Social Engagement and Marginalization (5 cr)
Code: SOSPST40-3040
General information
Enrollment
22.04.2024 - 28.04.2024
Timing
23.09.2024 - 23.11.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual proportion (cr)
4.5 op
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
12 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor of Social Services
Teachers
- Asta Pohjola
Scheduling groups
- Avoin AMK (Ei koske tutkinto-opiskelijaa) (Size: 10. Open UAS: 10.)
Student groups
-
SOS24ABachelor of Social Services, Full-time studies
Education groups
- Open UAS (Doesn't apply to degree student)
Objective
Students learn to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and recognize their connections to social work field. They learn to examine associations between social engagement and welfare from the perspectives of the individual, community and society. Students know how to examine themes related to social engagement and marginalization, especially from the perspectives of poverty, addictions, criminality, homelessness, unemployment and loneliness. They learn to see issues of social engagement and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field. Students examine phenomena that produce marginalization in a national and global context. They reflect on their personal professional interests that arise from the course themes.
Content
- social engagement and exclusion, encouraging participation, participation
- client involvement
- marginalization
- integration
- active citizenship
- poverty, unemployment, criminality, homelessness, addictions, loneliness
Materials
Gothóni, R.ym.(2016).Osallisuus yhteiskunnallisena haasteena.Diakonia-ammattikorkeakoulu.
Isola, A-M.&Suominen, E.(2016).Suomalainen köyhyys.Into-Kustannus Oy.
Juhila, K.(2015). Sosiaalityöntekijöinä ja asiakkaina. Sosiaalityön yhteiskunnalliset tehtävät ja paikat.Vastapaino.
Kivivuori, J.ym.(2018).Kriminologia.Rikollisuus ja kontrolli muuttuvassa yhteiskunnassa.Gaudeamus.
Pyyvaara, U.&Timonen, A.(2017).Naamat - tarinoita asunnottomuudesta.Into-Kustannus Oy.
Saari, J., Eskelinen, N.&Björklund, L.(2020).Raskas perintö -ylisukupolvinen huono-osaisuus Suomessa. Gaudeamus.
Tammi, T.&Raento, P.(Toim.).(2014).Addiktioyhteiskunta.Riippuvuus aikamme ilmiönä.Gaudeamus.
Teaching methods
Course is studied by e-learning.
Employer connections
Students do 2 visits to the social fields.
Exam schedules
Exam 15.10.2024 and learning assignment returned 22.11.2024.
Completion alternatives
-
Student workload
133 hours
Further information
Course is orientated by Teams at week 39. Orientation lesson is recorded.
Evaluation scale
1-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Students are able to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and to name associations between social engagement and welfare. Students are able to explain phenomena that produce marginalization from perspectives of individual person, of community and of society. They name the issues of participation and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field, and examine their personal professional interests.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and to explain associations between social engagement and welfare. Students are able to extensively examine phenomena that produce marginalization from perspectives of individual person, of community and of society. They see the issues of participation and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field, and reflect on their personal professional interests.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and to analyse associations between social engagement and welfare. Students are also able to analyse phenomena that produce marginalization from perspectives of individual person, of community and of society. They see the issues of participation and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field, and reflect and justify their personal professional interests.
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam evaluated between 1-5 (50%), learning assignment by small teams evaluated 1-5 (50%).
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Students are able to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and to name associations between social engagement and welfare. Students are able to explain phenomena that produce marginalization from perspectives of individual person, of community and of society. They name the issues of participation and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field, and examine their personal professional interests.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students are able to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and to explain associations between social engagement and welfare. Students are able to extensively examine phenomena that produce marginalization from perspectives of individual person, of community and of society. They see the issues of participation and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field, and reflect on their personal professional interests.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Students are able to define the concepts of social engagement/participation and marginalization and to analyse associations between social engagement and welfare. Students are also able to analyse phenomena that produce marginalization from perspectives of individual person, of community and of society. They see the issues of participation and marginalization as belonging to their scope of practice in the social field, and reflect and justify their personal professional interests.
Qualifications
previous studies are not required