Thesis Data Collection (5cr)
Code: GERAOP200-3009
General information
- Enrollment
- 22.04.2025 - 07.09.2025
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 01.08.2025 - 31.12.2025
- Implementation is running.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- SeAMK Social Services and Elderly Care
- Campus
- SeAMK Seinäjoki, Kampustalo
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Seats
- 12 - 40
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology
- Teachers
- Hanna Mähönen
- Heli Ridanpää
- Virve Rinne
- Tua Niemelä
- Kari Jokiranta
- Katariina Perttula
- Groups
-
MGERO23Bachelor of Social Services and Health Care, Applied Gerontology,Multimodal implementation
- Course
- GERAOP200
Evaluation scale
Passed/failed
Content scheduling
135 hours. The hours are divided in such a way that approx. 10 hours are spent at school for meetings of the whole group and small groups. 1 - 2 x 1 hour for the guidance of your own instructor. The rest of the time is budgeted for the student's independent work, planning, collection and processing of the material collection.
Objective
Students know how to implement a research-oriented development process accepted by worklife representatives, using a reflective, development-oriented approach. They use their information seeking skills in many ways during the research and development process. They are able to carry out long-term research or development projects. They have assimilated the research ethical principles.
Content
- implementation of the reseach plan, use of research methods, data collection and analysis
- cooperation with worklife representatives
Materials
- Instructions for written work
- Guidelines for Writing UAS Degree Thesis
Teaching methods
Lectures and small group meetings in the coming weeks, independent work.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
x
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Thesis Evaluation Criteria will be applied: intra.seamk.fi/opiskelu Seamkissa/Opiskelu/Instructions for written work/Thesis Evaluation Criteria