Skip to main content

Innovation in a Longevity Society (2cr)

Code: XX00DX74-3001

General information


Enrollment
31.01.2025 - 10.02.2025
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
11.02.2025 - 28.02.2025
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
2 cr
Local portion
2 cr
Mode of delivery
Contact learning
Campus
SeAMK Seinäjoki, Frami
Teaching languages
English
Seats
10 - 24
Degree programmes
International Business Management
Teachers
Nicolas Martinez
Course
XX00DX74

Evaluation scale

Passed/failed

Objective

The student understands the challenges of longevity and can apply solutions to them from the perspective of their field of study. The student can describe aging as a phenomenon and analyze how societal services and structures are interconnected. The student is proficient in applying various solution concepts from an ethical perspective and is capable of producing feasible and innovative solutions. Furthermore, the student can evaluate and compare the effectiveness and applicability of solutions. They are able to independently examine the challenges of aging and reflect on the societal impacts of their proposed solutions.

Content

- The human life cycle as a starting point for societal development
- Critical and visual thinking models in the innovation process
- Examining an aging society through creative thinking and storytelling
- Service design methods for creating innovative solutions

Materials

Recommenced reading:
- Scott, A. J. (2024). The Longevity Imperative. Publisher Basic Books.

Teaching methods

Lectures and workshops on campus. Group work and teacher's directions.

Student workload

Total of 54 hours of work. 12 hours of lectures and workshop. 42 hours of group and individual study and work.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

PASS
The student has completed the assigned tasks, demonstrating competence in line with the objectives. The student recognizes concepts related to aging and demonstrates the ability to create innovative solutions to the challenges of aging. The student's outputs showcase the ability to justify and analyze the functionality of solutions and their ethical considerations in a diverse manner. The student's work reflects the ability for critical analysis.
FAIL
The student doesn’t fulfill the criteria for passing.

Go back to top of page