Study Guide

Objective

Students know who to create a logical and coherent structure for their thesis report. They are able to write the theoretical framework of thesis, to choose relevant concepts and plan a realistic schedule. Students describe the data collection and analysis clearly, paying attention to the individual stages of the work. They critically reflect and evaluate their own and other students’ actions, and they are prepared to carry out research and development activities in cooperation with work life representatives. Students are aware of research ethical principles and apply them to their actions and report.

Content

- writing the theoretical framework
- reporting on data collection and analysis
- reporting on development action
- reporting on research or development results
- self and peer-evaluation
- cooperation with worklife representatives

Materials

- Instructions for written work
- Guidelines for Writing UAS Degree Thesis

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

X

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Thesis Evaluation Criteria will be applied: intra.seamk.fi/opiskelu Seamkissa/Opiskelu/Instructions for written work/Thesis Evaluation Criteria.

Qualifications

Study Course: Thesis Seminar 2

Objective

Students know who to create a logical and coherent structure for their thesis report. They are able to write the theoretical framework of thesis, to choose relevant concepts and plan a realistic schedule. Students describe the data collection and analysis clearly, paying attention to the individual stages of the work. They critically reflect and evaluate their own and other students’ actions, and they are prepared to carry out research and development activities in cooperation with work life representatives. Students are aware of research ethical principles and apply them to their actions and report.

Content

- writing the theoretical framework
- reporting on data collection and analysis
- reporting on development action
- reporting on research or development results
- self and peer-evaluation
- cooperation with worklife representatives

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

X

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Thesis Evaluation Criteria will be applied: intra.seamk.fi/opiskelu Seamkissa/Opiskelu/Instructions for written work/Thesis Evaluation Criteria.

Qualifications

Study Course: Thesis Seminar 2

Objective

Students know who to create a logical and coherent structure for their thesis report. They are able to write the theoretical framework of thesis, to choose relevant concepts and plan a realistic schedule. Students describe the data collection and analysis clearly, paying attention to the individual stages of the work. They critically reflect and evaluate their own and other students’ actions, and they are prepared to carry out research and development activities in cooperation with work life representatives. Students are aware of research ethical principles and apply them to their actions and report.

Content

- writing the theoretical framework
- reporting on data collection and analysis
- reporting on development action
- reporting on research or development results
- self and peer-evaluation
- cooperation with worklife representatives

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

X

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Thesis Evaluation Criteria will be applied: intra.seamk.fi/opiskelu Seamkissa/Opiskelu/Instructions for written work/Thesis Evaluation Criteria.

Qualifications

Study Course: Thesis Seminar 2

Objective

Students know who to create a logical and coherent structure for their thesis report. They are able to write the theoretical framework of thesis, to choose relevant concepts and plan a realistic schedule. Students describe the data collection and analysis clearly, paying attention to the individual stages of the work. They critically reflect and evaluate their own and other students’ actions, and they are prepared to carry out research and development activities in cooperation with work life representatives. Students are aware of research ethical principles and apply them to their actions and report.

Content

- writing the theoretical framework
- reporting on data collection and analysis
- reporting on development action
- reporting on research or development results
- self and peer-evaluation
- cooperation with worklife representatives

Evaluation scale

1-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

X

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Thesis Evaluation Criteria will be applied: intra.seamk.fi/opiskelu Seamkissa/Opiskelu/Instructions for written work/Thesis Evaluation Criteria.

Qualifications

Study Course: Thesis Seminar 2