Study Guide

Objective

The student is able to distinguish and explain the similarities and differences of everyday/lay and scientific thinking. S/he is able to recognise and define targets for development, improvement and research in working life. S/he knows how to plan and implement a justified process of developing or researching.

Content

Similarities and differences in scientific and everyday/lay thinking.
Ctirical thinking and argumentation.
Critical observation of practical activities.
Making suitable questions for development and research.
Designing developmend and research processes that meet practical demands.
Theories of knowledge.
At least two different methods for development work, for example development as a process, research-based developmend, action research, evaluation research.

Materials

Material provided by the teacher
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2016. Tutki ja kirjoita (earlier editions are ok)
Kananen, J. 2012. Kehittämistutkimus opinnäytetyönä : kehittämistutkimuksen kirjoittamisen käytännön opas

Teaching methods

Lectures, independent and group learning assignments

Student workload

5 cr = about 135 h hours of studying (includes contact time and independent work)

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has read all the materials used and accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and can explain the differences and similarities between development and research.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he
can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has thoroughly read all the materials used and studiously accomplished the tasks according to instructions. S/he is able to name the basic principles of development and research and knows what kind of development and research methods are suitable for different kind of topics. S/he shows ability in pointing out and evaluating different objects for development and research in everyday practices. Additionally s/he can plan and implement development and research processes including reporting, which is done logically and clearly so that a reader is able to follow and evaluate the process and results.

Assessment methods and criteria

Learning assignments, active participation online and during the lecture days

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments have not been completed successfully.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments have been completed, but the student has not understood the terminology.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The assignments have been completed successfully and the student has understood the terminology.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The assignments have been completed successfully and show excellent knowledge of the subject and terminolgy