Skip to main content

CAD -continuation studiesLaajuus (3 cr)

Code: 8C00CK72

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Materials

- Material provided during the classes

Enrollment

22.04.2024 - 04.09.2024

Timing

26.08.2024 - 13.10.2024

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • AUTO22
  • KONE22

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Materials

Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently

Used CAD-program is SolidEdge

Student workload

28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2

Enrollment

13.11.2023 - 17.01.2024

Timing

22.01.2024 - 14.04.2024

Credits

3 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

1.5 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • MKONE22

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Materials

Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently

Used CAD-program is SolidEdge

Student workload

28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2

Enrollment

17.04.2023 - 06.09.2023

Timing

28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023

Credits

3 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • KONE21
  • AUTO21

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Materials

Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently

Used CAD-program is SolidEdge

Student workload

28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2

Enrollment

14.11.2022 - 15.01.2023

Timing

09.01.2023 - 23.04.2023

Credits

3 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

2 op

RD proportion (cr)

1 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • MKONE21

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Materials

Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently

Used CAD-program is SolidEdge

Student workload

28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2

Enrollment

16.04.2022 - 07.09.2022

Timing

29.08.2022 - 27.11.2022

Credits

3 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

1 op

RD proportion (cr)

1 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

1 - 35

Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • KONE20
  • AUTO20

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Materials

Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently

Used CAD-program is SolidEdge

Student workload

28h lectures, exercises
28h practical work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2

Enrollment

03.12.2021 - 27.02.2022

Timing

10.01.2022 - 08.05.2022

Credits

3 op

Virtual proportion (cr)

1 op

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

30 - 30

Degree programmes
  • Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
  • Jorma Mettälä
Student groups
  • MKONE20

Objective

Upon completion of the course, students will be competent in:
- designing 3D-parts and assemblies with PDM (Product Data Management) systems.
- be able to produce high-quality manufacturing drawings, assembly drawings, parts lists and other design documents,
- designing sheet metal parts as well as welded parts with appropriate documentation.
- designing parametric part families.
- utilising the special design tools in CAD, such as frame design, pipe design, motion control, visualization, various parametric parts and features with standard parts library.

Content

-3D design of parts and assemlies
- Creating drawing and attaching design information to them
- Features and Functions of PDM (Product Data Management) systems
- Designing sheet metal parts and welded parts
- Creating a product family of parts
- Visualization
- Motion simulation
- Pipe and Frame Design

Materials

Laakko, T. & Sukuvaara, A. & Borgman, J. & Simolin, & T. Björkstrand, R. & Konkola, M. & Tuomi, J. & Kaikonen, H. 1998. Tuotteen 3D-CAD-suunnittelu. WSOY. Helsinki. 312 s.
Hietikko, E. 1996 Tietokoneavusteinen tuotesuunnittelu. Otatieto Oy. Kirjasarja 567. Helsinki. 238 s.
Autio A. & Hasari H. 1999. Koneenpiirustus ammattikorkeakouluille ja teknisille oppilaitoksille. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
tai vaihtoehtoisesti:
Autio A. & Hasari Heikki. 1993. Koneenpiirustus ammatilliselle korkea- ja opistoasteelle. Otava. Keuruu. 290 s.
Pere, A. 1990. Koneenpiirustus 1 & 2. Offsetpiste Ky. Helsinki.

Teaching methods

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
- Lectures on theory
- Supervised exercises
- Assignments to be completed independently

Used CAD-program is SolidEdge

Student workload

35h lectures, exercises
35h practical work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students are familiar with the standard technical drawing, and be able to make parametric 3D-models.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Students are able to model the 3D workpieces, create drawings and assemblies. Students can use visualization, animation, pipe and frame design.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Students can do a demanding technical design with visualization, animation, tube and frame design.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment Methods
- Approved exercises and practical work

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Completion of lesson tasks at least 50% and making and presenting the assignment. Versatile familiarization with the various topics of the course. In the assignment, special competence is demonstrated in one of the areas of the course.

Qualifications

Engineering drawing and CAD 1 and Engineering drawing and CAD 2