Skip to main content

Structural Social Work (4 cr)

Code: BE00CW51-3007

General information


Enrollment

06.05.2024 - 12.05.2024

Timing

07.01.2025 - 14.03.2025

Credits

4 op

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

12 - 14

Degree programmes

  • Bachelor of Social Services

Teachers

  • Mirva Siltakorpi

Student groups

  • MSOS23K
    Degree Programme in Social Services
  • SOS23A

Objective

Students learn to define the concept of structural social work and describe its connections with empowering social work. They know how to describe this approach in their professional work as Bachelors of Social Services. Students are capable of examining the social situation of individuals and communities from the perspectives of structures, processes and sustainable development. Students know how to seek and produce information required in decision-making concerning a client group. They are familiar with various practices and methods of structural social work. They know how to promote civic engagement and citizens’ opportunities to participate. They also know how to work with various actors to influence decision-making.

The student has the ability to reflect and observe their own role in the local and global community as well as the ability to develop themselves in action.

Content

- the concept of structural social work
- the concept of empowering social work
- evaluating the effects of structural and social factors, ecososcial social work
- sustainable development
- practices and methods of structural social work for Bachelors of Social Services
- seeking and producing information for structural social work

Materials

-Liukko, E., Muurinen, H., Kokkonen, T., & Santalahti, V. (toim.). (2022). Vaikuttava rakenteellinen sosiaalityö. Raportti 1/2022 . THL. Saatavana: https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/143940/RAP2022_001_WEB_final.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y
- Kivipelto, M. (2021). Rakenteellisen sosiaalityön katsaus. Työpaperi 16/2021. THL Saatavana: https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/142735
- Juhila, K. (2018). Aika, paikka & sosiaalityö. Vastapaino. s.10-19, 190-262 (luvut 1,4 ja 5)
ja joku seuraavista:
- Hirvonen, J., Kilpeläinen, V., Piirainen, K., Surakka,A., Tanttu, S., & Tuikka, A. (2021). Tiedolla vaikuttamisen mahdollisuudesta toteutukseen. Rakenteellisen sosiaalityön osaamiskartoitus. XAMK. Saatavana: https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/377388
- Lyly, A. (2016). Sosiaalinen raportointi asiakastiedon tuottajana Esimerkkinä aikuissosiaalityö ja lastensuojelu. Helsingin kaupunki Sosiaali- ja terveysvirasto Tutkimuksia ja raportteja 2 / 2016.
Saatavana: https://www.hel.fi/static/sote/hankkeet/sosiaalinen-raportointi-asiakastiedon-tuottajana.pdf
- Niemi, M. (2018). Sosiaalinen raportti ikääntyneiden perhesuhteissa ilmenevästä kaltoinkohtelusta. Helsingin kaupunki. Saatavana: https://www.hel.fi/static/sote/sosrap/raportit/sosiaalinen-raportti-ikaantyneiden-perhesuhteissa-ilmenevasta-kaltoinkohtelusta-GESO.pdf
- Meriluoto, T., Marila-Penttinen, L., & Lehtinen, E. (toim.). (2015). Osallisuuden ja kokemusasiantuntijuuden käsikirja. Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto.
Saatavana: https://issuu.com/ensi-jaturvakotienliitto/docs/osallisuus._osallisuuden_kokemusasi

Teaching methods

Implementation 2 : contact teaching, including lectures, excercises and essay

Employer connections

the course does not include practice

Completion alternatives

Implementation 1: exam

Student workload

108 hours

Further information

Students choose between this and the following courses:
- Communication and Media in Social Work
- Community-Oriented Social Work
- Empowering Social Work

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students
- have the capacity to define the general features of the concept structural social work and connect it to empowering social work, but their skills and knowledge are limited
- have ability to some extent describe the structural work perspective to their work as Bachelors of Social Services
- have ability to name some factors at general level that influence the social situation of individual citizens and communities from the perspectives of societal structures, processes and sustainable development
- are able to name some ways to gain and produce information about clients’ and client groups’ situation and to give examples of different practices and methods of structural social work
- recognise clients’ possibilities for social engagement and participation and know some ways to influence decision-making

has the ability to reflect and observe their own role in the local and global community as well as the ability to develop themselves in action.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

- have capacity to explain the concept structural social work using the framework of empowering social work
- have ability to analyse factors that influence the situation of individual citizens and communities from the perspectives of societal structures, processes and sustainable development, and understand their dynamic nature
- are able to extensively present various methods of gaining and producing information about clients’ and client groups’ situation, to give examples of various practices in structural social work and to apply them to their professional work as Bachelors of Social Services
-know how to report and promote citizens’ social engagement and participation and how to work with various actors

- has the ability to reflect and observe their own role in the local and global community as well as the ability to develop themselves in action.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

In addition to the criteria listed above, students
- have competence to critically and extensively evaluate the importance of structural social work from the framework of empowering social work
- have competence to relate methods and concepts of structural social work to other social work practices and compare them
- are able to draw conclusions of the meaning of structural social work using all the criter

- has the ability to reflect and observe their own role in the local and global community as well as the ability to develop themselves in action.

Assessment methods and criteria

Implementation 2: working in lessons 25%, essay 75%