapy
- Campus
- SeAMK Seinäjoki, Kampustalo
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Health Care, Physiotherapy
- Teachers
- Kaija Loppela
- Course
- KG00CA59
Evaluation scale
1-5
Objective
Students will:
- learn the background and concepts pertaining to strategic management and personnel management
- can explain the meaning of management, development and quality management for organizational activities
-understand the meaning of management and quality work in the organization and evaluate the level of quality work
Content
-Basics of personnel management (employee skills, recruitment, orientation for new employees, appraisal interviews, management and wellbeing at work)
- Concepts of strategic management (vision, mission, strategy, values)
-Effective performance in a service organization (BSC)
-Quality management in a service organization (ITE self-assessment instrument, EFQM)
Materials
- Syvänen, S., Tikkamäki, K., Loppela, K., Tappura, S., Kasvio, A. ja Toikko, T. 2015. Dialoginen johtaminen. TUP
Syvänen, S., Loppela, K. ja Kolehmainen, R. 2022. Työyhteisöjen ja johtamisen dialoginen kehittäminen. Työhyvinvoinnin ja uudistumisen tekijät. Tampereen yliopisto.
Laaksonen, H. ja Ollila, S. 2022. (toim.) Henkilöstöjohtamisen moninaisuus. Ajateltua, koettua, tutkittua. Oppian.
Englanniksi
Teaching methods
Asiantuntijaluento, opetuskeskustelut, itsenäinen tehtävä johtamiseen ja laadunhallintaan liittyen.
Student workload
Opintojakso vastaa 2 op:n eli noin 54 tunnin työtä. Työ koostuu osallistumisesta luentopäivään ja itsenäisestä tehtävästä ja sen esittämisestä ns. johtamisen seminaaripäivässä.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are not independenly able to evaluate and develop their action. They do not use theoretical knowledge or evidence to explain their choices. They fail to demonstrate by their action that they understand the meaning of management, development and quality management in work communities.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
-Students demonstrate by their action that they understand the meaning of management, development and quality management in work communities.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
- Students find solutions in new, unexpected situations and independently evaluate and develop their action. Students justify their choices theoretically, with evidence-based knowledge. They demonstrate by their action that they understand the meaning of management, development and quality management in work communities.